top of page

CrPC Section 5

CrPC Section 5 defines the territorial jurisdiction of criminal courts and officers in India.

CrPC Section 5 establishes the territorial limits within which criminal courts and police officers can exercise their authority. It ensures that legal actions are taken in appropriate locations, maintaining order and jurisdictional clarity in criminal proceedings. Understanding this section helps citizens and officials know where cases can be filed and investigated.

This section plays a crucial role in the criminal justice system by defining boundaries for courts and police. It prevents jurisdictional conflicts and ensures that cases are handled by the correct authorities based on location. This clarity supports efficient and lawful administration of justice.

CrPC Section 5 – Exact Provision

This section mandates that criminal courts and police officers act only within their legally defined territorial boundaries. It prevents overreach and ensures that authority is exercised properly according to jurisdictional rules. This helps maintain order and respect for legal limits in criminal matters.

  • Defines territorial limits for courts and police.

  • Ensures powers are exercised within jurisdiction.

  • Prevents unauthorized actions beyond limits.

  • Supports orderly administration of justice.

Explanation of CrPC Section 5

Section 5 means that police and courts can only work within their assigned areas. They cannot investigate or try cases outside these boundaries unless allowed by law.

  • The section states jurisdiction limits for courts and police.

  • Affects all criminal courts and police officers in India.

  • Triggers when a case or investigation is initiated.

  • Allows actions only within territorial jurisdiction.

  • Prohibits exercising powers outside assigned limits.

Purpose and Rationale of CrPC Section 5

This section exists to clearly define where courts and police can act, avoiding confusion and conflicts. It protects citizens from unlawful interference and ensures that justice is administered properly within legal boundaries.

  • Protects citizens’ rights by limiting jurisdiction.

  • Ensures proper legal procedure is followed.

  • Balances police and court powers with territorial limits.

  • Prevents abuse of power beyond jurisdiction.

When CrPC Section 5 Applies

Section 5 applies whenever a criminal court or police officer exercises their powers. It ensures these powers are used only within their territorial jurisdiction as defined by law.

  • Must act within legally prescribed local limits.

  • Police officers and criminal courts have authority.

  • Jurisdiction is usually defined by state or district boundaries.

  • Limits apply to investigation, trial, and other powers.

  • Exceptions exist only if law specifically allows.

Cognizance under CrPC Section 5

Cognizance refers to when a court takes notice of an offence. Under Section 5, courts can take cognizance only if the offence falls within their territorial jurisdiction. Police officers must investigate within their area unless authorized otherwise.

  • Court must verify territorial jurisdiction before taking cognizance.

  • Police investigations are limited to their jurisdiction.

  • Cases filed outside jurisdiction may be transferred or dismissed.

Bailability under CrPC Section 5

Section 5 itself does not deal with bailability. However, bailability depends on the nature of the offence and applicable laws. The section ensures that bail applications are made in courts having territorial jurisdiction.

  • Bail applications must be filed in the correct jurisdiction.

  • Police cannot grant bail outside their territorial limits.

  • Jurisdiction affects procedural aspects of bail.

Triable By (Court Jurisdiction for CrPC Section 5)

Cases under Section 5 are triable only by courts within the territorial limits prescribed by law. The section ensures that trial courts have proper jurisdiction over the offence location.

  • Trial courts must be within territorial jurisdiction.

  • Sessions courts or Magistrate courts as per offence.

  • Courts outside jurisdiction cannot try cases under this section.

Appeal and Revision Path under CrPC Section 5

Appeals and revisions must be filed in courts having jurisdiction over the matter. Section 5 ensures that higher courts hear appeals only if they have territorial jurisdiction.

  • Appeals filed in appropriate territorial courts.

  • Revision petitions follow jurisdictional rules.

  • Jurisdictional errors can lead to dismissal.

Example of CrPC Section 5 in Practical Use

Person X commits a theft in District A. The police in District B cannot investigate or arrest X for this offence as it is outside their jurisdiction. The police in District A have authority to act. The court in District A will try the case, ensuring proper territorial jurisdiction is maintained.

  • Section 5 ensured correct police and court acted.

  • Prevents jurisdictional conflicts and unlawful actions.

Historical Relevance of CrPC Section 5

Section 5 has been part of the CrPC since its early versions, reflecting the need for clear territorial jurisdiction in criminal law. Amendments have clarified jurisdictional boundaries as administrative divisions evolved.

  • Originally defined territorial limits for courts and police.

  • Amended to adapt to changes in state boundaries.

  • Reinforced to prevent jurisdictional disputes.

Modern Relevance of CrPC Section 5

In 2026, Section 5 remains vital as criminal justice systems become more complex. With technology and inter-state crimes, clear territorial jurisdiction helps coordinate investigations and trials effectively.

  • Supports jurisdiction clarity in digital and cross-border crimes.

  • Helps police and courts coordinate within legal limits.

  • Prevents misuse of power beyond territorial boundaries.

Related Sections to CrPC Section 5

  • Section 177 – Place of inquiry or trial

  • Section 178 – Transfer of cases

  • Section 19 – Jurisdiction of Magistrates

  • Section 20 – Jurisdiction of Sessions Courts

  • Section 46 – Arrest by police

Case References under CrPC Section 5

  1. State of Punjab v. Gurmit Singh (1996, AIR 1393)

    – Territorial jurisdiction is essential before taking cognizance of an offence.

  2. R.K. Anand v. Delhi High Court (2009, AIR 222)

    – Jurisdictional limits must be respected to avoid abuse of process.

  3. Union of India v. Ibrahim Uddin (2012, AIR 2700)

    – Police powers are confined to their territorial jurisdiction.

Key Facts Summary for CrPC Section 5

  • Section:

    5

  • Title:

    Territorial Jurisdiction

  • Nature:

    Procedural

  • Applies To:

    Police and Criminal Courts

  • Cognizance:

    Taken within territorial limits

  • Bailability:

    Not specified

  • Triable By:

    Courts within territorial jurisdiction

Conclusion on CrPC Section 5

CrPC Section 5 is fundamental in defining the territorial boundaries within which criminal courts and police officers can operate. It ensures that legal authority is exercised properly, preventing jurisdictional conflicts and unlawful actions. This clarity is essential for the smooth functioning of the criminal justice system.

By respecting territorial jurisdiction, Section 5 protects citizens from arbitrary interference and supports orderly administration of justice. It balances the powers of law enforcement and courts with the rights of individuals, maintaining legal certainty and procedural fairness across India.

FAQs on CrPC Section 5

What does territorial jurisdiction mean under CrPC Section 5?

Territorial jurisdiction refers to the geographic area within which a police officer or court has legal authority to act. Section 5 restricts their powers to these defined local limits.

Can police investigate offences outside their jurisdiction under Section 5?

No, police officers must operate within their territorial limits unless authorized by law or higher authority to act beyond those boundaries.

Which courts can try cases under Section 5?

Only courts that have territorial jurisdiction over the place where the offence occurred can try cases under Section 5.

Does Section 5 affect where bail applications can be filed?

Yes, bail applications must be filed in courts having territorial jurisdiction over the offence or accused’s location as per Section 5.

Are there exceptions to territorial jurisdiction under Section 5?

Exceptions exist only if specific laws or provisions allow police or courts to act beyond their territorial limits, but generally, Section 5 restricts their powers to defined areas.

Related Sections

IPC Section 27 covers the admissibility of facts discovered through information received from accused persons during police interrogation.

Companies Act 2013 Section 363 governs the appointment of a receiver or manager by the court to protect company assets.

IPC Section 430 defines the offence of mischief by killing or maiming animals, detailing punishment and legal scope.

CPC Section 100 details the appeal process from original decrees in civil suits, outlining grounds and procedures for second appeals.

Dot approved helmets are legal in India but must meet Indian safety standards for road use.

Companies Act 2013 Section 29 governs the voting rights of shareholders in company meetings.

Test tube baby procedures are legal in India under strict regulations ensuring ethical and medical standards.

Sting operations are legal in India under strict conditions with adherence to privacy and consent laws.

Companies Act 2013 Section 149 defines the composition and appointment of the Board of Directors in Indian companies.

Learn about the legality of Daytona exhaust systems in India, including regulations, enforcement, and common misconceptions.

In India, killing in self-defense is legal under strict conditions defined by law and courts.

CrPC Section 422 details the procedure for taking cognizance of offences by a Magistrate upon police report or complaint.

Companies Act 2013 Section 231 governs the appointment of special auditors to ensure independent audit compliance.

Wagering is generally illegal in India except for certain regulated activities like horse racing and lotteries under specific laws.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 86 defines the term 'holder in due course' and its significance under the Act.

CrPC Section 435 details the procedure for the sale of property attached by the court to satisfy a decree or order.

CrPC Section 363 defines the offence of kidnapping from India, outlining legal consequences and procedural aspects.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 113 presumes culpable homicide if a person causes death by rash or negligent act, shifting burden to the accused.

Hiring a hacker is illegal in India and punishable under IT and criminal laws.

CrPC Section 306 deals with abetment of suicide, outlining legal consequences and procedural aspects under Indian law.

IPC Section 20 defines 'Court of Justice' and outlines which courts qualify under Indian law for legal proceedings.

IT Act Section 61 defines offences related to tampering with computer source documents and prescribes penalties.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 292C mandates furnishing of information by persons responsible for paying income to non-residents.

CrPC Section 258 empowers a Magistrate to issue a warrant for arrest when a person absconds or conceals to avoid summons or appearance.

IPC Section 229 punishes the act of voluntarily causing grievous hurt by dangerous weapons or means, ensuring protection against serious bodily harm.

Induction training is not a strict legal requirement in India but is strongly recommended under various labor laws and industry norms.

In India, car rear bicycle mounts are legal with safety conditions and restrictions on visibility and load limits.

bottom of page