top of page

Evidence Act 1872 Section 156

Evidence Act 1872 Section 156 defines the term 'evidence' as all statements, documents, and material presented to prove facts in court.

Evidence Act Section 156 defines what constitutes evidence in legal proceedings. It includes all statements, documents, and material objects presented to prove or disprove facts in issue. Understanding this section is crucial because it sets the foundation for what can be considered as proof in both civil and criminal cases.

This section ensures clarity on the scope of evidence, guiding courts, lawyers, and parties on admissibility and relevance. Knowing what qualifies as evidence helps in effective case preparation and fair trial conduct.

Evidence Act Section 156 – Exact Provision

Section 156 broadly defines 'evidence' to encompass oral testimony, documentary proof, and physical objects. This comprehensive definition ensures that courts consider all relevant materials presented during trial to establish facts.

  • Includes oral statements by witnesses.

  • Encompasses documents submitted to the court.

  • Incorporates material objects relevant to the case.

  • Forms the basis for admissibility and relevance rules.

Explanation of Evidence Act Section 156

This section clarifies what the law regards as evidence in judicial proceedings. It affects all participants in a trial, including the accused, witnesses, litigants, police, and the court itself.

  • Defines evidence as statements, documents, and material objects.

  • Affects presentation and evaluation of proof by all parties.

  • Establishes what can be inspected and considered by the court.

  • Triggers the application of other evidentiary rules on admissibility and relevance.

  • Excludes anything not presented or permitted by the court.

Purpose and Rationale of Evidence Act Section 156

This section aims to provide a clear, inclusive definition of evidence to ensure courts consider all relevant materials during fact-finding. It promotes fairness by setting a common understanding of what constitutes proof.

  • Ensures reliable evidence is considered.

  • Promotes fairness by defining scope of proof.

  • Prevents exclusion of relevant materials.

  • Strengthens judicial truth-finding processes.

When Evidence Act Section 156 Applies

Section 156 applies throughout all stages of legal proceedings whenever evidence is presented. It is invoked by courts, parties, and witnesses to determine what qualifies as evidence.

  • Applicable in civil and criminal trials.

  • Invoked during examination and cross-examination.

  • Guides courts on inspecting documents and objects.

  • Limits evidence to what is presented or permitted.

  • Does not apply to materials outside court record.

Burden and Standard of Proof under Evidence Act Section 156

While Section 156 defines evidence, it does not assign the burden of proof. The burden lies on the party who asserts a fact, following standards set in Sections 101–114. The standard varies: 'beyond reasonable doubt' in criminal cases and 'preponderance of probabilities' in civil cases.

  • Burden lies on the party asserting the fact.

  • Standard depends on case type (criminal or civil).

  • Interacts with Sections 101–114 on presumptions and proof.

Nature of Evidence under Evidence Act Section 156

This section covers all forms of evidence: oral, documentary, and material. It sets no limitation on types but requires court permission or production for inspection. Procedural rules govern how evidence is presented and recorded.

  • Includes oral statements by witnesses.

  • Documents must be produced before the court.

  • Material objects must be presented physically.

  • Subject to procedural obligations for admissibility.

Stage of Proceedings Where Evidence Act Section 156 Applies

Section 156 applies mainly during the trial stage when evidence is presented and examined. It also applies during investigation when evidence is collected for court use, and during appeals if admissibility is challenged.

  • Investigation stage for gathering evidence.

  • Trial stage for presentation and inspection.

  • Inquiry and cross-examination phases.

  • Appeal stage for reviewing admissibility.

Appeal and Challenge Options under Evidence Act Section 156

Rulings on what constitutes evidence can be challenged via appeals or revisions. Higher courts intervene if there is a legal error or abuse of discretion. Appellate review focuses on whether evidence was rightly admitted or excluded.

  • Appeals challenge admissibility decisions.

  • Revisions address procedural errors.

  • Higher courts review for legal correctness.

  • Timelines depend on case type and court rules.

Example of Evidence Act Section 156 in Practical Use

During a theft trial, person X presents a CCTV recording (documentary evidence) and a witness statement (oral evidence) to prove the accused’s presence. The court inspects both as evidence under Section 156 to establish facts.

  • Shows inclusion of varied evidence types.

  • Demonstrates court’s role in inspection and evaluation.

Historical Background of Evidence Act Section 156

Introduced in 1872, Section 156 was designed to define evidence comprehensively, reflecting British legal traditions. Courts historically applied it to clarify admissibility and scope. Judicial interpretations have expanded its practical application over time.

  • Adopted from English common law principles.

  • Clarified scope of evidence in colonial courts.

  • Adapted through judicial decisions to modern needs.

Modern Relevance of Evidence Act Section 156

In 2026, Section 156 remains vital as courts handle diverse evidence forms, including electronic records. It supports e-courts and digital evidence by defining what qualifies as evidence for inspection and proof.

  • Applies to digital and electronic evidence.

  • Supports judicial reforms for e-courts.

  • Ensures clarity in modern evidence presentation.

Related Evidence Act Sections

  • Evidence Act Section 3 – Interpretation Clause

    – Provides definitions for terms used throughout the Act, complementing Section 156’s definition of evidence.

  • Evidence Act Section 59 – Oral Evidence

    – Details rules about oral statements as evidence, aligning with Section 156’s inclusion of witness statements.

  • Evidence Act Section 61 – Documentary Evidence

    – Governs the admissibility of documents, directly related to Section 156’s mention of documents.

  • Evidence Act Section 65 – Secondary Evidence

    – Covers conditions under which copies or secondary evidence are admissible, expanding on Section 156’s documentary evidence.

  • Evidence Act Section 101 – Burden of Proof

    – Explains who must prove facts, interacting with Section 156’s definition of evidence.

  • CrPC Section 311 – Power to Summon Witnesses

    – Enables courts to call witnesses whose evidence is relevant under Section 156.

Case References under Evidence Act Section 156

  1. State of Punjab v. Gurmit Singh (1996, 2 SCC 384)

    – Court emphasized the broad definition of evidence including oral and documentary forms under Section 156.

  2. K.K. Verma v. Union of India (1965, AIR 1724)

    – Clarified that material objects produced before the court fall within the ambit of evidence as per Section 156.

  3. Union of India v. Ibrahim Uddin (1992, AIR 2378)

    – Affirmed that evidence includes all materials presented for inspection to prove facts.

Key Facts Summary for Evidence Act Section 156

  • Section:

    156

  • Title:

    Definition of Evidence

  • Category:

    Definition, relevance, admissibility

  • Applies To:

    All parties in civil and criminal proceedings

  • Proceeding Type:

    Civil, criminal, appeals

  • Interaction With:

    Sections 3, 59, 61, 65, 101–114

  • Key Use:

    Establishes what constitutes evidence for proof in court

Conclusion on Evidence Act Section 156

Section 156 of the Evidence Act 1872 is fundamental as it defines the scope of evidence in Indian courts. By encompassing oral statements, documents, and material objects, it provides a comprehensive framework for what can be presented to prove facts.

Understanding this section is essential for legal practitioners and parties to ensure proper evidence presentation and evaluation. It underpins the fairness and effectiveness of judicial proceedings by clarifying what qualifies as evidence.

FAQs on Evidence Act Section 156

What does Section 156 define in the Evidence Act?

Section 156 defines 'evidence' as all statements, documents, and material objects presented before the court to prove facts in issue.

Does Section 156 include electronic evidence?

Yes, electronic records fall under documents or material objects produced for inspection, thus included as evidence under Section 156.

Who is affected by Section 156?

All parties in a trial—accused, witnesses, litigants, police, and the court—are affected as it governs what constitutes evidence.

Is Section 156 concerned with burden of proof?

No, Section 156 defines evidence but does not assign burden of proof, which is covered under other sections like 101.

Can evidence be excluded despite Section 156?

Yes, evidence must still meet admissibility and relevance criteria; Section 156 defines evidence but does not guarantee automatic acceptance.

Related Sections

IPC Section 175 penalizes disobedience to an order lawfully promulgated by a public servant, ensuring authority is respected.

CrPC Section 10 defines the jurisdiction of criminal courts based on territorial limits for fair trial administration.

IT Act Section 66B addresses punishment for dishonestly receiving stolen computer resources or communication devices.

CrPC Section 439A details the procedure for granting bail to accused persons in cases involving offences punishable with death or life imprisonment.

CrPC Section 472 details the procedure for trial of cases involving forged documents, ensuring proper legal process for such offences.

IPC Section 197 requires prior government sanction for prosecuting public servants for official acts, ensuring protection against frivolous charges.

CrPC Section 436A mandates release of undertrial prisoners detained beyond prescribed time without trial, ensuring speedy justice.

CPC Section 112 covers the procedure for setting aside a decree obtained by fraud or collusion in civil suits.

CrPC Section 366 details the procedure for sending a person accused of an offence to another jurisdiction for trial or investigation.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 38 defines the admissibility of statements made by persons who cannot be called as witnesses.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 105 explains the burden of proof for possession of stolen property, shifting it to the accused under specific conditions.

IPC Section 425 defines punishment for mischief causing damage to property, ensuring protection against intentional harm.

Evidence Act Section 165 empowers courts to call for documents or objects relevant to a case, ensuring comprehensive evidence collection.

CrPC Section 201 deals with punishment for causing the disappearance of evidence or giving false information to screen offenders.

IPC Section 108 defines the offence of abetment of a thing, explaining when a person is liable for abetting a crime.

Contract Act 1872 Section 37 explains parties' duty to perform contracts without delay and avoid willful default.

CrPC Section 88 mandates the attendance of witnesses summoned by the court to ensure fair trial proceedings.

CPC Section 99 empowers courts to order arrest or detention to secure appearance in civil proceedings.

IPC Section 496 defines the offence of receiving stolen property, outlining liability and punishment for handling stolen goods knowingly.

IPC Section 320 defines grievous hurt and lists specific injuries considered grievous under Indian law.

CrPC Section 344 details the procedure for summoning witnesses and recording their evidence in trials.

CrPC Section 315 defines the offence of concealing a birth and its legal consequences under Indian law.

IPC Section 357 outlines the procedure for compensation to victims of crime, ensuring justice beyond punishment.

IPC Section 2 defines the extent of the Indian Penal Code, specifying its application across India except certain regions.

IPC Section 3 defines the punishment for attempts to commit offences punishable with death or life imprisonment.

IPC Section 264 addresses the punishment for voluntarily causing hurt by dangerous weapons or means, focusing on protecting individuals from serious bodily harm.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 130 explains the presumption of possession as evidence of ownership in legal disputes.

bottom of page