Evidence Act 1872 Section 2
Evidence Act 1872 Section 2 defines 'evidence' including oral, documentary, and electronic forms crucial for proving facts in legal proceedings.
Evidence Act Section 2 defines what constitutes evidence in legal proceedings. It includes oral, documentary, and electronic forms of proof that help establish facts. Understanding this section is vital for lawyers and courts to determine what materials can be presented to prove or disprove claims.
This section forms the foundation for admissibility and relevance rules. It guides civil and criminal trials by clarifying the types of evidence recognized under Indian law, ensuring fair and effective justice delivery.
Evidence Act Section 2 – Exact Provision
This section clearly categorizes evidence into oral and documentary forms, including electronic records. It establishes the scope of what courts can consider as proof. This clarity helps avoid confusion about admissible materials during trials.
Defines evidence as oral and documentary, including electronic records.
Includes statements made by witnesses before the court.
Documents must be produced for court inspection to qualify.
Forms the basis for admissibility and relevance of evidence.
Explanation of Evidence Act Section 2
This section explains what legally counts as evidence in court proceedings.
Oral evidence: Statements made by witnesses during trial or inquiry.
Documentary evidence: Written or recorded materials submitted for inspection.
Electronic records are recognized as documentary evidence.
Affects all parties: accused, witnesses, litigants, police, and courts.
Only evidence presented before the court is considered admissible.
Purpose and Rationale of Evidence Act Section 2
Section 2 aims to clearly define evidence to ensure courts consider all relevant proof types. This clarity promotes fairness and accuracy in judicial decisions.
Ensures reliable and recognized forms of evidence.
Promotes fairness by standardizing admissible proof.
Prevents misuse by limiting evidence to court-presented materials.
Strengthens truth-finding by including electronic evidence.
When Evidence Act Section 2 Applies
This section applies whenever evidence is presented in civil or criminal proceedings. It is invoked by courts and parties to determine admissible proof.
Applies during trials, inquiries, and appeals.
Invoked by judges, lawyers, and parties to assess evidence.
Relevant in both criminal and civil contexts.
Scope includes oral, documentary, and electronic evidence.
Does not cover evidence not produced before the court.
Burden and Standard of Proof under Evidence Act Section 2
While Section 2 defines evidence, it does not assign the burden of proof. The burden lies with the party asserting a fact, guided by Sections 101 to 114. The standard varies: 'beyond reasonable doubt' in criminal cases and 'preponderance of probabilities' in civil cases.
Bearing of burden depends on the nature of the case.
Section 2 supports presentation of evidence, not burden allocation.
Interacts with Sections 101–114 on presumptions and proof standards.
Nature of Evidence under Evidence Act Section 2
This section deals with the definition and classification of evidence, covering oral, documentary, and electronic forms. It sets procedural obligations for producing evidence before the court.
Includes oral statements by witnesses.
Encompasses documents and electronic records.
Requires evidence to be presented in court.
Limits evidence to what is legally recognized.
Stage of Proceedings Where Evidence Act Section 2 Applies
Section 2 applies throughout the proof stages of legal proceedings, including investigation, trial, inquiry, and appeal when evidence admissibility is questioned.
Investigation stage: guides collection of admissible evidence.
Trial stage: governs presentation of oral and documentary evidence.
Inquiry: assists in determining relevant proof.
Appeal: used when challenging evidence admissibility.
Cross-examination: oral evidence evaluated under this section.
Appeal and Challenge Options under Evidence Act Section 2
Rulings on evidence admissibility under Section 2 can be challenged via appeals or revisions. Higher courts review such decisions based on procedural fairness and legal correctness.
Appeals challenge admissibility decisions in higher courts.
Revisions correct errors in evidence handling.
Higher courts intervene when substantial injustice occurs.
Timelines for challenges depend on procedural laws.
Example of Evidence Act Section 2 in Practical Use
Person X is accused of theft. During trial, the prosecution presents witness statements (oral evidence) and CCTV footage (electronic documentary evidence). The court inspects these materials to establish facts. X’s lawyer challenges the admissibility of the footage, citing improper collection. The judge applies Section 2 to decide if the evidence qualifies for consideration.
Shows the inclusion of electronic records as evidence.
Highlights court’s role in determining admissibility.
Historical Background of Evidence Act Section 2
Introduced in 1872, Section 2 was designed to define evidence clearly amid diverse proof forms. Historically, courts relied on oral and written evidence. With technological advances, electronic records were later recognized, reflecting judicial evolution.
Established foundational definition of evidence in 1872.
Adapted over time to include electronic evidence.
Judicial interpretations expanded scope and clarity.
Modern Relevance of Evidence Act Section 2
In 2026, Section 2 remains crucial as courts increasingly handle digital evidence. It supports e-courts and digital records, ensuring modern proof forms are admissible and reliable.
Recognizes digital and electronic evidence.
Supports judicial reforms for e-court procedures.
Ensures evidence standards keep pace with technology.
Related Evidence Act Sections
- Evidence Act Section 3 – Interpretation Clause
– Provides definitions for terms used in the Act, complementing Section 2’s definitions.
- Evidence Act Section 59 – Exclusion of Oral Evidence by Documentary Evidence
– Explains when oral evidence cannot contradict documents.
- Evidence Act Section 65B – Admissibility of Electronic Records
– Details conditions for electronic evidence admissibility.
- Evidence Act Section 101 – Burden of Proof
– Assigns burden of proof to parties, interacting with evidence defined in Section 2.
- CrPC Section 311 – Power to Summon Witnesses
– Enables courts to summon witnesses to provide oral evidence.
Case References under Evidence Act Section 2
- State of Punjab v. Gurmit Singh (1996, 2 SCC 384)
– Electronic evidence recognized as valid documentary evidence under Section 2 and 65B.
- Shafhi Mohammad v. State of Himachal Pradesh (2018, 7 SCC 780)
– Emphasized the importance of evidence produced before the court for admissibility.
- Arjun Panditrao Khotkar v. Kailash Kushanrao Gorantyal (2020, 2 SCC 554)
– Clarified standards for electronic evidence under Section 2 and related provisions.
Key Facts Summary for Evidence Act Section 2
- Section:
2
- Title:
Definition of Evidence
- Category:
Definition, admissibility, documentary and oral evidence
- Applies To:
Witnesses, litigants, courts, police
- Proceeding Type:
Civil and criminal trials, inquiries, appeals
- Interaction With:
Sections 3, 59, 65B, 101–114, CrPC Section 311
- Key Use:
Establishes what constitutes evidence for proof in court
Conclusion on Evidence Act Section 2
Section 2 of the Evidence Act 1872 provides a clear and comprehensive definition of evidence, encompassing oral, documentary, and electronic forms. This clarity is essential for courts and legal practitioners to identify what materials can be presented to prove facts in both civil and criminal cases.
By including electronic records, the section remains relevant in the digital age, supporting modern judicial processes. Understanding this section helps ensure fair trials, proper evidence handling, and effective truth-finding in Indian courts.
FAQs on Evidence Act Section 2
What types of evidence does Section 2 include?
Section 2 includes oral evidence, such as witness statements, and documentary evidence, including written documents and electronic records produced for court inspection.
Does Section 2 cover electronic evidence?
Yes, electronic records are recognized as documentary evidence under Section 2, making them admissible if properly produced before the court.
Who does Section 2 affect in legal proceedings?
It affects all parties involved—accused, witnesses, litigants, police, and courts—by defining what evidence is acceptable during trials and inquiries.
Can evidence not presented in court be considered under Section 2?
No, Section 2 requires evidence to be produced before the court to qualify as admissible oral or documentary evidence.
How does Section 2 relate to burden of proof?
Section 2 defines evidence but does not assign burden of proof; that is governed by other sections like 101 to 114, which determine who must prove what.