top of page

Income Tax Act 1961 Section 104

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 104 empowers the CBDT to delegate powers for efficient tax administration.

Income Tax Act Section 104 deals with the delegation of powers by the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT). This section allows the CBDT to authorize officers or authorities to perform functions or exercise powers under the Act. It is essential for taxpayers, tax professionals, and businesses to understand this section as it affects how tax administration functions and decisions are made.

Delegation ensures smooth and efficient tax administration by distributing responsibilities. Understanding Section 104 helps taxpayers know who can act on behalf of the CBDT and the scope of delegated authority, which is crucial during assessments, appeals, and other tax proceedings.

Income Tax Act Section 104 – Exact Provision

This provision empowers the CBDT to delegate its powers to subordinate officers or authorities. The delegation is subject to conditions and limitations specified in the order. This helps in decentralizing decision-making, speeding up processes, and managing workload effectively.

  • Allows CBDT to delegate powers to subordinate officers.

  • Delegation is by official order specifying conditions.

  • Ensures efficient tax administration.

  • Supports decentralization of authority.

  • Facilitates timely decision-making.

Explanation of Income Tax Act Section 104

This section states that the CBDT can delegate its powers to officers or authorities below it. It applies to the CBDT and its subordinate officials.

  • The CBDT holds original powers under the Income Tax Act.

  • Delegation can be full or partial, as per order.

  • Applies to officers within the CBDT hierarchy.

  • Conditions and limitations are specified in the delegation order.

  • Delegated powers can include assessment, enforcement, or administrative functions.

Purpose and Rationale of Income Tax Act Section 104

The main purpose is to enable efficient tax administration by distributing powers. It prevents bottlenecks and allows timely processing of tax matters.

  • Ensures fair and prompt tax administration.

  • Prevents concentration of powers at the top.

  • Encourages accountability among subordinate officers.

  • Supports smooth functioning of tax machinery.

When Income Tax Act Section 104 Applies

This section applies whenever the CBDT chooses to delegate powers to officers. It is relevant throughout the financial year and assessment cycles.

  • Applies during all tax administration activities.

  • Relevant for assessment, appeals, and enforcement.

  • Operates under conditions in delegation orders.

  • Applicable regardless of residential status of taxpayer.

Tax Treatment and Legal Effect under Income Tax Act Section 104

Section 104 does not directly affect tax computation but impacts how powers are exercised. Delegated officers can make binding decisions within their authority, affecting assessments and compliance.

  • Delegated powers have full legal effect.

  • Decisions by delegated officers are binding.

  • Supports enforcement and compliance.

Nature of Obligation or Benefit under Income Tax Act Section 104

This section creates a compliance framework for tax administration. It imposes obligations on CBDT to delegate powers properly and on officers to act within delegated authority.

  • Creates administrative duties for CBDT and officers.

  • Ensures lawful exercise of powers.

  • Mandatory delegation framework.

  • Benefits taxpayers through faster processing.

Stage of Tax Process Where Section Applies

Section 104 applies at multiple stages including assessment, enforcement, and appeals where delegated officers act on behalf of CBDT.

  • During income assessment and scrutiny.

  • While issuing notices or orders.

  • In appeals and review processes.

  • During enforcement and recovery actions.

Penalties, Interest, or Consequences under Income Tax Act Section 104

This section itself does not prescribe penalties but improper delegation or misuse of delegated powers can lead to legal consequences for officers and affect taxpayer rights.

  • Non-compliance with delegation rules may invalidate actions.

  • Misuse of delegated powers can attract disciplinary action.

  • Taxpayers can challenge unauthorized acts.

Example of Income Tax Act Section 104 in Practical Use

Assessee X receives a notice from an Income Tax Officer exercising powers delegated by the CBDT under Section 104. The officer conducts assessment and issues an order. Assessee X understands that the officer is authorized to act on behalf of the CBDT, ensuring the process is valid and binding.

  • Delegation enables timely assessment.

  • Taxpayer knows the authority of the officer.

Historical Background of Income Tax Act Section 104

Originally, Section 104 was introduced to empower the CBDT to manage its workload efficiently. Over time, amendments clarified delegation limits and conditions, adapting to growing tax administration needs.

  • Introduced to decentralize CBDT powers.

  • Amended to specify delegation conditions.

  • Judicial interpretations affirm delegation validity.

Modern Relevance of Income Tax Act Section 104

In 2026, with digital filings and faceless assessments, delegation under Section 104 is vital. It supports digital tax administration, AIS, and TDS return processing by empowering officers to act promptly.

  • Supports digital and faceless assessment frameworks.

  • Enables efficient handling of large data volumes.

  • Facilitates quicker taxpayer service delivery.

Related Sections

  • Income Tax Act Section 4 – Charging section.

  • Income Tax Act Section 5 – Scope of total income.

  • Income Tax Act Section 119 – Power to issue instructions.

  • Income Tax Act Section 120 – Power to delegate.

  • Income Tax Act Section 143 – Assessment.

  • Income Tax Act Section 147 – Income escaping assessment.

Case References under Income Tax Act Section 104

No landmark case directly interprets this section as of 2026.

Key Facts Summary for Income Tax Act Section 104

  • Section: 104

  • Title: Delegation of Powers

  • Category: Procedure, Administration

  • Applies To: CBDT, subordinate officers

  • Tax Impact: Indirect, affects exercise of powers

  • Compliance Requirement: Adherence to delegation orders

  • Related Forms/Returns: Not applicable

Conclusion on Income Tax Act Section 104

Section 104 is a crucial administrative provision enabling the CBDT to delegate powers to subordinate officers. This delegation ensures efficient tax administration and timely decision-making, benefiting both the tax authorities and taxpayers.

Understanding this section helps taxpayers recognize the authority of officers handling their cases. It also highlights the importance of lawful delegation to maintain transparency and accountability in tax processes.

FAQs on Income Tax Act Section 104

What is the main purpose of Section 104?

Section 104 allows the CBDT to delegate its powers to subordinate officers to ensure efficient and timely tax administration across various functions.

Who can receive delegated powers under Section 104?

The CBDT can delegate powers to any officer or authority subordinate to it, as specified in the delegation order with conditions.

Does Section 104 affect how my income is taxed?

No, Section 104 deals with administrative delegation and does not directly impact tax computation or liability.

Can a delegated officer’s decision be challenged?

Yes, taxpayers can challenge decisions if the officer acted beyond the scope of delegated powers or violated procedural rules.

Is delegation under Section 104 mandatory?

No, delegation is at the discretion of the CBDT but is commonly used to improve efficiency in tax administration.

Related Sections

Companies Act 2013 Section 443 governs the power of the Central Government to remove difficulties in implementing the Act.

CrPC Section 192 details the procedure for Magistrates to take cognizance of offences based on police reports or complaints.

Income Tax Act Section 25A defines the term 'business connection' for non-residents, crucial for tax liability determination.

In India, using a printed signature on forms is generally accepted but may have legal limits depending on the context.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 42 covers the taxation of income from business reorganization involving amalgamation or demerger.

Learn about the legal status of 9App in India, including restrictions, enforcement, and common misunderstandings.

Dailymotion is legal in India with no specific restrictions, but users must follow Indian internet laws and content regulations.

Corporal punishment is illegal in India under law, including schools and homes, with strict restrictions and penalties for violations.

IPC Section 13 defines criminal conspiracy, outlining its scope and legal implications in Indian law.

Crocodile leather is legal in India with strict regulations under wildlife laws and permits.

CrPC Section 60 defines the jurisdiction of Magistrates to try offences based on their nature and severity.

Exchanging bitcoins is legal in India but regulated with specific guidelines and restrictions by the government and RBI.

Companies Act 2013 Section 460 governs transitional provisions for companies under the Act.

Income Tax Act Section 109 covers the procedure for filing appeals against income tax orders by the assessee or the department.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 104 explains the burden of proof for facts that need to be proved by the party relying on them.

Companies Act 2013 Section 192 governs the procedure for passing resolutions by postal ballot in Indian companies.

Owning a lion in India is illegal without special permission due to wildlife protection laws and strict regulations.

Income Tax Act Section 245HA empowers the Transfer Pricing Officer to refer cases to the Dispute Resolution Panel for effective dispute resolution.

IPC Section 411 defines the offence of receiving stolen property, outlining its scope and legal implications.

Companies Act 2013 Section 151 governs the appointment of auditors in companies, ensuring proper audit compliance.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 131A empowers authorities to conduct surveys to detect undisclosed income and assets.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 66 details penalties for false or misleading advertisements to protect consumers.

CrPC Section 451 details the procedure for the custody and disposal of property pending trial or investigation.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 71 outlines penalties for false or misleading advertisements, protecting consumers from deceptive marketing.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 136 defines the term 'holder in due course' and its legal significance under the Act.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 2(8) defines 'goods' and their scope under the Act for consumer rights and protections.

Companies Act 2013 Section 209 mandates preparation and presentation of profit and loss accounts and balance sheets by companies.

bottom of page