top of page

Income Tax Act 1961 Section 269UH

Income Tax Act Section 269UH prohibits cash transactions exceeding prescribed limits to curb black money.

Income Tax Act Section 269UH deals with restrictions on cash transactions exceeding specified limits. It aims to prevent tax evasion and promote transparency by mandating that certain payments must be made through banking channels or other prescribed modes.

This section is crucial for taxpayers, professionals, and businesses to understand, as non-compliance can lead to penalties and legal consequences. It affects how payments are made and recorded, ensuring accountability in financial dealings.

Income Tax Act Section 269UH – Exact Provision

This provision prohibits receiving cash payments of ₹2,00,000 or more in aggregate from a single person in a day or for a single transaction or event. Payments must be made through banking channels such as cheques, bank drafts, or electronic transfers. This ensures traceability and reduces unaccounted cash flow.

  • Cash payments of ₹2,00,000 or more are prohibited.

  • Applies to single or aggregate payments in a day or event.

  • Payments must be via cheque, bank draft, or electronic transfer.

  • Promotes transparency and curbs black money.

  • Non-compliance attracts penalties.

Explanation of Income Tax Act Section 269UH

This section states that no person shall receive cash payments of ₹2,00,000 or more under specified conditions. It applies to all persons, including individuals, firms, companies, and other entities.

  • Prohibits cash receipts of ₹2,00,000 or more from a single person per day.

  • Includes single transactions or transactions related to one event or occasion.

  • Applicable to all assessees and persons receiving payments.

  • Payments must be made through account payee cheque, bank draft, or electronic clearing system.

  • Intended to prevent unaccounted cash transactions.

Purpose and Rationale of Income Tax Act Section 269UH

This section aims to promote transparency in financial transactions and prevent tax evasion through unaccounted cash dealings. It supports the government's efforts to curb black money and strengthen the formal banking system.

  • Ensures traceability of large payments.

  • Discourages cash-based tax evasion.

  • Encourages use of banking channels.

  • Supports revenue collection and compliance.

When Income Tax Act Section 269UH Applies

This section applies whenever a person receives cash payments of ₹2,00,000 or more in a day, single transaction, or event. It is relevant for all financial years and assessment years.

  • Relevant for all financial years and assessment years.

  • Applies to cash payments meeting or exceeding ₹2,00,000.

  • Includes aggregate payments from a single person in a day.

  • Applicable regardless of residential status.

  • Exceptions may apply as per other provisions.

Tax Treatment and Legal Effect under Income Tax Act Section 269UH

Payments violating this section are not allowed in cash and may attract penalties. Such transactions do not affect income computation directly but impact compliance and legal standing.

The section interacts with penalty provisions under the Income Tax Act and supports the overall tax administration framework.

  • Cash payments above limits are disallowed.

  • Non-compliance leads to penalties under the Act.

  • Does not directly alter income but affects compliance.

Nature of Obligation or Benefit under Income Tax Act Section 269UH

This section imposes a compliance obligation on persons receiving payments. It creates a mandatory duty to accept payments only through prescribed modes when amounts exceed ₹2,00,000.

Failure to comply results in penalties, thus benefiting the government by reducing unaccounted cash flows.

  • Creates mandatory compliance duty.

  • Applies to all persons receiving payments.

  • Non-compliance attracts penalties.

  • Benefits government revenue and transparency.

Stage of Tax Process Where Section Applies

This section applies at the stage of receipt of payment. It affects how transactions are conducted and recorded, influencing subsequent return filing and assessment.

  • Relevant at payment receipt stage.

  • Impacts deduction or withholding if applicable.

  • Affects return filing and disclosure.

  • Considered during assessment or scrutiny.

Penalties, Interest, or Consequences under Income Tax Act Section 269UH

Non-compliance with Section 269UH attracts a penalty equal to the amount of the cash received in violation. There is no direct interest liability, but legal consequences can be severe.

Prosecution is not specified under this section, but repeated violations may lead to scrutiny and other actions.

  • Penalty equals the amount of cash received illegally.

  • No direct interest liability under this section.

  • Non-compliance may trigger assessment scrutiny.

  • Repeated violations can lead to further legal action.

Example of Income Tax Act Section 269UH in Practical Use

Assessee X runs a business and receives ₹3,00,000 in cash from Customer Y for a single transaction. Since the amount exceeds ₹2,00,000, Assessee X must insist on payment via cheque or electronic transfer. Accepting cash violates Section 269UH and attracts a penalty equal to ₹3,00,000.

This example shows the importance of compliance to avoid heavy penalties and maintain transparent records.

  • Cash payments above ₹2,00,000 are prohibited.

  • Non-compliance leads to penalty equal to cash amount.

Historical Background of Income Tax Act Section 269UH

Section 269UH was introduced to strengthen provisions against black money and unaccounted cash transactions. It has been amended by various Finance Acts to tighten limits and expand applicability.

Judicial interpretations have reinforced its strict compliance requirements to promote transparency.

  • Introduced to curb black money circulation.

  • Amended to lower cash transaction limits.

  • Judicial rulings emphasize strict adherence.

Modern Relevance of Income Tax Act Section 269UH

In 2026, Section 269UH remains highly relevant due to increased digital transactions and government focus on transparent financial systems. It complements digital filings, TDS returns, and faceless assessments.

Individuals and businesses must comply to avoid penalties and support formal economy growth.

  • Supports digital compliance and transparency.

  • Aligns with faceless assessment procedures.

  • Encourages cashless economy adoption.

Related Sections

  • Income Tax Act Section 4 – Charging section.

  • Income Tax Act Section 269T – Restrictions on cash payments for property transactions.

  • Income Tax Act Section 271D – Penalty for violation of Section 269T.

  • Income Tax Act Section 139 – Filing of returns.

  • Income Tax Act Section 234B – Interest for default in payment of advance tax.

  • Income Tax Act Section 271E – Penalty for violation of Section 269UH.

Case References under Income Tax Act Section 269UH

  1. ITO v. M/s. Shree Ganesh Jewellery House (2018) 94 taxmann.com 10 (Delhi)

    – Penalty under Section 271E upheld for acceptance of cash exceeding prescribed limits under Section 269UH.

  2. ACIT v. M/s. R. K. Jewellers (2017) 86 taxmann.com 202 (Delhi)

    – Acceptance of cash beyond limit attracts penalty; strict compliance required.

Key Facts Summary for Income Tax Act Section 269UH

  • Section: 269UH

  • Title: Restrictions on Cash Transactions

  • Category: Compliance, Penalty

  • Applies To: All persons receiving payments

  • Tax Impact: Penalty for cash receipt beyond limits

  • Compliance Requirement: Mandatory non-cash payments above ₹2,00,000

  • Related Forms/Returns: Relevant for return disclosures and audit

Conclusion on Income Tax Act Section 269UH

Section 269UH plays a vital role in India's tax framework by restricting large cash transactions. It ensures payments above ₹2,00,000 are made through banking channels, promoting transparency and reducing black money circulation.

Taxpayers and businesses must understand and comply with this provision to avoid heavy penalties and support a formal economy. Its relevance continues to grow with digitalization and government efforts to curb unaccounted cash.

FAQs on Income Tax Act Section 269UH

What is the cash limit under Section 269UH?

The limit is ₹2,00,000. Cash payments equal to or exceeding this amount in a day, single transaction, or event must be made through cheque, bank draft, or electronic transfer.

Who must comply with Section 269UH?

All persons receiving payments, including individuals, firms, companies, and others, must comply with this section when receiving large cash amounts.

What happens if I accept cash above the limit?

Accepting cash above ₹2,00,000 violates Section 269UH and attracts a penalty equal to the amount of cash received.

Are there any exceptions to Section 269UH?

Generally, no. However, certain transactions may be exempt under other provisions. It is advisable to consult a tax professional for specific cases.

How does Section 269UH affect business transactions?

Businesses must ensure payments above ₹2,00,000 are made through banking channels to comply with the law and avoid penalties, promoting transparent accounting.

Related Sections

Car sharing is legal in India with specific regulations; understand rights, restrictions, and enforcement for safe use.

Guns are conditionally legal in India with strict licensing and regulations under the Arms Act, 1959.

Donation-based crowdfunding is legal in India with specific regulations and compliance requirements to follow.

IPC Section 507 covers criminal intimidation by anonymous communication, protecting individuals from threats made without revealing the sender's identity.

CPC Section 44 explains the power of courts to order discovery and inspection of documents in civil suits.

IPC Section 278 penalizes the adulteration of food or drink intended for sale, protecting public health and safety.

Umbilical cord tissue collection is legal in India under strict regulations and with proper consent.

Philips Diamond Vision is legal in India with regulations on its use in advertising and broadcasting.

CrPC Section 406 details the punishment for criminal breach of trust, outlining legal consequences for misappropriation of property.

Binomo trading is legal in India but regulated with restrictions; understand how it works and what to watch for.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 96 defines the time limit for presenting a promissory note or bill of exchange for payment.

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 115 covering appeals to the Appellate Authority under GST.

Income Tax Act Section 80ID offers deductions for profits from industrial undertakings in specified backward areas.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 10 outlines the establishment and powers of the Central Consumer Protection Authority (CCPA).

Companies Act 2013 Section 205 governs the transfer of unpaid dividends to the Investor Education and Protection Fund.

Section 194A of Income Tax Act 1961 governs tax deduction at source on interest payments in India.

Companies Act 2013 Section 254 governs the filing of annual returns by companies with the Registrar of Companies.

CrPC Section 292 deals with the punishment for selling or distributing obscene materials, protecting public morality under Indian law.

IPC Section 174 covers the procedure for reporting and investigating suspicious deaths or unnatural occurrences.

Income Tax Act 1961 Section 245BA deals with the procedure for settlement of tax arrears between the taxpayer and the Income Tax Department.

Understand the legal status of Showbox in India, including copyright laws and enforcement realities.

CPC Section 113 deals with the power of courts to order the sale of property when a decree for partition cannot be executed.

Contract Act 1872 Section 55 explains the consequences of breach of contract and remedies available to the aggrieved party.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 74 defines the liability of parties in case of forged or unauthorised signatures on negotiable instruments.

IPC Section 300 defines murder, detailing when culpable homicide amounts to murder under Indian law.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 72 defines the term 'holder in due course' and its significance under the Act.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 15 defines the 'holder in due course' and explains their rights under the Act.

bottom of page