top of page

IPC Section 125

IPC Section 125 mandates maintenance of wives, children, and parents to prevent destitution and neglect.

IPC Section 125 – Maintenance of Wives, Children, and Parents

IPC Section 125 is a crucial legal provision that ensures financial support for wives, children, and parents who are unable to maintain themselves. It mandates that a person having sufficient means must provide maintenance to their dependents, preventing neglect and destitution. This section plays a vital role in protecting vulnerable family members and upholding social responsibility.

Understanding IPC Section 125 is important as it provides a legal remedy for those denied maintenance, ensuring their right to basic livelihood. It also helps reduce the burden on public welfare systems by enforcing familial duties.

IPC Section 125 – Exact Provision

In simple terms, this section requires that a person who has enough income must provide financial support to their wife, minor children, or parents if they cannot support themselves. If they fail to do so, a court can order them to pay monthly maintenance.

  • Applies to wives, minor children, and parents unable to maintain themselves.

  • Person liable must have sufficient means to provide maintenance.

  • Maintenance is ordered by a Magistrate upon proof of neglect or refusal.

  • Ensures basic livelihood support to dependents.

  • Includes legitimate and illegitimate minor children.

Purpose of IPC Section 125

The primary objective of IPC Section 125 is to prevent destitution and vagrancy by ensuring that family members who cannot maintain themselves receive financial support. It promotes social justice by legally enforcing the duty of maintenance, thereby protecting vulnerable individuals from neglect. The section also aims to reduce the burden on public resources by encouraging familial responsibility.

  • To provide a speedy and effective remedy for maintenance claims.

  • To prevent neglect of dependents within the family.

  • To uphold social and moral obligations of maintenance.

Cognizance under IPC Section 125

Cognizance of an offence under Section 125 is taken by the Magistrate upon receiving a complaint or application from the aggrieved person. The Magistrate can initiate proceedings even without a formal complaint if sufficient cause is shown. The process is summary in nature to ensure quick relief.

  • Magistrate takes cognizance on complaint or application.

  • Proceedings are summary for speedy justice.

  • No formal police investigation required.

Bail under IPC Section 125

Since Section 125 deals with a civil obligation enforced through criminal procedure, the offence is generally non-cognizable and bailable. However, as the proceedings are primarily for maintenance, bail is usually granted easily if arrest occurs. The focus is on ensuring maintenance rather than punishment.

  • Offence is bailable and non-cognizable.

  • Bail is generally granted promptly.

  • Proceedings emphasize maintenance over penal action.

Triable By (Which Court Has Jurisdiction?)

Cases under IPC Section 125 are triable by the Magistrate of the first class. The Magistrate has exclusive jurisdiction to hear and decide maintenance applications. Sessions Courts do not have jurisdiction over these matters unless an appeal is filed.

  • First-class Magistrate tries maintenance cases.

  • Sessions Court hears appeals only.

  • Summary proceedings ensure quick disposal.

Example of IPC Section 125 in Use

Consider a wife who is abandoned by her husband without any financial support. She files an application under Section 125 seeking monthly maintenance. The Magistrate examines the husband's income and the wife's needs. If the husband is found to have sufficient means and neglects his duty, the court orders him to pay a monthly allowance. In contrast, if the husband proves he lacks sufficient income, the court may reject the claim or reduce the amount.

Historical Relevance of IPC Section 125

Section 125 was introduced in the Indian Penal Code in 1860 to address social issues related to neglect of family members. It was designed as a preventive measure against vagrancy and destitution. Over time, judicial interpretations have expanded its scope to include various dependents.

  • Introduced in IPC in 1860 to prevent destitution.

  • Expanded by courts to cover illegitimate children.

  • Landmark cases have clarified maintenance criteria.

Modern Relevance of IPC Section 125

In 2025, IPC Section 125 remains a vital tool for social justice, especially for women and elderly parents. Courts continue to interpret it liberally to ensure fair maintenance. It also complements other family laws by providing a quick remedy. The section supports gender equality by enforcing husbands' financial responsibilities.

  • Court rulings emphasize prompt maintenance orders.

  • Supports vulnerable groups in changing social contexts.

  • Works alongside family and matrimonial laws.

Related Sections to IPC Section 125

  • Section 126 – Order for maintenance of wives, children, and parents pending suit.

  • Section 127 – Alteration of allowance.

  • Section 128 – Enforcement of order for maintenance.

  • Section 129 – Detention for non-payment of maintenance.

  • Section 130 – Protection of maintenance allowance from attachment.

  • Section 31 of Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act – Maintenance of wife and children.

Case References under IPC Section 125

  1. Mohd. Ahmed Khan v. Shah Bano Begum (1985 AIR 945, SC)

    – The Supreme Court held that a divorced Muslim woman is entitled to maintenance under Section 125.

  2. Danial Latifi v. Union of India (2001 AIR 3958, SC)

    – Affirmed maintenance rights of Muslim women under Section 125 despite personal law exceptions.

  3. Vimala v. V. Krishnan (1974 AIR 134, SC)

    – Clarified that maintenance is a right and not a charity.

Key Facts Summary for IPC Section 125

  • Section:

    125

  • Title:

    Maintenance of Wives, Children, and Parents

  • Offence Type:

    Non-bailable; Non-cognizable

  • Punishment:

    Monthly allowance ordered for maintenance

  • Triable By:

    Magistrate of the first class

Conclusion on IPC Section 125

IPC Section 125 is a cornerstone provision that safeguards the right to maintenance for wives, children, and parents. It ensures that those unable to support themselves receive financial help from family members with sufficient means. This legal mechanism helps uphold family responsibilities and social welfare.

Its importance in modern India cannot be overstated, as it provides a swift and effective remedy against neglect. The section balances legal enforcement with social justice, making it an essential part of Indian criminal and family law.

FAQs on IPC Section 125

Who can claim maintenance under IPC Section 125?

Wives, legitimate or illegitimate minor children, and parents unable to maintain themselves can claim maintenance under this section.

Is IPC Section 125 applicable to divorced wives?

Yes, divorced wives who cannot maintain themselves are entitled to maintenance under Section 125.

What is the role of the Magistrate in Section 125 cases?

The Magistrate of the first class hears maintenance applications and can order monthly allowance after examining evidence.

Can maintenance be claimed if the person has no sufficient means?

No, the person liable must have sufficient means to provide maintenance for the claim to succeed.

Is IPC Section 125 a criminal offence?

It is a criminal procedure provision but mainly enforces a civil obligation; non-payment can lead to penal consequences.

Related Sections

CrPC Section 41B mandates police officers to inform arrested persons of their right to bail and the grounds of arrest promptly.

IPC Section 266 addresses public nuisance by unlawfully obstructing a public way, ensuring free passage and public safety.

IPC Section 320 defines grievous hurt and lists specific injuries considered grievous under Indian law.

CrPC Section 215 empowers courts to summon persons to produce documents or other things relevant to a case.

IPC Section 308 punishes attempts to commit suicide, aiming to prevent self-harm and provide legal deterrence.

IPC Section 242 defines the offence of wrongful confinement and its legal implications under Indian law.

CrPC Section 241 details the procedure for issuing summons for appearance in summons cases, ensuring proper notice to accused persons.

IPC Section 423 defines dishonestly receiving stolen property, outlining its scope and legal consequences.

CrPC Section 11 defines the territorial jurisdiction of criminal courts in India, specifying where cases can be tried.

CPC Section 52 details the procedure for arrest and detention of a judgment-debtor to enforce a decree.

CPC Section 98 outlines the procedure for execution of decrees by attachment and sale of property.

CrPC Section 103 empowers police to seize property connected to offences, ensuring evidence preservation and lawful investigation.

bottom of page