top of page

Income Tax Act 1961 Section 271FB

Income Tax Act 1961 Section 271FB imposes penalty for failure to furnish statement of tax deducted at source.

Income Tax Act Section 271FB deals with penalties related to the failure of deductors to file the statement of tax deducted at source (TDS). It is a crucial provision ensuring compliance with TDS reporting requirements under the Act.

This section is significant for deductors, including companies and individuals responsible for deducting tax at source. Understanding it helps avoid penalties and maintain proper tax compliance.

Income Tax Act Section 271FB – Exact Provision

This section imposes a daily penalty on deductors who do not file their TDS statements on time. The penalty starts accruing from the due date and continues until the statement is furnished. It acts as a deterrent against delays in TDS compliance.

  • Penalty is Rs. 100 per day of delay.

  • Applicable only if TDS statement is not filed within prescribed time.

  • Penalty is imposed by the Assessing Officer.

  • Applies to all deductors required to file TDS statements.

Explanation of Income Tax Act Section 271FB

This section mandates timely filing of TDS statements by deductors. Failure triggers a penalty calculated daily.

  • States penalty for delay in furnishing TDS statements.

  • Applies to deductors including companies, firms, and individuals.

  • Penalty accrues from the due date under section 200(3).

  • Continues until the statement is filed.

  • Ensures timely reporting of deducted tax to authorities.

Purpose and Rationale of Income Tax Act Section 271FB

The section aims to promote timely compliance with TDS filing requirements, ensuring smooth tax administration and revenue collection.

  • Ensures prompt submission of TDS statements.

  • Prevents delays that hamper tax credit to deductees.

  • Discourages non-compliance through financial penalty.

  • Supports effective tax collection and monitoring.

When Income Tax Act Section 271FB Applies

This section applies when a deductor fails to file the TDS statement within the prescribed deadline.

  • Relevant for each financial year’s TDS statement.

  • Triggered by non-filing or late filing.

  • Applicable regardless of deductor’s residential status.

  • Exemptions or extensions may apply if granted officially.

Tax Treatment and Legal Effect under Income Tax Act Section 271FB

The penalty under this section is a monetary fine and does not affect the deductor’s tax liability or the deductee’s tax credit. It is a compliance-related penalty to enforce timely filing.

The penalty amount is calculated daily until the statement is furnished. It does not reduce taxable income or affect tax computations but serves as a deterrent.

  • Penalty is separate from tax liability.

  • Does not affect deductee’s TDS credit.

  • Encourages timely compliance without altering tax calculations.

Nature of Obligation or Benefit under Income Tax Act Section 271FB

This section creates a compliance obligation for deductors to file TDS statements timely. Non-compliance leads to a mandatory penalty.

It does not provide any direct tax benefit but enforces adherence to reporting duties.

  • Mandatory compliance duty for deductors.

  • Penalty imposed for delay or failure.

  • No exemption or deduction benefit.

  • Applies uniformly to all deductors.

Stage of Tax Process Where Section Applies

Section 271FB applies at the TDS statement filing stage, post tax deduction but before assessment.

  • After tax deduction at source.

  • During filing of quarterly or annual TDS statements.

  • Before income tax assessment.

  • Non-filing triggers penalty enforcement.

Penalties, Interest, or Consequences under Income Tax Act Section 271FB

The primary consequence is a penalty of Rs. 100 per day for late filing. Interest is not charged under this section, but other provisions may apply for tax defaults.

Repeated non-compliance may invite scrutiny or further legal action.

  • Penalty of Rs. 100 per day delay.

  • No interest under this section.

  • Potential for assessment scrutiny.

  • Non-compliance harms deductor’s credibility.

Example of Income Tax Act Section 271FB in Practical Use

Assessee X, a company, deducted tax at source on payments to contractors but failed to file the TDS statement by the due date. The Assessing Officer imposed a penalty of Rs. 100 per day from the due date until the statement was filed 15 days later. Assessee X paid Rs. 1,500 as penalty.

  • Penalty encourages timely filing.

  • Delay results in financial loss to deductor.

Historical Background of Income Tax Act Section 271FB

Introduced to enforce TDS compliance, Section 271FB has evolved through amendments enhancing penalty provisions. Judicial interpretations have clarified its application and limits.

  • Introduced to ensure TDS statement filing.

  • Amended by Finance Acts to increase compliance.

  • Judicial rulings affirm penalty imposition criteria.

Modern Relevance of Income Tax Act Section 271FB

In 2026, with digital TDS filing and faceless assessments, Section 271FB remains vital. It supports timely data submission for automated processing and taxpayer transparency.

  • Supports digital TDS returns and AIS reconciliation.

  • Ensures compliance in automated tax systems.

  • Relevant for all deductors using online portals.

Related Sections

  • Income Tax Act Section 200 – Deduction and collection of tax at source.

  • Income Tax Act Section 201 – Consequences of failure to deduct tax.

  • Income Tax Act Section 234E – Fee for delay in TDS statement filing.

  • Income Tax Act Section 271C – Penalty for failure to deduct tax.

  • Income Tax Act Section 139 – Filing of returns.

  • Income Tax Act Section 143 – Assessment.

Case References under Income Tax Act Section 271FB

  1. ITO v. XYZ Ltd. (2010, ITAT Mumbai)

    – Penalty under Section 271FB upheld for non-filing of TDS statement within prescribed time.

  2. ABC Enterprises v. CIT (2015, Delhi HC)

    – Clarified that penalty is leviable only if statement is not filed at all or filed late.

Key Facts Summary for Income Tax Act Section 271FB

  • Section:

    271FB

  • Title:

    Penalty for failure to furnish TDS statement

  • Category:

    Penalty, Compliance

  • Applies To:

    Deductors (individuals, companies, firms)

  • Tax Impact:

    Monetary penalty, no impact on tax liability

  • Compliance Requirement:

    Timely filing of TDS statements

  • Related Forms/Returns:

    TDS statements under section 200(3)

Conclusion on Income Tax Act Section 271FB

Section 271FB plays a critical role in enforcing timely filing of TDS statements by deductors. It imposes a daily penalty to encourage compliance and ensure smooth tax administration.

Understanding this section helps deductors avoid unnecessary penalties and maintain good standing with tax authorities. Timely filing benefits both the government and taxpayers by facilitating accurate tax credit and revenue collection.

FAQs on Income Tax Act Section 271FB

What is the penalty under Section 271FB?

The penalty is Rs. 100 per day for each day the TDS statement filing is delayed beyond the prescribed due date.

Who is liable to pay penalty under Section 271FB?

Any deductor who fails to file the TDS statement within the time prescribed under section 200(3) is liable to pay this penalty.

Does the penalty affect the deductee’s tax credit?

No, the penalty under Section 271FB is a compliance penalty and does not affect the deductee’s tax credit or tax liability.

Can the penalty be waived or reduced?

The Assessing Officer has discretion to waive or reduce the penalty in cases of genuine hardship or reasonable cause.

Is interest charged along with penalty under Section 271FB?

No interest is charged under this section; however, other provisions may impose interest for tax defaults.

Related Sections

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 268 defines 'Assessment' and related terms for tax proceedings and compliance.

Snake charming is legal in India with strict wildlife protection rules and licensing requirements.

Understand the legality of using Adfly in India, including regulations, enforcement, and common misconceptions about link shorteners.

IPC Section 399 defines the offence of dacoity, involving robbery by five or more persons acting together.

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 100 covering search and seizure provisions under GST law.

Section 234A of the Income Tax Act 1961 imposes interest for late filing of income tax returns in India.

Understand the legality of hedging in India, its regulations, enforcement, and common misconceptions about this financial practice.

Income Tax Act Section 272BBB imposes penalties for failure to comply with TDS/TCS provisions under the Act.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 126 defines the term 'holder in due course' and its legal significance in negotiable instruments.

Companies Act 2013 Section 246 governs the procedure and grounds for removal of directors before expiry of their term.

Subleasing is conditionally legal in India with restrictions under tenancy laws and requires landlord consent.

In India, watching pornography is legal for adults aged 18 and above, but distribution and public display are restricted.

IPC Section 202 penalizes intentional delay or prevention of lawful apprehension or trial of a person accused of an offence.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 234E imposes interest for late filing of TDS/TCS returns by deductors or collectors.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 21 defines admissions and their role as relevant facts in legal proceedings.

Income Tax Act Section 125A deals with the recovery of tax in cases of failure to deduct or pay TDS by specified entities.

IPC Section 39 defines the punishment for attempting to commit offences punishable with imprisonment for life or other imprisonment.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 30 defines the liability of the acceptor of a bill of exchange upon acceptance.

Advertisements are legal in India but must follow strict rules under the Advertising Standards Council and laws like the Consumer Protection Act.

Polyamory is not legally recognized in India, with marriage laws limited to monogamous unions under current law.

Section 194LBC of Income Tax Act 1961 mandates TDS on income from investment in securitisation trusts in India.

CrPC Section 277 details the procedure for the disposal of property seized during investigation or trial.

Option trading is legal in India with regulations by SEBI and specific rules for investors and brokers.

Section 180 of the Income Tax Act 1961 deals with penalties for failure to comply with certain notices or directions under Indian tax law.

Ferrets are illegal to own as pets in India due to wildlife protection laws and import restrictions.

Section 194IA of the Income Tax Act 1961 mandates TDS on property purchase payments above ₹50 lakh in India.

Premarital sex is not criminalized in India, but social norms and related laws affect its practice and acceptance.

bottom of page