top of page

Companies Act 2013 Section 436

Companies Act 2013 Section 436 governs the power of the Tribunal to order winding up of companies under insolvency proceedings.

Companies Act 2013 Section 436 deals with the authority of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) to order the winding up of a company. This section is crucial in insolvency and bankruptcy proceedings, providing a legal framework for the dissolution of companies unable to meet their financial obligations.

Understanding Section 436 is essential for directors, shareholders, insolvency professionals, and legal practitioners. It ensures that winding up is conducted lawfully, protecting creditors' interests and maintaining corporate governance standards during insolvency.

Companies Act Section 436 – Exact Provision

This section empowers the Tribunal to initiate winding up proceedings either under the Companies Act or the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), depending on the circumstances. It acts as a bridge between company law and insolvency law, ensuring a smooth transition to dissolution when a company is insolvent.

  • Empowers NCLT to order winding up.

  • Applies to companies under insolvency proceedings.

  • Integrates Companies Act and IBC provisions.

  • Protects creditor and stakeholder interests.

  • Ensures lawful dissolution process.

Explanation of Companies Act Section 436

Section 436 authorizes the Tribunal to order winding up of companies subject to insolvency laws.

  • States that the Tribunal can order winding up on application.

  • Applies to companies undergoing insolvency or liquidation.

  • Mandates compliance with either Companies Act or IBC procedures.

  • Triggers when company is unable to pay debts or meets insolvency criteria.

  • Permits orderly winding up to protect stakeholders.

  • Prohibits arbitrary or unlawful winding up without Tribunal order.

Purpose and Rationale of Companies Act Section 436

This section strengthens the legal framework for company dissolution during insolvency, ensuring proper oversight.

  • Strengthens corporate governance during insolvency.

  • Protects creditors and stakeholders from losses.

  • Ensures transparency and accountability in winding up.

  • Prevents misuse of corporate structure to evade liabilities.

When Companies Act Section 436 Applies

Section 436 applies when a company faces insolvency and winding up is necessary under law.

  • Applicable to all companies under insolvency proceedings.

  • Triggered by insolvency petitions or creditor applications.

  • Must comply with timelines under Companies Act or IBC.

  • Exemptions may apply if alternative resolution is possible.

Legal Effect of Companies Act Section 436

Section 436 creates a legal duty for the Tribunal to oversee winding up, ensuring compliance with insolvency laws. It restricts companies from dissolving without Tribunal approval. Non-compliance can lead to legal penalties and creditor claims. The section interacts closely with MCA rules and insolvency notifications to streamline the process.

  • Creates duty for Tribunal to order winding up.

  • Restricts unauthorized company dissolution.

  • Non-compliance leads to penalties and legal action.

Nature of Compliance or Obligation under Companies Act Section 436

Compliance under Section 436 is mandatory and conditional on insolvency status. It is an event-based obligation requiring Tribunal approval before winding up. Directors and insolvency professionals must ensure adherence. It impacts internal governance by mandating transparent liquidation procedures.

  • Mandatory compliance upon insolvency.

  • Conditional on Tribunal application and approval.

  • One-time obligation per winding up event.

  • Responsibility lies with directors and insolvency professionals.

  • Enhances internal governance during liquidation.

Stage of Corporate Action Where Section Applies

Section 436 applies primarily at the winding up stage after insolvency determination.

  • Not applicable at incorporation stage.

  • Relevant during board or creditor decision on insolvency.

  • Requires Tribunal approval before winding up.

  • Involves filing and disclosures with MCA and NCLT.

  • Continues through ongoing compliance during liquidation.

Penalties and Consequences under Companies Act Section 436

Failure to comply with Section 436 can result in monetary penalties, legal sanctions, and possible disqualification of directors. Unauthorized winding up may attract fines and remedial orders. The section ensures enforcement through Tribunal oversight and MCA notifications.

  • Monetary fines for non-compliance.

  • Possible director disqualification.

  • Legal sanctions for unauthorized winding up.

  • Remedial directions by Tribunal.

Example of Companies Act Section 436 in Practical Use

Company X faced severe financial distress and defaulted on creditor payments. Creditors filed an application with the NCLT under Section 436. The Tribunal reviewed the insolvency status and ordered winding up under the IBC framework. Director X cooperated with the insolvency professional to ensure lawful liquidation, protecting creditor interests and complying with legal mandates.

  • Demonstrates Tribunal’s role in winding up.

  • Highlights importance of compliance by directors.

Historical Background of Companies Act Section 436

Section 436 was introduced in the 2013 Act to align company winding up with modern insolvency laws. It replaced older provisions in the 1956 Act, integrating the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. Amendments have enhanced Tribunal powers and streamlined liquidation procedures.

  • Replaced winding up provisions of 1956 Act.

  • Introduced to integrate IBC with company law.

  • Amended to strengthen Tribunal authority.

Modern Relevance of Companies Act Section 436

In 2026, Section 436 remains vital for digital insolvency filings via MCA portal and NCLT e-governance. It supports ESG and CSR compliance by ensuring responsible winding up. The section reflects governance reforms promoting transparency and creditor protection in corporate insolvency.

  • Enables digital compliance and e-filing.

  • Supports governance reforms in insolvency.

  • Ensures practical importance in modern corporate law.

Related Sections

  • Companies Act Section 434 – Power to order winding up by Tribunal.

  • Companies Act Section 439 – Effect of winding up order.

  • Companies Act Section 440 – Official liquidator's powers.

  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code Section 7 – Initiation of corporate insolvency resolution process.

  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code Section 33 – Liquidation of corporate debtor.

  • Companies Act Section 248 – Power to remove name of company from register.

Case References under Companies Act Section 436

  1. Swiss Ribbons Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. v. Union of India (2019, SC)

    – Affirmed Tribunal’s powers under IBC and related company law provisions for insolvency resolution.

  2. Innoventive Industries Ltd. v. ICICI Bank (2018, SC)

    – Clarified the role of NCLT in insolvency proceedings and winding up.

Key Facts Summary for Companies Act Section 436

  • Section: 436

  • Title: Tribunal's Power to Order Winding Up

  • Category: Insolvency, Corporate Governance, Compliance

  • Applies To: Companies under insolvency proceedings, directors, creditors, Tribunal

  • Compliance Nature: Mandatory, event-based, Tribunal approval required

  • Penalties: Monetary fines, director disqualification, legal sanctions

  • Related Filings: Insolvency petitions, winding up applications, MCA and NCLT filings

Conclusion on Companies Act Section 436

Section 436 is a pivotal provision empowering the National Company Law Tribunal to order the winding up of companies under insolvency laws. It ensures that companies unable to meet financial obligations are dissolved in a legally compliant and transparent manner. This protects the interests of creditors, shareholders, and other stakeholders while maintaining corporate governance standards.

For directors and insolvency professionals, understanding and complying with Section 436 is critical. It bridges company law and insolvency law, facilitating orderly liquidation and preventing misuse of the corporate form. As insolvency frameworks evolve, Section 436 remains central to India’s corporate legal landscape.

FAQs on Companies Act Section 436

What is the main purpose of Section 436?

Section 436 empowers the Tribunal to order winding up of companies under insolvency laws, ensuring lawful and transparent dissolution when companies cannot pay debts.

Who can apply for winding up under Section 436?

Creditors, the company itself, or other stakeholders can apply to the National Company Law Tribunal for winding up under this section.

Does Section 436 apply to all companies?

Yes, it applies to all companies undergoing insolvency proceedings where winding up is necessary under the Companies Act or Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with Section 436?

Non-compliance can lead to monetary penalties, director disqualification, and legal sanctions, including invalidation of unauthorized winding up.

How does Section 436 relate to the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code?

Section 436 integrates the Companies Act winding up provisions with the IBC, allowing the Tribunal to order winding up under either law as applicable.

Related Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 113 defines the holder in due course and their rights under the Act.

Section 194I of the Income Tax Act 1961 mandates tax deduction at source on rent payments in India.

Income Tax Act Section 44AD offers a presumptive taxation scheme for small businesses to simplify income computation and tax compliance.

CrPC Section 310 details the procedure for awarding death sentence and its confirmation by the High Court.

CPC Section 153A deals with the procedure for execution of decrees against property attached or sold in execution.

Poker earnings are conditionally legal in India, subject to state laws and whether poker is classified as a game of skill or chance.

IPC Section 376B addresses sexual intercourse by a man with his own wife during her pregnancy, defining it as an offence to protect maternal health.

Smoking in public places in India is largely prohibited with strict rules and limited exceptions under the Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products Act.

E-wallets are legal in India but regulated by RBI with strict rules for security and KYC compliance.

Contract Act 1872 Section 58 covers contracts that become void due to impossibility of performance.

IPC Section 67 penalizes publishing or transmitting obscene material electronically to protect public morality.

In India, owning or trading monitor lizards is illegal under wildlife laws protecting endangered species.

Peer-to-peer crowdfunding is legal in India under strict regulations by the RBI and SEBI.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 23 defines the liability of the acceptor of a bill of exchange upon dishonour by non-acceptance or non-payment.

Explore the legality of Best Gore in India, including laws on violent content, censorship, and online restrictions.

CrPC Section 309 deals with the procedure when a person attempts suicide and the legal steps police must follow.

CrPC Section 232 details the procedure for discharge of an accused before trial if evidence is insufficient.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 8 defines the holder in due course and their rights under the Act.

IPC Section 331 penalizes voluntarily obstructing a public servant from discharging official duties, ensuring lawful authority is respected.

Keeping pet snakes in India is legal with certain restrictions and permits depending on the species.

Carpooling in India is generally legal with some state-specific rules and safety regulations to follow.

IPC Section 46 defines the right of private defense of the body, detailing when and how force may be used to protect oneself.

In India, keeping green parrots as pets is regulated under wildlife laws with strict restrictions and permits required.

Contract Act 1872 Section 4 defines what constitutes a proposal and acceptance in contract formation.

IPC Section 292 prohibits sale and distribution of obscene material to protect public morality and decency.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 113 presumes culpable homicide if a person causes death by rash or negligent act, shifting burden to the accused.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 16 details the jurisdiction of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission for consumer complaints.

bottom of page