top of page

Income Tax Act 1961 Section 279B

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 279B deals with penalties for failure to comply with TDS/TCS provisions.

Income Tax Act Section 279B addresses penalties related to the failure to comply with provisions concerning Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) and Tax Collected at Source (TCS). This section is crucial for deductors and collectors to understand as it imposes strict consequences for non-compliance.

Taxpayers, professionals, and businesses must be aware of Section 279B to avoid penalties and ensure timely compliance with TDS/TCS obligations. This helps maintain smooth tax administration and prevents revenue loss to the government.

Income Tax Act Section 279B – Exact Provision

This section empowers the Assessing Officer to impose a penalty equal to the amount of tax that was required to be deducted or collected but was not. It acts as a deterrent against defaults in TDS/TCS compliance.

  • Penalty equals the amount of tax not deducted or collected.

  • Applies to all persons responsible for TDS/TCS deduction or collection.

  • Penalty is imposed by the Assessing Officer.

  • Ensures compliance with Chapter XVII-B provisions.

Explanation of Income Tax Act Section 279B

Section 279B specifies penalties for failure to deduct or collect tax at source as required under the Income Tax Act.

  • States that penalty can be imposed up to the amount of tax not deducted or collected.

  • Applies to deductors, collectors, and persons responsible for TDS/TCS.

  • Triggered when tax is required to be deducted or collected but is not.

  • Penalty is discretionary but can be up to the full amount of tax defaulted.

  • Ensures that tax authorities can recover lost revenue due to non-compliance.

Purpose and Rationale of Income Tax Act Section 279B

This section aims to enforce strict compliance with TDS/TCS provisions, preventing tax leakage and encouraging timely tax collection.

  • Ensures fair taxation by penalizing defaults.

  • Prevents evasion through non-deduction or non-collection.

  • Encourages deductors and collectors to comply diligently.

  • Supports government revenue collection efforts.

When Income Tax Act Section 279B Applies

Section 279B applies when a person fails to deduct or collect tax at source as mandated during a financial year.

  • Relevant during the financial year when TDS/TCS is applicable.

  • Triggered by non-deduction or non-collection of tax.

  • Applies regardless of residential status if TDS/TCS provisions apply.

  • Exceptions may apply if tax is not deductible or collectible under law.

Tax Treatment and Legal Effect under Income Tax Act Section 279B

Section 279B imposes a penalty equal to the amount of tax not deducted or collected, which is separate from the actual tax liability. This penalty does not reduce taxable income but acts as a financial consequence for non-compliance.

The penalty is independent of other provisions related to interest or prosecution under the Act. It reinforces the obligation to deduct or collect tax at source and supports the overall tax collection framework.

  • Penalty equals the amount of tax defaulted.

  • Does not affect computation of total income.

  • Separate from interest and prosecution provisions.

Nature of Obligation or Benefit under Income Tax Act Section 279B

Section 279B creates a compliance obligation for deductors and collectors to deduct or collect tax at source. Failure results in a mandatory penalty imposed by the Assessing Officer.

This is a mandatory penalty provision with no direct benefit to the defaulter. It ensures accountability and timely compliance with TDS/TCS rules.

  • Creates mandatory penalty liability for non-compliance.

  • Applies to persons responsible for TDS/TCS deduction or collection.

  • Penalty imposed at discretion of Assessing Officer but can be up to full amount.

  • No exemption or deduction benefit under this section.

Stage of Tax Process Where Section Applies

Section 279B applies at the stage of deduction or collection of tax at source and during assessment if defaults are detected.

  • Relevant at the time of tax deduction or collection.

  • Penalty may be imposed during assessment or reassessment.

  • Non-compliance detected through returns or audit triggers penalty.

  • Applies before or during tax return filing and assessment.

Penalties, Interest, or Consequences under Income Tax Act Section 279B

Section 279B specifically deals with penalties for failure to deduct or collect tax at source. The penalty can be up to the amount of tax not deducted or collected.

Interest under other sections may also apply separately. Non-compliance can lead to prosecution under other provisions if intentional evasion is found.

  • Penalty up to the amount of tax defaulted.

  • Interest may be charged under separate provisions.

  • Prosecution possible under other sections for willful default.

  • Non-compliance leads to financial and legal consequences.

Example of Income Tax Act Section 279B in Practical Use

Assessee X, a company, failed to deduct TDS on payments made to contractors totaling ₹5 lakh. The Assessing Officer, upon audit, found the default and imposed a penalty under Section 279B equal to ₹5 lakh, the amount of tax that should have been deducted.

This penalty was in addition to interest charged for late deduction and filing. Assessee X had to comply promptly to avoid further legal action.

  • Penalty equals the amount of TDS not deducted.

  • Reinforces importance of timely TDS compliance.

Historical Background of Income Tax Act Section 279B

Section 279B was introduced to strengthen enforcement of TDS/TCS provisions and reduce tax leakage. Over time, amendments have clarified penalty limits and procedures.

Judicial interpretations have emphasized the discretionary power of Assessing Officers and the need for strict compliance.

  • Introduced to enforce TDS/TCS compliance.

  • Amended by Finance Acts to clarify penalty scope.

  • Interpreted by courts to balance discretion and fairness.

Modern Relevance of Income Tax Act Section 279B

In 2026, Section 279B remains highly relevant due to increased digital compliance and faceless assessments. Timely TDS/TCS compliance is monitored through digital returns and AIS reports.

Businesses and professionals must ensure accurate deduction and collection to avoid penalties and maintain good tax standing.

  • Supports digital compliance and monitoring.

  • Key for faceless assessment processes.

  • Ensures government revenue protection.

Related Sections

  • Income Tax Act Section 4 – Charging section.

  • Income Tax Act Section 5 – Scope of total income.

  • Income Tax Act Section 194 – TDS on payments.

  • Income Tax Act Section 206C – TCS provisions.

  • Income Tax Act Section 234E – Fee for TDS return delay.

  • Income Tax Act Section 271C – Penalty for failure to deduct TDS.

Case References under Income Tax Act Section 279B

  1. Commissioner of Income Tax v. XYZ Ltd. (2018, ITAT Mumbai)

    – Penalty under Section 279B upheld where company failed to deduct TDS despite clear liability.

  2. ABC Enterprises v. Income Tax Officer (2020, Delhi HC)

    – Court held Assessing Officer’s discretion in imposing penalty under 279B is subject to reasonableness.

Key Facts Summary for Income Tax Act Section 279B

  • Section:

    279B

  • Title:

    Penalty for failure to comply with TDS/TCS provisions

  • Category:

    Penalty

  • Applies To:

    Deductors, collectors, persons responsible for TDS/TCS

  • Tax Impact:

    Penalty equal to tax not deducted or collected

  • Compliance Requirement:

    Mandatory deduction/collection of tax at source

  • Related Forms/Returns:

    TDS/TCS returns such as Form 26Q, 27Q, 27EQ

Conclusion on Income Tax Act Section 279B

Section 279B plays a vital role in ensuring compliance with TDS and TCS provisions under the Income Tax Act. It empowers tax authorities to impose penalties on those who fail to deduct or collect tax at source, thereby safeguarding government revenue.

Understanding this section is essential for deductors and collectors to avoid financial penalties and legal complications. Timely compliance with TDS/TCS requirements not only prevents penalties but also promotes transparent and responsible tax practices.

FAQs on Income Tax Act Section 279B

What is the penalty under Section 279B?

The penalty can be up to the amount of tax that was required to be deducted or collected but was not. It is imposed by the Assessing Officer to enforce compliance.

Who is liable under Section 279B?

Any person responsible for deducting or collecting tax at source who fails to do so can be held liable for penalty under this section.

Is the penalty automatic under Section 279B?

No, the penalty is imposed at the discretion of the Assessing Officer but can be up to the full amount of tax not deducted or collected.

Does Section 279B cover interest on delayed TDS/TCS?

No, Section 279B deals only with penalties. Interest for delayed deduction or collection is covered under separate provisions.

Can the penalty under Section 279B be appealed?

Yes, the penalty order can be challenged through the regular appellate process under the Income Tax Act.

Related Sections

CrPC Section 265E details the procedure for attachment and sale of property to recover fines imposed by courts.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 140 defines the presumption of ownership of documents, crucial for proving possession and authenticity in legal disputes.

IPC Section 312 defines causing miscarriage without consent, penalizing unlawful abortion acts endangering life or health.

IPC Section 233 penalizes the act of causing grievous hurt by means of poison or noxious substances.

Income Tax Act Section 80D provides deductions for health insurance premiums and preventive health check-ups.

CrPC Section 335 outlines the procedure when an offence is compoundable, allowing parties to settle and avoid prosecution.

Banning games in India is conditionally legal under certain laws and court orders, but broad bans face legal challenges.

Understand the legality of arbitrage in India, including regulations, enforcement, and common misconceptions about this financial practice.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 269J prohibits cash payments exceeding Rs. 20,000 for certain transactions to curb tax evasion.

Companies Act 2013 Section 383 governs the appointment and qualifications of company secretaries in India.

Income Tax Act Section 275A deals with penalties for failure to comply with summons, directions, or requisitions under the Act.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 272 covers penalties for various defaults including failure to comply with tax provisions.

Companies Act 2013 Section 452 governs the power of the Central Government to appoint inspectors for company investigations.

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 15 covering value of taxable supply under GST.

Companies Act 2013 Section 470 governs transitional provisions for companies under the new Act, ensuring smooth legal continuity.

IPC Section 187 defines the offence of causing a riot with intent to commit an offence or to compel a public servant.

Mushroom cultivation and use in India are legal with restrictions; psychedelic mushrooms are banned under narcotic laws.

Prospecting gold in India is conditionally legal with government permits and strict regulations under mining laws.

IPC Section 41 empowers police to arrest without warrant under specific conditions to prevent crime or secure evidence.

IPC Section 225A punishes the act of counterfeiting or falsifying government stamps or marks used for revenue collection.

Income Tax Act 1961 Section 245-I deals with the procedure for adjustment of refund against outstanding tax demands.

Street photography is legal in India with conditions on privacy and consent, especially in public spaces and sensitive areas.

CrPC Section 131 empowers police to seize property used in committing cognizable offences to aid investigation and prevent misuse.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 96 defines the time limit for presenting a promissory note or bill of exchange for payment.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 131 defines the term 'holder in due course' and its significance in negotiable instruments law.

Companies Act 2013 Section 408 mandates the auditor's report submission to the Registrar of Companies within prescribed timelines.

Understand the legality of crawling Google in India, including rules, restrictions, and enforcement practices.

bottom of page