top of page

Information Technology Act 2000 Section 60

IT Act Section 60 provides protection for intermediaries from liability for third-party information under specified conditions.

Section 60 of the Information Technology Act, 2000, addresses the liability of intermediaries for third-party information hosted or transmitted through their platforms. It offers a legal shield to intermediaries such as internet service providers, social media platforms, and web hosting services, protecting them from being held liable for unlawful content posted by users, provided they follow due diligence and act upon receiving actual knowledge of such content.

In today's digital environment, where online platforms facilitate massive user interactions, Section 60 is crucial. It balances the need for free flow of information with responsibilities to curb illegal content. This section impacts users, businesses, and law enforcement by defining when intermediaries must act and when they are exempt from liability.

Information Technology Act Section 60 – Exact Provision

This provision clearly states that intermediaries are not liable for third-party content they host or transmit. However, this protection is conditional and subject to other provisions of the IT Act and rules framed under it. The section aims to encourage intermediaries to provide services without fear of legal repercussions for user-generated content, as long as they comply with due diligence requirements.

  • Protects intermediaries from liability for third-party content.

  • Applies to hosting or transmitting information.

  • Encourages free flow of information online.

  • Subject to compliance with due diligence and legal orders.

  • Supports growth of digital platforms and services.

Explanation of Information Technology Act Section 60

This section exempts intermediaries from liability for third-party information hosted or transmitted through their services, under certain conditions.

  • States that intermediaries are not liable for third-party data or communication links.

  • Applies to internet service providers, social media platforms, web hosts, and similar entities.

  • Triggered when content is uploaded or shared by users on intermediary platforms.

  • Legal criteria include acting on actual knowledge or court orders to remove unlawful content.

  • Allows intermediaries to provide services without pre-screening all content.

  • Prohibits intermediaries from knowingly hosting illegal content.

Purpose and Rationale of IT Act Section 60

The section aims to protect intermediaries from undue legal burden for third-party content, fostering a safe and open digital environment. It balances freedom of expression with responsibility to prevent misuse.

  • Protects intermediaries in the digital ecosystem.

  • Prevents undue liability for user-generated content.

  • Encourages responsible behaviour online.

  • Supports regulation of online content without stifling innovation.

When IT Act Section 60 Applies

This section applies when intermediaries host or transmit third-party content and face potential liability claims.

  • When content is uploaded or shared by users.

  • When intermediaries receive actual knowledge of unlawful content.

  • When court or government orders direct removal of content.

  • Invoked by affected parties or law enforcement.

  • Evidence includes digital logs, notices, or legal orders.

  • Applies only to digital or networked communications.

  • Exceptions include failure to act on knowledge or legal orders.

Legal Effect of IT Act Section 60

Section 60 creates a legal shield for intermediaries, limiting their liability for third-party content under specified conditions. It reduces the risk of frivolous lawsuits and encourages digital service growth. However, intermediaries must comply with due diligence and remove unlawful content upon notice. This section interacts with other IT Act provisions and IPC offences such as defamation or obscenity.

  • Creates limited immunity for intermediaries.

  • Requires due diligence and prompt action on unlawful content.

  • Penalties apply if intermediaries fail to comply.

Nature of Offence or Liability under IT Act Section 60

This section primarily deals with regulatory compliance and civil liability protection for intermediaries. It does not impose criminal liability unless due diligence is neglected. The offence is generally non-cognizable unless related to other criminal provisions.

  • Focus on civil liability exemption.

  • Regulatory compliance mandatory.

  • No criminal liability if due diligence observed.

  • Non-cognizable offence unless linked to other crimes.

Stage of Proceedings Where IT Act Section 60 Applies

Section 60 is relevant during investigation, evidence collection, and trial stages involving intermediary liability for third-party content.

  • Investigation includes examining intermediary compliance.

  • Evidence collection involves digital logs and notices.

  • Complaints filed against intermediaries or users.

  • Trial assesses intermediary's due diligence.

  • Appeal may involve higher courts interpreting liability.

Penalties and Consequences under IT Act Section 60

While Section 60 provides immunity, failure to comply with due diligence or court orders can attract penalties under other IT Act provisions. Intermediaries may face fines, compensation claims, or regulatory action. Corporate liability applies if policies are inadequate.

  • Fines for non-compliance.

  • Compensation to affected parties.

  • Regulatory sanctions possible.

  • Corporate liability for negligence.

  • Intermediary liability conditional on due diligence.

Example of IT Act Section 60 in Practical Use

Consider "X", a social media platform hosting user content. A user uploads defamatory material about "Y". Upon receiving a court order, "X" promptly removes the content. Under Section 60, "X" is protected from liability for the defamatory post since it acted diligently and removed the content after notice. However, if "X" ignored the order, it could lose immunity and face penalties.

  • Intermediaries must act on knowledge or orders.

  • Protection depends on due diligence and prompt action.

Historical Background of IT Act Section 60

The IT Act was introduced in 2000 to regulate electronic commerce, digital signatures, and cybercrime. Section 60 was designed to protect intermediaries from liability for third-party content, encouraging internet growth. The 2008 Amendment Act refined intermediary liability rules, clarifying due diligence requirements and safe harbour provisions.

  • Introduced to support e-commerce and digital communication.

  • 2008 Amendment enhanced intermediary liability framework.

  • Evolution reflects balancing innovation and regulation.

Modern Relevance of IT Act Section 60

In 2026, with increased digital interactions, Section 60 remains vital. It addresses cybersecurity, data protection, and online platform responsibilities. The rise of fintech, digital identity, and social media reforms highlight the need for clear intermediary liability rules. Enforcement challenges persist due to evolving technologies and cross-border issues.

  • Supports digital evidence handling.

  • Promotes online safety and content regulation.

  • Challenges include enforcement and jurisdiction.

Related Sections

  • IT Act Section 43 – Penalty for unauthorised access and data theft.

  • IT Act Section 66 – Computer-related offences.

  • IT Act Section 67 – Publishing obscene material online.

  • IPC Section 420 – Cheating, relevant for online fraud.

  • Evidence Act Section 65B – Admissibility of electronic evidence.

  • CrPC Section 91 – Summons for digital records or documents.

Case References under IT Act Section 60

No landmark case directly interprets this section as of 2026.

Key Facts Summary for IT Act Section 60

  • Section: 60

  • Title: Intermediary Liability Protection

  • Category: Intermediary liability, regulation

  • Applies To: Intermediaries such as ISPs, social media platforms, web hosts

  • Stage: Investigation, trial, appeal

  • Legal Effect: Provides immunity from liability for third-party content subject to due diligence

  • Penalties: Fines and sanctions for non-compliance with due diligence or court orders

Conclusion on IT Act Section 60

Section 60 of the IT Act, 2000, plays a crucial role in defining the liability framework for intermediaries in India's digital ecosystem. By granting conditional immunity, it encourages the growth of online platforms while ensuring they act responsibly to curb unlawful content.

This balance is essential to maintain freedom of expression and innovation, alongside protecting users from harmful digital content. As technology evolves, Section 60's principles continue to guide legal interpretations and policy reforms in intermediary liability.

FAQs on IT Act Section 60

What is the main protection offered by Section 60?

Section 60 protects intermediaries from liability for third-party information hosted or transmitted through their platforms, provided they follow due diligence and act on unlawful content notices.

Who qualifies as an intermediary under this section?

Intermediaries include internet service providers, social media platforms, web hosting services, search engines, and other entities facilitating online communication or hosting content.

When can an intermediary lose immunity under Section 60?

An intermediary can lose immunity if it fails to exercise due diligence or does not remove unlawful content after receiving actual knowledge or a court order.

Does Section 60 provide protection against all types of liability?

No, Section 60 provides conditional immunity for third-party content but does not protect intermediaries from liability arising from their own actions or negligence.

How does Section 60 impact users and businesses?

It enables platforms to host user content without undue fear of liability, fostering innovation and free expression, while ensuring mechanisms to address illegal content are in place.

Related Sections

IPC Section 87 covers acts not intended to cause harm but done with consent, defining exceptions to criminal liability.

IPC Section 490 punishes marrying again during the lifetime of a spouse, addressing bigamy and protecting marital fidelity.

IPC Section 455 defines the offence of lurking house-trespass or house-breaking in the night with intent to commit an offence.

CrPC Section 357C mandates the constitution of a Victim Compensation Fund to support victims of crime and their families.

CrPC Section 249 details the procedure for taking cognizance of offences upon police reports by Magistrates.

Companies Act 2013 Section 182 governs disclosure of interest by directors in contracts or arrangements.

Contract Act 1872 Section 21 defines the legal consequences of a contract induced by coercion, making it voidable at the option of the aggrieved party.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 61 defines the competency of witnesses, outlining who may testify in court and its significance in legal proceedings.

CrPC Section 103 empowers police to seize property connected to offences, ensuring evidence preservation and lawful investigation.

CrPC Section 126 empowers police to disperse unlawful assemblies to maintain public order and prevent violence.

CPC Section 102 covers the procedure for execution of decrees by delivery of possession in civil suits.

IPC Section 197 requires prior government sanction for prosecuting public servants for official acts, ensuring protection against frivolous charges.

Companies Act 2013 Section 71 governs the issuance and regulation of debentures by companies in India.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 2(21) defines 'defect' in goods, crucial for consumer rights and product liability claims.

CPC Section 103 covers the procedure for execution of decrees against property attached or sold in execution.

Contract Act 1872 Section 43 explains the effect of novation, rescission, and alteration of contracts on original obligations.

Companies Act 2013 Section 189 mandates disclosure of interest by directors and key managerial personnel in contracts or arrangements.

IPC Section 26 defines the term 'counterfeit' for legal clarity in offences involving imitation of documents or currency.

CrPC Section 5 defines the territorial jurisdiction of criminal courts and officers in India.

Companies Act 2013 Section 174 governs the convening of board meetings, ensuring proper corporate governance and decision-making.

CrPC Section 265F details the procedure for issuing summons to accused persons in warrant cases, ensuring proper notice and appearance in court.

IPC Section 473 addresses the offence of forging a document with intent to cheat, outlining its scope and punishment.

IPC Section 234 penalizes wrongful confinement in secret, protecting personal liberty and privacy.

IPC Section 206 penalizes the act of causing disappearance of evidence to obstruct justice.

IPC Section 364A defines the offence of kidnapping for ransom, outlining severe punishment for abducting a person to demand ransom.

CrPC Section 302 details the punishment for murder, outlining legal consequences and procedural aspects under Indian law.

IPC Section 59 defines the punishment for public nuisance causing danger to human life, health, or safety.

bottom of page