top of page

Information Technology Act 2000 Section 60

IT Act Section 60 provides protection for intermediaries from liability for third-party information under specified conditions.

Section 60 of the Information Technology Act, 2000, addresses the liability of intermediaries for third-party information hosted or transmitted through their platforms. It offers a legal shield to intermediaries such as internet service providers, social media platforms, and web hosting services, protecting them from being held liable for unlawful content posted by users, provided they follow due diligence and act upon receiving actual knowledge of such content.

In today's digital environment, where online platforms facilitate massive user interactions, Section 60 is crucial. It balances the need for free flow of information with responsibilities to curb illegal content. This section impacts users, businesses, and law enforcement by defining when intermediaries must act and when they are exempt from liability.

Information Technology Act Section 60 – Exact Provision

This provision clearly states that intermediaries are not liable for third-party content they host or transmit. However, this protection is conditional and subject to other provisions of the IT Act and rules framed under it. The section aims to encourage intermediaries to provide services without fear of legal repercussions for user-generated content, as long as they comply with due diligence requirements.

  • Protects intermediaries from liability for third-party content.

  • Applies to hosting or transmitting information.

  • Encourages free flow of information online.

  • Subject to compliance with due diligence and legal orders.

  • Supports growth of digital platforms and services.

Explanation of Information Technology Act Section 60

This section exempts intermediaries from liability for third-party information hosted or transmitted through their services, under certain conditions.

  • States that intermediaries are not liable for third-party data or communication links.

  • Applies to internet service providers, social media platforms, web hosts, and similar entities.

  • Triggered when content is uploaded or shared by users on intermediary platforms.

  • Legal criteria include acting on actual knowledge or court orders to remove unlawful content.

  • Allows intermediaries to provide services without pre-screening all content.

  • Prohibits intermediaries from knowingly hosting illegal content.

Purpose and Rationale of IT Act Section 60

The section aims to protect intermediaries from undue legal burden for third-party content, fostering a safe and open digital environment. It balances freedom of expression with responsibility to prevent misuse.

  • Protects intermediaries in the digital ecosystem.

  • Prevents undue liability for user-generated content.

  • Encourages responsible behaviour online.

  • Supports regulation of online content without stifling innovation.

When IT Act Section 60 Applies

This section applies when intermediaries host or transmit third-party content and face potential liability claims.

  • When content is uploaded or shared by users.

  • When intermediaries receive actual knowledge of unlawful content.

  • When court or government orders direct removal of content.

  • Invoked by affected parties or law enforcement.

  • Evidence includes digital logs, notices, or legal orders.

  • Applies only to digital or networked communications.

  • Exceptions include failure to act on knowledge or legal orders.

Legal Effect of IT Act Section 60

Section 60 creates a legal shield for intermediaries, limiting their liability for third-party content under specified conditions. It reduces the risk of frivolous lawsuits and encourages digital service growth. However, intermediaries must comply with due diligence and remove unlawful content upon notice. This section interacts with other IT Act provisions and IPC offences such as defamation or obscenity.

  • Creates limited immunity for intermediaries.

  • Requires due diligence and prompt action on unlawful content.

  • Penalties apply if intermediaries fail to comply.

Nature of Offence or Liability under IT Act Section 60

This section primarily deals with regulatory compliance and civil liability protection for intermediaries. It does not impose criminal liability unless due diligence is neglected. The offence is generally non-cognizable unless related to other criminal provisions.

  • Focus on civil liability exemption.

  • Regulatory compliance mandatory.

  • No criminal liability if due diligence observed.

  • Non-cognizable offence unless linked to other crimes.

Stage of Proceedings Where IT Act Section 60 Applies

Section 60 is relevant during investigation, evidence collection, and trial stages involving intermediary liability for third-party content.

  • Investigation includes examining intermediary compliance.

  • Evidence collection involves digital logs and notices.

  • Complaints filed against intermediaries or users.

  • Trial assesses intermediary's due diligence.

  • Appeal may involve higher courts interpreting liability.

Penalties and Consequences under IT Act Section 60

While Section 60 provides immunity, failure to comply with due diligence or court orders can attract penalties under other IT Act provisions. Intermediaries may face fines, compensation claims, or regulatory action. Corporate liability applies if policies are inadequate.

  • Fines for non-compliance.

  • Compensation to affected parties.

  • Regulatory sanctions possible.

  • Corporate liability for negligence.

  • Intermediary liability conditional on due diligence.

Example of IT Act Section 60 in Practical Use

Consider "X", a social media platform hosting user content. A user uploads defamatory material about "Y". Upon receiving a court order, "X" promptly removes the content. Under Section 60, "X" is protected from liability for the defamatory post since it acted diligently and removed the content after notice. However, if "X" ignored the order, it could lose immunity and face penalties.

  • Intermediaries must act on knowledge or orders.

  • Protection depends on due diligence and prompt action.

Historical Background of IT Act Section 60

The IT Act was introduced in 2000 to regulate electronic commerce, digital signatures, and cybercrime. Section 60 was designed to protect intermediaries from liability for third-party content, encouraging internet growth. The 2008 Amendment Act refined intermediary liability rules, clarifying due diligence requirements and safe harbour provisions.

  • Introduced to support e-commerce and digital communication.

  • 2008 Amendment enhanced intermediary liability framework.

  • Evolution reflects balancing innovation and regulation.

Modern Relevance of IT Act Section 60

In 2026, with increased digital interactions, Section 60 remains vital. It addresses cybersecurity, data protection, and online platform responsibilities. The rise of fintech, digital identity, and social media reforms highlight the need for clear intermediary liability rules. Enforcement challenges persist due to evolving technologies and cross-border issues.

  • Supports digital evidence handling.

  • Promotes online safety and content regulation.

  • Challenges include enforcement and jurisdiction.

Related Sections

  • IT Act Section 43 – Penalty for unauthorised access and data theft.

  • IT Act Section 66 – Computer-related offences.

  • IT Act Section 67 – Publishing obscene material online.

  • IPC Section 420 – Cheating, relevant for online fraud.

  • Evidence Act Section 65B – Admissibility of electronic evidence.

  • CrPC Section 91 – Summons for digital records or documents.

Case References under IT Act Section 60

No landmark case directly interprets this section as of 2026.

Key Facts Summary for IT Act Section 60

  • Section: 60

  • Title: Intermediary Liability Protection

  • Category: Intermediary liability, regulation

  • Applies To: Intermediaries such as ISPs, social media platforms, web hosts

  • Stage: Investigation, trial, appeal

  • Legal Effect: Provides immunity from liability for third-party content subject to due diligence

  • Penalties: Fines and sanctions for non-compliance with due diligence or court orders

Conclusion on IT Act Section 60

Section 60 of the IT Act, 2000, plays a crucial role in defining the liability framework for intermediaries in India's digital ecosystem. By granting conditional immunity, it encourages the growth of online platforms while ensuring they act responsibly to curb unlawful content.

This balance is essential to maintain freedom of expression and innovation, alongside protecting users from harmful digital content. As technology evolves, Section 60's principles continue to guide legal interpretations and policy reforms in intermediary liability.

FAQs on IT Act Section 60

What is the main protection offered by Section 60?

Section 60 protects intermediaries from liability for third-party information hosted or transmitted through their platforms, provided they follow due diligence and act on unlawful content notices.

Who qualifies as an intermediary under this section?

Intermediaries include internet service providers, social media platforms, web hosting services, search engines, and other entities facilitating online communication or hosting content.

When can an intermediary lose immunity under Section 60?

An intermediary can lose immunity if it fails to exercise due diligence or does not remove unlawful content after receiving actual knowledge or a court order.

Does Section 60 provide protection against all types of liability?

No, Section 60 provides conditional immunity for third-party content but does not protect intermediaries from liability arising from their own actions or negligence.

How does Section 60 impact users and businesses?

It enables platforms to host user content without undue fear of liability, fostering innovation and free expression, while ensuring mechanisms to address illegal content are in place.

Related Sections

CrPC Section 215 empowers courts to summon persons to produce documents or other things relevant to a case.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 101 defines the burden of proof, specifying who must prove a fact in civil and criminal cases.

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 76 covering assessment of unregistered persons.

Income Tax Act Section 94B limits interest deduction on debt paid to associated enterprises to curb base erosion.

CrPC Section 105C details the procedure for conducting a preliminary inquiry by a Magistrate before taking cognizance of certain offences.

Understand the legality and application of double jeopardy protection under Indian law.

MMA is legal in India with regulated events and licensing; enforcement varies by state and local authorities.

Income Tax Act Section 10AA provides tax exemption for units in Special Economic Zones (SEZs) to promote exports and economic growth.

Income Tax Act Section 80CC provides deductions for contributions to notified pension funds under specified conditions.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 91 defines the holder in due course and their rights under the Act.

Companies Act 2013 Section 458 deals with the power of the Central Government to appoint inspectors for company investigations.

Bluetooth helmets are legal in India if they meet safety standards and do not obstruct hearing or vision while riding.

Hamsters are legal to keep as pets in India with no major restrictions under central laws.

IPC Section 110 defines the offence of abetment of a criminal conspiracy, outlining liability and scope under Indian law.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 39 defines the admissibility of oral evidence and its role in proving facts in court.

Companies Act 2013 Section 205 governs the transfer of unpaid dividends to the Investor Education and Protection Fund.

Astrology is legal in India with cultural acceptance but no formal government regulation or licensing requirements.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 7 defines the term 'holder' and explains who qualifies as a holder of a negotiable instrument.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 161 covers the examination of witnesses by police during investigation, crucial for admissibility and proof in trials.

Companies Act 2013 Section 404 mandates the audit of internal financial controls over financial reporting for companies.

CrPC Section 378 defines the offence of theft, detailing key elements and legal implications under Indian criminal law.

IPC Section 464 defines the offence of making a false document with intent to cause damage or injury.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 75 mandates product liability, holding manufacturers and sellers accountable for defective goods causing harm.

Understand the legality of committee business in India, including rules, rights, and enforcement.

IPC Section 460 defines punishment for committing theft by a clerk or servant in possession of property.

Companies Act 2013 Section 188 governs related party transactions ensuring transparency and fairness in corporate dealings.

Income Tax Act Section 115BBF provides concessional tax rates on undisclosed income declared under the Income Declaration Scheme.

bottom of page