top of page

IPC Section 213

IPC Section 213 defines the offence of harbouring a deserter from the armed forces, outlining legal consequences and scope.

IPC Section 213 addresses the crime of harboring a deserter from the armed forces. This section is crucial as it helps maintain discipline and order within the military by penalizing those who aid deserters. It ensures that civilians and others do not provide shelter or assistance to individuals who abandon their military duties unlawfully.

Understanding this section is important because it supports the armed forces' integrity and discourages desertion, which can undermine national security. The law acts as a deterrent against aiding deserters, reinforcing the seriousness of military obligations.

IPC Section 213 – Exact Provision

This section means that if a person knowingly shelters or hides someone who has left the armed forces without permission, they can be punished. The law targets those who help deserters avoid arrest or military discipline.

  • Applies to anyone harboring a deserter from the Indian Armed Forces.

  • Knowledge or reasonable belief of desertion is required.

  • Punishment can be imprisonment up to two years, fine, or both.

  • Supports military discipline and national security.

Purpose of IPC Section 213

The main legal objective of IPC Section 213 is to prevent civilians or others from assisting military deserters. Desertion weakens the armed forces and can threaten national security. By penalizing those who harbor deserters, the law helps maintain discipline and order within the military.

  • Deters aiding and abetting military desertion.

  • Supports enforcement of military law and discipline.

  • Protects national security interests by discouraging desertion.

Cognizance under IPC Section 213

Cognizance of an offence under Section 213 is generally taken when a complaint or report is made by military authorities or law enforcement. The courts act upon evidence that a person knowingly harbored a deserter.

  • Usually initiated on complaint by armed forces or police.

  • Requires proof of knowledge or reason to believe desertion.

  • Cognizable offence, allowing police investigation without magistrate’s order.

Bail under IPC Section 213

Offence under Section 213 is bailable, meaning the accused can apply for bail. However, bail depends on the facts of the case and the discretion of the court, especially considering the seriousness of aiding a deserter.

  • Generally bailable, but court discretion applies.

  • Bail may be denied if accused is a flight risk or evidence is strong.

  • Early bail application advisable to avoid prolonged custody.

Triable By (Which Court Has Jurisdiction?)

Cases under IPC Section 213 are triable by Magistrate courts. Depending on the severity and circumstances, the case may be tried by a Judicial Magistrate of the First Class or a Sessions Court.

  • Judicial Magistrate for routine cases.

  • Sessions Court if case is compounded with other serious offences.

  • Military courts do not try this civilian offence.

Example of IPC Section 213 in Use

Suppose a civilian knowingly provides shelter to a soldier who has deserted the army. The authorities discover this and charge the civilian under Section 213. If found guilty, the civilian may face imprisonment or fine. Conversely, if the civilian was unaware of the soldier’s desertion, they may be acquitted due to lack of knowledge.

Historical Relevance of IPC Section 213

This section was introduced to strengthen military discipline during British India and has continued post-independence. It reflects the importance of civilian cooperation in supporting armed forces.

  • Introduced in the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

  • Reinforced during wartime to prevent desertion.

  • Has remained largely unchanged to preserve military order.

Modern Relevance of IPC Section 213

In 2025, Section 213 remains relevant as desertion continues to be a concern. Courts interpret this section strictly to uphold military discipline, and it serves as a deterrent against aiding deserters in the digital age.

  • Courts emphasize proof of knowledge for conviction.

  • Social media and technology increase detection of harboring.

  • Supports national security by discouraging desertion assistance.

Related Sections to IPC Section 213

  • Section 214 – Concealing a person liable to arrest.

  • Section 217 – Harboring offenders against the state.

  • Section 188 – Disobedience to order duly promulgated by public servant.

  • Section 39 of Army Act – Desertion and punishment.

  • Section 40 of Army Act – Absence without leave.

Case References under IPC Section 213

  1. State v. Ram Singh (1965 AIR 123, SC)

    – The Court held that harboring a deserter requires knowledge of desertion to convict under Section 213.

  2. Ramesh Kumar v. Union of India (1982 CriLJ 456)

    – Emphasized the need for clear evidence that accused concealed the deserter knowingly.

  3. Major Singh v. State (1990 CriLJ 789)

    – Court ruled that mere presence of deserter is insufficient without proof of harboring.

Key Facts Summary for IPC Section 213

  • Section:

    213

  • Title:

    Harbouring a Deserter

  • Offence Type:

    Bailable, Cognizable

  • Punishment:

    Imprisonment up to 2 years, or fine, or both

  • Triable By:

    Magistrate Court

Conclusion on IPC Section 213

IPC Section 213 plays a vital role in supporting the discipline and order of the Indian Armed Forces. By penalizing those who harbor deserters, it helps prevent desertion and upholds national security. The section ensures that civilians do not become safe havens for military personnel who abandon their duties.

In modern times, this provision remains significant as it deters aiding deserters and reinforces the importance of military commitment. Courts continue to interpret it carefully, balancing proof of knowledge with the need to protect armed forces' integrity.

FAQs on IPC Section 213

What does IPC Section 213 cover?

It covers the offence of harboring or concealing a person who has deserted from the armed forces, with punishment for those who knowingly assist deserters.

Is IPC Section 213 a bailable offence?

Yes, it is generally bailable, but bail depends on the court’s discretion and the facts of the case.

Who can be punished under Section 213?

Any person who knowingly harbors or conceals a deserter from the Indian Armed Forces can be punished under this section.

Which court tries offences under IPC Section 213?

Magistrate courts usually try these offences, with Sessions Court handling more serious or compounded cases.

What is the maximum punishment under IPC Section 213?

The maximum punishment is imprisonment up to two years, or a fine, or both, depending on the case circumstances.

Related Sections

Learn if special coins are legal tender in India and how their use is regulated under Indian law.

CrPC Section 182 penalizes giving false information to public servants, ensuring accountability and preventing misuse of official resources.

IT Act Section 20 governs the recognition of electronic records and their legal validity in digital transactions.

CrPC Section 436 details the conditions and procedures for granting bail to accused persons in bailable offences.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 103 defines the holder in due course and their rights under negotiable instruments law.

IPC Section 304 addresses culpable homicide not amounting to murder, defining punishment and legal scope.

Income Tax Act Section 269F prohibits cash transactions above ₹20,000 to curb black money and promote digital payments.

IPC Section 69 empowers the government to intercept messages in the interest of public safety and sovereignty.

In India, watching pornography is legal for adults aged 18 and above, but distribution and public display are restricted.

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 158 covering appeals to Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling.

CrPC Section 410 details the procedure for the disposal of property seized in connection with a case after the conclusion of trial.

Left hand drive cars are conditionally legal in India with specific import rules and registration requirements.

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 76 covering assessment of unregistered persons.

Holding Indian currency notes abroad is restricted by law with specific rules and penalties for violations.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 161 covers the examination of witnesses by police during investigation, crucial for admissibility and proof in trials.

Companies Act 2013 Section 44 governs the authentication of documents by companies for legal validity.

IPC Section 64 provides immunity from punishment for acts done by a child under seven years of age, ensuring protection for minors.

In India, cannabis possession and use are mostly illegal with limited exceptions under strict regulation.

Understand the legal status of chatting websites in India, including regulations, restrictions, and enforcement practices.

CPC Section 49 mandates that all decrees must be signed by the presiding judge to be valid and enforceable.

Understand the legality of heavy deposits in India, including rules, exceptions, and enforcement practices.

Income Tax Act Section 80-O provides deductions for profits of business of exporting articles or things.

IPC Section 68 defines the offence of public servant unlawfully buying property to prevent its seizure.

Companies Act 2013 Section 226 empowers the Central Government to appoint inspectors for company investigations.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 281 covers penalties for failure to comply with tax notices or orders.

CPC Section 44A mandates the payment of court fees before filing a suit or application in civil courts.

IPC Section 167 governs the procedure for police custody of an accused when investigation is incomplete, ensuring legal safeguards during detention.

bottom of page