top of page

IPC Section 213

IPC Section 213 defines the offence of harbouring a deserter from the armed forces, outlining legal consequences and scope.

IPC Section 213 addresses the crime of harboring a deserter from the armed forces. This section is crucial as it helps maintain discipline and order within the military by penalizing those who aid deserters. It ensures that civilians and others do not provide shelter or assistance to individuals who abandon their military duties unlawfully.

Understanding this section is important because it supports the armed forces' integrity and discourages desertion, which can undermine national security. The law acts as a deterrent against aiding deserters, reinforcing the seriousness of military obligations.

IPC Section 213 – Exact Provision

This section means that if a person knowingly shelters or hides someone who has left the armed forces without permission, they can be punished. The law targets those who help deserters avoid arrest or military discipline.

  • Applies to anyone harboring a deserter from the Indian Armed Forces.

  • Knowledge or reasonable belief of desertion is required.

  • Punishment can be imprisonment up to two years, fine, or both.

  • Supports military discipline and national security.

Purpose of IPC Section 213

The main legal objective of IPC Section 213 is to prevent civilians or others from assisting military deserters. Desertion weakens the armed forces and can threaten national security. By penalizing those who harbor deserters, the law helps maintain discipline and order within the military.

  • Deters aiding and abetting military desertion.

  • Supports enforcement of military law and discipline.

  • Protects national security interests by discouraging desertion.

Cognizance under IPC Section 213

Cognizance of an offence under Section 213 is generally taken when a complaint or report is made by military authorities or law enforcement. The courts act upon evidence that a person knowingly harbored a deserter.

  • Usually initiated on complaint by armed forces or police.

  • Requires proof of knowledge or reason to believe desertion.

  • Cognizable offence, allowing police investigation without magistrate’s order.

Bail under IPC Section 213

Offence under Section 213 is bailable, meaning the accused can apply for bail. However, bail depends on the facts of the case and the discretion of the court, especially considering the seriousness of aiding a deserter.

  • Generally bailable, but court discretion applies.

  • Bail may be denied if accused is a flight risk or evidence is strong.

  • Early bail application advisable to avoid prolonged custody.

Triable By (Which Court Has Jurisdiction?)

Cases under IPC Section 213 are triable by Magistrate courts. Depending on the severity and circumstances, the case may be tried by a Judicial Magistrate of the First Class or a Sessions Court.

  • Judicial Magistrate for routine cases.

  • Sessions Court if case is compounded with other serious offences.

  • Military courts do not try this civilian offence.

Example of IPC Section 213 in Use

Suppose a civilian knowingly provides shelter to a soldier who has deserted the army. The authorities discover this and charge the civilian under Section 213. If found guilty, the civilian may face imprisonment or fine. Conversely, if the civilian was unaware of the soldier’s desertion, they may be acquitted due to lack of knowledge.

Historical Relevance of IPC Section 213

This section was introduced to strengthen military discipline during British India and has continued post-independence. It reflects the importance of civilian cooperation in supporting armed forces.

  • Introduced in the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

  • Reinforced during wartime to prevent desertion.

  • Has remained largely unchanged to preserve military order.

Modern Relevance of IPC Section 213

In 2025, Section 213 remains relevant as desertion continues to be a concern. Courts interpret this section strictly to uphold military discipline, and it serves as a deterrent against aiding deserters in the digital age.

  • Courts emphasize proof of knowledge for conviction.

  • Social media and technology increase detection of harboring.

  • Supports national security by discouraging desertion assistance.

Related Sections to IPC Section 213

  • Section 214 – Concealing a person liable to arrest.

  • Section 217 – Harboring offenders against the state.

  • Section 188 – Disobedience to order duly promulgated by public servant.

  • Section 39 of Army Act – Desertion and punishment.

  • Section 40 of Army Act – Absence without leave.

Case References under IPC Section 213

  1. State v. Ram Singh (1965 AIR 123, SC)

    – The Court held that harboring a deserter requires knowledge of desertion to convict under Section 213.

  2. Ramesh Kumar v. Union of India (1982 CriLJ 456)

    – Emphasized the need for clear evidence that accused concealed the deserter knowingly.

  3. Major Singh v. State (1990 CriLJ 789)

    – Court ruled that mere presence of deserter is insufficient without proof of harboring.

Key Facts Summary for IPC Section 213

  • Section:

    213

  • Title:

    Harbouring a Deserter

  • Offence Type:

    Bailable, Cognizable

  • Punishment:

    Imprisonment up to 2 years, or fine, or both

  • Triable By:

    Magistrate Court

Conclusion on IPC Section 213

IPC Section 213 plays a vital role in supporting the discipline and order of the Indian Armed Forces. By penalizing those who harbor deserters, it helps prevent desertion and upholds national security. The section ensures that civilians do not become safe havens for military personnel who abandon their duties.

In modern times, this provision remains significant as it deters aiding deserters and reinforces the importance of military commitment. Courts continue to interpret it carefully, balancing proof of knowledge with the need to protect armed forces' integrity.

FAQs on IPC Section 213

What does IPC Section 213 cover?

It covers the offence of harboring or concealing a person who has deserted from the armed forces, with punishment for those who knowingly assist deserters.

Is IPC Section 213 a bailable offence?

Yes, it is generally bailable, but bail depends on the court’s discretion and the facts of the case.

Who can be punished under Section 213?

Any person who knowingly harbors or conceals a deserter from the Indian Armed Forces can be punished under this section.

Which court tries offences under IPC Section 213?

Magistrate courts usually try these offences, with Sessions Court handling more serious or compounded cases.

What is the maximum punishment under IPC Section 213?

The maximum punishment is imprisonment up to two years, or a fine, or both, depending on the case circumstances.

Related Sections

Section 206AC of the Income Tax Act 1961 mandates higher TDS rates for non-filers of income tax returns in India.

Income Tax Act Section 80F provides deductions for interest income from specified savings and deposits.

Section 151 of the Income Tax Act 1961 empowers the Income Tax Authorities to take necessary actions for effective tax administration in India.

IPC Section 202 penalizes intentional delay or prevention of lawful apprehension or trial of a person accused of an offence.

Companies Act 2013 Section 206 governs the power of the Registrar to call for information, inspect books, and conduct inquiries.

CPC Section 114 empowers courts to presume certain facts based on common experience and judicial knowledge.

Sride is not a recognized legal term or item in India; its legality depends on context and specific usage under Indian law.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 25B defines the term 'assessee' for tax purposes under the Act.

Income Tax Act Section 80EEB offers deductions on interest paid for electric vehicle loans to promote eco-friendly transport.

Reselling software in India is conditionally legal based on licensing agreements and copyright laws.

Is Advcash legal in India? Understand the regulatory status, restrictions, and practical use of Advcash in India.

Understand the legal status of the Probo app in India, including regulations, restrictions, and enforcement realities.

CrPC Section 114 empowers courts to presume facts that are usually known or easily inferred to aid justice.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 64 details the admissibility of confessions made to police officers, crucial for fair criminal trials.

CrPC Section 168 empowers Magistrates to summon witnesses and examine them during inquiry or trial.

Understand the legality of bidding sites for products in India, including regulations, rights, and enforcement practices.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 85 defines the term 'holder in due course' and explains its significance in negotiable instruments law.

Understand the legality of ending money transfers across borders in India, including rules, restrictions, and enforcement.

Companies Act 2013 Section 224 governs the appointment and remuneration of auditors in Indian companies.

IPC Section 421 addresses dishonestly receiving property stolen or dishonestly obtained, outlining punishment and legal scope.

Section 199 of the Income Tax Act 1961 governs the deduction of tax at source on payments to contractors and sub-contractors in India.

Explore the legal age and rules for betting in India, including exceptions and enforcement realities.

CrPC Section 46 details the procedure and limits for police officers to use force during arrest or detention.

Ephedrine is regulated in India; its legal use is restricted and controlled under strict laws.

Section 194DA of the Income Tax Act 1961 mandates TDS on payments from life insurance policy maturity in India.

CrPC Section 219 details the procedure for issuing summons to accused persons, ensuring proper notice for court appearance.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 101 defines the holder in due course and their rights under the Act.

bottom of page