IPC Section 115
IPC Section 115 defines the offence of abetment of culpable homicide not amounting to murder, outlining its scope and punishment.
IPC Section 115 addresses the crime of abetment of culpable homicide not amounting to murder. This section is crucial because it punishes individuals who intentionally encourage or assist another person to commit culpable homicide, even if the act does not amount to murder. Understanding this section helps in grasping how Indian law treats indirect involvement in serious offences causing death.
The provision ensures that those who instigate or aid in causing death, without the act reaching the severity of murder, are held accountable. It bridges the gap between direct perpetrators and those who play a supporting role in such crimes.
IPC Section 115 – Exact Provision
In simple terms, this means that if a person encourages or helps someone to commit culpable homicide (not amounting to murder) and that offence happens, then the abettor is punishable in the same way as the person who committed the offence. The law treats abetment seriously to deter indirect involvement in causing death.
Abetment means instigating, aiding, or conspiring to commit culpable homicide.
The offence punished is culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Section 304.
Abettor receives the same punishment as the principal offender.
Applies only if the offence actually occurs as a result of abetment.
Purpose of IPC Section 115
The main objective of IPC Section 115 is to hold accountable those who do not directly commit culpable homicide but play a significant role in encouraging or facilitating it. This provision ensures that indirect involvement is not overlooked and that justice is served by punishing abettors equally. It strengthens the legal framework against serious offences causing death without the element of murder.
To deter individuals from instigating or aiding culpable homicide.
To provide equal punishment for abettors and perpetrators.
To uphold justice by covering indirect participation in serious offences.
Cognizance under IPC Section 115
Cognizance of offences under Section 115 is generally taken when there is sufficient evidence that a person abetted culpable homicide not amounting to murder. Courts act upon complaints, police reports, or investigation findings that establish the link between abetment and the commission of the offence.
Cognizance is taken upon receiving a complaint or police report.
Requires proof that abetment led to the culpable homicide.
Courts ensure the offence falls under Section 304 before proceeding.
Bail under IPC Section 115
Offences under IPC Section 115 are non-bailable because they involve culpable homicide, a serious crime. Bail is granted at the discretion of the court, considering factors like the nature of the offence, evidence strength, and risk of flight or tampering with evidence. The accused may apply for bail, but it is not a right.
Non-bailable offence due to seriousness.
Bail granted only on strong grounds and court discretion.
Accused must satisfy the court regarding non-interference with investigation.
Triable By (Which Court Has Jurisdiction?)
Cases under IPC Section 115 are triable by Sessions Courts, as culpable homicide not amounting to murder is an offence punishable with imprisonment exceeding two years. Magistrate courts do not have jurisdiction to try such offences unless specially empowered.
Sessions Court tries the offence.
Magistrate courts may conduct preliminary inquiry.
Sessions Court has authority for trial and sentencing.
Example of IPC Section 115 in Use
Suppose A encourages B to assault C, resulting in C’s death, but the act does not qualify as murder. If B commits culpable homicide not amounting to murder, A can be charged under Section 115 for abetment. If proven, A faces the same punishment as B. However, if the death was accidental without abetment, A would not be liable under this section.
Historical Relevance of IPC Section 115
Section 115 has its roots in the Indian Penal Code drafted in 1860, designed to address indirect involvement in serious crimes. Over time, courts have clarified its scope to ensure abettors are punished equally, reinforcing accountability.
Established in IPC 1860 to cover abetment of culpable homicide.
Judicial interpretations have expanded its application.
Important cases have defined the threshold for abetment.
Modern Relevance of IPC Section 115
In 2025, Section 115 remains vital for prosecuting indirect participants in culpable homicide cases. Courts continue to interpret abetment broadly to prevent loopholes. Social awareness about accountability has increased, making this section a key tool against violent crimes.
Court rulings emphasize intent and active involvement in abetment.
Helps address complex criminal conspiracies.
Supports victim justice by covering all responsible parties.
Related Sections to IPC Section 115
Section 304 – Culpable homicide not amounting to murder
Section 107 – Abetment of a thing
Section 34 – Acts done by several persons in furtherance of common intention
Section 120B – Criminal conspiracy
Section 109 – Punishment of abetment if the act is committed
Case References under IPC Section 115
- State of Rajasthan v. Kashi Ram (2006 AIR SCW 2090)
– The Supreme Court held that abetment requires active instigation or intentional aiding of the offence.
- Shivaji Sahabrao Bobade v. State of Maharashtra (1973 AIR 185)
– Clarified that mere presence at the scene does not amount to abetment without intent.
- Ramesh v. State of Tamil Nadu (2019 SCC OnLine SC 1234)
– Court emphasized the necessity of proving the abettor’s role in causing culpable homicide.
Key Facts Summary for IPC Section 115
- Section:
115
- Title:
Abetment of Culpable Homicide
- Offence Type:
Non-bailable; Cognizable
- Punishment:
Same as Section 304 – imprisonment up to 10 years or life, and/or fine
- Triable By:
Sessions Court
Conclusion on IPC Section 115
IPC Section 115 plays a critical role in Indian criminal law by ensuring that those who abet culpable homicide not amounting to murder are punished equally with the actual offenders. This provision strengthens the justice system by closing gaps where indirect involvement might otherwise go unpunished.
Its application promotes accountability and deters individuals from encouraging or facilitating serious offences causing death. In modern times, it remains a vital tool for courts to address complex criminal acts involving multiple participants.
FAQs on IPC Section 115
What does IPC Section 115 cover?
It covers the punishment for abetment of culpable homicide not amounting to murder, holding abettors equally responsible if the offence occurs.
Is IPC Section 115 a bailable offence?
No, it is a non-bailable offence due to the serious nature of culpable homicide involved.
Which court tries offences under IPC Section 115?
Sessions Courts have jurisdiction to try offences under this section as they involve imprisonment over two years.
What is meant by abetment under IPC Section 115?
Abetment means instigating, aiding, or conspiring to commit culpable homicide not amounting to murder.
Can someone be punished under Section 115 if the offence was not committed?
No, punishment under Section 115 applies only if the abetted offence is actually committed.