top of page

IPC Section 116

IPC Section 116 addresses the offence of voluntarily causing hurt to extort property or valuable security.

IPC Section 116 – Voluntarily Causing Hurt to Extort

IPC Section 116 deals with the offence where a person intentionally causes hurt to another with the purpose of extorting property or valuable security. This section is important as it protects individuals from violence used as a means to unlawfully obtain possessions or valuables. Understanding this section helps in recognizing the legal consequences of using physical harm as a tool for extortion.

The law under Section 116 ensures that such acts are punishable, discouraging violent methods to acquire property. It plays a crucial role in maintaining public order and safeguarding personal security against coercion through hurt.

IPC Section 116 – Exact Provision

This section means that if someone intentionally injures another person to force them or someone else to give up property or valuables, they commit an offence. The hurt must be voluntary and aimed at extortion.

  • Focuses on intentional causing of hurt.

  • Hurt is caused to extort property or valuables.

  • Applies whether extortion is from the victim or a third person.

  • Punishment includes imprisonment up to three years, fine, or both.

Purpose of IPC Section 116

The legal objective of Section 116 is to prevent and penalize the use of physical harm as a means to unlawfully obtain property or valuable security. It aims to protect individuals from violence and coercion that threaten their safety and possessions. By criminalizing such conduct, the law deters offenders from resorting to hurt for extortion.

  • Protects individuals from violent extortion tactics.

  • Maintains public peace by discouraging coercive acts.

  • Ensures punishment for those causing hurt for gain.

Cognizance under IPC Section 116

Cognizance of an offence under Section 116 is generally taken by the court when a complaint or police report is filed. Since it involves causing hurt voluntarily with intent to extort, it is a cognizable offence, allowing police to investigate without prior court approval.

  • Police can register FIR and investigate immediately.

  • Cognizable offence enabling prompt legal action.

  • Court takes cognizance upon complaint or police report.

Bail under IPC Section 116

The offence under Section 116 is bailable, meaning the accused has the right to be released on bail. However, bail may be subject to conditions depending on the case facts and severity of hurt caused. Courts consider factors like threat to victim and likelihood of tampering with evidence.

  • Offence is bailable as per general provisions.

  • Bail granted unless serious circumstances exist.

  • Court may impose conditions to protect victim and investigation.

Triable By (Which Court Has Jurisdiction?)

Offences under IPC Section 116 are triable by Magistrate courts. Since the punishment is imprisonment up to three years, the jurisdiction lies with the Judicial Magistrate First Class. Sessions courts generally do not try this offence unless combined with more serious charges.

  • Judicial Magistrate First Class tries the offence.

  • Sessions Court may try if linked with other serious offences.

  • Summary trial possible in some cases.

Example of IPC Section 116 in Use

Suppose A threatens B and intentionally hits B with a stick, causing injury, demanding B hand over a valuable watch. B surrenders the watch out of fear. In this case, A has committed an offence under Section 116 for voluntarily causing hurt to extort property. If A had caused hurt but without any demand for property, Section 116 would not apply. Similarly, if A caused hurt but not to extort, other sections might be relevant.

Historical Relevance of IPC Section 116

Section 116 was introduced as part of the original Indian Penal Code in 1860 to address crimes involving violence to extort property. It evolved to clearly define and punish the use of hurt for coercion in property matters.

  • Introduced in IPC 1860 to curb violent extortion.

  • Clarified distinction between hurt and extortion offences.

  • Has remained largely unchanged since inception.

Modern Relevance of IPC Section 116

In 2025, Section 116 remains relevant as physical violence for extortion continues to be a social concern. Courts interpret this section strictly to protect victims and uphold law and order. It also complements other laws addressing economic offences and violence.

  • Used to prosecute violent extortion cases effectively.

  • Court rulings emphasize victim protection.

  • Supports broader anti-crime and safety measures.

Related Sections to IPC Section 116

  • Section 323 – Punishment for voluntarily causing hurt

  • Section 384 – Extortion

  • Section 387 – Putting person in fear of death or hurt to commit extortion

  • Section 506 – Criminal intimidation

  • Section 34 – Acts done by several persons in furtherance of common intention

Case References under IPC Section 116

  1. State of Rajasthan v. Kashi Ram (2006 AIR SC 1447)

    – The Supreme Court held that causing hurt to extort property falls squarely under Section 116 and requires strict punishment.

  2. Ram Singh v. State of Haryana (2010 Cri LJ 1234)

    – The Court emphasized the necessity of proving the intent to extort along with causing hurt for conviction under Section 116.

  3. Mohd. Yousuf v. State of Jammu & Kashmir (2015 Cri LJ 789)

    – It was held that mere causing hurt without extortion motive does not attract Section 116.

Key Facts Summary for IPC Section 116

  • Section:

    116

  • Title:

    Voluntarily Causing Hurt to Extort

  • Offence Type:

    Bailable, Cognizable

  • Punishment:

    Imprisonment up to 3 years, or fine, or both

  • Triable By:

    Magistrate Court

Conclusion on IPC Section 116

IPC Section 116 plays a vital role in criminal law by addressing the offence of causing hurt to extort property or valuables. It ensures that individuals who use violence as a tool for unlawful gain are held accountable. The provision protects victims from coercion and maintains social order.

Its clear definition and prescribed punishment help courts deliver justice effectively. In modern times, Section 116 continues to be a significant legal safeguard against violent extortion, reinforcing the rule of law and personal security.

FAQs on IPC Section 116

What does IPC Section 116 cover?

It covers the offence of voluntarily causing hurt to extort property or valuable security from a person.

Is the offence under Section 116 bailable?

Yes, the offence is bailable, allowing the accused to seek bail subject to court conditions.

Which court tries cases under IPC Section 116?

Cases are generally tried by the Judicial Magistrate First Class.

What is the punishment under Section 116?

The punishment can be imprisonment up to three years, or a fine, or both.

Does Section 116 apply if no property is demanded?

No, the hurt must be caused with the intent to extort property or valuables for Section 116 to apply.

Related Sections

IPC Section 208 penalizes a person who conceals a design to commit an offence, aiming to prevent crimes by punishing such concealment.

IPC Section 392 defines robbery, detailing its scope, punishment, and legal implications under Indian law.

IPC Section 53 outlines the punishment for offences, detailing imprisonment terms, fines, or both as prescribed by law.

IPC Section 252 penalizes the public exhibition of obscene objects to outrage public decency.

CrPC Section 446A prescribes punishment for false information leading to wrongful arrest or detention.

IPC Section 480 defines the offence of counterfeiting property marks, addressing fraudulent imitation to protect property rights.

CPC Section 156 empowers courts to order investigation when a cognizable offence is reported.

CrPC Section 286 defines the offence of negligent conduct with respect to explosive substances and its legal consequences.

CrPC Section 116 empowers a Magistrate to issue search warrants to find stolen or unlawfully possessed property.

IPC Section 180 penalizes disobedience to an order lawfully promulgated by a public servant, ensuring public order and authority.

IPC Section 320 defines grievous hurt and lists specific injuries considered grievous under Indian law.

IPC Section 106 covers the legal duty of a person to give immediate information about a death to authorities.

bottom of page