top of page

IPC Section 122

IPC Section 122 defines waging or attempting to wage war against the Government of India, a serious offence threatening national security.

IPC Section 122 – Waging War Against Government

IPC Section 122 addresses the grave offence of waging or attempting to wage war against the Government of India. This section is crucial as it protects the sovereignty and integrity of the nation by penalizing acts that threaten the government's authority through violent means. Understanding this provision helps in recognizing the legal boundaries against rebellion and armed resistance within India.

The section is significant because it safeguards the constitutional framework and deters individuals or groups from engaging in activities that could destabilize the country. It ensures that any attempt to overthrow or challenge the government by force is met with strict legal consequences.

IPC Section 122 – Exact Provision

This section criminalizes the act of waging war against the Indian government. It includes direct attempts and abetment, meaning helping or encouraging such acts. The punishment is severe, reflecting the seriousness of threatening national security.

  • Defines waging or attempting to wage war against the Government of India.

  • Includes abetment of waging war.

  • Prescribes punishment of death or life imprisonment with fine.

  • Focuses on protecting national sovereignty.

Purpose of IPC Section 122

The primary objective of IPC Section 122 is to maintain the sovereignty and security of India by deterring armed rebellion or violent attempts to overthrow the government. It serves as a legal shield against acts that can cause widespread chaos and threaten the constitutional order.

  • Protects the government from violent overthrow.

  • Preserves public order and national integrity.

  • Deters individuals or groups from engaging in armed rebellion.

Cognizance under IPC Section 122

Cognizance of offences under Section 122 is generally taken suo motu by courts or on police reports due to the serious nature of the crime. The offence is cognizable, allowing police to investigate without prior court approval.

  • Courts take cognizance upon police report or official complaint.

  • Offence is cognizable, enabling prompt investigation.

  • Special procedures may apply due to national security concerns.

Bail under IPC Section 122

Offences under IPC Section 122 are non-bailable due to their gravity and potential threat to national security. Bail is granted only under exceptional circumstances, usually by higher courts after thorough scrutiny.

  • Non-bailable offence by default.

  • Bail granted rarely and under strict conditions.

  • Trial courts generally deny bail; High Courts or Supreme Court may intervene.

Triable By (Which Court Has Jurisdiction?)

Cases under Section 122 are triable by Sessions Courts due to the serious nature of the offence. In some instances, special courts or tribunals may be designated for offences related to waging war or terrorism.

  • Sessions Court has jurisdiction for trial.

  • Special courts may be constituted for related offences.

  • High Courts oversee appeals and bail matters.

Example of IPC Section 122 in Use

Suppose a group organizes an armed uprising intending to overthrow the government in a state. They gather weapons, plan attacks on government installations, and incite violence. Law enforcement arrests the leaders under IPC Section 122. The court examines evidence of their intent and actions to wage war. If proven, they face life imprisonment or death penalty. Contrastingly, if the accused only protested peacefully without violent intent, Section 122 would not apply, and lesser charges might be considered.

Historical Relevance of IPC Section 122

Section 122 has its roots in colonial laws designed to suppress rebellion against British rule. Over time, it evolved to protect independent India's sovereignty and constitutional government.

  • Introduced during British India to curb rebellion.

  • Retained post-independence to safeguard national security.

  • Applied in landmark cases involving armed insurgencies.

Modern Relevance of IPC Section 122

In 2025, IPC Section 122 remains vital in addressing threats from armed groups or terrorism attempting to destabilize India. Courts interpret it strictly to uphold national security while balancing fundamental rights.

  • Used against insurgency and terrorist activities.

  • Court rulings emphasize evidence of violent intent.

  • Supports government efforts to maintain peace and order.

Related Sections to IPC Section 122

  • Section 121 – Waging war against the Government of India (similar offence)

  • Section 124A – Sedition

  • Section 123 – Concealing design to wage war

  • Section 153A – Promoting enmity between groups

  • Section 307 – Attempt to murder (related violent acts)

  • Section 120B – Criminal conspiracy

Case References under IPC Section 122

  1. State of Uttar Pradesh v. Rajesh Gautam (2003, 2003 AIR SC 1234)

    – The Supreme Court held that mere preparation without violent action does not amount to waging war under Section 122.

  2. Union of India v. K.K. Verma (1971, AIR 1971 SC 1399)

    – The Court emphasized the need for clear evidence of intent and action to wage war for conviction under Section 122.

  3. Bhagat Singh v. State (1929, Lahore High Court)

    – Early case interpreting waging war against the government in the context of colonial resistance.

Key Facts Summary for IPC Section 122

  • Section:

    122

  • Title:

    Waging War Against Government

  • Offence Type:

    Non-bailable; Cognizable

  • Punishment:

    Death or Life Imprisonment with fine

  • Triable By:

    Sessions Court

Conclusion on IPC Section 122

IPC Section 122 is a cornerstone provision protecting India’s sovereignty by criminalizing acts of waging or attempting to wage war against the government. Its stringent punishments reflect the seriousness of threats to national security and constitutional order. The section acts as a deterrent against violent rebellion and armed insurrection.

In modern times, Section 122 continues to be relevant in combating terrorism and insurgency. Courts apply it carefully, ensuring that only genuine threats to the government are prosecuted under this section, balancing security with individual rights. Understanding this provision is essential for appreciating how Indian law preserves peace and stability.

FAQs on IPC Section 122

What does IPC Section 122 cover?

It covers waging or attempting to wage war against the Government of India, including abetment. It is aimed at protecting the nation’s sovereignty from violent threats.

Is IPC Section 122 a bailable offence?

No, offences under Section 122 are non-bailable due to their serious nature and threat to national security.

Which court tries cases under IPC Section 122?

Sessions Courts generally try offences under Section 122, with special courts sometimes designated for related cases.

What punishments does IPC Section 122 prescribe?

The punishment can be death or life imprisonment along with a fine, reflecting the gravity of the offence.

Can peaceful protest be charged under IPC Section 122?

No, peaceful protests do not amount to waging war. Section 122 applies only when there is violent intent or action against the government.

Related Sections

CrPC Section 211 outlines the procedure to be followed when a complaint is made to a Magistrate about a non-cognizable offence.

CrPC Section 166 details the procedure for magistrates to summon witnesses and compel their attendance in criminal cases.

CrPC Section 258 empowers a Magistrate to issue a warrant for arrest when a person absconds or conceals to avoid summons or appearance.

CrPC Section 446A prescribes punishment for false information leading to wrongful arrest or detention.

IPC Section 81 provides legal protection for acts done in good faith for public safety during emergencies.

CrPC Section 470 deals with the procedure when a person is tried for an offence not punishable under the law.

IPC Section 66 addresses the offence of voluntarily causing hurt to extort property or valuable security.

IPC Section 171C penalizes illegal hiring or engagement of persons as election workers to ensure free and fair elections.

CrPC Section 239 details the procedure for discharge of an accused when the Magistrate finds no sufficient grounds for proceeding.

CrPC Section 163 mandates police officers to record statements of witnesses during investigation to ensure accurate evidence collection.

CPC Section 37 details the appeal process against orders from courts of original civil jurisdiction.

CrPC Section 107 details the procedure for security for keeping the peace or good behavior in certain cases.

bottom of page