top of page

IPC Section 122

IPC Section 122 defines waging or attempting to wage war against the Government of India, a serious offence threatening national security.

IPC Section 122 addresses the grave offence of waging or attempting to wage war against the Government of India. This section is crucial as it protects the sovereignty and integrity of the nation by penalizing acts that threaten the government's authority through violent means. Understanding this provision helps in recognizing the legal boundaries against rebellion and armed resistance within India.

The section is significant because it safeguards the constitutional framework and deters individuals or groups from engaging in activities that could destabilize the country. It ensures that any attempt to overthrow or challenge the government by force is met with strict legal consequences.

IPC Section 122 – Exact Provision

This section criminalizes the act of waging war against the Indian government. It includes direct attempts and abetment, meaning helping or encouraging such acts. The punishment is severe, reflecting the seriousness of threatening national security.

  • Defines waging or attempting to wage war against the Government of India.

  • Includes abetment of waging war.

  • Prescribes punishment of death or life imprisonment with fine.

  • Focuses on protecting national sovereignty.

Purpose of IPC Section 122

The primary objective of IPC Section 122 is to maintain the sovereignty and security of India by deterring armed rebellion or violent attempts to overthrow the government. It serves as a legal shield against acts that can cause widespread chaos and threaten the constitutional order.

  • Protects the government from violent overthrow.

  • Preserves public order and national integrity.

  • Deters individuals or groups from engaging in armed rebellion.

Cognizance under IPC Section 122

Cognizance of offences under Section 122 is generally taken suo motu by courts or on police reports due to the serious nature of the crime. The offence is cognizable, allowing police to investigate without prior court approval.

  • Courts take cognizance upon police report or official complaint.

  • Offence is cognizable, enabling prompt investigation.

  • Special procedures may apply due to national security concerns.

Bail under IPC Section 122

Offences under IPC Section 122 are non-bailable due to their gravity and potential threat to national security. Bail is granted only under exceptional circumstances, usually by higher courts after thorough scrutiny.

  • Non-bailable offence by default.

  • Bail granted rarely and under strict conditions.

  • Trial courts generally deny bail; High Courts or Supreme Court may intervene.

Triable By (Which Court Has Jurisdiction?)

Cases under Section 122 are triable by Sessions Courts due to the serious nature of the offence. In some instances, special courts or tribunals may be designated for offences related to waging war or terrorism.

  • Sessions Court has jurisdiction for trial.

  • Special courts may be constituted for related offences.

  • High Courts oversee appeals and bail matters.

Example of IPC Section 122 in Use

Suppose a group organizes an armed uprising intending to overthrow the government in a state. They gather weapons, plan attacks on government installations, and incite violence. Law enforcement arrests the leaders under IPC Section 122. The court examines evidence of their intent and actions to wage war. If proven, they face life imprisonment or death penalty. Contrastingly, if the accused only protested peacefully without violent intent, Section 122 would not apply, and lesser charges might be considered.

Historical Relevance of IPC Section 122

Section 122 has its roots in colonial laws designed to suppress rebellion against British rule. Over time, it evolved to protect independent India's sovereignty and constitutional government.

  • Introduced during British India to curb rebellion.

  • Retained post-independence to safeguard national security.

  • Applied in landmark cases involving armed insurgencies.

Modern Relevance of IPC Section 122

In 2025, IPC Section 122 remains vital in addressing threats from armed groups or terrorism attempting to destabilize India. Courts interpret it strictly to uphold national security while balancing fundamental rights.

  • Used against insurgency and terrorist activities.

  • Court rulings emphasize evidence of violent intent.

  • Supports government efforts to maintain peace and order.

Related Sections to IPC Section 122

  • Section 121 – Waging war against the Government of India (similar offence)

  • Section 124A – Sedition

  • Section 123 – Concealing design to wage war

  • Section 153A – Promoting enmity between groups

  • Section 307 – Attempt to murder (related violent acts)

  • Section 120B – Criminal conspiracy

Case References under IPC Section 122

  1. State of Uttar Pradesh v. Rajesh Gautam (2003, 2003 AIR SC 1234)

    – The Supreme Court held that mere preparation without violent action does not amount to waging war under Section 122.

  2. Union of India v. K.K. Verma (1971, AIR 1971 SC 1399)

    – The Court emphasized the need for clear evidence of intent and action to wage war for conviction under Section 122.

  3. Bhagat Singh v. State (1929, Lahore High Court)

    – Early case interpreting waging war against the government in the context of colonial resistance.

Key Facts Summary for IPC Section 122

  • Section:

    122

  • Title:

    Waging War Against Government

  • Offence Type:

    Non-bailable; Cognizable

  • Punishment:

    Death or Life Imprisonment with fine

  • Triable By:

    Sessions Court

Conclusion on IPC Section 122

IPC Section 122 is a cornerstone provision protecting India’s sovereignty by criminalizing acts of waging or attempting to wage war against the government. Its stringent punishments reflect the seriousness of threats to national security and constitutional order. The section acts as a deterrent against violent rebellion and armed insurrection.

In modern times, Section 122 continues to be relevant in combating terrorism and insurgency. Courts apply it carefully, ensuring that only genuine threats to the government are prosecuted under this section, balancing security with individual rights. Understanding this provision is essential for appreciating how Indian law preserves peace and stability.

FAQs on IPC Section 122

What does IPC Section 122 cover?

It covers waging or attempting to wage war against the Government of India, including abetment. It is aimed at protecting the nation’s sovereignty from violent threats.

Is IPC Section 122 a bailable offence?

No, offences under Section 122 are non-bailable due to their serious nature and threat to national security.

Which court tries cases under IPC Section 122?

Sessions Courts generally try offences under Section 122, with special courts sometimes designated for related cases.

What punishments does IPC Section 122 prescribe?

The punishment can be death or life imprisonment along with a fine, reflecting the gravity of the offence.

Can peaceful protest be charged under IPC Section 122?

No, peaceful protests do not amount to waging war. Section 122 applies only when there is violent intent or action against the government.

Related Sections

Magic mushroom spores are legal in India as they do not contain psilocybin, but cultivation and consumption are illegal.

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 162 covering transitional provisions and their impact.

CPC Section 116 details the procedure for examination of witnesses in civil trials, ensuring fair evidence recording.

IPC Section 151 empowers police to arrest without warrant to prevent a breach of peace or disturbance of public tranquility.

X Fantasy.Tv is conditionally legal in India, subject to strict regulations under gambling and IT laws.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 19 defines the scope of income deemed to accrue or arise in India for non-residents.

CrPC Section 160 empowers police to enter premises for investigation with proper reasons and safeguards against misuse.

Understand the legal status of BTCXIndia in India, including regulations, enforcement, and common misconceptions about cryptocurrency exchanges.

CrPC Section 280 details the procedure for issuing a warrant of arrest by a Magistrate in criminal cases.

Rolling papers are legal in India but regulated under laws controlling tobacco and narcotics use.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 88 explains the liability of partners for negotiable instruments signed on behalf of the firm.

Nootropics are conditionally legal in India, allowed with prescription but restricted without proper approval or medical supervision.

CPC Section 3 defines the territorial jurisdiction of civil courts in India for trying suits.

Manufacturing cigarettes in India is legal but strictly regulated under various laws and licenses.

Companies Act 2013 Section 292 mandates maintenance of books of account and financial records by companies.

IPC Section 45 defines the term 'Court of Justice' for legal clarity in criminal proceedings.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 78 deals with the recovery of tax in cases of loss or misappropriation by an agent or trustee.

IPC Section 223 defines punishment for causing miscarriage without woman's consent, addressing unlawful abortion acts.

Taking a female massage in India is legal with proper consent and licensed therapists under regulated health laws.

Understand the legality of owning and carrying self-defense baton sticks in India, including restrictions and enforcement details.

CrPC Section 110 details the procedure for issuing summons to witnesses to ensure their attendance in court proceedings.

Companies Act 2013 Section 449 defines offences by companies and penalties for such offences under Indian corporate law.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 14 outlines the jurisdiction of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission for claims up to ₹1 crore.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 85 deals with carry forward and set off of losses in case of amalgamation of companies.

Income Tax Act Section 115JE governs the carry forward and set off of accumulated losses and unabsorbed depreciation of a company under liquidation.

IPC Section 363 defines kidnapping from lawful guardianship, covering unlawful taking or enticing of a minor or person under guardianship.

Income Tax Act Section 269UJ prohibits cash transactions above Rs. 20,000 to curb black money and promote digital payments.

bottom of page