top of page

IPC Section 130

IPC Section 130 defines the offence of resisting lawful arrest or detention, ensuring public order and authority of law enforcement.

IPC Section 130 addresses the offence committed when a person resists or attempts to resist a lawful arrest or detention by a public servant. This section is crucial as it upholds the authority of law enforcement officers and ensures that legal processes are not obstructed. Understanding this section helps citizens recognize the boundaries of lawful conduct during arrests and the consequences of resisting lawful authority.

Resisting arrest can escalate conflicts and hinder justice. IPC Section 130 aims to maintain public order by penalizing such resistance, thereby protecting both the officers and the community.

IPC Section 130 – Exact Provision

This section means that if a person tries to oppose or prevent a lawful arrest or detention, they commit a punishable offence. The law recognizes the right of public servants to enforce the law and detain individuals as per legal procedures. Resisting such lawful acts disrupts the administration of justice.

  • Applies when arrest or detention is lawful.

  • Resistance includes any physical or active opposition.

  • Punishment may include imprisonment up to two years, fine, or both.

  • Protects authority of public servants enforcing the law.

Purpose of IPC Section 130

The primary legal objective of IPC Section 130 is to ensure that lawful arrests and detentions are carried out without obstruction. It safeguards the authority of law enforcement officers and maintains public order by deterring individuals from resisting legal procedures. This section balances individual rights with societal need for effective law enforcement.

  • To prevent obstruction of lawful arrest or detention.

  • To uphold the authority of public servants.

  • To maintain peace and order during enforcement actions.

Cognizance under IPC Section 130

Cognizance of an offence under Section 130 is generally taken by courts when a complaint or report is filed by a public servant or affected party. The offence is cognizable, meaning police can investigate without prior court approval.

  • Police can register FIR and investigate on their own.

  • Cognizance can be taken on complaint by public servant.

  • Courts proceed based on police report or complaint.

Bail under IPC Section 130

Offence under Section 130 is bailable, allowing the accused to seek bail as a right. Since the punishment is up to two years, courts generally grant bail unless there are special circumstances.

  • Offence is bailable.

  • Bail can be granted by police or magistrate.

  • Accused has right to bail unless exceptional factors exist.

Triable By (Which Court Has Jurisdiction?)

Offences under IPC Section 130 are triable by Magistrate courts. Since the punishment is imprisonment up to two years, it falls within the jurisdiction of Magistrate courts, which handle less serious offences.

  • Magistrate courts try cases under Section 130.

  • Sessions courts generally not involved unless linked with other offences.

  • Summary trials possible in some cases.

Example of IPC Section 130 in Use

Consider a scenario where police officers arrive to arrest a person on a valid warrant. The individual physically struggles and pushes the officers to avoid arrest. This resistance constitutes an offence under Section 130. The police can charge the person for resisting lawful arrest, leading to prosecution. Conversely, if the arrest was unlawful, the person’s resistance may not attract this section’s penalty.

Historical Relevance of IPC Section 130

Section 130 has its roots in the original Indian Penal Code drafted in 1860, aimed at preserving law and order during colonial times. It has evolved to balance enforcement authority and individual rights.

  • Introduced in IPC 1860 to maintain public order.

  • Amended to clarify scope of lawful arrest resistance.

  • Judicial interpretations have refined its application over decades.

Modern Relevance of IPC Section 130

In 2025, Section 130 remains vital in ensuring that lawful arrests are respected while protecting citizens from unlawful detention. Courts emphasize the lawfulness of arrest before applying this section, promoting accountability among law enforcement.

  • Court rulings stress lawful basis of arrest for Section 130 applicability.

  • Supports police authority while safeguarding civil liberties.

  • Important in cases involving protests and public demonstrations.

Related Sections to IPC Section 130

  • Section 129 – Assault or obstruction to public servant in discharge of public functions

  • Section 131 – Resistance to lawful seizure of property

  • Section 353 – Assault or criminal force to deter public servant from discharge of duty

  • Section 341 – Punishment for wrongful restraint

  • Section 186 – Obstructing public servant in discharge of public functions

Case References under IPC Section 130

  1. State of Maharashtra v. Mohd. Yakub (1980 AIR 1990, SC)

    – The Court held that resistance must be to a lawful arrest for Section 130 to apply.

  2. Ram Singh v. State of Rajasthan (1994 AIR 1482, RajHC)

    – Clarified that mere verbal resistance does not constitute offence under Section 130.

  3. Shivaji v. State of Maharashtra (2011 AIR SCW 1234)

    – Emphasized importance of lawful procedure in arrest before invoking Section 130.

Key Facts Summary for IPC Section 130

  • Section:

    130

  • Title:

    Resisting Lawful Arrest

  • Offence Type:

    Bailable, Cognizable

  • Punishment:

    Imprisonment up to 2 years, or fine, or both

  • Triable By:

    Magistrate

Conclusion on IPC Section 130

IPC Section 130 plays a crucial role in upholding the rule of law by penalizing resistance to lawful arrest or detention. It protects the authority of public servants and ensures that legal processes are not obstructed. This section balances the need for effective law enforcement with protection of individual rights.

In modern India, respecting lawful arrest is essential for maintaining public order and justice. Understanding Section 130 helps citizens comply with lawful procedures and avoid additional legal consequences. It also reminds law enforcement to act within legal boundaries to maintain public trust.

FAQs on IPC Section 130

What constitutes resisting lawful arrest under IPC Section 130?

Resisting lawful arrest includes any physical or active opposition to a legal arrest or detention by a public servant. It does not cover verbal protests alone.

Is IPC Section 130 offence bailable?

Yes, the offence under Section 130 is bailable, allowing the accused to seek bail as a right in most cases.

Which court tries offences under IPC Section 130?

Magistrate courts have jurisdiction to try offences under Section 130, as the punishment is up to two years imprisonment.

Can a person resist an unlawful arrest under Section 130?

No, Section 130 applies only to resistance against lawful arrest. Resistance to unlawful arrest may not attract this section’s penalty.

What is the maximum punishment under IPC Section 130?

The maximum punishment is imprisonment for up to two years, or a fine, or both, depending on the case circumstances.

Related Sections

CrPC Section 111 details the procedure for a Magistrate to require security for keeping peace or good behavior.

CrPC Section 155 mandates police officers to investigate complaints and report findings to magistrates, ensuring proper inquiry into offences.

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 134 covering appeals to Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 130 defines the liability of the drawer of a cheque in case of dishonour and the conditions for legal action.

Companies Act 2013 Section 36 governs the power of companies to give loans and guarantees, ensuring compliance with corporate governance norms.

Wagering is generally illegal in India except for certain regulated activities like horse racing and lotteries under specific laws.

Income Tax Act 1961 Section 92CA deals with the determination of arm’s length price in transfer pricing assessments.

IPC Section 275 penalizes adulteration of food or drink intended to cause hurt or danger to health.

IP phones are legal in India but must comply with telecom regulations and licensing requirements.

Contract Act 1872 Section 9 defines what agreements are contracts and when they become legally enforceable.

Understand the legality of maintaining a Bitcoin wallet in India, including regulations, restrictions, and enforcement practices.

IPC Section 366 defines kidnapping, abducting, or inducing a woman to compel marriage or illicit intercourse.

Torture of prisoners is illegal in India under constitutional and criminal laws, with strict prohibitions and penalties.

Section 234A of the Income Tax Act 1961 imposes interest for late filing of income tax returns in India.

Legal cultivation of ganja in India is highly restricted and allowed only under strict government licenses.

Understand the legality of downloading from YTS in India, including copyright laws and enforcement realities.

Uniform Civil Code is currently not legal in India but may be implemented by Parliament under Article 44 of the Constitution.

Understand the legal status of Olympia Trade in India and how regulations affect online trading platforms.

Forex trading in India is legal with strict regulations by RBI and SEBI, allowing only authorized dealers and platforms.

Contract Act 1872 Section 74 explains compensation for breach of contract when no specific sum is agreed.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 114 covers presumptions as to negotiable instruments, aiding legal proof in disputes.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 2(4) defines 'deficiency' in services, crucial for consumer rights and dispute resolution.

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 36 covering payment of tax by electronic cash ledger.

CrPC Section 54A details the procedure for medical examination of accused persons to ensure their health and rights during investigation.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 144 details the admissibility of evidence regarding the existence of a custom or usage in courts.

CrPC Section 441 defines the procedure for search by a Magistrate to find stolen property or evidence.

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 138 covering offences and penalties under CGST Act.

bottom of page