top of page

Companies Act 2013 Section 276

Companies Act 2013 Section 276 details penalties for offences under the Act, ensuring corporate compliance and accountability.

Companies Act 2013 Section 276 governs the penalties applicable for offences committed under the Act. It plays a critical role in enforcing compliance and deterring violations by companies, directors, officers, and other stakeholders. Understanding this section is essential for corporate professionals to ensure lawful conduct and avoid legal consequences.

This section is relevant for directors, shareholders, auditors, and companies as it defines the consequences of non-compliance. It strengthens corporate governance by imposing monetary fines, imprisonment, or both, depending on the nature of the offence. Professionals must be aware of these provisions to advise companies correctly and maintain regulatory adherence.

Companies Act Section 276 – Exact Provision

This section acts as a catch-all penalty clause for offences under the Companies Act 2013 that do not have specific penalties mentioned elsewhere. It empowers authorities to impose fines up to ₹1,00,000 for a single offence and additional daily fines up to ₹5,000 for ongoing violations. This ensures no breach goes unpunished, promoting strict adherence to the Act.

  • Applies to offences without specified penalties.

  • Maximum fine of ₹1,00,000 for initial offence.

  • Daily fine of up to ₹5,000 for continuing offences.

  • Deters persistent non-compliance.

  • Supports enforcement of the Companies Act.

Explanation of Companies Act Section 276

This section specifies penalties for offences under the Companies Act 2013 that lack explicit punishment clauses. It applies broadly to companies, directors, officers, and others responsible for compliance.

  • States penalty limits for unspecified offences.

  • Applies to companies and individuals violating the Act.

  • Mandates fines up to ₹1,00,000 for first offence.

  • Imposes daily fines up to ₹5,000 for ongoing violations.

  • Does not prescribe imprisonment but focuses on monetary penalties.

Purpose and Rationale of Companies Act Section 276

This section ensures that all breaches of the Companies Act 2013 are punishable, even if no specific penalty is mentioned elsewhere. It strengthens the legal framework by closing gaps and promoting compliance.

  • Strengthens corporate governance by enforcing accountability.

  • Protects shareholders and stakeholders from unlawful acts.

  • Ensures transparency and deters violations.

  • Prevents misuse of corporate structures through penalties.

When Companies Act Section 276 Applies

Section 276 applies whenever an offence under the Companies Act 2013 occurs without a designated penalty. It is triggered by any contravention that continues beyond the initial violation.

  • Applicable to all companies registered under the Act.

  • Enforced when no other penalty is prescribed.

  • Daily fines apply if the offence continues after the first day.

  • No exemptions unless specified elsewhere.

Legal Effect of Companies Act Section 276

This provision creates a mandatory penalty regime for unspecified offences, imposing monetary fines to enforce compliance. It impacts corporate actions by deterring breaches and encouraging timely rectification. Non-compliance can lead to cumulative fines, increasing financial liability. The section works alongside MCA rules and notifications to ensure comprehensive enforcement.

  • Creates mandatory monetary penalties for unspecified offences.

  • Impacts company compliance and governance.

  • Non-compliance leads to escalating fines.

Nature of Compliance or Obligation under Companies Act Section 276

Compliance with Section 276 is mandatory whenever an offence without a specified penalty occurs. It is an ongoing obligation if the contravention continues, requiring companies and officers to promptly address violations. Directors and officers bear responsibility to ensure adherence and avoid penalties, affecting internal governance and risk management.

  • Mandatory compliance for all companies and officers.

  • Ongoing obligation for continuing offences.

  • Responsibility lies with directors and officers.

  • Encourages proactive governance and compliance.

Stage of Corporate Action Where Section Applies

Section 276 applies at multiple stages, particularly when offences are detected during company operations. It is relevant during board decisions, compliance reviews, filings, and ongoing governance activities.

  • During company operations and compliance monitoring.

  • At the stage of board and management decisions.

  • During statutory filings and disclosures.

  • Throughout ongoing corporate governance.

Penalties and Consequences under Companies Act Section 276

Penalties under Section 276 include monetary fines up to ₹1,00,000 for the initial offence and daily fines up to ₹5,000 for continuing contraventions. There is no imprisonment specified. Persistent non-compliance can lead to significant financial burden and reputational damage.

  • Monetary penalty up to ₹1,00,000 for first offence.

  • Daily fine up to ₹5,000 for continuing offence.

  • No imprisonment prescribed under this section.

  • Possible additional fees or remedial directions by authorities.

Example of Companies Act Section 276 in Practical Use

Company X failed to file a required return within the stipulated time. No specific penalty was prescribed for this delay under the relevant section. The Registrar imposed a fine of ₹75,000 under Section 276. As the delay continued for 10 days, an additional daily fine of ₹5,000 was levied, totaling ₹50,000 more. Director X ensured immediate filing to stop further penalties.

  • Section 276 enforces penalties for unspecified offences.

  • Daily fines incentivize prompt compliance.

Historical Background of Companies Act Section 276

Section 276 was introduced in the Companies Act 2013 to address gaps in penalty provisions present in the 1956 Act. It ensures all offences have enforceable consequences, reflecting modern corporate governance needs. Amendments have maintained its role as a catch-all penalty clause.

  • Replaced ambiguous penalty provisions from 1956 Act.

  • Introduced to ensure comprehensive enforcement.

  • Maintained in subsequent amendments for clarity.

Modern Relevance of Companies Act Section 276

In 2026, Section 276 remains vital for digital compliance and e-governance via the MCA portal. It supports governance reforms by deterring violations and ensuring accountability. The section complements ESG and CSR compliance trends by enforcing discipline in corporate conduct.

  • Supports digital compliance and MCA filings.

  • Enhances governance reforms and accountability.

  • Maintains practical importance in corporate law enforcement.

Related Sections

  • Companies Act Section 2 – Definitions relevant to corporate entities.

  • Companies Act Section 166 – Duties of directors.

  • Companies Act Section 173 – Board meetings.

  • Companies Act Section 179 – Powers of the Board.

  • IPC Section 447 – Punishment for fraud.

  • SEBI Act Section 11 – Regulatory oversight for listed companies.

Case References under Companies Act Section 276

No landmark case directly interprets this section as of 2026.

Key Facts Summary for Companies Act Section 276

  • Section:

    276

  • Title:

    Penalty for offences not otherwise provided for

  • Category:

    Compliance, Penalties

  • Applies To:

    Companies, directors, officers, others under the Act

  • Compliance Nature:

    Mandatory, ongoing for continuing offences

  • Penalties:

    Monetary fines up to ₹1,00,000 plus daily fines up to ₹5,000

  • Related Filings:

    Statutory returns, compliance documents

Conclusion on Companies Act Section 276

Section 276 of the Companies Act 2013 is a crucial provision ensuring that all offences under the Act are punishable, even if no specific penalty is mentioned. It acts as a deterrent against non-compliance by imposing monetary fines and daily penalties for continuing violations. This promotes a culture of accountability and timely compliance within companies.

For directors, officers, and companies, understanding Section 276 is essential to avoid unexpected penalties and maintain good corporate governance. It complements other provisions by filling enforcement gaps, thereby strengthening the overall regulatory framework governing corporate conduct in India.

FAQs on Companies Act Section 276

What types of offences does Section 276 cover?

Section 276 covers offences under the Companies Act 2013 for which no specific penalty is provided. It ensures all breaches are punishable, preventing any violation from going unpenalized.

Who is liable under Section 276?

Companies, directors, officers, and any persons responsible for contravening the Act can be held liable under Section 276 for offences without specified penalties.

What penalties does Section 276 prescribe?

The section prescribes a fine up to ₹1,00,000 for the first offence and a daily fine up to ₹5,000 for continuing offences. No imprisonment is specified under this section.

Is compliance with Section 276 mandatory?

Yes, compliance is mandatory whenever an offence without a specific penalty occurs. The fines apply until the contravention is rectified.

How does Section 276 support corporate governance?

By imposing penalties for all offences, Section 276 promotes accountability, deters violations, and encourages companies to maintain lawful and transparent operations.

Get a Free Legal Consultation

Reading about legal issues is just the first step. Let us connect you with a verified lawyer who specialises in exactly what you need.

K_gYgciFRGKYrIgrlwTBzQ_2k.webp

Related Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 62 explains the liability of parties for payment of negotiable instruments and their obligations.

Automatic rifles are illegal in India except under strict licenses for defense and law enforcement.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 96 deals with the procedure for rectification of mistakes in orders passed by income tax authorities.

IT Act Section 32 mandates secure electronic records and digital signatures for legal recognition in electronic transactions.

भारत में क्राउडफंडिंग कानूनी है, लेकिन नियमों और प्रतिबंधों के साथ। जानिए कैसे काम करता है और क्या ध्यान रखें।

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 126 empowers tax authorities to seize undisclosed assets during search operations.

CPC Section 118 empowers courts to issue commissions for examination of witnesses or documents in civil suits.

CrPC Section 143 defines unlawful assembly and the conditions under which a group is deemed unlawful.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 24 defines the liability of the acceptor of a bill of exchange upon dishonour by non-acceptance.

CrPC Section 357A mandates state compensation to victims of crimes for their losses and rehabilitation.

Credit transfer is legal in India under specific banking and financial regulations with strict compliance requirements.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 82 defines the term 'holder in due course' and its significance under the Act.

IPC Section 194 penalizes giving false evidence or fabricating false documents to mislead judicial proceedings.

CrPC Section 63 details the procedure for arresting a person who is unlawfully at large after being released on bail or bond.

In India, using LPG in cars is legal with government approval and safety standards, but strict rules apply to installation and use.

Olymp is not legally recognized in India; understand its legal status and implications in this detailed guide.

Companies Act 2013 Section 117 governs filing of resolutions and agreements with the Registrar of Companies.

In India, same-sex consensual relationships between adults are legal following the decriminalization of homosexuality in 2018.

Section 192 of the Income Tax Act 1961 mandates tax deduction at source on salary income in India.

IPC Section 171C penalizes illegal hiring or engagement of persons as election workers to ensure free and fair elections.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 53 defines the term 'holder in due course' and its significance under the Act.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 99 defines the term 'holder' and explains who qualifies as a holder of a negotiable instrument.

Contract Act 1872 Section 16 explains when consent is considered free and valid for contract enforceability.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 254 deals with the powers of the Commissioner (Appeals) in income tax appeal proceedings.

Understand the legal status of Bitconnect in India, including regulations, risks, and enforcement related to cryptocurrency platforms.

Understand the history and current status of abortion legality in India, including early abortion laws and their enforcement.

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 108 covering appeals to Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling.

bottom of page