top of page

IPC Section 15

IPC Section 15 defines the scope of 'public servant' under Indian Penal Code for legal clarity in offences involving officials.

IPC Section 15 – Definition of Public Servant

IPC Section 15 provides a clear definition of who qualifies as a 'public servant' under the Indian Penal Code. This classification is crucial because many offences under the IPC specifically relate to actions by or against public servants. Understanding this section helps in identifying the persons to whom certain legal provisions apply, especially in cases involving corruption, abuse of power, or official misconduct.

The section covers various categories of individuals holding positions of authority or service in government or public institutions. It ensures that the law can effectively regulate and penalize misconduct by those entrusted with public duties, thereby safeguarding public interest and maintaining administrative integrity.

IPC Section 15 – Exact Provision

In simple terms, IPC Section 15 explains who is considered a public servant. This includes government officials, elected representatives, and others performing public duties. The definition is broad to cover various roles that impact public administration and governance.

  • Defines 'public servant' for legal clarity.

  • Includes appointed and elected officials.

  • Covers persons discharging public functions.

  • Essential for offences involving public officials.

Purpose of IPC Section 15

The main legal objective of IPC Section 15 is to identify individuals who hold public office or perform public duties so that specific laws can apply to them. This helps in prosecuting offences like bribery, corruption, and abuse of power effectively. By defining 'public servant,' the law ensures accountability and transparency in public administration.

  • Clarifies who is accountable under public servant-related offences.

  • Supports anti-corruption and misconduct laws.

  • Protects public interest by regulating officials' conduct.

Cognizance under IPC Section 15

Cognizance related to offences involving public servants is generally taken when there is credible evidence of misconduct or violation of law by such persons. Courts rely on the definition in Section 15 to determine if the accused qualifies as a public servant.

  • Court takes cognizance if accused fits Section 15 definition.

  • Usually initiated on complaint or police report.

  • Essential for offences like bribery, criminal misconduct.

Bail under IPC Section 15

Since Section 15 itself is a definitional provision, it does not prescribe punishment or bail conditions. However, offences involving public servants defined under this section may be non-bailable depending on the specific offence. Courts consider the nature of the offence and the role of the public servant when granting bail.

  • Section 15 is definitional; no direct bail provisions.

  • Related offences may be non-bailable.

  • Bail depends on offence severity and facts.

Triable By (Which Court Has Jurisdiction?)

Offences involving public servants as defined under IPC Section 15 are triable by courts depending on the nature and gravity of the offence. Minor offences may be tried by Magistrate courts, while serious crimes involving public servants fall under Sessions Court jurisdiction.

  • Magistrate courts try minor offences involving public servants.

  • Sessions courts handle serious offences like corruption.

  • Special courts may be constituted for specific public servant offences.

Example of IPC Section 15 in Use

Consider a government clerk who accepts a bribe to expedite a license application. Under IPC Section 15, this clerk qualifies as a public servant. Therefore, offences like bribery or criminal misconduct committed by this clerk can be prosecuted under relevant IPC provisions. If the accused was a private individual, these specific laws would not apply.

In contrast, if a private citizen accepts a bribe, different legal provisions apply. The definition in Section 15 helps courts determine the applicability of public servant-related offences.

Historical Relevance of IPC Section 15

IPC Section 15 has been part of the Indian Penal Code since its inception in 1860. It was introduced to clearly demarcate public servants from private individuals, ensuring that offences involving officials are properly addressed.

  • Introduced in IPC 1860 for clarity on public servants.

  • Expanded over time to include elected representatives.

  • Key in anti-corruption legal framework development.

Modern Relevance of IPC Section 15

In 2025, IPC Section 15 remains vital as governance and public administration evolve. Courts continue to interpret this section broadly to include new categories of public functionaries, including those in autonomous bodies and government corporations. Its role in combating corruption and ensuring accountability is increasingly important.

  • Broad interpretation includes modern public roles.

  • Supports anti-corruption and transparency initiatives.

  • Courts uphold strict accountability for public servants.

Related Sections to IPC Section 15

  • Section 17 – Public servant disobeying law.

  • Section 166 – Public servant disobeying law, with intent to cause injury.

  • Section 171B – Bribery of public servant.

  • Section 172 – Absence without leave of public servant.

  • Section 193 – False evidence by public servant.

  • Section 199 – Prosecution of public servants.

Case References under IPC Section 15

  1. State of Maharashtra v. Dr. Praful B. Desai (2003 AIR 40, SC)

    – The Court elaborated on the scope of 'public servant' including persons in government-aided institutions.

  2. R.K. Jain v. Union of India (2003 AIR 3826, SC)

    – Clarified that elected representatives are public servants under IPC Section 15.

  3. Subramanian Swamy v. Director, CBI (2014 AIR 499, SC)

    – Affirmed broad interpretation of public servant to include persons performing public functions.

Key Facts Summary for IPC Section 15

  • Section:

    15

  • Title:

    Definition of Public Servant

  • Offence Type:

    Not an offence; definitional provision

  • Punishment:

    Not applicable

  • Triable By:

    Depends on offence involving public servant

Conclusion on IPC Section 15

IPC Section 15 plays a foundational role in the Indian Penal Code by defining who is a public servant. This definition is essential for enforcing laws related to public officials, including offences like corruption, misconduct, and abuse of power. Without this clarity, prosecuting such offences would be challenging.

In modern India, where governance transparency and accountability are critical, Section 15 ensures that individuals entrusted with public duties are held responsible under the law. Its broad and inclusive definition keeps pace with evolving public roles and supports the justice system in maintaining integrity within public administration.

FAQs on IPC Section 15

What does IPC Section 15 define?

IPC Section 15 defines the term 'public servant' to include government officials, elected representatives, and others performing public duties under the law.

Why is the definition of public servant important?

It helps apply specific legal provisions related to offences like corruption and misconduct to the right individuals holding public office or performing public functions.

Does IPC Section 15 prescribe any punishment?

No, Section 15 is a definitional section and does not prescribe punishment. Punishments depend on the offence involving the public servant.

Who tries offences involving public servants?

Depending on the offence's seriousness, Magistrate courts or Sessions courts try offences involving public servants defined under Section 15.

Can private individuals be public servants under IPC Section 15?

No, only persons holding office by government appointment, election, or discharging public functions are considered public servants under this section.

Related Sections

CrPC Section 29 defines the territorial jurisdiction of criminal courts in India for trial and inquiry purposes.

IPC Section 95 defines acts done by a person incapable of judgment as not offenses, protecting those lacking mental capacity.

CPC Section 24 defines the power of courts to grant temporary injunctions to protect rights during civil suits.

CrPC Section 41D mandates police to issue a notice before arresting a person, ensuring legal safeguards against arbitrary arrests.

IPC Section 472 defines the offence of using as genuine a forged document, detailing its scope and punishment.

IPC Section 467 defines the offence of forgery of valuable security, a key crime involving fraudulent documents with severe penalties.

IPC Section 143 defines punishment for unlawful assembly membership, addressing group crimes and public order protection.

IPC Section 41 empowers police to arrest without warrant under specific conditions to prevent crime or secure evidence.

IPC Section 27 covers the admissibility of facts discovered through information received from accused persons during police interrogation.

CrPC Section 194 defines punishment for giving false evidence, ensuring integrity of judicial proceedings.

IPC Section 287 addresses negligent conduct with respect to causing injury to persons or property, focusing on preventing harm through carelessness.

IPC Section 316 defines culpable homicide by a person causing death of a child under twelve years during childbirth or by an act done with intent to cause miscarriage.

bottom of page