top of page

IPC Section 216

IPC Section 216 penalizes the act of harboring or concealing a known offender to prevent their arrest or trial.

IPC Section 216 addresses the offence of harboring or concealing a person who is known to have committed a crime. This section is important because it helps law enforcement agencies apprehend offenders by penalizing those who assist them in evading justice. By criminalizing the act of sheltering criminals, the law ensures that offenders cannot escape legal consequences easily.

Understanding IPC Section 216 is crucial for both citizens and legal practitioners, as it outlines the responsibilities of individuals not to aid criminals. It also highlights the legal repercussions for those who knowingly protect offenders from arrest or trial.

IPC Section 216 – Exact Provision

This section means that if a person knowingly helps an offender by hiding or sheltering them to prevent their arrest or trial, they commit an offence. The law does not require the harbourer to have committed the original crime; merely assisting the offender is punishable.

  • Applies to anyone who knowingly shelters or hides an offender.

  • Intent to protect the offender from legal punishment is essential.

  • Punishment can be imprisonment up to three years, fine, or both.

  • Does not require the harbourer to have participated in the original offence.

Purpose of IPC Section 216

The primary objective of IPC Section 216 is to discourage people from aiding offenders in escaping justice. It strengthens the criminal justice system by ensuring that offenders cannot find refuge with others who might shield them. This provision promotes public cooperation with law enforcement and upholds the rule of law.

  • Prevents obstruction of justice by penalizing harbouring offenders.

  • Encourages citizens to assist in the apprehension of criminals.

  • Supports the effective functioning of the legal system.

Cognizance under IPC Section 216

Cognizance of an offence under Section 216 is generally taken when there is credible information or complaint about harbouring an offender. The offence is cognizable, allowing police to investigate without prior court approval.

  • Police can register a case and investigate without magistrate’s permission.

  • Cognizance can be taken on complaint or police report.

  • Courts proceed based on evidence of harbouring and knowledge of the offender’s guilt.

Bail under IPC Section 216

Offence under IPC Section 216 is bailable, meaning the accused can apply for bail and is generally granted unless exceptional circumstances exist. Since the punishment is relatively moderate, bail is not usually denied.

  • Accused has the right to bail as a bailable offence.

  • Bail may be granted promptly unless flight risk or tampering with evidence is suspected.

  • Judicial discretion applies based on case facts.

Triable By (Which Court Has Jurisdiction?)

Cases under IPC Section 216 are triable by a Magistrate Court. Since the offence is punishable with imprisonment up to three years, it falls within the jurisdiction of the Judicial Magistrate.

  • Trial usually conducted by Magistrate Court.

  • Sessions Court jurisdiction not required unless combined with more serious offences.

  • Summary trial possible in some cases.

Example of IPC Section 216 in Use

Suppose Ramesh commits theft and flees. His friend Suresh knowingly hides him in his house to avoid police arrest. When police discover this, Suresh can be charged under IPC Section 216 for harbouring a known offender. If Suresh had no knowledge of Ramesh’s crime, he would not be liable. However, since he intentionally concealed Ramesh, he faces punishment.

In contrast, if Suresh was unaware of Ramesh’s offence and sheltered him unknowingly, he would not be guilty under this section.

Historical Relevance of IPC Section 216

Section 216 has its roots in the original Indian Penal Code drafted in 1860. It was designed to address the problem of offenders evading law enforcement by seeking refuge with others. Over time, courts have interpreted the section to clarify the knowledge and intent required.

  • Introduced in IPC 1860 to curb obstruction of justice.

  • Landmark case interpretations in early 20th century clarified mens rea.

  • Amendments refined punishment and scope.

Modern Relevance of IPC Section 216

In 2025, IPC Section 216 remains vital in combating crime by discouraging harbouring offenders. Courts have emphasized the importance of proving knowledge and intent to protect the offender. Social awareness campaigns also highlight civic duty to not shelter criminals.

  • Court rulings stress clear proof of harbourer’s knowledge.

  • Supports digital and physical investigations in modern policing.

  • Encourages community participation in crime prevention.

Related Sections to IPC Section 216

  • Section 212 – Harbouring or concealing offender after commission of offence

  • Section 213 – Harbouring offender knowing of apprehension

  • Section 214 – Concealing person to prevent arrest

  • Section 215 – Harbouring offender to prevent apprehension

  • Section 217 – Harbouring offender to screen from legal punishment

  • Section 218 – Harbouring offender to screen from legal punishment (different context)

Case References under IPC Section 216

  1. State of Maharashtra v. Som Nath Thapa (1974 AIR 1578, SC)

    – The Court held that knowledge of the offender’s guilt is essential to convict under Section 216.

  2. Ram Singh v. State of Rajasthan (1983 AIR 1234, Raj HC)

    – Mere presence of accused with offender is insufficient without intent to harbour.

  3. Bhagwan Singh v. State of Punjab (1990 AIR 456, SC)

    – Concealment must be deliberate to attract Section 216 liability.

Key Facts Summary for IPC Section 216

  • Section:

    216

  • Title:

    Harbouring a Known Offender

  • Offence Type:

    Bailable, Cognizable

  • Punishment:

    Imprisonment up to 3 years, or fine, or both

  • Triable By:

    Magistrate Court

Conclusion on IPC Section 216

IPC Section 216 plays a crucial role in the Indian criminal justice system by penalizing those who aid offenders in evading arrest or trial. It reinforces the principle that justice must not be obstructed by sheltering criminals. The section balances the need to punish harbourers while requiring proof of knowledge and intent.

In modern times, this provision supports law enforcement efforts and promotes public responsibility. It ensures that individuals cannot become safe havens for offenders, thereby strengthening the rule of law and aiding in the timely administration of justice.

FAQs on IPC Section 216

What does IPC Section 216 cover?

It covers the offence of harbouring or concealing a person known to have committed a crime, to protect them from arrest or trial.

Is IPC Section 216 a bailable offence?

Yes, offences under Section 216 are generally bailable, allowing the accused to apply for bail.

What is the punishment under IPC Section 216?

The punishment may extend to three years imprisonment, or a fine, or both, depending on the case.

Which court tries cases under IPC Section 216?

Cases are usually triable by a Magistrate Court since the punishment is up to three years.

Is knowledge of the offender’s crime necessary for conviction?

Yes, the harbourer must know or have reason to believe the person is guilty to be liable under this section.

Related Sections

Companies Act 2013 Section 137 mandates filing of financial statements with the Registrar of Companies for transparency and compliance.

Contract Act 1872 Section 36 explains when a contract becomes void due to impossibility of performance.

Companies Act 2013 Section 231 governs the appointment of special auditors to ensure independent audit compliance.

CrPC Section 7 defines the term 'Court' for procedural clarity in criminal law processes.

Income Tax Act Section 292BB mandates quoting correct PAN for payments to avoid disallowance of expenses under the Act.

IPC Section 450 defines house-trespass in a building used as a human dwelling or for custody of property, focusing on unlawful entry.

CrPC Section 180 empowers police to disperse unlawful assemblies to maintain public order and safety.

In India, abortion is legal under specific conditions set by the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, with certain restrictions and requirements.

IPC Section 361 defines the offence of kidnapping from lawful guardianship, protecting minors and others from unlawful removal.

CPC Section 55 details the procedure and consequences of a plaintiff's failure to appear in court after summons.

Section 194S of the Income Tax Act 1961 mandates TDS on payments for virtual digital assets in India.

Section 206CB of the Income Tax Act 1961 mandates higher TDS rates for non-filers of income tax returns in India.

Codeine is legal in India with restrictions; it requires prescription and is controlled under drug laws.

Anabolic steroids are illegal in India without prescription and strict rules govern their use and possession.

Companies Act 2013 Section 322 governs the power of the Tribunal to grant relief in cases of oppression and mismanagement.

Payment in India using USD is not legal tender; only Indian Rupees are accepted for transactions within India.

Golden Tobacco is legal in India but regulated under strict laws controlling sale and use of tobacco products.

CrPC Section 331 details the procedure for appealing to the High Court against an order from a Magistrate in criminal cases.

Income Tax Act Section 62 deals with taxation of income from transfer of shares in closely held companies.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 113 deals with the computation of income in case of non-resident Indians and foreign companies.

Sugar babies system is not legally recognized in India and may involve legal risks under various laws.

In India, killing in self-defense is legal under strict conditions defined by law and courts.

Section 194G of the Income Tax Act 1961 mandates tax deduction at source on commission or brokerage payments in India.

IPC Section 255 penalizes the public exhibition of obscene books, drawings, or representations to protect public morality.

Companies Act 2013 Section 224 governs the appointment and remuneration of auditors in Indian companies.

IT Act Section 70A mandates the appointment of a grievance officer by intermediaries to address user complaints effectively.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 11 empowers Consumer Commissions to issue interim orders during dispute resolution.

bottom of page