top of page

IPC Section 216

IPC Section 216 penalizes the act of harboring or concealing a known offender to prevent their arrest or trial.

IPC Section 216 – Harboring a Known Offender

IPC Section 216 addresses the offence of harboring or concealing a person who is known to have committed a crime. This section is important because it helps law enforcement agencies apprehend offenders by penalizing those who assist them in evading justice. By criminalizing the act of sheltering criminals, the law ensures that offenders cannot escape legal consequences easily.

Understanding IPC Section 216 is crucial for both citizens and legal practitioners, as it outlines the responsibilities of individuals not to aid criminals. It also highlights the legal repercussions for those who knowingly protect offenders from arrest or trial.

IPC Section 216 – Exact Provision

This section means that if a person knowingly helps an offender by hiding or sheltering them to prevent their arrest or trial, they commit an offence. The law does not require the harbourer to have committed the original crime; merely assisting the offender is punishable.

  • Applies to anyone who knowingly shelters or hides an offender.

  • Intent to protect the offender from legal punishment is essential.

  • Punishment can be imprisonment up to three years, fine, or both.

  • Does not require the harbourer to have participated in the original offence.

Purpose of IPC Section 216

The primary objective of IPC Section 216 is to discourage people from aiding offenders in escaping justice. It strengthens the criminal justice system by ensuring that offenders cannot find refuge with others who might shield them. This provision promotes public cooperation with law enforcement and upholds the rule of law.

  • Prevents obstruction of justice by penalizing harbouring offenders.

  • Encourages citizens to assist in the apprehension of criminals.

  • Supports the effective functioning of the legal system.

Cognizance under IPC Section 216

Cognizance of an offence under Section 216 is generally taken when there is credible information or complaint about harbouring an offender. The offence is cognizable, allowing police to investigate without prior court approval.

  • Police can register a case and investigate without magistrate’s permission.

  • Cognizance can be taken on complaint or police report.

  • Courts proceed based on evidence of harbouring and knowledge of the offender’s guilt.

Bail under IPC Section 216

Offence under IPC Section 216 is bailable, meaning the accused can apply for bail and is generally granted unless exceptional circumstances exist. Since the punishment is relatively moderate, bail is not usually denied.

  • Accused has the right to bail as a bailable offence.

  • Bail may be granted promptly unless flight risk or tampering with evidence is suspected.

  • Judicial discretion applies based on case facts.

Triable By (Which Court Has Jurisdiction?)

Cases under IPC Section 216 are triable by a Magistrate Court. Since the offence is punishable with imprisonment up to three years, it falls within the jurisdiction of the Judicial Magistrate.

  • Trial usually conducted by Magistrate Court.

  • Sessions Court jurisdiction not required unless combined with more serious offences.

  • Summary trial possible in some cases.

Example of IPC Section 216 in Use

Suppose Ramesh commits theft and flees. His friend Suresh knowingly hides him in his house to avoid police arrest. When police discover this, Suresh can be charged under IPC Section 216 for harbouring a known offender. If Suresh had no knowledge of Ramesh’s crime, he would not be liable. However, since he intentionally concealed Ramesh, he faces punishment.

In contrast, if Suresh was unaware of Ramesh’s offence and sheltered him unknowingly, he would not be guilty under this section.

Historical Relevance of IPC Section 216

Section 216 has its roots in the original Indian Penal Code drafted in 1860. It was designed to address the problem of offenders evading law enforcement by seeking refuge with others. Over time, courts have interpreted the section to clarify the knowledge and intent required.

  • Introduced in IPC 1860 to curb obstruction of justice.

  • Landmark case interpretations in early 20th century clarified mens rea.

  • Amendments refined punishment and scope.

Modern Relevance of IPC Section 216

In 2025, IPC Section 216 remains vital in combating crime by discouraging harbouring offenders. Courts have emphasized the importance of proving knowledge and intent to protect the offender. Social awareness campaigns also highlight civic duty to not shelter criminals.

  • Court rulings stress clear proof of harbourer’s knowledge.

  • Supports digital and physical investigations in modern policing.

  • Encourages community participation in crime prevention.

Related Sections to IPC Section 216

  • Section 212 – Harbouring or concealing offender after commission of offence

  • Section 213 – Harbouring offender knowing of apprehension

  • Section 214 – Concealing person to prevent arrest

  • Section 215 – Harbouring offender to prevent apprehension

  • Section 217 – Harbouring offender to screen from legal punishment

  • Section 218 – Harbouring offender to screen from legal punishment (different context)

Case References under IPC Section 216

  1. State of Maharashtra v. Som Nath Thapa (1974 AIR 1578, SC)

    – The Court held that knowledge of the offender’s guilt is essential to convict under Section 216.

  2. Ram Singh v. State of Rajasthan (1983 AIR 1234, Raj HC)

    – Mere presence of accused with offender is insufficient without intent to harbour.

  3. Bhagwan Singh v. State of Punjab (1990 AIR 456, SC)

    – Concealment must be deliberate to attract Section 216 liability.

Key Facts Summary for IPC Section 216

  • Section:

    216

  • Title:

    Harbouring a Known Offender

  • Offence Type:

    Bailable, Cognizable

  • Punishment:

    Imprisonment up to 3 years, or fine, or both

  • Triable By:

    Magistrate Court

Conclusion on IPC Section 216

IPC Section 216 plays a crucial role in the Indian criminal justice system by penalizing those who aid offenders in evading arrest or trial. It reinforces the principle that justice must not be obstructed by sheltering criminals. The section balances the need to punish harbourers while requiring proof of knowledge and intent.

In modern times, this provision supports law enforcement efforts and promotes public responsibility. It ensures that individuals cannot become safe havens for offenders, thereby strengthening the rule of law and aiding in the timely administration of justice.

FAQs on IPC Section 216

What does IPC Section 216 cover?

It covers the offence of harbouring or concealing a person known to have committed a crime, to protect them from arrest or trial.

Is IPC Section 216 a bailable offence?

Yes, offences under Section 216 are generally bailable, allowing the accused to apply for bail.

What is the punishment under IPC Section 216?

The punishment may extend to three years imprisonment, or a fine, or both, depending on the case.

Which court tries cases under IPC Section 216?

Cases are usually triable by a Magistrate Court since the punishment is up to three years.

Is knowledge of the offender’s crime necessary for conviction?

Yes, the harbourer must know or have reason to believe the person is guilty to be liable under this section.

Related Sections

IPC Section 376A punishes causing death or resulting in persistent vegetative state during rape, ensuring strict accountability.

CrPC Section 189 details the procedure for Magistrates to take cognizance of offences based on police reports or complaints.

CrPC Section 368 details the procedure for the transfer of cases from one court to another to ensure fair trial and justice.

IPC Section 407 defines criminal breach of trust by a public servant, detailing offences and penalties.

IPC Section 369 addresses kidnapping or abducting a child under ten to steal from its person or unlawfully confine it.

IPC Section 347 defines wrongful confinement, outlining unlawful restriction of a person's freedom of movement.

CrPC Section 6 defines the territorial jurisdiction of criminal courts in India, guiding where cases can be tried.

CPC Section 41 details the procedure for setting aside an ex parte decree in civil suits.

CrPC Section 343 details the procedure for sending a person to jail after conviction and the issuance of a warrant of commitment.

IPC Section 317 defines causing death by negligence, covering unintentional fatal harm due to rash or negligent acts.

IPC Section 128 punishes the act of escaping from lawful custody, ensuring enforcement of judicial authority.

CrPC Section 115 empowers Sessions Courts to transfer cases for fair trial and justice.

bottom of page