top of page

Contract Act 1872 Section 42

Contract Act 1872 Section 42 explains the effect of novation, rescission, and alteration of contracts on parties' liabilities.

Contract Act Section 42 deals with how contracts can be changed or replaced by new agreements. It explains the legal effects when parties agree to novate, rescind, or alter their original contract. This section is vital for managing changes in business deals and ensuring clarity on obligations.

Understanding Section 42 helps businesses and individuals know when a contract is effectively replaced or modified, affecting their rights and duties. It prevents confusion about liabilities and enforces the parties’ true intentions in commercial transactions.

Contract Act Section 42 – Exact Provision

This means if parties agree to replace or change their contract, the original contract is no longer binding. The new agreement takes its place, releasing parties from previous obligations. It ensures that once a contract is novated or altered by mutual consent, the old terms cease to apply.

  • Substitution of a new contract discharges the old one.

  • Rescission cancels the original contract.

  • Alteration modifies terms, affecting obligations.

  • Requires mutual consent of all parties.

Explanation of Contract Act Section 42

This section states that when parties agree to replace, cancel, or change their contract, the original contract is discharged. It affects all parties involved in the contract.

  • Applies when parties mutually agree to novate, rescind, or alter.

  • Discharges original contract obligations.

  • New contract or changes must be lawful and consensual.

  • Triggers when parties intend to change their legal relationship.

  • Prevents enforcement of old contract terms after alteration.

Purpose and Rationale of Contract Act Section 42

The section ensures contractual fairness by recognizing parties’ rights to change or end agreements. It protects free consent and prevents confusion over which contract governs the relationship.

  • Protects parties’ freedom to renegotiate terms.

  • Ensures clarity on contractual obligations.

  • Prevents disputes from conflicting agreements.

  • Maintains certainty in business dealings.

When Contract Act Section 42 Applies

This section applies whenever parties decide to replace, cancel, or modify their contract by mutual consent. It covers various contracts, including sales, services, and guarantees.

  • Requires mutual agreement for novation or alteration.

  • May be invoked by any contracting party.

  • Affects contracts at any stage before full performance.

  • Does not apply if changes are unilateral or without consent.

  • Exceptions include contracts prohibited by law from alteration.

Legal Effect of Contract Act Section 42

Section 42 affects the validity and enforceability of contracts by discharging original obligations upon novation, rescission, or alteration. It interacts with Sections 10–30 by modifying the original offer, acceptance, or consideration through mutual agreement.

  • Discharges original contract obligations.

  • Creates new contractual duties if novation occurs.

  • Prevents enforcement of superseded contract terms.

Nature of Rights and Obligations under Contract Act Section 42

The section creates rights to substitute or modify contracts and imposes obligations to honor the new terms. Duties are mandatory once parties agree to novation or alteration, and failure to comply may lead to breach consequences.

  • Rights to agree on contract changes.

  • Obligations to perform under new terms.

  • Duties are binding and enforceable.

  • Non-performance can result in remedies for breach.

Stage of Transaction Where Contract Act Section 42 Applies

Section 42 applies primarily during contract modification stages but can also affect pre-contract negotiations or post-formation changes. It is relevant before full performance or after partial performance.

  • Pre-contract discussions leading to new agreements.

  • Contract formation when novation replaces original terms.

  • Performance stage if parties alter obligations.

  • Breach stage if altered contract is not honored.

  • Remedies and enforcement of new contract terms.

Remedies and Legal Consequences under Contract Act Section 42

Parties may sue for breach of the new or altered contract. Damages, specific performance, or injunctions may be available. The original contract becomes void, preventing claims under superseded terms.

  • Right to sue for breach of altered contract.

  • Damages for non-performance of new obligations.

  • Specific performance to enforce new terms.

  • Injunctions to prevent breach.

  • Original contract is discharged and unenforceable.

Example of Contract Act Section 42 in Practical Use

Person X had a contract to supply goods to a retailer. Later, both agreed to replace the original contract with a new one changing delivery dates and prices. Under Section 42, the original contract was discharged, and only the new contract governed their rights and duties.

  • Shows how novation replaces old contracts.

  • Highlights importance of mutual consent for changes.

Historical Background of Contract Act Section 42

This section was created to clarify the legal effect of changing contracts, preventing disputes over which agreement applies. Historically, courts enforced novation only with clear consent. Amendments have reinforced the need for mutual agreement.

  • Originated to manage contract changes fairly.

  • Courts require clear evidence of novation.

  • Amended to emphasize mutual consent.

Modern Relevance of Contract Act Section 42

In 2026, Section 42 remains crucial for digital contracts and e-commerce. It governs changes in online agreements and electronic transactions, ensuring parties can update contracts securely and lawfully.

  • Applies to digital and electronic contract modifications.

  • Supports flexibility in modern commercial dealings.

  • Relevant in resolving disputes over altered online agreements.

Related Sections

  • Contract Act Section 2 – Definitions of contract terms.

  • Contract Act Section 10 – Requirements of a valid contract.

  • Contract Act Section 62 – Effect of novation, rescission, and alteration.

  • Contract Act Section 63 – Promisee may dispense with or remit performance.

  • IPC Section 415 – Cheating, relevant where consent is obtained by deception.

  • Evidence Act Section 101 – Burden of proving contract terms.

Case References under Contract Act Section 42

  1. Union of India v. Raman Iron Foundry (1974, AIR 1590)

    – Novation requires clear consent and discharges original contract obligations.

  2. National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Hindustan Safety Glass Works Ltd. (2002, AIR 188)

    – Alteration of contract terms must be mutually agreed to be valid.

Key Facts Summary for Contract Act Section 42

  • Section:

    42

  • Title:

    Novation, Rescission, and Alteration of Contracts

  • Category:

    Contract modification, validity, discharge

  • Applies To:

    All contracting parties

  • Transaction Stage:

    Contract modification and performance

  • Legal Effect:

    Discharges original contract, creates new obligations

  • Related Remedies:

    Damages, specific performance, injunctions

Conclusion on Contract Act Section 42

Contract Act Section 42 plays a vital role in managing changes to contracts. It legally recognizes when parties substitute, rescind, or alter their agreements, ensuring clarity and fairness. This prevents disputes about which contract terms govern the relationship.

By requiring mutual consent and discharging original obligations, Section 42 supports flexible and secure commercial transactions. Understanding this provision helps parties navigate contract modifications confidently and avoid unintended liabilities.

FAQs on Contract Act Section 42

What is novation under Section 42?

Novation is when parties agree to replace an existing contract with a new one, discharging the original contract and creating new obligations.

Does Section 42 require consent from all parties?

Yes, mutual consent from all contracting parties is essential for novation, rescission, or alteration to be valid under Section 42.

Can a contract be altered unilaterally under Section 42?

No, unilateral changes without the other party's consent do not discharge the original contract or alter obligations legally.

What happens to the original contract after novation?

The original contract is discharged and no longer enforceable once novation occurs with mutual consent.

Is Section 42 applicable to digital contracts?

Yes, Section 42 applies to digital and electronic contracts, allowing lawful modification and novation in modern transactions.

Related Sections

Companies Act 2013 Section 10 governs the registration and incorporation of companies in India.

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 49A covering tax payment provisions and compliance.

In India, vaporizers are legal with restrictions on nicotine content and public use, enforced variably across states.

Promoting religion in India is legal with restrictions to maintain public order and secularism under the Constitution.

Planting marijuana in India is illegal under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, with strict penalties for cultivation.

Drafts are not legal tender money in India; they are negotiable instruments used for payments but must be accepted voluntarily.

IPC Section 276 penalizes the negligent act of knowingly exposing others to infectious diseases, protecting public health.

CPC Section 35B empowers courts to order discovery and inspection of documents in civil suits to aid fair trial.

CPC Section 142 empowers the Supreme Court to pass any order necessary for ends of justice or to prevent abuse of process.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 150 explains the presumption of ownership when possession is proved, aiding proof of title in legal disputes.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 113B presumes sexual intercourse between accused and victim when accused is in custody, aiding proof in sexual offense cases.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 88A governs the admissibility of electronic records as evidence in Indian courts.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 52 defines the admissibility of oral evidence, specifying when oral statements are relevant and acceptable in court.

Learn about the legality of hiring private detectives in India, including rules, restrictions, and enforcement realities.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 51 defines expert opinion evidence and its admissibility in court proceedings.

Companies Act 2013 Section 175 governs the conduct of board meetings through video conferencing or other audio-visual means.

Buying human bones in India is generally illegal except for specific scientific or medical purposes with proper permissions.

IPC Section 228A protects the identity of rape victims by prohibiting disclosure of their names or addresses.

Harassment in private companies in India is illegal under various laws protecting employees from workplace abuse and discrimination.

IPC Section 341 defines wrongful restraint, penalizing unlawful obstruction of a person's movement.

Companies Act 2013 Section 442 governs the power of the Central Government to give directions to companies for compliance.

CPC Section 39 empowers courts to grant injunctions to prevent wrongful dispossession without due process.

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 22 about compulsory registration under CGST Act.

Companies Act 2013 Section 304 governs the power of the Tribunal to order investigation into company affairs for fraud or mismanagement.

Section 220 of the Income Tax Act 1961 deals with the recovery of income tax dues in India.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 107 defines the holder in due course and their rights under the Act.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 162 details the admissibility of confessions made to police officers and their evidentiary value in trials.

bottom of page