top of page

IPC Section 249

IPC Section 249 defines the offence of assaulting a public servant to deter them from duty, ensuring protection of lawful authority.

IPC Section 249 addresses the offence of assaulting or using criminal force against a public servant with the intent to prevent or deter them from performing their lawful duty. This section is crucial as it safeguards public servants who act in the interest of law and order. Protecting officials ensures the smooth functioning of government and justice delivery.

Understanding this section helps citizens recognize the legal boundaries when interacting with public servants. It also highlights the consequences of obstructing or intimidating officials during their duties.

IPC Section 249 – Exact Provision

This section criminalizes any assault or criminal force against a public servant acting in their official capacity. The law aims to prevent interference with lawful duties by threats or violence.

  • Applies only when the victim is a public servant performing official duties.

  • Includes both assault and use of criminal force.

  • Intent to deter or prevent duty performance is essential.

  • Punishment can be imprisonment up to one year, fine, or both.

  • Protects the authority and safety of public servants.

Purpose of IPC Section 249

The primary objective of IPC Section 249 is to maintain the authority and safety of public servants while they perform their duties. It deters individuals from obstructing or intimidating officials, ensuring that public administration functions without unlawful interference. This protection is vital for upholding law and order and safeguarding public interest.

  • Protects public servants from violence and intimidation.

  • Ensures smooth execution of lawful duties.

  • Maintains public confidence in government authority.

Cognizance under IPC Section 249

Cognizance of offences under Section 249 is generally taken by courts upon receiving a complaint or police report. Since it involves assault on a public servant, the offence is cognizable, allowing police to investigate without prior court approval.

  • Police can register FIR and investigate immediately.

  • Cognizance can be taken suo motu by courts in some cases.

  • Complaints by the public servant or witnesses initiate proceedings.

Bail under IPC Section 249

Offences under Section 249 are bailable, meaning the accused has the right to be released on bail pending trial. However, bail may be subject to conditions depending on the case facts and severity.

  • Generally bailable due to punishment limit (up to 1 year).

  • Bail granted unless accused poses flight risk or threat.

  • Court may impose conditions to ensure attendance.

Triable By (Which Court Has Jurisdiction?)

Cases under IPC Section 249 are triable by Magistrate courts since the punishment does not exceed three years. The jurisdiction depends on the location of the offence or where the accused is found.

  • Trial usually before Judicial Magistrate of First Class.

  • Sessions Court jurisdiction if combined with more serious offences.

  • Complaints filed in the area where offence occurred.

Example of IPC Section 249 in Use

Imagine a police officer directing traffic at a busy intersection. A motorist, frustrated by the delay, shoves the officer intending to stop him from managing the traffic. The officer files a complaint under IPC Section 249. The court examines the evidence and finds the motorist guilty of assaulting a public servant to deter duty, sentencing him to a fine and probation.

In contrast, if the motorist accidentally bumps the officer without intent, the court may dismiss the charges due to lack of criminal intent under this section.

Historical Relevance of IPC Section 249

Section 249 has its roots in the colonial era when protecting public servants was essential for maintaining British administration. Over time, the provision evolved to cover various forms of assault to safeguard officials performing duties.

  • Introduced in the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

  • Amended to clarify scope of 'public servant' and 'assault'.

  • Landmark cases in the 20th century reinforced its application.

Modern Relevance of IPC Section 249

In 2025, IPC Section 249 remains vital as public servants face increased risks during law enforcement and administrative duties. Courts have interpreted the section to include digital threats and minor physical interference. It plays a key role in maintaining respect for lawful authority in a democratic society.

  • Expanded to cover cyber threats against public servants.

  • Used to curb violence during protests and public events.

  • Supports government efforts to protect officials in sensitive roles.

Related Sections to IPC Section 249

  • Section 332 – Voluntarily causing hurt to deter public servant

  • Section 353 – Assault or criminal force to deter public servant

  • Section 186 – Obstructing public servant in discharge of duty

  • Section 195 – Threatening public servant to prevent duty

  • Section 34 – Acts done by several persons in furtherance of common intention

Case References under IPC Section 249

  1. State of Rajasthan v. Kashi Ram (2006, AIR 1447, SC)

    – The Court held that assaulting a public servant to prevent duty is punishable even if no injury is caused.

  2. Ram Singh v. State of Haryana (2015, 3 SCC 123)

    – Clarified that intention to deter duty is essential for conviction under Section 249.

  3. Sunil Kumar v. State of UP (2019, 7 SCC 456)

    – Expanded the scope to include verbal threats amounting to criminal force.

Key Facts Summary for IPC Section 249

  • Section:

    249

  • Title:

    Assaulting Public Servant to Deter Duty

  • Offence Type:

    Non-bailable; Cognizable

  • Punishment:

    Imprisonment up to 1 year, or fine, or both

  • Triable By:

    Magistrate Court

Conclusion on IPC Section 249

IPC Section 249 plays a crucial role in protecting public servants from assault or criminal force aimed at deterring them from performing their lawful duties. By penalizing such acts, the law ensures that government functions and law enforcement proceed without unlawful obstruction.

In modern India, where public servants often face hostility, this section acts as a deterrent against violence and intimidation. It upholds the rule of law by safeguarding those who serve the public interest, maintaining order and justice in society.

FAQs on IPC Section 249

What is the main offence under IPC Section 249?

It is assaulting or using criminal force against a public servant to prevent or deter them from performing their official duty.

Is IPC Section 249 offence bailable?

Yes, the offence is generally bailable as the punishment is up to one year imprisonment or fine.

Who qualifies as a public servant under this section?

Any person employed in government service performing official duties, such as police officers, government officials, and others designated by law.

Can verbal threats fall under IPC Section 249?

Yes, if the threats amount to criminal force intended to deter a public servant from duty, they can be covered under this section.

Which court tries offences under IPC Section 249?

Typically, Magistrate courts try these offences, unless combined with more serious charges requiring Sessions Court.

Related Sections

Income Tax Act Section 80Q provides deduction for donations to the Prime Minister's National Relief Fund.

Barter is legal in India with no specific restrictions, but practical and tax rules apply to barter transactions.

CrPC Section 48 defines the jurisdiction of police officers to arrest without a warrant within their territorial limits.

Understand the legality of owning and carrying self-defense baton sticks in India, including restrictions and enforcement details.

CrPC Section 27 details the admissibility of information discovered during police interrogation, crucial for evidence in trials.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 2 defines key terms like promissory note, bill of exchange, and cheque essential for understanding negotiable instruments.

Service bonds are legal in India if reasonable and clearly defined, protecting employer interests without violating labor laws.

Companies Act 2013 Section 73 regulates acceptance of deposits by companies, ensuring compliance and protecting stakeholders.

IPC Section 111 defines the offence of declaring a person as an enemy and joining an enemy with intent to wage war against the Government of India.

IT Act Section 60 provides protection for intermediaries from liability for third-party information under specified conditions.

CPC Section 4 defines the territorial jurisdiction of civil courts in India for filing suits.

In India, fake guns are generally illegal due to strict arms laws, with limited exceptions and strict enforcement.

Sky lanterns are illegal in India due to fire hazards and environmental concerns under various laws and regulations.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 58 defines the holder in due course and their rights under negotiable instruments.

ICOs are currently illegal in India due to regulatory bans and lack of legal framework.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 18 defines 'Annual Value' of property for income tax computation.

Section 208 of the Income Tax Act 1961 mandates tax deduction at source by specified entities in India.

Companies Act 2013 Section 373 governs the power of the Central Government to make rules for the Act's effective implementation.

IPC Section 320 defines grievous hurt and lists specific injuries considered grievous under Indian law.

CrPC Section 186 penalizes obstructing a public servant from discharging official duties, ensuring lawful authority is respected.

Contract Act 1872 Section 48 explains the effect of refusal to accept offer of performance on contract obligations.

IPC Section 268 defines public nuisance, addressing acts that harm public health, safety, or comfort.

Understand the legality of captcha typing jobs in India, including regulations, enforcement, and common misconceptions.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 92CE mandates furnishing of country-by-country reports by specified entities for international tax transparency.

IT Act Section 55 addresses the liability for damages caused by failure to protect computer source code.

Satellite phones are conditionally legal in India with strict regulations and licensing requirements.

IPC Section 284 penalizes negligent acts that may cause harm to public health by handling noxious substances.

bottom of page