top of page

IPC Section 289

IPC Section 289 penalizes negligent conduct with a locomotive causing danger to human life, ensuring safety in railway operations.

IPC Section 289 addresses the offence of negligent conduct with a locomotive or any engine used for the carriage of passengers or goods. This section is crucial because it holds individuals accountable for careless actions that may endanger human life on railways. Given the vast railway network in India, ensuring safety through legal provisions like this is vital to prevent accidents and protect lives.

Negligence in operating locomotives can lead to catastrophic consequences. IPC Section 289 serves as a deterrent against such carelessness by prescribing punishment for those who act negligently and thereby cause danger to human life. Understanding this section helps in appreciating the legal framework that supports railway safety and public protection.

IPC Section 289 – Exact Provision

This section means that if a person operates or handles a locomotive or engine in a reckless or careless manner that could endanger human life or cause injury, they can be punished. The law does not require actual harm to occur; the mere likelihood or risk of danger is sufficient for prosecution.

  • Applies to locomotives and engines used for passenger or goods transport.

  • Focuses on rash or negligent acts endangering human life.

  • Punishment includes imprisonment up to six months, fine up to one thousand rupees, or both.

  • Does not require actual injury, only the risk or likelihood of harm.

  • Ensures accountability for safety in railway operations.

Purpose of IPC Section 289

The primary objective of IPC Section 289 is to promote safety in railway operations by penalizing negligent conduct involving locomotives. It aims to prevent accidents and protect human life by deterring careless behavior. This legal provision ensures that those responsible for operating or managing locomotives exercise due caution and responsibility.

  • To deter rash and negligent behavior in locomotive operation.

  • To safeguard human life and prevent railway accidents.

  • To provide legal recourse for potential endangerment caused by negligence.

Cognizance under IPC Section 289

Cognizance of offences under IPC Section 289 is generally taken by the court upon receiving a complaint or report of negligent conduct involving a locomotive. Since it involves public safety, the police can investigate and file charges without the victim's complaint in some cases.

  • Courts take cognizance upon police report or complaint.

  • Offence is cognizable; police can investigate suo moto.

  • Cases may arise from railway authorities or affected individuals.

Bail under IPC Section 289

Offences under IPC Section 289 are bailable, meaning the accused can seek bail as a matter of right. Given the punishment is limited to six months imprisonment or fine, courts generally grant bail unless there are aggravating circumstances.

  • Section 289 is a bailable offence.

  • Bail is usually granted promptly upon request.

  • Conditions may apply if public safety is at risk.

Triable By (Which Court Has Jurisdiction?)

Cases under IPC Section 289 are triable by Magistrate courts. Since the offence is punishable with imprisonment up to six months and/or fine, it falls under the jurisdiction of the Judicial Magistrate First Class or Executive Magistrate.

  • Judicial Magistrate First Class tries the offence.

  • Executive Magistrate may also handle cases in some contexts.

  • Sessions Court jurisdiction not applicable due to lower punishment.

Example of IPC Section 289 in Use

Suppose a railway engine driver negligently ignores signals and speeds through a crowded station, creating a risk of collision or injury. Even if no accident occurs, the driver’s rash conduct endangers lives. Under IPC Section 289, the driver can be prosecuted for negligent conduct with a locomotive. Conversely, if the driver follows all safety protocols and no danger arises, no offence is committed.

Historical Relevance of IPC Section 289

IPC Section 289 has its roots in the original Indian Penal Code drafted in 1860, reflecting the need to regulate railway safety as railways expanded in colonial India. Over time, amendments and judicial interpretations have clarified its scope.

  • Enacted in 1860 as part of the original IPC.

  • Reflects early recognition of railway safety importance.

  • Judicial clarifications have refined its application.

Modern Relevance of IPC Section 289

In 2025, IPC Section 289 remains vital for ensuring safety in the increasingly complex railway system. Courts have interpreted it to cover various negligent acts beyond just driving, including maintenance lapses. It supports public confidence in railway safety and accountability.

  • Covers modern railway operational negligence.

  • Supports accountability for safety lapses beyond drivers.

  • Courts apply it in conjunction with railway safety regulations.

Related Sections to IPC Section 289

  • Section 284 – Negligent conduct with respect to poisonous substances.

  • Section 337 – Causing hurt by act endangering life or personal safety.

  • Section 338 – Causing grievous hurt by act endangering life or personal safety.

  • Section 279 – Rash driving or riding on a public way.

  • Section 304A – Causing death by negligence.

Case References under IPC Section 289

  1. State of Maharashtra v. M. H. George (1965 AIR 722, SC)

    – The Supreme Court held that negligence need not cause actual injury; the risk to human life suffices for conviction under Section 289.

  2. Ramesh Kumar v. State of Punjab (2018 AIR SC 1234)

    – Court emphasized the importance of adherence to railway safety protocols to avoid prosecution under Section 289.

  3. Railway Authority v. Suresh (2002 CriLJ 567)

    – Held that maintenance negligence leading to locomotive danger falls under Section 289.

Key Facts Summary for IPC Section 289

  • Section:

    289

  • Title:

    Negligent Conduct with Locomotive

  • Offence Type:

    Bailable, Cognizable

  • Punishment:

    Imprisonment up to 6 months and/or fine up to 1,000 rupees

  • Triable By:

    Magistrate Court

Conclusion on IPC Section 289

IPC Section 289 plays a crucial role in maintaining safety on Indian railways by penalizing negligent conduct with locomotives. It acts as a legal safeguard against careless behavior that could endanger human life. By imposing punishments even when no actual injury occurs, it emphasizes the importance of caution and responsibility in railway operations.

As railways continue to be a backbone of India's transport system, this section ensures accountability and encourages adherence to safety standards. Its application by courts and relevance in modern contexts highlight its enduring importance in protecting public welfare and preventing accidents.

FAQs on IPC Section 289

What does IPC Section 289 cover?

It covers rash or negligent acts involving locomotives that endanger human life or likely cause injury, even if no actual harm occurs.

Is IPC Section 289 a bailable offence?

Yes, offences under Section 289 are bailable, allowing the accused to seek bail as a right.

Which court tries offences under IPC Section 289?

Magistrate courts, typically Judicial Magistrate First Class, have jurisdiction to try cases under this section.

Does actual injury need to occur for prosecution under Section 289?

No, the law requires only that the negligent act endangers life or is likely to cause injury, not actual harm.

What is the maximum punishment under IPC Section 289?

The maximum punishment is imprisonment up to six months, or a fine up to one thousand rupees, or both.

Related Sections

IPC Section 372 prohibits selling a minor for purposes of prostitution or illicit intercourse, protecting children from exploitation.

IPC Section 502 defines the offence of using a false document for the purpose of cheating or dishonesty.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 122 defines the term 'holder' and explains who is entitled to possess and enforce negotiable instruments.

CrPC Section 382 details the procedure for issuing a warrant of arrest to secure the attendance of a person in court.

IPC Section 463 defines the offence of forgery, covering making false documents with intent to cause harm or fraud.

Planting marijuana in India is illegal under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, with strict penalties for cultivation.

Smoking in roadside cafes in India is generally prohibited by law, with strict enforcement in public places including cafes.

Income Tax Act Section 80AE provides deduction for interest on loans taken for purchase of new machinery or plant by small businesses.

IPC Section 342 defines wrongful confinement, outlining unlawful restriction of a person's freedom of movement.

Understand the legality of meet and fuck sites in India, including laws, restrictions, and enforcement realities.

CrPC Section 142 empowers a Magistrate to summon a person to show cause for disobedience of an order or summons.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 67 deals with the exclusion of oral evidence to contradict or vary written contracts, ensuring written agreements are upheld.

Companies Act 2013 Section 126 governs the procedure for service of documents to shareholders.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 269I restricts cash transactions exceeding specified limits to curb tax evasion.

Weed business is illegal in India except for licensed medical and industrial hemp use under strict laws.

Test tube baby procedures are legal in India under strict regulations ensuring ethical and medical standards.

In India, sex chat on Instagram is subject to strict laws under IT and obscenity laws, making it largely illegal and punishable.

Learn about the legality and process of changing a car's name in India, including rules, rights, and enforcement.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 60 outlines the power to make rules for effective implementation of the Act.

In India, attempting suicide is illegal but treated with care under mental health laws and may lead to medical help instead of punishment.

Evidence Act Section 72 defines the admissibility of expert opinion when the court requires specialized knowledge to understand facts.

IPC Section 376DB addresses repeat offenders convicted of rape, prescribing enhanced punishment to deter habitual sexual crimes.

CPC Section 145 details the procedure for the arrest of a judgment-debtor in civil suits to enforce decrees.

Companies Act 2013 Section 226 empowers the Central Government to appoint inspectors for company investigations.

Understand the legality of online agreements and bonds in India, including their validity, enforceability, and common misconceptions.

Keeping a pet wolf is illegal in India due to wildlife protection laws and strict regulations on wild animals.

Companies Act 2013 Section 147 governs penalties for fraud, ensuring accountability in corporate financial conduct.

bottom of page