top of page

IPC Section 289

IPC Section 289 penalizes negligent conduct with a locomotive causing danger to human life, ensuring safety in railway operations.

IPC Section 289 – Negligent Conduct with Locomotive

IPC Section 289 addresses the offence of negligent conduct with a locomotive or any engine used for the carriage of passengers or goods. This section is crucial because it holds individuals accountable for careless actions that may endanger human life on railways. Given the vast railway network in India, ensuring safety through legal provisions like this is vital to prevent accidents and protect lives.

Negligence in operating locomotives can lead to catastrophic consequences. IPC Section 289 serves as a deterrent against such carelessness by prescribing punishment for those who act negligently and thereby cause danger to human life. Understanding this section helps in appreciating the legal framework that supports railway safety and public protection.

IPC Section 289 – Exact Provision

This section means that if a person operates or handles a locomotive or engine in a reckless or careless manner that could endanger human life or cause injury, they can be punished. The law does not require actual harm to occur; the mere likelihood or risk of danger is sufficient for prosecution.

  • Applies to locomotives and engines used for passenger or goods transport.

  • Focuses on rash or negligent acts endangering human life.

  • Punishment includes imprisonment up to six months, fine up to one thousand rupees, or both.

  • Does not require actual injury, only the risk or likelihood of harm.

  • Ensures accountability for safety in railway operations.

Purpose of IPC Section 289

The primary objective of IPC Section 289 is to promote safety in railway operations by penalizing negligent conduct involving locomotives. It aims to prevent accidents and protect human life by deterring careless behavior. This legal provision ensures that those responsible for operating or managing locomotives exercise due caution and responsibility.

  • To deter rash and negligent behavior in locomotive operation.

  • To safeguard human life and prevent railway accidents.

  • To provide legal recourse for potential endangerment caused by negligence.

Cognizance under IPC Section 289

Cognizance of offences under IPC Section 289 is generally taken by the court upon receiving a complaint or report of negligent conduct involving a locomotive. Since it involves public safety, the police can investigate and file charges without the victim's complaint in some cases.

  • Courts take cognizance upon police report or complaint.

  • Offence is cognizable; police can investigate suo moto.

  • Cases may arise from railway authorities or affected individuals.

Bail under IPC Section 289

Offences under IPC Section 289 are bailable, meaning the accused can seek bail as a matter of right. Given the punishment is limited to six months imprisonment or fine, courts generally grant bail unless there are aggravating circumstances.

  • Section 289 is a bailable offence.

  • Bail is usually granted promptly upon request.

  • Conditions may apply if public safety is at risk.

Triable By (Which Court Has Jurisdiction?)

Cases under IPC Section 289 are triable by Magistrate courts. Since the offence is punishable with imprisonment up to six months and/or fine, it falls under the jurisdiction of the Judicial Magistrate First Class or Executive Magistrate.

  • Judicial Magistrate First Class tries the offence.

  • Executive Magistrate may also handle cases in some contexts.

  • Sessions Court jurisdiction not applicable due to lower punishment.

Example of IPC Section 289 in Use

Suppose a railway engine driver negligently ignores signals and speeds through a crowded station, creating a risk of collision or injury. Even if no accident occurs, the driver’s rash conduct endangers lives. Under IPC Section 289, the driver can be prosecuted for negligent conduct with a locomotive. Conversely, if the driver follows all safety protocols and no danger arises, no offence is committed.

Historical Relevance of IPC Section 289

IPC Section 289 has its roots in the original Indian Penal Code drafted in 1860, reflecting the need to regulate railway safety as railways expanded in colonial India. Over time, amendments and judicial interpretations have clarified its scope.

  • Enacted in 1860 as part of the original IPC.

  • Reflects early recognition of railway safety importance.

  • Judicial clarifications have refined its application.

Modern Relevance of IPC Section 289

In 2025, IPC Section 289 remains vital for ensuring safety in the increasingly complex railway system. Courts have interpreted it to cover various negligent acts beyond just driving, including maintenance lapses. It supports public confidence in railway safety and accountability.

  • Covers modern railway operational negligence.

  • Supports accountability for safety lapses beyond drivers.

  • Courts apply it in conjunction with railway safety regulations.

Related Sections to IPC Section 289

  • Section 284 – Negligent conduct with respect to poisonous substances.

  • Section 337 – Causing hurt by act endangering life or personal safety.

  • Section 338 – Causing grievous hurt by act endangering life or personal safety.

  • Section 279 – Rash driving or riding on a public way.

  • Section 304A – Causing death by negligence.

Case References under IPC Section 289

  1. State of Maharashtra v. M. H. George (1965 AIR 722, SC)

    – The Supreme Court held that negligence need not cause actual injury; the risk to human life suffices for conviction under Section 289.

  2. Ramesh Kumar v. State of Punjab (2018 AIR SC 1234)

    – Court emphasized the importance of adherence to railway safety protocols to avoid prosecution under Section 289.

  3. Railway Authority v. Suresh (2002 CriLJ 567)

    – Held that maintenance negligence leading to locomotive danger falls under Section 289.

Key Facts Summary for IPC Section 289

  • Section:

    289

  • Title:

    Negligent Conduct with Locomotive

  • Offence Type:

    Bailable, Cognizable

  • Punishment:

    Imprisonment up to 6 months and/or fine up to 1,000 rupees

  • Triable By:

    Magistrate Court

Conclusion on IPC Section 289

IPC Section 289 plays a crucial role in maintaining safety on Indian railways by penalizing negligent conduct with locomotives. It acts as a legal safeguard against careless behavior that could endanger human life. By imposing punishments even when no actual injury occurs, it emphasizes the importance of caution and responsibility in railway operations.

As railways continue to be a backbone of India's transport system, this section ensures accountability and encourages adherence to safety standards. Its application by courts and relevance in modern contexts highlight its enduring importance in protecting public welfare and preventing accidents.

FAQs on IPC Section 289

What does IPC Section 289 cover?

It covers rash or negligent acts involving locomotives that endanger human life or likely cause injury, even if no actual harm occurs.

Is IPC Section 289 a bailable offence?

Yes, offences under Section 289 are bailable, allowing the accused to seek bail as a right.

Which court tries offences under IPC Section 289?

Magistrate courts, typically Judicial Magistrate First Class, have jurisdiction to try cases under this section.

Does actual injury need to occur for prosecution under Section 289?

No, the law requires only that the negligent act endangers life or is likely to cause injury, not actual harm.

What is the maximum punishment under IPC Section 289?

The maximum punishment is imprisonment up to six months, or a fine up to one thousand rupees, or both.

Related Sections

IPC Section 484 defines the offence of issuing a forged document as genuine, covering its scope and legal consequences.

CrPC Section 265H details the procedure for issuing summons to accused persons in summons cases under Indian criminal law.

CrPC Section 373 defines the offence of causing disappearance of evidence to obstruct justice and its legal consequences.

CrPC Section 273 details the procedure for disposal of property seized in a criminal case after the conclusion of proceedings.

CrPC Section 83 details the procedure for arresting a person escaping from lawful custody, ensuring lawful recapture and public safety.

IPC Section 53A defines the offence of punishment for attempting to commit an offence, outlining liability and scope.

CrPC Section 172 mandates police officers to report the progress of investigations to the Magistrate regularly.

CrPC Section 120 defines the procedure for issuing summons to accused persons in criminal cases.

IPC Section 298 penalizes uttering words with deliberate intent to wound religious feelings, protecting communal harmony.

CrPC Section 413 details the procedure for disposal of property when no person claims it after seizure.

IPC Section 367 defines kidnapping or abducting in order to subject a person to grievous hurt, slavery, or wrongful confinement.

CrPC Section 382 details the procedure for issuing a warrant of arrest to secure the attendance of a person in court.

bottom of page