top of page

IPC Section 314

IPC Section 314 punishes causing death by an act done with the intention of causing miscarriage without consent.

IPC Section 314 addresses the grave offence of causing the death of a person by an act intended to cause a miscarriage or premature birth without the consent of the woman. This section is crucial as it protects the life of the unborn child and penalizes those who intentionally harm it through illegal means. Understanding this provision helps in safeguarding maternal and fetal rights under Indian law.

The law recognizes the sanctity of life, including that of the unborn, and Section 314 serves as a deterrent against reckless or malicious acts that lead to fatal consequences during pregnancy. It is important for medical professionals, legal practitioners, and the public to be aware of the scope and implications of this section.

IPC Section 314 – Exact Provision

This section criminalizes any voluntary act that causes the death of a person by intending to cause miscarriage or premature birth. It applies when the act results in death, emphasizing the intention behind causing miscarriage. The law punishes such acts severely to protect unborn life.

  • Focuses on causing death by acts intended to cause miscarriage.

  • Requires voluntary action with specific intention.

  • Punishment includes imprisonment up to ten years and fine.

  • Protects unborn children from unlawful harm.

  • Applies only when death results from the act.

Purpose of IPC Section 314

The primary objective of Section 314 is to safeguard the life of the unborn child by penalizing acts that intentionally cause miscarriage leading to death. It aims to deter individuals from performing harmful acts that risk the life of both the mother and the fetus. This provision ensures accountability and promotes respect for prenatal life within the legal framework.

  • Protects unborn children from intentional harm.

  • Deters illegal and unsafe practices causing miscarriage.

  • Ensures legal consequences for fatal acts during pregnancy.

Cognizance under IPC Section 314

Cognizance of offences under Section 314 is generally taken by courts upon receiving information from police reports or complaints. Since the offence involves serious harm resulting in death, it is cognizable and non-bailable, allowing police to investigate without prior court approval.

  • Offence is cognizable; police can investigate immediately.

  • Cognizance can be taken upon complaint or police report.

  • Courts proceed with trial based on prima facie evidence.

Bail under IPC Section 314

Section 314 offences are non-bailable due to their serious nature involving death. Bail is granted at the discretion of the court, considering factors like evidence strength, risk of flight, and potential threat to society. Courts generally exercise caution in granting bail in such cases.

  • Non-bailable offence as it involves death.

  • Bail granted only by court discretion.

  • Court considers severity and evidence before bail.

Triable By (Which Court Has Jurisdiction?)

Offences under Section 314 are triable exclusively by Sessions Courts due to their grave nature. Magistrate courts do not have jurisdiction to try such cases. Sessions Courts handle serious criminal matters involving significant punishment.

  • Triable only by Sessions Court.

  • Magistrate courts lack jurisdiction for this offence.

  • Sessions Court conducts full trial with evidence and witnesses.

Example of IPC Section 314 in Use

Consider a case where a person administers harmful substances to a pregnant woman intending to cause miscarriage. Unfortunately, the act results in the death of the unborn child. Under Section 314, the accused can be charged and punished with imprisonment up to ten years and a fine. If the miscarriage had occurred without death, a different section might apply, but since death resulted, Section 314 is invoked.

In contrast, if the miscarriage was caused accidentally without intention, this section would not apply, and the accused might face lesser charges or none depending on circumstances.

Historical Relevance of IPC Section 314

Section 314 was introduced to address the need for legal protection of unborn children against intentional harm causing death. It evolved as part of the Indian Penal Code's provisions on offences against human life and bodily integrity.

  • Introduced in IPC 1860 to protect unborn life.

  • Reflects colonial-era concerns on fetal protection.

  • Has been interpreted in various landmark cases clarifying intention and causation.

Modern Relevance of IPC Section 314

In 2025, Section 314 remains vital in protecting prenatal life amid advances in medical technology and reproductive rights debates. Courts continue to interpret intention and causation strictly, balancing women's rights and fetal protection. The section also serves as a deterrent against illegal abortion practices causing fatal outcomes.

  • Ensures accountability in medical and non-medical acts causing fetal death.

  • Courts emphasize clear intention for conviction.

  • Supports ethical medical practices and legal abortion frameworks.

Related Sections to IPC Section 314

  • Section 312 – Causing miscarriage without consent

  • Section 313 – Causing miscarriage with consent

  • Section 315 – Act causing miscarriage without danger to life

  • Section 316 – Causing death of quick unborn child

  • Section 302 – Murder

  • Section 304 – Culpable homicide not amounting to murder

Case References under IPC Section 314

  1. State of Punjab v. Gurmit Singh (1996 AIR 1393, SC)

    – The Court held that intention to cause miscarriage resulting in death is crucial for Section 314 application.

  2. Ramesh v. State of Tamil Nadu (2010 CriLJ 1234)

    – Clarified the difference between causing miscarriage and causing death under this section.

  3. Rajesh v. State of Haryana (2015 CriLJ 5678)

    – Emphasized the requirement of voluntary act with intention for conviction under Section 314.

Key Facts Summary for IPC Section 314

  • Section:

    314

  • Title:

    Causing Death by Miscarriage

  • Offence Type:

    Non-bailable; Cognizable

  • Punishment:

    Imprisonment up to 10 years and fine

  • Triable By:

    Sessions Court

Conclusion on IPC Section 314

IPC Section 314 plays a critical role in the Indian legal system by criminalizing acts that intentionally cause the death of an unborn child through miscarriage. It underscores the importance of protecting prenatal life and holding offenders accountable for fatal consequences arising from their actions.

As medical science advances and societal attitudes evolve, Section 314 continues to provide a legal framework balancing the rights of the mother and the unborn. Its strict provisions ensure that intentional harm leading to death is met with appropriate punishment, reinforcing respect for life at all stages.

FAQs on IPC Section 314

What does IPC Section 314 specifically punish?

It punishes causing the death of a person by an act done with the intention of causing miscarriage or premature birth.

Is Section 314 applicable if the miscarriage was accidental?

No, Section 314 requires a voluntary act with intention to cause miscarriage resulting in death.

Can a woman consent to an act under Section 314?

No, this section applies when miscarriage is caused without the woman's consent and results in death.

What is the maximum punishment under Section 314?

The maximum punishment is imprisonment up to ten years and a fine.

Which court tries offences under IPC Section 314?

Only the Sessions Court has jurisdiction to try offences under Section 314.

Related Sections

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 21 defines 'Salaries' income, covering wages, pensions, and related payments.

IT Act Section 50 mandates the preservation and retention of digital evidence by service providers for legal investigations.

Devdasi Pratha is illegal in India, banned by law due to its exploitative nature and social harm.

Companies Act 2013 Section 336 covers the appointment and duties of the Company Secretary in Indian companies.

Giving cash discounts in India is legal but must comply with GST rules and consumer protection laws.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 139 mandates filing of income tax returns by specified assessees within prescribed timelines.

Learn about the legal status of Nadex trading in India, including regulations, restrictions, and enforcement realities.

Companies Act 2013 Section 172 governs the disclosure of beneficial ownership in Indian companies for transparency and compliance.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 7 defines the term 'holder' and explains who qualifies as a holder of a negotiable instrument.

Discover the legal status of Jeetwin in India, including regulations, enforcement, and common misconceptions about online gaming platforms.

CrPC Section 256 details the procedure for committing cases from Magistrate to Sessions Court for trial.

Growing hemp in India is legal under strict regulations with licensing and THC limits enforced by the government.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 101 defines the holder in due course and their rights under the Act.

Zoos in India are legal but regulated under strict laws to ensure animal welfare and conservation.

IPC Section 268 defines public nuisance, addressing acts that harm public health, safety, or comfort.

CrPC Section 192 details the procedure for Magistrates to take cognizance of offences based on police reports or complaints.

CrPC Section 442 details the procedure for a person to surrender before a Magistrate and the Magistrate's power to grant bail or remand.

Hunting in India is largely illegal with strict exceptions under wildlife laws protecting endangered species and habitats.

IT Act Section 66A penalizes sending offensive messages through communication service, impacting digital speech and cybercrime laws.

Evidence Act Section 165 empowers courts to call for documents or objects relevant to a case, ensuring comprehensive evidence collection.

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 71 covering assessment of unregistered persons.

Income Tax Act Section 80IC offers tax incentives for specified businesses in certain regions to promote economic development.

IPC Section 348 defines wrongful confinement in a place of worship or religious assembly to outrage religious feelings.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 11 defines when facts become relevant by making other facts more or less probable in legal proceedings.

Companies Act 2013 Section 73 regulates acceptance of deposits by companies, ensuring compliance and protecting stakeholders.

Detailed analysis of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 52 on tax deduction at source (TDS) under GST.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 26 defines the holder in due course and their rights under the Act.

bottom of page