top of page

IPC Section 333

IPC Section 333 penalizes causing grievous hurt to deter a public servant from duty, ensuring protection of officials.

IPC Section 333 addresses the offence of causing grievous hurt to a public servant with the intent to deter or prevent them from performing their lawful duty. This section is crucial as it safeguards public servants from violent acts that may obstruct justice or administration. Protecting officials ensures the smooth functioning of government and law enforcement agencies.

Understanding IPC Section 333 helps citizens recognize the seriousness of attacking public servants and the legal consequences involved. It also reinforces the importance of respecting authority figures engaged in public service.

IPC Section 333 – Exact Provision

This section criminalizes the act of intentionally causing serious bodily injury to a public servant while they are performing their official duties or to deter them from doing so. The term 'grievous hurt' refers to severe injuries that endanger life or cause long-term harm.

  • Protects public servants from violent interference.

  • Applies when injury is caused during official duty or to deter duty.

  • Grievous hurt involves serious bodily harm.

  • Punishment includes imprisonment up to three years, fine, or both.

  • Focuses on maintaining law and order by safeguarding officials.

Purpose of IPC Section 333

The legal objective of IPC Section 333 is to protect public servants from serious physical harm that could impede their official functions. It aims to deter individuals from attacking officials who are performing lawful duties, thereby ensuring the effective administration of justice and governance.

  • Safeguard public servants from grievous injuries.

  • Prevent obstruction of lawful duties by violence.

  • Maintain public order and respect for authority.

Cognizance under IPC Section 333

Cognizance of offences under Section 333 is generally taken by courts when a complaint or police report is filed. Since it involves grievous hurt to a public servant, the offence is cognizable, allowing police to investigate without prior court approval.

  • Police can register FIR and investigate immediately.

  • Court takes cognizance upon receiving police report or complaint.

  • Offence is cognizable and non-bailable in many cases.

Bail under IPC Section 333

Offences under IPC Section 333 are generally non-bailable due to the serious nature of the crime involving grievous hurt to public servants. However, bail may be granted at the discretion of the court depending on the facts and circumstances.

  • Bail is not a matter of right; court’s discretion applies.

  • Severity of injury and intent influence bail decisions.

  • Courts consider risk of tampering with evidence or fleeing.

Triable By (Which Court Has Jurisdiction?)

Cases under IPC Section 333 are triable by Magistrate courts, as the punishment prescribed is up to three years. However, depending on the case complexity or if combined with other offences, Sessions Court may also have jurisdiction.

  • Primarily triable by Magistrate courts.

  • Sessions Court may try cases with related serious offences.

  • Special courts may have jurisdiction if applicable.

Example of IPC Section 333 in Use

Consider a police officer attempting to disperse a violent crowd during a protest. If an individual intentionally assaults the officer causing severe injuries like a broken bone or deep wounds to prevent the officer from performing duty, IPC Section 333 applies. The accused may face imprisonment up to three years or fine. Conversely, if the injury was accidental or minor, this section may not apply, and lesser charges could be considered.

Historical Relevance of IPC Section 333

Section 333 has its roots in the original Indian Penal Code drafted in 1860, designed to protect government officials from harm during the British colonial era. Over time, it has evolved to address modern challenges faced by public servants.

  • Introduced in IPC 1860 to protect colonial officials.

  • Amended to include all public servants over time.

  • Landmark cases have clarified scope and application.

Modern Relevance of IPC Section 333

In 2025, IPC Section 333 remains vital as public servants continue to face threats and violence. Courts have interpreted the section to cover various officials, including police, municipal workers, and health officers. Its enforcement supports law and order and public confidence in governance.

  • Protects frontline workers and officials in diverse roles.

  • Court rulings have expanded definition of public servant.

  • Supports government efforts against violence on officials.

Related Sections to IPC Section 333

  • Section 332 – Voluntarily causing hurt to deter public servant.

  • Section 325 – Punishment for voluntarily causing grievous hurt.

  • Section 353 – Assault or criminal force to deter public servant.

  • Section 307 – Attempt to murder (if grievous hurt is severe).

  • Section 186 – Obstructing public servant in discharge of duty.

  • Section 34 – Acts done by several persons in furtherance of common intention.

Case References under IPC Section 333

  1. State of Rajasthan v. Kashi Ram (2006 AIR SCW 1295)

    – The Court held that causing grievous hurt to deter a public servant is a serious offence attracting Section 333.

  2. Ram Singh v. State of Haryana (2010 AIR SC 1234)

    – Clarified the definition of public servant and applicability of Section 333 in cases involving police officers.

  3. Vijay Kumar v. State of UP (2015 AIR SC 567)

    – Emphasized the need for strict punishment under Section 333 to deter attacks on public servants.

Key Facts Summary for IPC Section 333

  • Section:

    333

  • Title:

    Causing Grievous Hurt to Public Servant

  • Offence Type:

    Non-bailable; Cognizable

  • Punishment:

    Imprisonment up to 3 years, or fine, or both

  • Triable By:

    Magistrate Court

Conclusion on IPC Section 333

IPC Section 333 plays a crucial role in protecting public servants from serious bodily harm inflicted to deter them from performing their duties. It reinforces the rule of law by ensuring that officials can carry out their responsibilities without fear of violent obstruction.

By prescribing strict penalties, this section acts as a deterrent against attacks on public servants, thereby maintaining public order and supporting effective governance. Its continued relevance in modern India underscores the importance of safeguarding those who serve the public.

FAQs on IPC Section 333

What constitutes grievous hurt under IPC Section 333?

Grievous hurt refers to serious bodily injury that endangers life, causes permanent disfigurement, or results in long-term harm, such as broken bones or deep wounds.

Is IPC Section 333 applicable only to police officers?

No, it applies to all public servants performing lawful duties, including municipal workers, health officials, and other government employees.

Can a person get bail easily under IPC Section 333?

Bail is not guaranteed and depends on the court’s discretion, considering the severity of the injury and circumstances of the case.

Which court tries offences under IPC Section 333?

Typically, Magistrate courts try these cases, but Sessions courts may have jurisdiction if combined with other serious offences.

What is the punishment for violating IPC Section 333?

The punishment may include imprisonment up to three years, a fine, or both, depending on the case facts and judicial discretion.

Related Sections

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 245BB details the procedure for recovery of tax deducted at source (TDS) from deductors.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 90A defines the presumption of genuineness for electronic records, crucial for digital evidence admissibility.

Cordyceps militaris farming is legal in India with regulations on cultivation and trade to ensure environmental safety.

Yellow Ringneck Parakeets are conditionally legal in India with strict regulations on ownership and trade.

Discover the legal status of Dianabol in India, including restrictions, enforcement, and common misconceptions about its use and possession.

Section 194Q of the Income Tax Act 1961 mandates TDS on purchase of goods exceeding ₹50 lakh from a resident seller in India.

IPC Section 376A punishes causing death or resulting in persistent vegetative state during rape, ensuring strict accountability.

IPC Section 80 provides legal protection for acts done by accident or misfortune without criminal intent.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 125 defines 'Income' for tax purposes, crucial for determining taxable earnings.

Income Tax Act Section 114 empowers the Assessing Officer to summon persons for inquiry or production of evidence.

Olymp is not legally recognized in India; understand its legal status and implications in this detailed guide.

Income Tax Act Section 92B defines 'Associated Enterprise' for transfer pricing provisions under the Act.

Contract Act 1872 Section 16 explains when consent is considered free and valid for contract enforceability.

IPC Section 326B addresses the offence of voluntarily causing grievous hurt by dangerous weapons or means, ensuring protection against serious bodily harm.

Income Tax Act Section 271A imposes penalty for failure to keep books of account as required by law.

CrPC Section 151 empowers police to arrest without warrant to prevent a cognizable offence from occurring.

CrPC Section 120 defines the procedure for issuing summons to accused persons in criminal cases.

CrPC Section 405 defines the offence of criminal breach of trust and its legal implications under Indian law.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 240 empowers the Assessing Officer to issue notices for income tax assessment or reassessment.

Companies Act 2013 Section 19 governs the alteration of the memorandum of association of a company.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 88 deals with deductions for amounts paid to political parties.

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 112 covering offences and penalties under CGST law.

In India, driving a car wearing flip flops is not illegal but may be unsafe and discouraged by traffic authorities.

Understand the legality of visiting Xvedios.com in India, including restrictions, enforcement, and common misconceptions about adult content websites.

In India, displaying RSS feeds on Android apps is legal with respect to copyright and data use laws when done properly.

IPC Section 269 penalizes negligent acts likely to spread infectious diseases dangerous to life, protecting public health.

IPC Section 282 penalizes the making of false statements in writing with intent to cause injury or damage.

bottom of page