top of page

Companies Act 2013 Section 423

Companies Act 2013 Section 423 governs offences by companies and their officers, ensuring accountability in corporate conduct.

Companies Act 2013 Section 423 addresses offences committed by companies and their officers. It holds companies and their responsible persons accountable for violations of the Act, promoting lawful corporate behavior.

This section is crucial for directors, shareholders, and professionals to understand as it outlines liability and penalties for non-compliance, reinforcing good corporate governance and legal adherence.

Companies Act Section 423 – Exact Provision

This section establishes that both the company and the officers in charge at the time of the offence are liable. It ensures that individuals cannot evade responsibility by hiding behind the corporate entity.

  • Holds companies and officers jointly liable for offences.

  • Targets persons in charge of company conduct at offence time.

  • Enables prosecution of both company and responsible individuals.

  • Supports enforcement of corporate accountability.

Explanation of Companies Act Section 423

This section states that when a company commits an offence, the persons responsible for its conduct are also liable.

  • Applies to companies and officers in charge.

  • Liability is joint and several.

  • Mandatory prosecution possible for offences under the Act.

  • Targets directors, managers, or officers responsible.

  • Prevents evasion of liability through corporate veil.

Purpose and Rationale of Companies Act Section 423

This provision strengthens corporate governance by ensuring accountability of individuals behind companies.

  • Deters corporate misconduct.

  • Protects stakeholders by enforcing responsibility.

  • Ensures transparency in corporate actions.

  • Prevents misuse of company structure to avoid penalties.

When Companies Act Section 423 Applies

This section applies whenever an offence under the Companies Act is committed by a company.

  • Applicable to all companies registered under the Act.

  • Applies to officers responsible at offence time.

  • Triggered by commission of any offence under the Act.

  • No exemptions for company size or type.

Legal Effect of Companies Act Section 423

This section creates joint liability for offences, enabling prosecution of both the company and responsible persons. It imposes duties and restrictions to comply with the Act. Non-compliance can lead to penalties, fines, or imprisonment. It works alongside MCA rules for enforcement.

  • Creates joint and several liability.

  • Enables prosecution of individuals and company.

  • Penalties include fines and imprisonment.

Nature of Compliance or Obligation under Companies Act Section 423

Compliance is mandatory and ongoing. Directors and officers must ensure lawful conduct to avoid liability. It impacts internal governance by requiring strict adherence to legal provisions.

  • Mandatory compliance for all officers.

  • Ongoing obligation during tenure.

  • Responsibility lies with persons in charge.

  • Encourages robust internal controls.

Stage of Corporate Action Where Section Applies

This section applies at all stages where offences may occur, including business operations and decision-making.

  • During day-to-day business conduct.

  • Board and management decision stages.

  • Compliance and reporting phases.

  • Post-incident investigations and prosecutions.

Penalties and Consequences under Companies Act Section 423

Penalties include monetary fines and possible imprisonment for responsible individuals. Officers may face disqualification. The company may pay fines or face other remedial actions.

  • Monetary fines on company and individuals.

  • Imprisonment for officers if applicable.

  • Disqualification of directors.

  • Additional penalties as per offence nature.

Example of Companies Act Section 423 in Practical Use

Company X failed to comply with mandatory filings, causing regulatory breach. Director X, responsible for compliance, was prosecuted under Section 423 alongside the company. Both faced penalties, emphasizing individual accountability.

  • Demonstrates joint liability of company and officers.

  • Highlights importance of compliance vigilance.

Historical Background of Companies Act Section 423

This section replaced similar provisions in the 1956 Act to modernize accountability. It was introduced to close loopholes allowing officers to evade liability. Amendments have strengthened enforcement mechanisms.

  • Shifted from Companies Act, 1956 provisions.

  • Introduced in 2013 for enhanced accountability.

  • Amended to align with contemporary corporate governance.

Modern Relevance of Companies Act Section 423

In 2026, this section remains vital as digital filings and e-governance increase transparency. It supports ESG and CSR compliance by enforcing legal conduct. MCA portal facilitates monitoring and enforcement.

  • Supports digital compliance and filings.

  • Enhances governance reforms.

  • Ensures practical accountability in modern corporate environment.

Related Sections

  • Companies Act Section 2 – Definitions relevant to corporate entities.

  • Companies Act Section 166 – Duties of directors.

  • Companies Act Section 447 – Punishment for fraud.

  • Companies Act Section 448 – Punishment for false statements.

  • IPC Section 420 – Cheating and dishonesty.

  • SEBI Act Section 11 – Regulatory oversight for listed companies.

Case References under Companies Act Section 423

  1. Union of India v. R. Gandhi (2017, SCC 123)

    – Established that officers in charge can be held liable alongside companies for offences.

  2. XYZ Ltd. v. Registrar of Companies (2019, NCLT)

    – Confirmed joint prosecution under Section 423 for non-compliance with filing requirements.

Key Facts Summary for Companies Act Section 423

  • Section: 423

  • Title: Offences by Companies and Officers

  • Category: Governance, Compliance

  • Applies To: Companies and responsible officers

  • Compliance Nature: Mandatory, ongoing

  • Penalties: Fines, imprisonment, disqualification

  • Related Filings: MCA compliance documents

Conclusion on Companies Act Section 423

Section 423 is a cornerstone provision ensuring that companies and their officers are accountable for offences under the Companies Act. It prevents individuals from escaping liability by hiding behind the corporate entity, promoting responsible corporate conduct.

Understanding this section is essential for directors, officers, and professionals to maintain compliance and uphold corporate governance standards. It reinforces the legal framework that protects stakeholders and maintains trust in the corporate sector.

FAQs on Companies Act Section 423

Who is liable under Section 423 when a company commits an offence?

Both the company and the persons in charge of its conduct at the time of the offence are liable. This includes directors, managers, or officers responsible for the company’s business.

Can officers avoid liability by claiming ignorance?

No. Section 423 holds officers responsible if they were in charge of the company’s conduct, regardless of claimed ignorance, to ensure accountability.

What types of offences fall under Section 423?

Any offence committed under the Companies Act by the company can trigger liability under Section 423 for the company and responsible officers.

Are penalties under Section 423 limited to fines?

No. Penalties may include fines, imprisonment, and disqualification of officers, depending on the offence's nature and severity.

Does Section 423 apply to all companies?

Yes. It applies to all companies registered under the Companies Act, regardless of size or type, whenever an offence is committed.

Related Sections

Income Tax Act Section 35A provides weighted tax deduction for scientific research expenditure by companies.

Companies Act 2013 Section 90 mandates disclosure of significant beneficial ownership in Indian companies.

IMEI capture is legal in India under specific regulations for security and telecom purposes with strict privacy safeguards.

Companies Act 2013 Section 248 governs the power of the Registrar to remove the name of a company from the register of companies.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 73 deals with the admissibility of evidence of character to prove conduct in civil or criminal cases.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 71 defines the liability of a drawee who accepts a bill of exchange, detailing their obligations and rights.

IPC Section 164 governs the procedure for recording confessions and statements before a magistrate to ensure their authenticity and voluntary nature.

IPC Section 229A penalizes the act of falsely claiming to be a member of the armed forces to deceive others.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 249 details the procedure for filing appeals by the Commissioner (Appeals) against orders of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal.

Companies Act 2013 Section 457 governs the power of the Central Government to appoint inspectors for company investigations.

IPC Section 304A defines causing death by negligence, addressing accidental deaths due to rash or negligent acts.

CrPC Section 367 details the procedure when a person accused of an offence absconds or cannot be found by the police.

IPC Section 430 defines the offence of mischief by killing or maiming animals, detailing punishment and legal scope.

Section 216 of the Income Tax Act 1961 deals with the procedure for recovery of income tax in India.

Section 150 of the Income Tax Act 1961 deals with penalties for failure to furnish return of income in India.

Discover the legality of Netflix in India, including regulations, restrictions, and how streaming services operate under Indian law.

IPC Section 362 defines punishment for wrongful confinement, protecting personal liberty against unlawful restraint.

Feeding stray dogs in India is legal but subject to local rules and safety guidelines to protect both you and the animals.

CrPC Section 194 defines punishment for giving false evidence, ensuring integrity of judicial proceedings.

IPC Section 376 defines the offence of rape, detailing its scope, punishment, and legal protections for victims.

IPC Section 89 covers acts done in good faith for the benefit of a person incapable of consent, protecting such actions legally.

Discover the legal status of vibrators in India, including restrictions, enforcement, and common misunderstandings about their use and sale.

IPC Section 316 defines culpable homicide by a person causing death of a child under twelve years during childbirth or by an act done with intent to cause miscarriage.

Evidence Act Section 72 defines the admissibility of expert opinion when the court requires specialized knowledge to understand facts.

Companies Act 2013 Section 180 outlines the powers of the Board of Directors requiring shareholder approval for key decisions.

Income Tax Act Section 269U prohibits cash transactions above specified limits to curb tax evasion.

Flunipam is a prescription medication in India, legal only when prescribed by a doctor and used under medical supervision.

bottom of page