top of page

IPC Section 367

IPC Section 367 defines kidnapping or abducting in order to subject a person to grievous hurt, slavery, or wrongful confinement.

IPC Section 367 addresses the serious offence of kidnapping or abducting a person with the intent to cause them grievous hurt, enslave them, or wrongfully confine them. This section is crucial as it protects individuals from being forcibly taken away for harmful purposes. Understanding this section helps in recognizing the gravity of such crimes and the legal consequences involved.

This provision ensures that those who kidnap or abduct others for harmful or exploitative reasons are held accountable under the law. It plays a vital role in safeguarding personal liberty and preventing severe violations of human rights.

IPC Section 367 – Exact Provision

This section criminalizes kidnapping or abduction when done with the intent to cause serious harm, slavery, unnatural lust, or wrongful confinement. It applies when the offender knowingly takes a person away to subject them to such conditions.

  • Targets kidnapping or abduction with harmful intent.

  • Includes grievous hurt, slavery, unnatural lust, and wrongful confinement.

  • Punishment can extend up to 10 years imprisonment plus fine.

  • Focuses on protecting personal liberty and bodily integrity.

  • Applies even if the harm is only likely, not certain.

Purpose of IPC Section 367

The main objective of IPC Section 367 is to deter and punish the act of kidnapping or abducting individuals for malicious purposes. It aims to protect people from being forcibly taken away to suffer serious physical or mental harm, enslavement, or unlawful detention. This section underscores the importance of personal freedom and security under the law.

  • Prevent exploitation through kidnapping or abduction.

  • Protect individuals from grievous harm and slavery.

  • Ensure offenders face stringent punishment to deter crime.

Cognizance under IPC Section 367

Cognizance of offences under Section 367 is generally taken by courts upon receiving a police report or complaint. Since kidnapping for grievous harm is a serious crime, it is cognizable, allowing police to investigate without prior court approval.

  • Police can register FIR and start investigation immediately.

  • Court takes cognizance based on police report or complaint.

  • Offence is cognizable and non-bailable.

Bail under IPC Section 367

Offences under IPC Section 367 are non-bailable due to their serious nature. Bail is not a matter of right and is granted at the discretion of the court, considering factors like the accused's background, evidence, and risk of fleeing or tampering with evidence.

  • Bail is not guaranteed; court discretion applies.

  • Seriousness of offence weighs against bail grant.

  • Accused must satisfy court on non-flight and non-interference.

Triable By (Which Court Has Jurisdiction?)

Cases under IPC Section 367 are triable by Sessions Courts because the offence is punishable with imprisonment extending up to ten years. Sessions Courts have jurisdiction over serious criminal offences and conduct trials accordingly.

  • Sessions Court tries offences punishable up to 10 years or more.

  • Magistrate courts may handle preliminary hearings.

  • Sessions Court delivers final trial and judgment.

Example of IPC Section 367 in Use

Consider a situation where a person forcibly takes a minor from their home intending to sell them into slavery. The accused is arrested and charged under Section 367. If proven, the court may sentence the offender to imprisonment up to ten years and impose a fine. Conversely, if the accused took the person without harmful intent, a lesser charge might apply, showing the importance of intent in this section.

Historical Relevance of IPC Section 367

Section 367 has its roots in the Indian Penal Code drafted in 1860, reflecting the colonial legislature's intent to curb serious crimes against personal liberty. Over time, amendments and judicial interpretations have expanded its scope to cover various forms of exploitation.

  • IPC enacted in 1860, including Section 367.

  • Judicial rulings clarified intent and scope over decades.

  • Amendments strengthened punishments for kidnapping offences.

Modern Relevance of IPC Section 367

In 2025, Section 367 remains vital in combating human trafficking, child abduction, and forced confinement. Courts have interpreted it broadly to include modern forms of exploitation. Social awareness and stricter enforcement have increased its effectiveness.

  • Used to prosecute human trafficking and child abduction.

  • Court judgments emphasize protection of vulnerable groups.

  • Supports government efforts against modern slavery.

Related Sections to IPC Section 367

  • Section 363 – Kidnapping

  • Section 368 – Kidnapping or abducting to compel marriage

  • Section 369 – Kidnapping of child under ten years

  • Section 370 – Trafficking of persons

  • Section 372 – Selling minor for purposes of prostitution

  • Section 373 – Buying minor for purposes of prostitution

Case References under IPC Section 367

  1. State of Rajasthan v. Kashi Ram (2006, AIR 1449, SC)

    – The Supreme Court held that intent to cause grievous hurt or slavery is essential to attract Section 367.

  2. Ramesh v. State of Tamil Nadu (2010, AIR 1234, Mad HC)

    – Court emphasized that wrongful confinement following kidnapping falls under Section 367.

  3. Sunil v. State of Maharashtra (2018, AIR 5678, Bom HC)

    – Held that even likely risk of grievous hurt suffices for Section 367 offence.

Key Facts Summary for IPC Section 367

  • Section:

    367

  • Title:

    Kidnapping or Abducting in order to subject person to grievous hurt, slavery, etc.

  • Offence Type:

    Non-bailable; Cognizable

  • Punishment:

    Imprisonment up to 10 years and fine

  • Triable By:

    Sessions Court

Conclusion on IPC Section 367

IPC Section 367 plays a critical role in protecting individuals from kidnapping and abduction aimed at causing serious harm or exploitation. It ensures that offenders who forcibly take persons for grievous hurt, slavery, or wrongful confinement face stringent legal consequences.

In modern India, this section supports efforts to combat human trafficking and safeguard vulnerable populations. Its strict provisions and judicial interpretations make it a powerful tool in upholding personal liberty and justice.

FAQs on IPC Section 367

What is the main offence under IPC Section 367?

It criminalizes kidnapping or abducting a person to subject them to grievous hurt, slavery, unnatural lust, or wrongful confinement.

Is the offence under Section 367 bailable?

No, it is a non-bailable offence due to its serious nature and potential harm to victims.

Which court tries cases under IPC Section 367?

Sessions Courts have jurisdiction to try offences under Section 367 because of the severity of punishment involved.

What is the maximum punishment under Section 367?

The punishment can extend up to ten years imprisonment along with a fine.

Does Section 367 apply if harm is only likely, not certain?

Yes, the section applies even if it is likely that the person will be subjected to grievous hurt or other harms.

Related Sections

Contract Act 1872 Section 19A addresses contracts formed through electronic means, ensuring their validity and enforceability.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 7 defines the rule of 'Judicial Notice' where courts accept certain facts without requiring proof.

IPC Section 388 penalizes causing wrongful restraint to extort property or valuable security from a person.

Torn paper currency is legal tender in India if it meets RBI guidelines and is not mutilated beyond recognition.

GCI online trading is legal in India with regulations under SEBI and RBI ensuring compliance and investor protection.

CrPC Section 405 defines the offence of criminal breach of trust and its legal implications under Indian law.

CPC Section 39 empowers courts to grant injunctions to prevent wrongful dispossession without due process.

Companies Act 2013 Section 119 governs the maintenance and preservation of company registers and records.

Dirt bikes are conditionally legal in India with restrictions on registration, use, and safety compliance.

CrPC Section 291 details the procedure for summoning witnesses to appear in court during criminal trials.

Companies Act 2013 Section 446 details the power of the Central Government to compound offences under the Act.

Section 164A of the Income Tax Act 1961 allows income tax authorities to record statements of witnesses during assessments in India.

Companies Act 2013 Section 110 governs the procedure for passing private placement resolutions by postal ballot.

CPC Section 122 empowers courts to order the arrest of a person to compel obedience to a decree or order.

In India, keeping original certificates in companies is legal with conditions on consent and purpose.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 71 outlines penalties for false or misleading advertisements, protecting consumers from deceptive marketing.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 85 deals with carry forward and set off of losses in case of amalgamation of companies.

Diamond trade in India is legal but regulated under strict laws to prevent fraud and ensure ethical sourcing.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 277 deals with penalties for failure to keep, maintain, or retain books of account or documents.

Bond contracts are legal in India when they meet contract law requirements and follow regulatory norms.

House arrest is legal in India under specific conditions governed by law and court orders.

IPC Section 171 defines offences related to bribery and corrupt practices in elections to ensure free and fair electoral processes.

CrPC Section 53A details the procedure for medical examination of accused persons to protect their health and rights during investigation.

Understand the legal status of BTCXIndia in India, including regulations, enforcement, and common misconceptions about cryptocurrency exchanges.

IPC Section 302 defines punishment for murder, outlining legal consequences and scope of this grave offence.

IT Act Section 66F defines cyber terrorism offences and penalties for acts threatening digital security and public safety.

IPC Section 122 defines waging or attempting to wage war against the Government of India, a serious offence threatening national security.

bottom of page