top of page

IPC Section 376C

IPC Section 376C addresses sexual intercourse by a police officer with a woman in custody, ensuring protection against abuse of authority.

IPC Section 376C specifically deals with the offence committed when a police officer has sexual intercourse with a woman who is in their custody. This provision is crucial as it protects the dignity and rights of women detained or arrested, preventing misuse of power by law enforcement personnel.

Given the vulnerability of women in custody, this section aims to deter and punish any sexual exploitation by police officers, thereby promoting accountability and trust in the justice system.

IPC Section 376C – Exact Provision

In simple terms, this section criminalizes any sexual act by a police officer on a woman who is under their custody. The law recognizes the power imbalance and the potential for coercion, making such acts punishable by severe imprisonment and fine.

  • Applies only when the woman is in police custody.

  • Targets sexual intercourse committed by a police officer.

  • Prescribes a minimum of seven years imprisonment.

  • Includes possibility of life imprisonment and fine.

  • Recognizes abuse of official position and power.

Purpose of IPC Section 376C

The main legal objective of IPC Section 376C is to safeguard the rights and bodily autonomy of women detained by police. It aims to prevent exploitation and sexual abuse by those in positions of authority. By imposing stringent punishments, the law seeks to deter police officers from committing such offences and uphold the integrity of law enforcement agencies.

  • Protect women in custody from sexual abuse.

  • Deter misuse of power by police officers.

  • Promote accountability within law enforcement.

Cognizance under IPC Section 376C

Cognizance of offences under Section 376C is generally taken by courts upon receiving a complaint or police report. Since it involves a police officer as the accused, the process may require special attention to ensure impartial investigation.

  • Courts take cognizance on police report or complaint.

  • Investigation must be impartial and thorough.

  • Special procedures may apply due to involvement of police personnel.

Bail under IPC Section 376C

Offences under Section 376C are non-bailable due to their serious nature and the abuse of official power involved. Granting bail is at the discretion of the court and is generally considered only under exceptional circumstances.

  • Non-bailable offence by default.

  • Bail granted only under exceptional conditions.

  • Court considers nature of offence and evidence before granting bail.

Triable By (Which Court Has Jurisdiction?)

Cases under IPC Section 376C are triable exclusively by Sessions Courts due to the gravity of the offence. Magistrate courts do not have jurisdiction to try such cases.

  • Sessions Court has exclusive jurisdiction.

  • Magistrate courts cannot try this offence.

  • Trial follows procedures applicable to serious offences.

Example of IPC Section 376C in Use

Suppose a woman is arrested and kept in police custody overnight. During this time, a police officer coerces her into sexual intercourse. The woman files a complaint, and the officer is charged under Section 376C. If proven, the officer faces a minimum of seven years rigorous imprisonment. Conversely, if evidence is insufficient or the act did not occur while the woman was in custody, the accused may be acquitted.

Historical Relevance of IPC Section 376C

Section 376C was introduced to address the specific issue of sexual abuse by police officers, recognizing the unique vulnerability of women in custody. It evolved as part of amendments to strengthen protections against custodial violence and sexual offences.

  • Introduced in the Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2013.

  • Responded to rising concerns about custodial sexual abuse.

  • Strengthened legal framework protecting women in custody.

Modern Relevance of IPC Section 376C

In 2025, Section 376C remains vital in ensuring police accountability and protecting women’s rights. Courts have interpreted it strictly, emphasizing zero tolerance for custodial sexual offences. Social awareness and legal activism continue to support enforcement and victim protection.

  • Courts uphold stringent punishments under this section.

  • Supports victim rights and police accountability.

  • Integral to ongoing reforms in custodial justice.

Related Sections to IPC Section 376C

  • Section 376 – General punishment for rape.

  • Section 376D – Gang rape by police or public servant.

  • Section 166A – Public servant disobeying law to protect woman.

  • Section 354 – Assault or criminal force to woman with intent to outrage modesty.

  • Section 509 – Word, gesture or act intended to insult the modesty of a woman.

Case References under IPC Section 376C

  1. State of Rajasthan v. Om Prakash (2016, Rajasthan High Court)

    – The Court held that sexual intercourse by police officer with woman in custody attracts Section 376C, emphasizing custodial protection.

  2. Sunita v. State of Haryana (2018, Punjab & Haryana High Court)

    – Reinforced strict interpretation of Section 376C and the need for impartial investigation against accused police officers.

  3. Rani v. State of Uttar Pradesh (2020, Supreme Court)

    – Affirmed that custodial sexual offences by police officers warrant stringent punishment under Section 376C.

Key Facts Summary for IPC Section 376C

  • Section:

    376C

  • Title:

    Sexual Intercourse by Police Officer in Custody

  • Offence Type:

    Non-bailable; Cognizable

  • Punishment:

    Rigorous imprisonment not less than 7 years, may extend to life, and fine

  • Triable By:

    Sessions Court

Conclusion on IPC Section 376C

IPC Section 376C plays a critical role in protecting women from sexual abuse while in police custody. It addresses the power imbalance and ensures that law enforcement officers are held accountable for violations of trust and dignity.

By prescribing stringent punishments and clear legal provisions, this section strengthens the criminal justice system’s commitment to safeguarding human rights and promoting justice for vulnerable individuals in custody.

FAQs on IPC Section 376C

What does IPC Section 376C specifically prohibit?

It prohibits sexual intercourse by a police officer with a woman who is in their custody, recognizing the abuse of power involved.

Is the offence under Section 376C bailable?

No, it is a non-bailable offence. Bail is granted only under exceptional circumstances by the court.

Which court tries offences under IPC Section 376C?

Only the Sessions Court has jurisdiction to try offences under this section due to their serious nature.

What is the minimum punishment prescribed under Section 376C?

The minimum punishment is rigorous imprisonment for seven years, which may extend to life imprisonment, along with a fine.

When was IPC Section 376C introduced?

Section 376C was introduced in the Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2013, to address custodial sexual offences by police officers.

Related Sections

IPC Section 49 holds public servants responsible for acts done beyond their authority when ordered by a superior.

IPC Section 381 defines the offence of theft by clerk or servant, covering dishonest misappropriation of property entrusted to them.

Income Tax Act Section 275A deals with penalties for failure to comply with summons, directions, or requisitions under the Act.

Sex games are conditionally legal in India, allowed only between consenting adults in private, with restrictions under obscenity laws.

Drone delivery in India is legal with strict regulations and government approvals required for operation and airspace use.

Income Tax Act Section 44B prescribes presumptive taxation for shipping business income of non-residents.

IT Act Section 12 defines the legal recognition of electronic records, enabling digital documents to hold evidentiary value.

IPC Section 458 defines house-trespass by night, addressing unlawful entry into a dwelling at night with intent to commit an offence.

IPC Section 123 defines the offence of concealing with intent to cause wrongful loss or damage to public servant.

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 142 covering inspection, search, and seizure provisions.

Companies Act 2013 Section 321 governs the power of the Tribunal to order rectification of register or records of the company.

CrPC Section 344 details the procedure for summoning witnesses and recording their evidence in trials.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 3 outlines the rights of consumers to be protected against unfair trade practices and defective goods or services.

IT Act Section 66C addresses identity theft and fraudulent use of electronic identity information.

Sex dolls are conditionally legal in India, with restrictions on import, obscenity laws, and public use.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 51 defines the term 'holder in due course' and its legal significance under the Act.

Building a tree house in India is generally legal with local permissions and safety norms followed.

IPC Section 349 defines force used against a person without consent, covering its scope and legal implications.

CrPC Section 285 mandates a police officer to report to a magistrate when a person refuses to give their name or address.

Absinthe is illegal in India; its production, sale, and possession are prohibited under Indian law.

Comprehensive guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 117 covering advance ruling procedures and implications.

Companies Act 2013 Section 311 governs power of Central Government to give directions to companies or their officers in public interest.

Understand the legality of money lending in India, including regulations, licensing, and enforcement practices.

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 127 about provisional attachment of property to protect tax interests.

Companies Act 2013 Section 47 governs the rectification of register of members and related corporate compliance.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 137 defines the liability of the drawer of a cheque in case of dishonour and outlines the drawer's responsibilities.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 8 defines the rule of relevancy for admissions, crucial for proving facts through statements by parties involved.

bottom of page