top of page

IPC Section 376C

IPC Section 376C addresses sexual intercourse by a police officer with a woman in custody, ensuring protection against abuse of authority.

IPC Section 376C – Sexual Intercourse by Police Officer in Custody

IPC Section 376C specifically deals with the offence committed when a police officer has sexual intercourse with a woman who is in their custody. This provision is crucial as it protects the dignity and rights of women detained or arrested, preventing misuse of power by law enforcement personnel.

Given the vulnerability of women in custody, this section aims to deter and punish any sexual exploitation by police officers, thereby promoting accountability and trust in the justice system.

IPC Section 376C – Exact Provision

In simple terms, this section criminalizes any sexual act by a police officer on a woman who is under their custody. The law recognizes the power imbalance and the potential for coercion, making such acts punishable by severe imprisonment and fine.

  • Applies only when the woman is in police custody.

  • Targets sexual intercourse committed by a police officer.

  • Prescribes a minimum of seven years imprisonment.

  • Includes possibility of life imprisonment and fine.

  • Recognizes abuse of official position and power.

Purpose of IPC Section 376C

The main legal objective of IPC Section 376C is to safeguard the rights and bodily autonomy of women detained by police. It aims to prevent exploitation and sexual abuse by those in positions of authority. By imposing stringent punishments, the law seeks to deter police officers from committing such offences and uphold the integrity of law enforcement agencies.

  • Protect women in custody from sexual abuse.

  • Deter misuse of power by police officers.

  • Promote accountability within law enforcement.

Cognizance under IPC Section 376C

Cognizance of offences under Section 376C is generally taken by courts upon receiving a complaint or police report. Since it involves a police officer as the accused, the process may require special attention to ensure impartial investigation.

  • Courts take cognizance on police report or complaint.

  • Investigation must be impartial and thorough.

  • Special procedures may apply due to involvement of police personnel.

Bail under IPC Section 376C

Offences under Section 376C are non-bailable due to their serious nature and the abuse of official power involved. Granting bail is at the discretion of the court and is generally considered only under exceptional circumstances.

  • Non-bailable offence by default.

  • Bail granted only under exceptional conditions.

  • Court considers nature of offence and evidence before granting bail.

Triable By (Which Court Has Jurisdiction?)

Cases under IPC Section 376C are triable exclusively by Sessions Courts due to the gravity of the offence. Magistrate courts do not have jurisdiction to try such cases.

  • Sessions Court has exclusive jurisdiction.

  • Magistrate courts cannot try this offence.

  • Trial follows procedures applicable to serious offences.

Example of IPC Section 376C in Use

Suppose a woman is arrested and kept in police custody overnight. During this time, a police officer coerces her into sexual intercourse. The woman files a complaint, and the officer is charged under Section 376C. If proven, the officer faces a minimum of seven years rigorous imprisonment. Conversely, if evidence is insufficient or the act did not occur while the woman was in custody, the accused may be acquitted.

Historical Relevance of IPC Section 376C

Section 376C was introduced to address the specific issue of sexual abuse by police officers, recognizing the unique vulnerability of women in custody. It evolved as part of amendments to strengthen protections against custodial violence and sexual offences.

  • Introduced in the Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2013.

  • Responded to rising concerns about custodial sexual abuse.

  • Strengthened legal framework protecting women in custody.

Modern Relevance of IPC Section 376C

In 2025, Section 376C remains vital in ensuring police accountability and protecting women’s rights. Courts have interpreted it strictly, emphasizing zero tolerance for custodial sexual offences. Social awareness and legal activism continue to support enforcement and victim protection.

  • Courts uphold stringent punishments under this section.

  • Supports victim rights and police accountability.

  • Integral to ongoing reforms in custodial justice.

Related Sections to IPC Section 376C

  • Section 376 – General punishment for rape.

  • Section 376D – Gang rape by police or public servant.

  • Section 166A – Public servant disobeying law to protect woman.

  • Section 354 – Assault or criminal force to woman with intent to outrage modesty.

  • Section 509 – Word, gesture or act intended to insult the modesty of a woman.

Case References under IPC Section 376C

  1. State of Rajasthan v. Om Prakash (2016, Rajasthan High Court)

    – The Court held that sexual intercourse by police officer with woman in custody attracts Section 376C, emphasizing custodial protection.

  2. Sunita v. State of Haryana (2018, Punjab & Haryana High Court)

    – Reinforced strict interpretation of Section 376C and the need for impartial investigation against accused police officers.

  3. Rani v. State of Uttar Pradesh (2020, Supreme Court)

    – Affirmed that custodial sexual offences by police officers warrant stringent punishment under Section 376C.

Key Facts Summary for IPC Section 376C

  • Section:

    376C

  • Title:

    Sexual Intercourse by Police Officer in Custody

  • Offence Type:

    Non-bailable; Cognizable

  • Punishment:

    Rigorous imprisonment not less than 7 years, may extend to life, and fine

  • Triable By:

    Sessions Court

Conclusion on IPC Section 376C

IPC Section 376C plays a critical role in protecting women from sexual abuse while in police custody. It addresses the power imbalance and ensures that law enforcement officers are held accountable for violations of trust and dignity.

By prescribing stringent punishments and clear legal provisions, this section strengthens the criminal justice system’s commitment to safeguarding human rights and promoting justice for vulnerable individuals in custody.

FAQs on IPC Section 376C

What does IPC Section 376C specifically prohibit?

It prohibits sexual intercourse by a police officer with a woman who is in their custody, recognizing the abuse of power involved.

Is the offence under Section 376C bailable?

No, it is a non-bailable offence. Bail is granted only under exceptional circumstances by the court.

Which court tries offences under IPC Section 376C?

Only the Sessions Court has jurisdiction to try offences under this section due to their serious nature.

What is the minimum punishment prescribed under Section 376C?

The minimum punishment is rigorous imprisonment for seven years, which may extend to life imprisonment, along with a fine.

When was IPC Section 376C introduced?

Section 376C was introduced in the Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2013, to address custodial sexual offences by police officers.

Related Sections

CPC Section 93 empowers courts to summon witnesses, compel attendance, and enforce evidence production in civil suits.

IPC Section 260 defines the offence of wrongful confinement in a secret place, outlining its scope and punishment.

IPC Section 130 defines the offence of resisting lawful arrest or detention, ensuring public order and authority of law enforcement.

IPC Section 157 mandates police officers to register and investigate information about cognizable offences promptly.

IPC Section 195 defines offences related to giving false evidence and the legal procedures to prevent perjury in judicial proceedings.

IPC Section 201 addresses causing the disappearance of evidence to obstruct justice, defining its scope and punishment.

IPC Section 75 defines the punishment for attempts to commit offences punishable with death or life imprisonment.

IPC Section 430 defines the offence of mischief by killing or maiming animals, detailing punishment and legal scope.

CrPC Section 419 defines the offence of cheating by personation and its legal consequences under Indian law.

CrPC Section 119 empowers a Magistrate to order police investigation into cognizable offences upon receiving information.

IPC Section 489C defines the offence of using forged currency notes or banknotes, outlining penalties and legal scope.

CrPC Section 179 details the procedure for police to investigate cognizable offences upon receiving information or complaint.

bottom of page