IPC Section 464

IPC Section 464 addresses the crime of creating a false document or electronic record with the intention to cause harm or injury to someone. This section is crucial because documents often serve as evidence or proof in legal and personal matters. Forging such documents can lead to serious consequences, including wrongful loss or damage to individuals or entities.

Understanding this section helps in recognizing the severity of falsifying documents and the legal repercussions involved. It protects the integrity of records and maintains trust in official and private documentation.

IPC Section 464 – Exact Provision

This section criminalizes the act of making a false document or electronic record intending to cause harm. It covers documents that appear to be issued by public servants or any other false documents. The law aims to deter forgery and protect individuals and the public from deceitful practices.

• Making false documents or electronic records is an offence.

• Intent to cause damage or injury is essential.

• Includes documents purporting to be issued by public servants.

• Applies to both physical and electronic documents.

• Punishment is prescribed under this section.

Purpose of IPC Section 464

The legal objective of IPC Section 464 is to prevent and penalize the creation of false documents that can mislead, defraud, or harm individuals or the public. It safeguards the authenticity of documents which are often critical in legal, financial, and personal matters. By criminalizing such acts, the law aims to uphold trust and integrity in documentation.

• Protects individuals and public from fraudulent documents.

• Maintains the credibility of official and private records.

• Deters forgery and related dishonest activities.

Cognizance under IPC Section 464

Cognizance of offences under Section 464 is generally taken by courts when a complaint or report is filed by the aggrieved party or law enforcement. Since it involves forgery and false documentation, the offence is cognizable, allowing police to investigate without prior court approval.

• Offence is cognizable; police can register FIR and investigate.

• Court takes cognizance upon receiving police report or complaint.

• Investigation may involve forensic examination of documents.

Bail under IPC Section 464

Offences under IPC Section 464 are non-bailable due to their serious nature involving forgery and intent to cause harm. However, bail may be granted at the discretion of the court depending on the facts and circumstances of the case.

• Generally non-bailable offence.

• Bail depends on court’s discretion and case specifics.

• Factors like severity, evidence, and risk of tampering considered.

Triable By (Which Court Has Jurisdiction?)

Cases under IPC Section 464 are triable by a Magistrate Court. Depending on the gravity and connected offences, Sessions Court may also have jurisdiction. The trial court examines evidence and determines guilt or innocence.

• Primarily triable by Magistrate Court.

• Sessions Court may try cases linked with serious offences.

• Jurisdiction depends on nature and severity of the offence.

Example of IPC Section 464 in Use

Suppose a person creates a fake property ownership document claiming they own a house to fraudulently sell it to an unsuspecting buyer. The document appears genuine and is designed to deceive. When the buyer discovers the fraud, the person can be charged under IPC Section 464 for making a false document with intent to cause injury.

If the accused had no intention to cause harm or if the document was not false, the outcome would differ. The presence of intent and falsity is crucial for conviction under this section.

Historical Relevance of IPC Section 464

Section 464 has its roots in the original Indian Penal Code drafted in 1860, aimed at curbing forgery and protecting document integrity. Over time, amendments have included electronic records to keep pace with technological advances.

• Introduced in IPC 1860 to address forgery.

• Amended to include electronic records with IT Act developments.

• Landmark cases have clarified intent and scope.

Modern Relevance of IPC Section 464

In 2025, with increased digital transactions, IPC Section 464 plays a vital role in combating electronic forgery and cyber fraud. Courts have interpreted the section to cover digital documents, ensuring protection against evolving forms of document falsification.

• Includes electronic records and digital documents.

• Courts actively prosecute cyber forgery cases under this section.

• Supports legal framework against digital fraud and identity theft.

Related Sections to IPC Section 464

• Section 463 – Definition of Forgery

• Section 465 – Punishment for Forgery

• Section 466 – Forgery of valuable security, will, etc.

• Section 468 – Forgery for purpose of cheating

• Section 471 – Using as genuine a forged document

• Section 469 – Forgery for defamation

Case References under IPC Section 464

1. State of Maharashtra v. Dr. Praful B. Desai (2003, 4 SCC 601)

   – The Supreme Court held that intent to cause injury is essential for conviction under Section 464.

2. R. v. Kedar Nath (1954 AIR 123)

   – Clarified the importance of document falsity and intention in forgery cases.

3. Union of India v. Ibrahim Uddin (1971 AIR 1003)

   – Established that electronic records fall under the ambit of forgery provisions.

Key Facts Summary for IPC Section 464

• Section:

  464

• Title:

  Making a False Document

• Offence Type:

  Non-bailable; Cognizable

• Punishment:

  Imprisonment up to 2 years, or fine, or both

• Triable By:

  Magistrate Court

Conclusion on IPC Section 464

IPC Section 464 is a critical provision that protects the authenticity and reliability of documents, both physical and electronic. By criminalizing the making of false documents with intent to cause harm, it safeguards individuals and the public from deceit and fraud.

In the modern digital era, this section has gained even more importance as documents increasingly exist in electronic form. Its enforcement ensures trust in legal and commercial transactions, maintaining the rule of law and justice.

FAQs on IPC Section 464

What does IPC Section 464 cover?

It covers making false documents or electronic records with the intent to cause damage or injury to any person or the public.

Is making a false document under Section 464 a bailable offence?

No, it is generally a non-bailable offence, but bail may be granted at the court's discretion.

Which court tries offences under IPC Section 464?

Such offences are primarily triable by Magistrate Courts, though Sessions Courts may try related serious cases.

Does Section 464 apply to electronic documents?

Yes, the section includes electronic records, covering digital forgery and related offences.

What is the punishment under IPC Section 464?

The punishment can be imprisonment up to two years, or a fine, or both, depending on the case.