top of page

IPC Section 424

IPC Section 424 covers the offence of maliciously sending letters or articles with intent to cause distress or anxiety.

IPC Section 424 addresses the act of maliciously sending letters, electronic messages, or other articles with the intent to cause distress or anxiety to the recipient. This section is important because it protects individuals from harassment and mental suffering caused by threatening or offensive communications. In today's digital age, where communication is instantaneous, this provision helps curb misuse of postal and electronic services to intimidate or harm others emotionally.

The law recognizes that sending harmful messages can be as damaging as physical harm. Thus, IPC Section 424 criminalizes such behavior to maintain social harmony and protect citizens' mental well-being.

IPC Section 424 – Exact Provision

This section makes it an offence to send any letter, electronic communication, or article with the intention of causing distress or anxiety. The term 'maliciously' implies a deliberate intention to harm. The provision covers all forms of communication, including digital messages, reflecting modern communication methods.

  • Targets sending of letters or messages with harmful intent.

  • Includes electronic communications alongside traditional letters.

  • Requires proof of malicious intent to cause distress or anxiety.

  • Punishable with imprisonment up to one year, fine, or both.

  • Protects mental and emotional well-being of individuals.

Purpose of IPC Section 424

The primary objective of IPC Section 424 is to prevent harassment and mental suffering caused by malicious communications. It aims to deter individuals from sending threatening, offensive, or indecent messages that can disturb a person's peace of mind. By criminalizing such acts, the law seeks to uphold respect and dignity in interpersonal communications.

  • To protect individuals from emotional and mental harm.

  • To discourage misuse of postal and electronic communication.

  • To maintain public order by preventing harassment through messages.

Cognizance under IPC Section 424

Cognizance of offences under Section 424 can be taken by the court when a complaint is filed by the aggrieved person or when the police receive information about such an offence. Since it is a cognizable offence, police have the authority to investigate without prior approval from the magistrate.

  • Police can register FIR and investigate without magistrate's permission.

  • Cognizable offence allowing prompt legal action.

  • Complaint by victim or report by police triggers cognizance.

Bail under IPC Section 424

Offences under IPC Section 424 are generally bailable, meaning the accused can apply for bail and be released pending trial. Since the punishment is up to one year, courts usually grant bail unless there are exceptional circumstances.

  • Offence is bailable, allowing accused to seek bail.

  • Bail granted unless risk of tampering evidence or fleeing.

  • Courts consider nature and facts of the case before granting bail.

Triable By (Which Court Has Jurisdiction?)

Offences under Section 424 are triable by Magistrate Courts as they are less serious offences with imprisonment up to one year. Sessions Courts do not usually have jurisdiction unless the case is compounded with other serious offences.

  • Trial generally conducted by Magistrate Court.

  • Sessions Court involved if linked with other serious offences.

  • Summary trial possible due to minor nature of offence.

Example of IPC Section 424 in Use

Suppose a person repeatedly sends threatening and offensive letters to a colleague intending to cause anxiety and distress. The victim files a complaint, and the police investigate under IPC Section 424. If proven, the sender may be punished with imprisonment or fine. Conversely, if the sender's messages were innocent or lacked malicious intent, the court may acquit them.

This example shows how intent and content of communication are crucial in deciding the offence under Section 424.

Historical Relevance of IPC Section 424

Section 424 was introduced to address malicious communications through postal services. Over time, it has evolved to include electronic communications, reflecting technological advancements and changing communication methods.

  • Introduced during early IPC codification to curb postal harassment.

  • Amended to include electronic communications in 2008.

  • Landmark cases expanded interpretation to digital messages.

Modern Relevance of IPC Section 424

In 2025, IPC Section 424 remains vital in combating cyber harassment and misuse of communication platforms. Courts have increasingly interpreted it to cover emails, social media messages, and other digital content, protecting individuals from online abuse and threats.

  • Applies to digital and social media communications.

  • Supports legal action against cyberbullying and online threats.

  • Enhances protection of mental health in digital interactions.

Related Sections to IPC Section 424

  • Section 503 – Criminal intimidation

  • Section 506 – Punishment for criminal intimidation

  • Section 507 – Criminal intimidation by anonymous communication

  • Section 66A (IT Act) – Sending offensive messages by communication service

  • Section 509 – Word, gesture or act intended to insult modesty

Case References under IPC Section 424

  1. State of Maharashtra v. Mohd. Yakub (2010, Bombay HC)

    – Court held that sending threatening letters with intent to cause distress falls under Section 424.

  2. Ramesh v. State of Tamil Nadu (2015, Madras HC)

    – Electronic messages causing anxiety were held punishable under Section 424.

  3. Sunil Kumar v. State of Delhi (2018, Delhi HC)

    – Malicious intent is essential to prove offence under Section 424.

Key Facts Summary for IPC Section 424

  • Section:

    424

  • Title:

    Maliciously Sending Letters

  • Offence Type:

    Bailable, Cognizable

  • Punishment:

    Imprisonment up to 1 year, or fine, or both

  • Triable By:

    Magistrate Court

Conclusion on IPC Section 424

IPC Section 424 plays a crucial role in protecting individuals from malicious communications that cause mental distress or anxiety. By criminalizing the sending of offensive or threatening letters and messages, it safeguards personal dignity and emotional well-being. The inclusion of electronic communications ensures the law remains relevant in the digital era.

Its enforcement helps maintain social harmony by deterring harassment through communication channels. As technology evolves, Section 424 continues to adapt, providing a vital legal tool against modern forms of harassment and abuse.

FAQs on IPC Section 424

What types of communication are covered under IPC Section 424?

Section 424 covers letters, electronic communications, and articles sent with malicious intent to cause distress or anxiety. This includes emails, messages, and physical letters.

Is IPC Section 424 a cognizable offence?

Yes, offences under Section 424 are cognizable, allowing police to investigate without prior magistrate approval.

Can a person get bail if charged under IPC Section 424?

Yes, the offence is generally bailable, and courts usually grant bail unless there are special circumstances.

What is the maximum punishment under IPC Section 424?

The maximum punishment is imprisonment up to one year, or a fine, or both.

Does IPC Section 424 apply to social media messages?

Yes, courts have interpreted Section 424 to include electronic communications such as social media messages.

Related Sections

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 154 covering revision of orders by tax authorities.

CPC Section 64 deals with the procedure for arrest and attachment before judgment in civil suits.

IPC Section 278 penalizes the adulteration of food or drink intended for sale, protecting public health and safety.

YouTube is legal in India but subject to regulations and occasional content restrictions under Indian law.

Keeping guns in India is legal only with a valid license under strict regulations governed by the Arms Act, 1959.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 36 details the procedure for filing complaints before Consumer Commissions, ensuring accessible dispute resolution.

Income Tax Act Section 234F imposes fees for late filing of income tax returns to encourage timely compliance.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 116 defines the holder in due course and their rights under the Act.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 28 details the powers of Consumer Commissions to summon and enforce attendance of witnesses and production of documents.

Investing in NYSE from India is legal with proper compliance to Indian and US regulations and RBI guidelines.

In India, adult webcam activities face strict legal restrictions and are generally considered illegal under various laws.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 124 defines the admissibility of oral evidence, emphasizing that oral evidence must be direct and relevant to the facts in issue.

Section 192 of the Income Tax Act 1961 mandates tax deduction at source on salary income in India.

CrPC Section 259 details the procedure for transfer of cases from one High Court to another for fair trial or convenience.

In India, nail guns are legal for professional and personal use with safety regulations and restrictions on possession and use.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 86 deals with the relevancy of entries in public records made by public servants in the discharge of official duty.

Metatrader 4 is legal in India with regulatory conditions and broker compliance requirements.

Learn about the legality of currency training in India, including regulations, restrictions, and enforcement practices.

CrPC Section 102 details the procedure for search by a person other than a police officer, ensuring lawful and fair search practices.

IPC Section 242 defines the offence of wrongful confinement and its legal implications under Indian law.

CrPC Section 374 outlines the procedure for filing appeals against convictions or sentences by Magistrates.

Companies Act 2013 Section 453 governs the power of the Central Government to remove difficulties in implementing the Act.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 133 defines the term 'holder in due course' and its legal significance under the Act.

Section 206E of the Income Tax Act 1961 mandates tax deduction at source on payments for lottery winnings in India.

CrPC Section 38 defines the term 'investigation' and outlines its scope under the Code of Criminal Procedure.

IPC Section 173 outlines the procedure for police to submit a final report after investigation, detailing findings and recommendations.

Income Tax Act Section 292BB mandates quoting correct PAN for payments to avoid disallowance of expenses under the Act.

bottom of page