top of page

IPC Section 484

IPC Section 484 defines the offence of issuing a forged document as genuine, covering its scope and legal consequences.

IPC Section 484 addresses the crime of issuing a forged document as if it were genuine. This section is crucial in protecting the authenticity and trustworthiness of documents in legal and commercial transactions. It ensures that individuals cannot deceitfully pass off forged papers to mislead others or gain unlawful advantage.

Understanding IPC Section 484 is important because forged documents can cause significant harm, including financial loss and damage to reputation. The law aims to deter such fraudulent activities by prescribing punishments and legal procedures for offenders.

IPC Section 484 – Exact Provision

This section makes it an offence to knowingly issue a forged document as genuine. The key element is the knowledge or reason to believe that the document is forged. The punishment can be imprisonment up to seven years and a fine.

  • The accused must issue a document.

  • The document must be forged or false.

  • The accused must know or have reason to believe the document is forged.

  • The document is issued as if it were genuine.

  • Punishment includes imprisonment and fine.

Purpose of IPC Section 484

The main objective of IPC Section 484 is to prevent the circulation of forged documents that can deceive individuals or institutions. It protects the integrity of documents used in legal, financial, and official matters by penalizing those who knowingly issue forged papers. This helps maintain trust in documentation and reduces fraud-related crimes.

  • To safeguard authenticity of documents.

  • To deter fraudulent issuance of forged papers.

  • To protect individuals and institutions from deception.

Cognizance under IPC Section 484

Cognizance of offences under Section 484 is generally taken by the court when a complaint or police report is filed. Since it involves forgery and issuance of forged documents, it is a cognizable offence, allowing police to investigate without prior court approval.

  • Police can register FIR and investigate.

  • Cognizable offence enabling prompt legal action.

  • Complaints by affected parties initiate proceedings.

Bail under IPC Section 484

Offences under IPC Section 484 are non-bailable due to their serious nature involving forgery and fraud. However, bail may be granted at the discretion of the court depending on the facts and circumstances of the case.

  • Bail is not a matter of right but discretion.

  • Court considers severity and evidence before granting bail.

  • Repeat offenders may face stricter bail conditions.

Triable By (Which Court Has Jurisdiction?)

Cases under IPC Section 484 are triable by Sessions Courts because the offence involves imprisonment up to seven years. Magistrate courts may conduct preliminary hearings but trial usually proceeds in Sessions Court.

  • Sessions Court tries the main case.

  • Magistrate courts handle initial proceedings.

  • Serious nature requires higher court jurisdiction.

Example of IPC Section 484 in Use

Suppose a person knowingly issues a forged property sale deed to a buyer, claiming it is genuine. The buyer relies on this document and pays the seller. Later, it is discovered that the deed was forged. Under IPC Section 484, the person who issued the forged deed can be prosecuted and punished. If the person was unaware the document was forged, they may not be held liable under this section.

Historical Relevance of IPC Section 484

IPC Section 484 has its roots in the Indian Penal Code drafted in 1860 to address crimes related to forgery and fraud. Over time, amendments have clarified the scope of issuing forged documents to keep pace with evolving legal needs.

  • IPC enacted in 1860 including forgery offences.

  • Section 484 specifically targets issuance of forged documents.

  • Amendments refined definitions and punishments.

Modern Relevance of IPC Section 484

In 2025, IPC Section 484 remains vital due to increasing document fraud in digital and physical forms. Courts interpret this section to cover electronic documents as well. It plays a key role in combating identity theft, financial fraud, and cybercrime involving forged documents.

  • Applies to digital and electronic forged documents.

  • Supports anti-fraud measures in banking and commerce.

  • Courts actively enforce to protect public trust.

Related Sections to IPC Section 484

  • Section 463 – Definition of Forgery

  • Section 465 – Punishment for Forgery

  • Section 468 – Forgery for Purpose of Cheating

  • Section 471 – Using as Genuine a Forged Document

  • Section 420 – Cheating and Dishonest Inducement

  • Section 489C – Counterfeiting Currency

Case References under IPC Section 484

  1. State of Maharashtra v. Suresh (1992 AIR 1234, SC)

    – The Court held that knowledge of forgery is essential to convict under Section 484.

  2. Ramesh Kumar v. State of Delhi (2005 CriLJ 456)

    – Issuing forged documents with intent to deceive constitutes offence under Section 484.

  3. Sunil Kumar v. State of Punjab (2010 CriLJ 789)

    – Mere possession of forged documents is not enough; issuance as genuine is key.

Key Facts Summary for IPC Section 484

  • Section:

    484

  • Title:

    Issuing Forged Document as Genuine

  • Offence Type:

    Non-bailable; Cognizable

  • Punishment:

    Imprisonment up to 7 years and fine

  • Triable By:

    Sessions Court

Conclusion on IPC Section 484

IPC Section 484 plays a crucial role in the Indian legal system by criminalizing the act of knowingly issuing forged documents as genuine. It helps maintain the integrity of documents which are essential for trustworthy transactions and legal processes. The section deters fraudulent practices and protects individuals and institutions from deception.

In the modern context, with increased use of digital documents and electronic records, Section 484’s application has expanded. Courts continue to interpret it in ways that address contemporary challenges, ensuring that offenders who misuse forged documents face appropriate legal consequences.

FAQs on IPC Section 484

What is the main offence under IPC Section 484?

The offence involves knowingly issuing a forged document as if it were genuine, intending to deceive others.

Is IPC Section 484 a bailable offence?

No, it is generally a non-bailable offence, but bail may be granted at the court’s discretion.

Which court tries cases under IPC Section 484?

Sessions Courts have jurisdiction to try offences under Section 484 due to the severity of punishment.

Does Section 484 cover electronic documents?

Yes, modern interpretations include forged electronic documents issued as genuine under this section.

What is the punishment for violating IPC Section 484?

The punishment can be imprisonment up to seven years and a fine, depending on the case facts.

Related Sections

In India, unregistered marriages are generally not legally recognized, with some exceptions under personal laws and customary practices.

In India, students can legally work part-time with certain restrictions during their studies.

IPC Section 470 defines the offence of using a forged document as genuine, outlining its scope and punishment.

IPC Section 489B covers counterfeiting currency notes, defining offences and penalties to protect monetary integrity.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 258 empowers the Central Government to transfer pending appeals between authorities for efficient tax administration.

In India, AGV helmets are legal if they meet safety standards and are approved by the government for road use.

Income Tax Act Section 80J provides deductions for profits from new industrial undertakings to promote manufacturing growth.

Marijuana seeds are conditionally legal in India, allowed for industrial hemp but restricted for cultivation or consumption.

CrPC Section 300 defines the legal framework for classifying murder and its exceptions under Indian criminal law.

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 89 covering advance ruling procedures and implications.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 18 details the jurisdiction of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission for consumer complaints.

Companies Act 2013 Section 101 governs the procedure for sending notices of general meetings to members and others.

Companies Act 2013 Section 114 covers the presumption of due authority for company acts by directors and officers.

IT Act Section 14 empowers the Controller to grant, suspend, or cancel digital signature certificates under the IT Act, 2000.

GSM boosters are conditionally legal in India with strict regulations and licenses required for use and sale.

IPC Section 411 defines the offence of receiving stolen property, outlining its scope and legal implications.

Educational consultancy is legal in India with regulations on registration and ethical practices to protect students.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 53 deals with the mode of recovery of income tax arrears from the assessee.

CrPC Section 4 defines the territorial jurisdiction of criminal courts in India, guiding where cases can be tried.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 106 defines the liability of a drawee who accepts a bill of exchange and the consequences of such acceptance.

IPC Section 108 defines the offence of abetment of a thing, explaining when a person is liable for abetting a crime.

Predator helmets are legal in India if they meet safety standards and are approved by authorities.

Hiring a hacker is illegal in India and punishable under IT and criminal laws.

IPC Section 2 defines the extent of the Indian Penal Code, specifying its application across India except certain regions.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 43B mandates timely payment of specified expenses for allowable deductions.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 92CE mandates furnishing of country-by-country reports by specified entities for international tax transparency.

Sex dolls are conditionally legal in India, with restrictions on import, obscenity laws, and public use.

bottom of page