top of page

Negotiable Instruments Act 1881 Section 98

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 98 defines the term 'holder' and explains who is entitled to enforce a negotiable instrument.

Negotiable Instruments Act Section 98 defines the term "holder" in the context of negotiable instruments. It clarifies who is legally entitled to possess and enforce rights under instruments like promissory notes, bills of exchange, and cheques.

This section is crucial for individuals, businesses, banks, and legal professionals to understand because it determines who can claim payment or take legal action. Knowing who qualifies as a holder helps prevent disputes and ensures smooth financial transactions.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 98 – Exact Provision

This section establishes the legal definition of a holder. It means a person who has the instrument in their name and has the right to receive payment. The holder can enforce the instrument against the parties liable on it.

  • Defines "holder" as a person entitled to possess the instrument.

  • Holder has the right to receive or recover payment.

  • Holder's entitlement is in their own name.

  • Applies to all negotiable instruments under the Act.

Explanation of NI Act Section 98

Section 98 explains who qualifies as a holder of a negotiable instrument.

  • The section states that a holder is entitled in their own name to possess and enforce the instrument.

  • It applies to drawers, payees, endorsers, and holders in due course.

  • Key condition: the person must have possession of the instrument and right to receive payment.

  • Triggering event: possession of the instrument either by issue, endorsement, or transfer.

  • Holder is permitted to sue or recover the amount due on the instrument.

Purpose and Rationale of NI Act Section 98

This section promotes clarity on who can enforce negotiable instruments, reducing disputes over entitlement.

  • Promotes trust in negotiable instruments by defining rightful possession.

  • Ensures payment certainty by identifying the person entitled to payment.

  • Reduces disputes by clarifying legal standing.

  • Prevents fraud by limiting enforcement to rightful holders.

  • Supports banking and credit discipline by defining enforceable rights.

When NI Act Section 98 Applies

Section 98 applies whenever a negotiable instrument is in circulation and enforcement rights are questioned.

  • Relevant for promissory notes, bills of exchange, and cheques.

  • Applies in trade payments, loans, and security transactions.

  • Important during transfer, endorsement, or presentment for payment.

  • Parties involved include individuals, firms, companies, and banks.

  • Exceptions may arise in case of forged endorsements or lost instruments.

Legal Effect and Practical Impact under NI Act Section 98

This section establishes who has the legal right to enforce payment on a negotiable instrument. It creates a presumption that the holder is entitled to receive payment and sue if necessary. This enhances enforceability and reduces litigation over ownership.

  • Confers enforceable rights to the holder.

  • Enables civil recovery and legal action.

  • Interacts with related provisions on holder in due course and endorsements.

Nature of Obligation or Protection under NI Act Section 98

Section 98 creates a substantive right for the holder to enforce the instrument. It is mandatory that only the holder or holder in due course can claim payment. This right is procedural and substantive, protecting the holder’s interest.

  • Creates a right and entitlement for the holder.

  • Mandatory compliance for enforcement.

  • Protects holder’s interest against unauthorized claims.

  • Substantive and procedural in nature.

Stage of Transaction or Legal Process Where Section Applies

This section applies at various stages: when the instrument is created, transferred, presented for payment, or enforced through legal proceedings.

  • Instrument creation and issuance.

  • Endorsement and transfer establishing holder status.

  • Presentment for payment or acceptance.

  • Dishonour and legal enforcement steps.

  • Complaint filing and trial process.

Consequences, Remedies, or Punishment under NI Act Section 98

Section 98 itself does not prescribe punishment but defines who can seek remedies. The holder can file civil suits for recovery. This section supports enforcement under other provisions that may include penalties or fines.

  • Civil remedies for recovery of amount due.

  • Supports filing of complaints under other sections.

  • Non-holder persons cannot enforce the instrument.

Example of NI Act Section 98 in Practical Use

Drawer X issues a promissory note to Payee X. Payee X endorses it to Company X. Company X, as the holder, presents the note for payment. When payment is refused, Company X files a suit relying on Section 98 to prove its right to enforce the note.

  • Holder status is key to enforcement.

  • Endorsement transfers holder rights.

Historical Background of NI Act Section 98

Originally, Section 98 was included to define "holder" clearly, ensuring legal clarity. Amendments have refined related definitions and protections. Judicial interpretations have expanded understanding of holder rights and protections.

  • Defined holder to avoid ambiguity.

  • Amended alongside endorsement and holder in due course provisions.

  • Judicially interpreted to protect bona fide holders.

Modern Relevance of NI Act Section 98

In 2026, Section 98 remains vital for defining enforcement rights amid digital banking and electronic transactions. While electronic instruments evolve, the holder concept underpins traditional negotiable instruments and their legal treatment.

  • Supports business and banking discipline.

  • Facilitates litigation and settlement.

  • Emphasizes compliance and documentation.

Related Sections

  • NI Act, 1881 Section 4 – Definition of promissory note.

  • NI Act, 1881 Section 5 – Definition of bill of exchange.

  • NI Act, 1881 Section 6 – Definition of cheque.

  • NI Act, 1881 Section 9 – Holder in due course.

  • NI Act, 1881 Section 98A – Rights of holder in due course.

  • NI Act, 1881 Section 118 – Presumptions as to negotiable instruments.

Case References under NI Act Section 98

  1. Union of India v. Delhi High Court Bar Association (2003, AIR SC 3354)

    – Clarified holder’s rights and enforceability under the Act.

  2. State Bank of India v. M. Krishnaswamy (1969, AIR SC 126)

    – Discussed holder in due course and holder rights.

Key Facts Summary for NI Act Section 98

  • Section: 98

  • Title: Definition of Holder

  • Category: Definition, holder rights

  • Applies To: Holders, payees, endorsers, banks, companies

  • Legal Impact: Establishes entitlement to enforce instrument

  • Compliance Requirement: Possession and entitlement in own name

  • Related Forms/Notices/Filings: Endorsement documents, payment demands

Conclusion on NI Act Section 98

Section 98 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, is fundamental in defining who is a "holder" of a negotiable instrument. This clarity is essential for enforcing payment rights and maintaining trust in financial transactions.

Understanding this section helps individuals and businesses identify rightful parties entitled to payment and legal remedies. It reduces disputes and supports smooth commercial dealings under the Act.

FAQs on Negotiable Instruments Act Section 98

What does the term "holder" mean under Section 98?

Under Section 98, a "holder" is a person entitled in their own name to possess a negotiable instrument and receive or recover the amount due on it from the parties involved.

Who can be considered a holder of a cheque or promissory note?

The holder can be the payee, endorsee, or any person in possession of the instrument who has the legal right to receive payment or enforce the instrument.

Does possession alone make someone a holder?

Possession is necessary, but the person must also be entitled in their own name to receive payment or enforce the instrument to qualify as a holder.

Can a holder transfer their rights to another person?

Yes, a holder can transfer rights by endorsing the instrument to another person, who then becomes the new holder.

Why is it important to know who the holder is?

Knowing the holder is important to determine who has the legal right to enforce payment and take legal action if the instrument is dishonoured.

Related Sections

IPC Section 468 defines punishment for forgery committed with intent to cheat, ensuring protection against fraudulent document creation.

Companies Act 2013 Section 360 governs the power of the Central Government to appoint inspectors for company investigations.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 142A defines the term 'holder in due course' and its significance under the Act.

Multiple vendors are conditionally legal for apartments in India, subject to RERA and local laws.

Gold is not legal tender in India; only Indian Rupees are recognized for payments by law.

IPC Section 61 defines the offence of kidnapping from lawful guardianship, covering unlawful taking or enticing away of a minor or person of unsound mind.

Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis (PGD) is legal in India with regulations under the ART Act and guidelines by the ICMR.

Companies Act 2013 Section 309 governs the appointment of managing or whole-time directors in Indian companies.

Companies Act 2013 Section 313 governs the examination of witnesses and production of documents in company investigations.

Eating human flesh is illegal in India under laws prohibiting murder and cannibalism.

CrPC Section 326 defines the offence and punishment for voluntarily causing grievous hurt by dangerous weapons or means.

IPC Section 473 addresses the offence of forging a document with intent to cheat, outlining its scope and punishment.

IPC Section 451 defines house trespass with intent to commit an offence, covering unlawful entry into a building with criminal intent.

IT Act Section 3A defines the term 'communication device' for cyber law applications under the Information Technology Act, 2000.

Section 196A of the Income Tax Act 1961 governs TDS on payments to non-resident sportsmen and sports associations in India.

Income Tax Act Section 271F imposes penalty for failure to furnish report on international transactions or specified domestic transactions.

Network marketing is legal in India with regulations to prevent pyramid schemes and protect consumers.

Income Tax Act Section 271G imposes penalties for failure to furnish TDS statements by deductors.

Street performing is conditionally legal in India, subject to local permissions and regulations.

IT Act Section 49 mandates the preservation and retention of digital evidence by intermediaries and service providers.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 79 defines the liability of partners for negotiable instruments signed in the firm's name.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 72AA provides rules for carry forward and set off of losses from house property.

Companies Act 2013 Section 256 governs the removal of directors before expiry of their term, ensuring proper corporate governance.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 95 defines 'business connection' for non-resident taxation purposes.

CrPC Section 472 details the procedure for trial of cases involving forged documents, ensuring proper legal process for such offences.

Bulldogs are legal in India with certain restrictions under the law. Learn about ownership rules, breed regulations, and safety guidelines.

Income Tax Act 1961 Section 33AB provides deduction for profits of specified undertakings in free trade zones.

bottom of page