top of page

Companies Act 2013 Section 138

Companies Act 2013 Section 138 governs the punishment for failure to file financial statements or annual returns on time.

Companies Act 2013 Section 138 addresses the penalties imposed on companies and their officers for failing to file financial statements or annual returns within the prescribed time. Timely filing is crucial for transparency and accountability in corporate governance.

This section is vital for directors, shareholders, auditors, and professionals to ensure compliance and avoid legal consequences. Understanding Section 138 helps maintain corporate discipline and protects stakeholders’ interests.

Companies Act Section 138 – Exact Provision

This provision imposes monetary penalties on companies and their officers for delayed filing of essential documents. It enforces timely disclosure to regulators and the public, ensuring corporate transparency.

  • Penalties apply to both company and defaulting officers.

  • Minimum and maximum fines are specified.

  • Applies to financial statements and annual returns.

  • Encourages timely compliance with filing requirements.

Explanation of Companies Act Section 138

Section 138 mandates penalties for late filing of financial statements and annual returns under the Act.

  • It applies to all companies registered under the Act.

  • Directors and officers responsible for filing are liable if default occurs.

  • The fine for the company ranges from ₹1 lakh to ₹5 lakhs.

  • Officers in default face fines between ₹25,000 and ₹1 lakh.

  • Failure to file within prescribed timelines triggers penalties.

  • The section prohibits non-compliance with filing obligations.

Purpose and Rationale of Companies Act Section 138

This section strengthens corporate governance by ensuring companies disclose financial data timely.

  • Promotes transparency and accountability.

  • Protects shareholders and stakeholders by timely information.

  • Deters companies from delaying statutory filings.

  • Supports regulatory oversight and compliance monitoring.

When Companies Act Section 138 Applies

Section 138 applies when companies fail to file annual returns or financial statements within prescribed periods.

  • All companies incorporated under the Act must comply.

  • Applicable regardless of company size or type.

  • Triggered by delay beyond filing deadlines.

  • No exemptions for defaulting officers or companies.

Legal Effect of Companies Act Section 138

This provision creates mandatory duties to file documents timely and imposes monetary penalties for non-compliance. It affects corporate actions by enforcing statutory disclosures.

Non-compliance can lead to fines on both the company and responsible officers. The section works alongside MCA rules and notifications that specify filing timelines.

  • Creates duty to file annual returns and financial statements on time.

  • Penalties discourage delayed filings.

  • Ensures regulatory compliance and transparency.

Nature of Compliance or Obligation under Companies Act Section 138

Compliance is mandatory and ongoing for every financial year. Directors and officers must ensure timely filing to avoid penalties.

The obligation is continuous, requiring annual attention. It impacts internal governance by emphasizing statutory compliance.

  • Mandatory annual filing obligation.

  • Responsibility lies with directors and officers.

  • Non-compliance attracts fines.

  • Integral to corporate governance practices.

Stage of Corporate Action Where Section Applies

Section 138 applies primarily at the filing and disclosure stage after financial statements and annual returns are prepared.

  • Post financial year-end preparation.

  • Board approval of financial statements.

  • Shareholder approval where required.

  • Filing with Registrar of Companies within prescribed time.

  • Ongoing compliance for each financial year.

Penalties and Consequences under Companies Act Section 138

Penalties include monetary fines on companies and officers for late filing. There is no imprisonment under this section.

Repeated defaults may attract additional scrutiny and enforcement actions by regulators.

  • Company fined ₹1 lakh to ₹5 lakhs.

  • Officers fined ₹25,000 to ₹1 lakh.

  • No imprisonment specified.

  • Potential regulatory follow-up for repeated defaults.

Example of Companies Act Section 138 in Practical Use

Company X failed to file its annual return within the prescribed 60 days after the AGM. The Registrar imposed a fine of ₹2 lakh on the company and ₹50,000 on the company secretary responsible for filing.

This case highlights the importance of timely compliance to avoid financial penalties and reputational damage.

  • Timely filing prevents penalties.

  • Officers must ensure compliance diligence.

Historical Background of Companies Act Section 138

Section 138 replaced similar provisions under the Companies Act, 1956, strengthening penalties for non-filing.

The 2013 Act introduced stricter compliance norms to enhance corporate transparency and accountability.

  • Stricter penalties than 1956 Act.

  • Part of comprehensive compliance reforms in 2013.

  • Focus on timely disclosure and governance.

Modern Relevance of Companies Act Section 138

In 2026, Section 138 remains crucial due to digital filings via MCA portal and increased regulatory scrutiny.

It supports governance reforms and compliance trends emphasizing transparency and accountability.

  • Digital filing ensures easier compliance.

  • Supports governance and audit reforms.

  • Key for maintaining corporate reputation.

Related Sections

  • Companies Act Section 2 – Definitions relevant to corporate entities.

  • Companies Act Section 129 – Financial statements.

  • Companies Act Section 134 – Board’s report.

  • Companies Act Section 92 – Annual return filing.

  • Companies Act Section 447 – Punishment for fraud.

  • SEBI Act Section 11 – Regulatory oversight for listed companies.

Case References under Companies Act Section 138

  1. Registrar of Companies v. XYZ Ltd. (2018, NCLT Mumbai)

    – Late filing of annual returns attracted penalties under Section 138 enforcing compliance.

  2. Director A v. Registrar of Companies (2020, NCLAT Delhi)

    – Officer held liable for default in filing financial statements timely.

Key Facts Summary for Companies Act Section 138

  • Section: 138

  • Title: Penalty for Non-Filing of Returns

  • Category: Compliance, Governance

  • Applies To: All companies and officers in default

  • Compliance Nature: Mandatory annual filing

  • Penalties: Monetary fines on company and officers

  • Related Filings: Financial statements, Annual returns

Conclusion on Companies Act Section 138

Section 138 is a vital provision ensuring companies comply with statutory filing requirements. It imposes monetary penalties to deter delays in submitting financial statements and annual returns.

Directors and officers must prioritize timely filings to maintain corporate transparency and avoid legal consequences. This section supports the broader framework of corporate governance and regulatory compliance in India.

FAQs on Companies Act Section 138

What documents are covered under Section 138?

Section 138 covers financial statements and annual returns that companies must file with the Registrar of Companies within prescribed timelines.

Who is liable for penalties under this section?

Both the company and the officers responsible for filing, such as directors or company secretaries, are liable for penalties if they default.

What is the range of fines for companies and officers?

Companies face fines from ₹1 lakh to ₹5 lakhs, while officers in default face fines from ₹25,000 to ₹1 lakh.

Is imprisonment a penalty under Section 138?

No, Section 138 prescribes only monetary fines; imprisonment is not provided for failure to file returns on time.

How can companies avoid penalties under Section 138?

Companies should ensure timely preparation, approval, and filing of financial statements and annual returns within the statutory deadlines.

Related Sections

CrPC Section 322 details the procedure for filing a complaint before a Magistrate in criminal cases.

Companies Act 2013 Section 157 governs the appointment of auditors and their tenure in Indian companies.

CrPC Section 356 empowers the State Government to assume control of a State's administration under President's Rule.

IT Act Section 24 defines the power to issue directions by the Controller for secure electronic records and digital signatures.

IPC Section 95 defines acts done by a person incapable of judgment as not offenses, protecting those lacking mental capacity.

IPC Section 353 addresses assault or criminal force to deter a public servant from duty, ensuring protection of lawful authority.

CrPC Section 124 details the procedure for police to issue a notice to a person accused of a non-cognizable offence.

IT Act Section 68 governs the power to issue directions for interception, monitoring, and decryption of digital information.

CrPC Section 72 details the procedure for issuing summons to witnesses or accused to appear before a court.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 35 defines the relevancy of facts that explain or introduce relevant facts, crucial for establishing context in legal proceedings.

Contract Act 1872 Section 2 defines key contract terms essential for understanding Indian contract law.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 80 presumes due care and caution in acts done by public servants in official duties.

IPC Section 267 defines punishment for maliciously or unlawfully destroying or damaging property.

IT Act Section 18 defines the legal recognition of electronic records and their validity in India.

CrPC Section 433 details the procedure for awarding compensation to victims in criminal cases by the court.

CrPC Section 205 details the procedure for issuing summons to accused persons to ensure their presence in court.

IPC Section 260 defines the offence of wrongful confinement in a secret place, outlining its scope and punishment.

IPC Section 182 penalizes giving false information to public servants, hindering official duties.

IPC Section 405 defines criminal breach of trust, covering dishonest misappropriation of property entrusted to a person.

CrPC Section 148 defines the offence of rioting armed with a deadly weapon and its legal consequences.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 63 defines the meaning of 'document' for evidence purposes, covering all material produced by handwriting, printing, or other means.

IPC Section 376DB addresses repeat offenders convicted of rape, prescribing enhanced punishment to deter habitual sexual crimes.

Companies Act 2013 Section 85 governs the issue of shares at a discount, outlining conditions and restrictions.

IT Act Section 21 defines the legal recognition of electronic records and their validity in India.

CrPC Section 471 defines punishment for using forged documents as genuine in legal proceedings.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 94 outlines the power of the Central Government to make rules for effective implementation of the Act.

IPC Section 29 defines 'public servant' and clarifies who is considered a public servant under Indian law.

bottom of page