top of page

Companies Act 2013 Section 162

Companies Act 2013 Section 162 governs the resignation of directors and related procedures under Indian corporate law.

Companies Act Section 162 deals with the resignation process of directors in Indian companies. It provides a clear legal framework for directors wishing to resign from their position and outlines the procedural requirements to ensure proper communication and record-keeping.

This section is vital for corporate governance as it ensures transparency and accountability when directors step down. Directors, shareholders, company secretaries, and legal professionals must understand this section to comply with statutory obligations and maintain accurate company records.

Companies Act Section 162 – Exact Provision

This section allows directors to resign by submitting a written notice to the company. The resignation becomes effective either on the date the company receives the notice or a later date specified by the director. The company must inform the Registrar of Companies (ROC) within 30 days using e-form DIR-12. Additionally, the resignation must be disclosed in the directors' report at the next general meeting.

  • Director must submit written resignation notice.

  • Resignation effective on receipt or specified date.

  • Company must file DIR-12 with ROC within 30 days.

  • Resignation disclosed in directors’ report.

  • Ensures transparency and official record updates.

Explanation of Companies Act Section 162

Section 162 specifies the resignation process for directors and the company’s obligations following such resignation.

  • Directors may resign by written notice to the company.

  • Applies to all directors of companies registered under the Act.

  • Company must notify the Registrar within 30 days.

  • Resignation must be recorded in the directors’ report.

  • Prevents ambiguity about the effective date of resignation.

  • Ensures official records reflect current board composition.

Purpose and Rationale of Companies Act Section 162

This section strengthens corporate governance by providing a clear, standardized process for director resignation. It protects shareholders and stakeholders by ensuring timely disclosure and record updates.

  • Promotes transparency in board changes.

  • Protects interests of shareholders and stakeholders.

  • Ensures accountability of directors stepping down.

  • Prevents misuse of resignation process.

When Companies Act Section 162 Applies

Section 162 applies whenever a director resigns from a company registered under the Act, regardless of company size or type.

  • Applicable to all companies under Companies Act 2013.

  • Mandatory for directors submitting resignation.

  • Company must comply within 30 days of notice receipt.

  • No exemptions for private or public companies.

  • Triggers filing and disclosure obligations.

Legal Effect of Companies Act Section 162

This section creates a legal duty for directors to submit resignation notices in writing and for companies to file the resignation with the Registrar. It impacts corporate actions by ensuring the board’s composition is accurately reflected in official records. Non-compliance can lead to penalties and affect corporate governance credibility. The section works alongside MCA rules on director filings.

  • Creates duty to submit and file resignation notices.

  • Ensures official records are updated promptly.

  • Non-compliance may attract penalties.

Nature of Compliance or Obligation under Companies Act Section 162

Compliance with Section 162 is mandatory and involves both one-time and ongoing obligations. Directors must submit written resignation notices, and companies must file the necessary forms and disclose the resignation in reports. The responsibility primarily lies with the company’s board and company secretary to ensure timely compliance, impacting internal governance and transparency.

  • Mandatory written notice by director.

  • Company must file e-form DIR-12 within 30 days.

  • Disclosure in directors’ report is compulsory.

  • Ongoing obligation to maintain accurate records.

Stage of Corporate Action Where Section Applies

Section 162 applies at the stage when a director decides to resign and the company processes this event through filings and disclosures.

  • Board decision to accept resignation.

  • Submission of resignation notice by director.

  • Filing DIR-12 with ROC post-resignation.

  • Disclosure in next general meeting’s directors’ report.

  • Ongoing record maintenance of board composition.

Penalties and Consequences under Companies Act Section 162

Failure to comply with Section 162 can result in monetary penalties on the company and its officers. While imprisonment is not specified for non-filing, persistent non-compliance may lead to further regulatory actions. Disqualification of directors is not directly linked but may arise from related governance failures.

  • Monetary fines for company and officers.

  • No direct imprisonment clause.

  • Possible regulatory scrutiny for repeated defaults.

  • Impact on company’s compliance rating.

Example of Companies Act Section 162 in Practical Use

Director X of Company Y decided to resign due to personal reasons. He submitted a written resignation notice specifying the effective date. Company Y promptly filed e-form DIR-12 within 30 days and disclosed the resignation in the next annual report. This ensured compliance with Section 162 and maintained transparency with shareholders and regulators.

  • Timely written notice by Director X ensured clarity.

  • Company Y’s prompt filing avoided penalties.

Historical Background of Companies Act Section 162

Under the Companies Act, 1956, director resignation procedures were less detailed. Section 162 was introduced in the 2013 Act to clarify resignation formalities and improve governance transparency. It has undergone minor amendments to align with electronic filing requirements and MCA notifications.

  • Clarified resignation process from 1956 Act.

  • Introduced electronic filing mandates.

  • Strengthened disclosure norms in directors’ report.

Modern Relevance of Companies Act Section 162

In 2026, Section 162 remains crucial for digital compliance via MCA portal filings. It supports e-governance and transparency trends. With increased focus on governance reforms and board accountability, this section helps companies maintain updated records and comply with regulatory expectations.

  • Supports digital filing via MCA portal.

  • Enhances board governance transparency.

  • Aligns with evolving corporate compliance standards.

Related Sections

  • Companies Act Section 2 – Definitions relevant to corporate entities.

  • Companies Act Section 149 – Appointment and qualifications of directors.

  • Companies Act Section 167 – Vacation of office of director.

  • Companies Act Section 168 – Removal of directors.

  • Companies Act Section 170 – Register of directors and key managerial personnel.

  • SEBI Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements (LODR) – Board disclosures for listed companies.

Case References under Companies Act Section 162

No landmark case directly interprets this section as of 2026.

Key Facts Summary for Companies Act Section 162

  • Section: 162

  • Title: Resignation of Directors

  • Category: Governance, Compliance

  • Applies To: All directors and companies under Companies Act 2013

  • Compliance Nature: Mandatory written notice, filing, and disclosure

  • Penalties: Monetary fines for non-compliance

  • Related Filings: e-form DIR-12, directors’ report

Conclusion on Companies Act Section 162

Section 162 provides a clear and structured process for directors wishing to resign from their office. It ensures that resignations are communicated effectively and recorded properly, maintaining transparency for shareholders and regulators.

By mandating timely filings and disclosures, this section strengthens corporate governance and accountability. Companies and directors must adhere strictly to these provisions to avoid penalties and uphold the integrity of board composition records.

FAQs on Companies Act Section 162

What is the procedure for a director to resign under Section 162?

A director must submit a written resignation notice to the company. The resignation takes effect on the date the company receives the notice or a later date specified in the notice.

Who is responsible for filing the resignation with the Registrar?

The company is responsible for filing e-form DIR-12 with the Registrar of Companies within 30 days of receiving the director’s resignation notice.

Is disclosure of director resignation mandatory in company reports?

Yes, the company must disclose the director’s resignation in the directors’ report at the next general meeting following the resignation.

What happens if the company fails to file the resignation with the ROC?

Failure to file the resignation with the ROC can lead to monetary penalties on the company and its officers and may affect the company’s compliance status.

Can a director specify a future date for resignation to take effect?

Yes, a director can specify a future date in the resignation notice. The resignation will take effect on that date or when the company receives the notice, whichever is later.

Related Sections

Companies Act 2013 Section 172 governs the disclosure of beneficial ownership in Indian companies for transparency and compliance.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 2(26) defines 'defect' in goods, crucial for consumer rights and product liability claims.

CrPC Section 453 details the procedure for search of places suspected to conceal stolen property or things unlawfully obtained.

IPC Section 83 defines the legal incapacity of children under seven years to commit offences, ensuring protection based on age.

CrPC Section 158 outlines the procedure for police to register an FIR upon receiving information about a cognizable offence.

CPC Section 158 empowers courts to issue commissions for examination of witnesses or documents in civil suits.

IPC Section 325 defines punishment for voluntarily causing grievous hurt, specifying imprisonment and fines for such offences.

IPC Section 272 penalizes the sale of noxious food or drink harmful to health, ensuring public safety and health standards.

CrPC Section 400 details the procedure for issuing a search warrant to find stolen property or evidence.

CPC Section 106 covers the procedure for transfer of suits by the High Court to ensure proper jurisdiction and convenience.

IPC Section 376DA addresses the offence of sexual intercourse by a man with his own wife when she is under 18 years of age.

IT Act Section 17 defines 'Electronic Signature' and its legal recognition under the Information Technology Act, 2000.

IT Act Section 90 empowers the government to intercept, monitor, or decrypt digital information for security and public order.

CrPC Section 384 defines the offence of extortion and its legal consequences under Indian law.

Companies Act 2013 Section 87 governs the power of the Tribunal to order rectification of the register of members.

IPC Section 376 defines the offence of rape, detailing its scope, punishment, and legal protections for victims.

IPC Section 56 addresses the liability for acts done by a person incapable of judgment due to intoxication.

IPC Section 499 defines the offence of defamation, covering harm to a person's reputation through false statements.

CPC Section 149 defines the power of the court to order the arrest of a judgment-debtor for willful disobedience of its decree.

CrPC Section 239 details the procedure for discharge of an accused when the Magistrate finds no sufficient grounds for proceeding.

Companies Act 2013 Section 117 governs filing of resolutions and agreements with the Registrar of Companies.

IPC Section 278 penalizes the adulteration of food or drink intended for sale, protecting public health and safety.

CrPC Section 428 details the procedure for the disposal of property when no person claims it during investigation.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 144 details the admissibility of evidence regarding the existence of a custom or usage in courts.

CrPC Section 366 details the procedure for sending a person accused of an offence to another jurisdiction for trial or investigation.

IPC Section 402 defines the offence of dishonest misappropriation of property entrusted to a person.

Companies Act 2013 Section 89 governs the declaration and maintenance of beneficial ownership registers by companies.

bottom of page