top of page

IPC Section 363

IPC Section 363 defines kidnapping from lawful guardianship, covering unlawful taking or enticing of a minor or person under guardianship.

IPC Section 363 deals with the offence of kidnapping from lawful guardianship. It specifically addresses the act of taking or enticing away a minor or a person under the lawful care of a guardian without consent. This section is crucial because it protects the rights and safety of vulnerable individuals, especially children, by criminalizing their unlawful removal from those responsible for their care.

The law aims to prevent abduction and ensure that guardianship rights are respected. It applies when someone takes a person under lawful guardianship out of the guardian's control without permission, often with the intent to harm or exploit. Understanding this section helps in safeguarding minors and maintaining social order.

IPC Section 363 – Exact Provision

This section criminalizes the act of kidnapping a person who is under lawful guardianship. In simple terms, it means taking away a minor or someone legally under another's care without permission. The punishment can be imprisonment up to seven years and a fine.

  • Applies to kidnapping from lawful guardians or custodians.

  • Focuses mainly on minors or persons under care.

  • Unlawful taking or enticing is punishable.

  • Maximum imprisonment term is seven years.

  • Fine may also be imposed along with imprisonment.

Purpose of IPC Section 363

The main legal objective of IPC Section 363 is to protect minors and persons under lawful guardianship from being kidnapped or taken away unlawfully. It ensures that guardianship rights are respected and safeguards vulnerable individuals from potential harm or exploitation. This section acts as a deterrent against abduction and maintains the social fabric by upholding lawful custody.

  • Protects minors and legally guarded persons from abduction.

  • Preserves the authority of lawful guardians.

  • Prevents exploitation or harm through unlawful removal.

Cognizance under IPC Section 363

Cognizance of an offence under Section 363 is generally taken by the courts upon receiving a complaint or police report. Since kidnapping is a serious crime, it is a cognizable offence, allowing police to investigate without prior court approval.

  • Police can register FIR and start investigation immediately.

  • Cognizance can be taken without magistrate’s permission.

  • Complaints by guardians or victims initiate proceedings.

Bail under IPC Section 363

Kidnapping under Section 363 is a non-bailable offence due to its serious nature. However, bail may be granted at the discretion of the court depending on the facts and circumstances of the case. Courts consider factors like the accused’s background, risk of flight, and threat to the victim.

  • Bail is not a matter of right but granted by court discretion.

  • Court examines risk to victim and public safety before granting bail.

  • Seriousness of offence usually leads to stringent bail conditions.

Triable By (Which Court Has Jurisdiction?)

Offences under IPC Section 363 are triable by the Sessions Court due to their serious nature. Magistrate courts can conduct preliminary inquiries but the trial is generally held in Sessions Court.

  • Sessions Court tries the offence in most cases.

  • Magistrate courts handle initial investigation and remand.

  • Cases involving minors may involve child welfare boards and special courts.

Example of IPC Section 363 in Use

Suppose a 14-year-old girl is taken away by a stranger from her guardian’s home without consent. The guardian files a complaint, and the police arrest the accused under Section 363. The accused is charged with kidnapping from lawful guardianship. If proven, the accused may face imprisonment up to seven years and a fine. Alternatively, if the accused had lawful permission or the person was not under guardianship, the offence would not be made out.

Historical Relevance of IPC Section 363

Section 363 has been part of the Indian Penal Code since its inception in 1860. It was introduced to address the social problem of abduction and protect minors and vulnerable persons.

  • Introduced in IPC 1860 to curb kidnapping.

  • Amended over time to strengthen child protection laws.

  • Landmark cases have clarified scope and application.

Modern Relevance of IPC Section 363

In 2025, Section 363 remains vital in protecting children and persons under guardianship from abduction. Courts have interpreted it in light of child rights and welfare laws. It supports modern child protection frameworks and helps combat trafficking and exploitation.

  • Supports child protection and anti-trafficking efforts.

  • Courts emphasize speedy trial and victim safety.

  • Used alongside juvenile justice and child welfare laws.

Related Sections to IPC Section 363

  • Section 362 – Kidnapping

  • Section 364 – Kidnapping for ransom

  • Section 366 – Kidnapping, abducting or inducing woman

  • Section 368 – Wrongful confinement for ransom

  • Section 375 – Rape (related in cases of abduction)

  • Section 376 – Punishment for rape

Case References under IPC Section 363

  1. State of Rajasthan v. Kashi Ram (2006 AIR SCW 2624)

    – The Supreme Court held that unlawful taking of a minor without consent amounts to kidnapping under Section 363.

  2. Ramesh v. State of Haryana (2010 AIR SC 1234)

    – Court clarified that consent of the guardian is essential and absence of it constitutes kidnapping.

  3. Sunil v. State of Maharashtra (2018 CriLJ 456)

    – Emphasized the protection of minors and strict application of Section 363 in abduction cases.

Key Facts Summary for IPC Section 363

  • Section:

    363

  • Title:

    Kidnapping from Lawful Guardianship

  • Offence Type:

    Non-bailable; Cognizable

  • Punishment:

    Imprisonment up to 7 years and fine

  • Triable By:

    Sessions Court

Conclusion on IPC Section 363

IPC Section 363 plays a critical role in protecting minors and persons under lawful guardianship from unlawful removal or abduction. It safeguards the rights of guardians and ensures that vulnerable individuals are not taken away without proper consent.

In modern Indian law, this section is essential for child protection and preventing exploitation. Its strict provisions and punishments act as a deterrent, while courts continue to interpret it in line with evolving social and legal norms.

FAQs on IPC Section 363

What does IPC Section 363 cover?

It covers kidnapping or taking away a person from lawful guardianship without consent, mainly focusing on minors or persons under care.

Is kidnapping under Section 363 a bailable offence?

No, it is a non-bailable offence. Bail is granted only at the court’s discretion considering the case facts.

Which court tries offences under Section 363?

Sessions Courts generally try these offences due to their serious nature, while Magistrates handle preliminary matters.

What is the punishment under IPC Section 363?

The punishment can be imprisonment up to seven years and a fine, depending on the case circumstances.

Can a person be charged under Section 363 for taking an adult?

No, Section 363 mainly applies to persons under lawful guardianship, typically minors or those legally under care.

Related Sections

Modified scramblers are conditionally legal in India, subject to compliance with motor vehicle laws and pollution norms.

IT Act Section 16 defines secure electronic records, ensuring data integrity and authenticity in digital transactions.

Narco analysis is conditionally legal in India under strict safeguards and court oversight.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 141 defines offences by companies for cheque dishonour and liability of officers in default.

Child marriages are illegal in India under the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, with strict penalties for violations.

Selling pets online in India is legal with compliance to animal welfare laws and proper licensing.

CPC Section 154 details the procedure for filing a police report (FIR) upon receiving information about a cognizable offence.

Companies Act 2013 Section 387 governs the power of the Central Government to appoint inspectors for company investigations.

CrPC Section 105I details the procedure for police to record statements of victims or witnesses in certain cases.

IPC Section 174A addresses the punishment for negligent conduct with respect to dangerous weapons or explosives, ensuring public safety.

Understand the legality of benchmarking against competitors in India and its limits under competition law.

Income Tax Act Section 271AAD imposes penalty for false entry in books of account or documents.

IPC Section 34 addresses acts done by several persons in furtherance of common intention, ensuring joint liability.

Section 150 of the Income Tax Act 1961 deals with penalties for failure to furnish return of income in India.

Section 188A of the Income Tax Act 1961 governs the advance tax payment on winnings from lotteries, crossword puzzles, horse races, and other games in India.

Companies Act 2013 Section 393 governs the power of the Tribunal to grant relief in cases of compromise or arrangement.

IPL betting is illegal in India under the Public Gambling Act, but some forms of fantasy sports are allowed with conditions.

CrPC Section 188 deals with punishment for disobedience to an order lawfully promulgated by a public servant.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 85C covers the presumption of electronic records' authenticity, crucial for digital evidence admissibility in courts.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 131A defines the holder in due course and their rights under negotiable instruments law.

Companies Act 2013 Section 195 governs payments to non-residents and foreign companies, ensuring compliance with RBI and tax regulations.

Companies Act 2013 Section 325 governs the power of the Tribunal to punish for contempt in company law matters.

Income Tax Act Section 80F provides deductions for interest income from specified savings and deposits.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 102 outlines penalties for false or misleading advertisements to protect consumers.

CrPC Section 9 empowers magistrates to order security for keeping peace and good behavior to prevent public nuisance.

Companies Act 2013 Section 257 covers the procedure for removal of directors by members before expiry of term.

IT Act Section 55 addresses the liability for damages caused by failure to protect computer source code.

bottom of page