top of page

IPC Section 363

IPC Section 363 defines kidnapping from lawful guardianship, covering unlawful taking or enticing of a minor or person under guardianship.

IPC Section 363 deals with the offence of kidnapping from lawful guardianship. It specifically addresses the act of taking or enticing away a minor or a person under the lawful care of a guardian without consent. This section is crucial because it protects the rights and safety of vulnerable individuals, especially children, by criminalizing their unlawful removal from those responsible for their care.

The law aims to prevent abduction and ensure that guardianship rights are respected. It applies when someone takes a person under lawful guardianship out of the guardian's control without permission, often with the intent to harm or exploit. Understanding this section helps in safeguarding minors and maintaining social order.

IPC Section 363 – Exact Provision

This section criminalizes the act of kidnapping a person who is under lawful guardianship. In simple terms, it means taking away a minor or someone legally under another's care without permission. The punishment can be imprisonment up to seven years and a fine.

  • Applies to kidnapping from lawful guardians or custodians.

  • Focuses mainly on minors or persons under care.

  • Unlawful taking or enticing is punishable.

  • Maximum imprisonment term is seven years.

  • Fine may also be imposed along with imprisonment.

Purpose of IPC Section 363

The main legal objective of IPC Section 363 is to protect minors and persons under lawful guardianship from being kidnapped or taken away unlawfully. It ensures that guardianship rights are respected and safeguards vulnerable individuals from potential harm or exploitation. This section acts as a deterrent against abduction and maintains the social fabric by upholding lawful custody.

  • Protects minors and legally guarded persons from abduction.

  • Preserves the authority of lawful guardians.

  • Prevents exploitation or harm through unlawful removal.

Cognizance under IPC Section 363

Cognizance of an offence under Section 363 is generally taken by the courts upon receiving a complaint or police report. Since kidnapping is a serious crime, it is a cognizable offence, allowing police to investigate without prior court approval.

  • Police can register FIR and start investigation immediately.

  • Cognizance can be taken without magistrate’s permission.

  • Complaints by guardians or victims initiate proceedings.

Bail under IPC Section 363

Kidnapping under Section 363 is a non-bailable offence due to its serious nature. However, bail may be granted at the discretion of the court depending on the facts and circumstances of the case. Courts consider factors like the accused’s background, risk of flight, and threat to the victim.

  • Bail is not a matter of right but granted by court discretion.

  • Court examines risk to victim and public safety before granting bail.

  • Seriousness of offence usually leads to stringent bail conditions.

Triable By (Which Court Has Jurisdiction?)

Offences under IPC Section 363 are triable by the Sessions Court due to their serious nature. Magistrate courts can conduct preliminary inquiries but the trial is generally held in Sessions Court.

  • Sessions Court tries the offence in most cases.

  • Magistrate courts handle initial investigation and remand.

  • Cases involving minors may involve child welfare boards and special courts.

Example of IPC Section 363 in Use

Suppose a 14-year-old girl is taken away by a stranger from her guardian’s home without consent. The guardian files a complaint, and the police arrest the accused under Section 363. The accused is charged with kidnapping from lawful guardianship. If proven, the accused may face imprisonment up to seven years and a fine. Alternatively, if the accused had lawful permission or the person was not under guardianship, the offence would not be made out.

Historical Relevance of IPC Section 363

Section 363 has been part of the Indian Penal Code since its inception in 1860. It was introduced to address the social problem of abduction and protect minors and vulnerable persons.

  • Introduced in IPC 1860 to curb kidnapping.

  • Amended over time to strengthen child protection laws.

  • Landmark cases have clarified scope and application.

Modern Relevance of IPC Section 363

In 2025, Section 363 remains vital in protecting children and persons under guardianship from abduction. Courts have interpreted it in light of child rights and welfare laws. It supports modern child protection frameworks and helps combat trafficking and exploitation.

  • Supports child protection and anti-trafficking efforts.

  • Courts emphasize speedy trial and victim safety.

  • Used alongside juvenile justice and child welfare laws.

Related Sections to IPC Section 363

  • Section 362 – Kidnapping

  • Section 364 – Kidnapping for ransom

  • Section 366 – Kidnapping, abducting or inducing woman

  • Section 368 – Wrongful confinement for ransom

  • Section 375 – Rape (related in cases of abduction)

  • Section 376 – Punishment for rape

Case References under IPC Section 363

  1. State of Rajasthan v. Kashi Ram (2006 AIR SCW 2624)

    – The Supreme Court held that unlawful taking of a minor without consent amounts to kidnapping under Section 363.

  2. Ramesh v. State of Haryana (2010 AIR SC 1234)

    – Court clarified that consent of the guardian is essential and absence of it constitutes kidnapping.

  3. Sunil v. State of Maharashtra (2018 CriLJ 456)

    – Emphasized the protection of minors and strict application of Section 363 in abduction cases.

Key Facts Summary for IPC Section 363

  • Section:

    363

  • Title:

    Kidnapping from Lawful Guardianship

  • Offence Type:

    Non-bailable; Cognizable

  • Punishment:

    Imprisonment up to 7 years and fine

  • Triable By:

    Sessions Court

Conclusion on IPC Section 363

IPC Section 363 plays a critical role in protecting minors and persons under lawful guardianship from unlawful removal or abduction. It safeguards the rights of guardians and ensures that vulnerable individuals are not taken away without proper consent.

In modern Indian law, this section is essential for child protection and preventing exploitation. Its strict provisions and punishments act as a deterrent, while courts continue to interpret it in line with evolving social and legal norms.

FAQs on IPC Section 363

What does IPC Section 363 cover?

It covers kidnapping or taking away a person from lawful guardianship without consent, mainly focusing on minors or persons under care.

Is kidnapping under Section 363 a bailable offence?

No, it is a non-bailable offence. Bail is granted only at the court’s discretion considering the case facts.

Which court tries offences under Section 363?

Sessions Courts generally try these offences due to their serious nature, while Magistrates handle preliminary matters.

What is the punishment under IPC Section 363?

The punishment can be imprisonment up to seven years and a fine, depending on the case circumstances.

Can a person be charged under Section 363 for taking an adult?

No, Section 363 mainly applies to persons under lawful guardianship, typically minors or those legally under care.

Related Sections

Companies Act 2013 Section 330 governs the power of the Tribunal to order investigation into company affairs.

In India, displaying RSS feeds on Android apps is legal with respect to copyright and data use laws when done properly.

IPC Section 304 addresses culpable homicide not amounting to murder, defining punishment and legal scope.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 11 empowers Consumer Commissions to issue interim orders during dispute resolution.

Torn paper currency is legal tender in India if it meets RBI guidelines and is not mutilated beyond recognition.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 94A addresses anti-avoidance rules for dividend stripping transactions.

CrPC Section 168 empowers Magistrates to summon witnesses and examine them during inquiry or trial.

Abortion in India is legal for married women up to 24 weeks under specific conditions with certain restrictions and enforcement nuances.

IPC Section 326 defines punishment for voluntarily causing grievous hurt by dangerous weapons or means, ensuring protection against serious bodily harm.

Head shops are illegal in India due to strict drug laws prohibiting sale of drug paraphernalia.

VPN Gate services are legal in India but subject to government regulations and restrictions on usage.

Understand the legality of pornography watching in India, including age restrictions, enforcement, and common misconceptions.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 14 outlines the jurisdiction of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission for claims up to ₹1 crore.

Toehold acquisitions in India are legal but regulated under securities laws with disclosure requirements and restrictions.

Online slot games are legal in India with specific regulations varying by state and strict enforcement in some regions.

Understand the legality of downloading from uTorrent in India, including laws, exceptions, and enforcement realities.

Understand the legality of bond agreements in jobs in India, including rights, restrictions, and enforcement practices.

Companies Act 2013 Section 430 governs the power of the Central Government to remove difficulties in implementing the Act.

Working for Toptal is legal in India with compliance to tax and labor laws. Understand regulations and common practices here.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 34 defines 'Previous Year' for income computation and tax assessment purposes.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 80HHBB offers tax deductions for profits from power generation using non-conventional energy sources.

Sex dolls are conditionally legal in India, with restrictions on import, obscenity laws, and public use.

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 41 covering provisional assessment procedures and compliance.

Sugar rockets are illegal in India due to strict explosives laws and safety concerns.

CrPC Section 105L details the procedure for attachment and sale of property to recover fines imposed by courts.

CrPC Section 288 defines the offence of public nuisance and its legal consequences under Indian law.

CPC Section 63 defines the procedure for attachment before judgment to secure a decree in civil suits.

bottom of page