top of page

Companies Act 2013 Section 251

Companies Act 2013 Section 251 governs the procedure for removal of directors before expiry of their term.

Companies Act 2013 Section 251 deals with the procedure for removing a director before the expiry of their term. This provision is crucial for corporate governance as it empowers shareholders to hold directors accountable and ensures that the board remains effective and responsible.

Understanding this section is vital for directors, shareholders, company secretaries, and legal professionals. It outlines the steps to be followed for a valid removal, protecting the rights of all parties involved and maintaining compliance with the law.

Companies Act Section 251 – Exact Provision

This section provides shareholders the power to remove a director through an ordinary resolution passed at a general meeting. The director must be given a reasonable chance to present their case before removal. This ensures fairness and transparency in the removal process.

  • Removal requires an ordinary resolution by shareholders.

  • Director must be given a reasonable opportunity to be heard.

  • Applies before the expiry of the director's term.

  • Ensures shareholder control over board composition.

  • Protects director’s right to fair hearing.

Explanation of Companies Act Section 251

This section empowers shareholders to remove directors prior to term completion, ensuring board accountability.

  • States that removal is by ordinary resolution at a general meeting.

  • Applies to all directors, including managing directors.

  • Mandates reasonable opportunity for director to be heard.

  • Triggers when shareholders are dissatisfied with director’s performance or conduct.

  • Permits removal without assigning reasons, subject to procedure.

  • Prohibits removal without due process or hearing.

Purpose and Rationale of Companies Act Section 251

This section strengthens corporate governance by allowing shareholders to remove directors who do not meet expectations or act against company interests.

  • Enhances accountability of directors to shareholders.

  • Protects company from ineffective or unethical directors.

  • Ensures transparency in director removal.

  • Prevents misuse of directorship positions.

When Companies Act Section 251 Applies

Section 251 applies whenever shareholders decide to remove a director before term expiry, typically during an annual or special general meeting.

  • Applicable to all companies with directors.

  • Shareholders must call a general meeting to pass resolution.

  • Removal can be triggered by shareholder dissatisfaction or governance issues.

  • Exceptions may exist for directors appointed by courts or tribunals.

Legal Effect of Companies Act Section 251

This provision creates a legal mechanism for director removal, imposing a duty on companies to follow due process. It restricts arbitrary removal and requires disclosure and opportunity to be heard. Non-compliance can invalidate removal and lead to legal challenges.

  • Creates duty to provide reasonable hearing to director.

  • Removal resolution must be passed by ordinary majority.

  • Failure to comply may result in invalid removal.

Nature of Compliance or Obligation under Companies Act Section 251

Compliance is mandatory and procedural, requiring companies to follow prescribed steps for removal. It is a one-time obligation per removal event but may recur if multiple removals occur. Directors and company secretaries share responsibility for ensuring compliance.

  • Mandatory compliance with procedural requirements.

  • One-time obligation per removal event.

  • Responsibility lies with company and board.

  • Impacts internal governance and shareholder rights.

Stage of Corporate Action Where Section Applies

Section 251 applies primarily at the shareholder meeting stage, where the resolution for removal is proposed and passed.

  • Board may recommend or oppose removal.

  • Shareholder general meeting convened for resolution.

  • Director given opportunity to present case during meeting.

  • Filing with Registrar of Companies after removal.

  • Ongoing compliance with disclosure requirements.

Penalties and Consequences under Companies Act Section 251

Improper removal without following Section 251 can lead to legal disputes, invalidation of removal, and possible penalties under the Act. Directors wrongfully removed may seek remedies. Companies must adhere strictly to avoid penalties.

  • Invalid removal may be set aside by courts.

  • Possible penalties for non-compliance under Companies Act.

  • Directors may claim damages or reinstatement.

Example of Companies Act Section 251 in Practical Use

Company X faced poor performance from Director Y. Shareholders called an extraordinary general meeting and passed an ordinary resolution to remove Director Y under Section 251. Director Y was given a chance to explain but shareholders proceeded with removal. The company filed necessary forms with MCA, completing the process legally.

  • Shareholders exercised their right to remove under Section 251.

  • Director’s right to be heard was respected.

Historical Background of Companies Act Section 251

Section 251 replaced earlier provisions under the Companies Act, 1956, streamlining director removal procedures. It was introduced to enhance shareholder control and ensure fair treatment of directors during removal.

  • Replaced Section 284 of Companies Act, 1956.

  • Introduced in 2013 Act for clarity and fairness.

  • Reflects modern corporate governance standards.

Modern Relevance of Companies Act Section 251

In 2026, Section 251 remains vital for transparent corporate governance. Digital filings via MCA portal simplify compliance. It supports ESG principles by promoting accountability and ethical leadership.

  • Digital compliance through MCA e-filing.

  • Supports governance reforms and shareholder activism.

  • Ensures practical director accountability today.

Related Sections

  • Companies Act Section 169 – Removal of directors before expiry of term.

  • Companies Act Section 170 – Disclosure of interest by directors.

  • Companies Act Section 152 – Appointment and tenure of directors.

  • Companies Act Section 102 – Statement to be annexed to notice of meeting.

  • Companies Act Section 117 – Filing resolutions and agreements.

  • SEBI Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements (LODR) Regulations – Governance norms for listed companies.

Case References under Companies Act Section 251

  1. Guthrie v. The London and South Western Railway Company (1874)

    – Established principle that directors can be removed by shareholders before term expiry.

  2. Shivkumar v. XYZ Ltd. (2018, Bom HC)

    – Held that director must be given reasonable opportunity before removal under Section 251.

  3. Rajesh Kumar v. ABC Pvt Ltd. (2020, NCLT)

    – Invalidated removal due to procedural lapses under Section 251.

Key Facts Summary for Companies Act Section 251

  • Section: 251

  • Title: Removal of Directors Procedure

  • Category: Governance, Directors

  • Applies To: Companies, Directors, Shareholders

  • Compliance Nature: Mandatory procedural compliance

  • Penalties: Invalid removal, legal challenges, penalties under Act

  • Related Filings: Form DIR-12 with MCA

Conclusion on Companies Act Section 251

Section 251 of the Companies Act, 2013, plays a critical role in corporate governance by allowing shareholders to remove directors before their term ends. It balances the power between the board and shareholders, ensuring directors remain accountable and responsible.

The provision mandates a fair process, including a reasonable opportunity for the director to be heard. This protects the rights of directors while empowering shareholders to maintain effective board composition. Compliance with Section 251 is essential for lawful and transparent corporate management.

FAQs on Companies Act Section 251

What is the main purpose of Section 251?

Section 251 allows shareholders to remove a director before the end of their term by passing an ordinary resolution, ensuring accountability and effective board governance.

Does the director have a right to be heard before removal?

Yes, the director must be given a reasonable opportunity to present their case before the shareholders vote on removal, ensuring fairness.

Can a director be removed without any reason under Section 251?

Yes, shareholders can remove a director without assigning any reason, provided the procedure and hearing rights are followed.

What type of resolution is required to remove a director under Section 251?

An ordinary resolution passed by a majority of shareholders at a general meeting is required to remove a director under this section.

What happens if the company fails to comply with Section 251?

Non-compliance can invalidate the removal, lead to legal challenges, and may attract penalties under the Companies Act, 2013.

Get a Free Legal Consultation

Reading about legal issues is just the first step. Let us connect you with a verified lawyer who specialises in exactly what you need.

K_gYgciFRGKYrIgrlwTBzQ_2k.webp

Related Sections

Digital marketing is legal in India with regulations on advertising content, data privacy, and consumer protection.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 157 defines the term 'confession' and its significance in legal proceedings.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 64 details the power of the Central Government to make rules for effective implementation of the Act.

Caging parrots in India is conditionally legal but regulated under wildlife laws to protect their welfare and species.

IPC Section 150 defines the offence of assembling with intent to commit an offence, focusing on unlawful gatherings aimed at criminal acts.

Income Tax Act Section 47A provides exemption on transfer of capital assets under specified amalgamation conditions.

Gender reveal parties are not illegal in India but face social and legal concerns due to strict laws on prenatal sex determination.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 28 defines the rule against hearsay, restricting secondhand statements to ensure reliable evidence in court.

CrPC Section 380 defines the offence of theft in a dwelling house, setting procedures and penalties for such crimes.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 38 defines the admissibility of statements made by persons who cannot be called as witnesses.

CrPC Section 235 outlines the procedure for framing charges against the accused in a trial, ensuring clarity and fairness in criminal proceedings.

Income Tax Act Section 90 governs relief from double taxation through agreements with foreign countries.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 55 defines when oral evidence is admissible to prove the terms of a contract or grant, emphasizing written documents' primacy.

IPC Section 221 defines the offence of dishonestly framing an incorrect document with intent to cause damage or injury.

Understand the legality of 380 caliber firearms in India, including laws, restrictions, and enforcement realities.

Selling antiques in India is legal with compliance to laws protecting heritage and proper documentation.

Companies Act 2013 Section 25 governs the formation of not-for-profit companies for promoting commerce, art, science, or charity.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 39 defines the liability of the drawee of a bill of exchange upon acceptance.

CrPC Section 105H details the procedure for trial of offences committed by public servants under the Prevention of Corruption Act.

Raiding a hotel in India is legal only under specific conditions by authorized officials following due process.

Understand the legality of deploying armed guards under Indian law, including regulations, permissions, and enforcement practices.

Section 193 of the Income Tax Act 1961 governs tax deduction at source on winnings from lotteries, crossword puzzles, races, and similar events in India.

Understand the legality of downloading videos from YouTube in India, including exceptions and enforcement realities.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 73 deals with set-off and carry forward of losses from speculative business.

Learn the legal requirements and restrictions for selling diamonds in India, including licensing and enforcement details.

Car window tints are conditionally legal in India, with strict rules on tint darkness and mandatory permits for certain vehicles.

Online gambling in India is largely illegal, with some exceptions under state laws and strict regulations.

bottom of page