top of page

Companies Act 2013 Section 367

Companies Act 2013 Section 367 governs the power of the Central Government to remove difficulties in implementing the Act.

Companies Act Section 367 empowers the Central Government to address and resolve difficulties arising during the implementation of the Companies Act, 2013. This provision ensures smooth enforcement and timely clarification of any ambiguities or practical challenges faced by companies, directors, and regulators.

Understanding this section is crucial for directors, company secretaries, legal professionals, and stakeholders to navigate transitional issues and comply effectively with the law. It acts as a safeguard to maintain corporate governance and regulatory compliance without disruption.

Companies Act Section 367 – Exact Provision

This section grants the Central Government a special power to issue orders to remove difficulties in applying the Act. It is a flexible tool to address unforeseen issues, ensuring the law's objectives are met without legal or procedural hurdles.

  • Enables Central Government to resolve implementation challenges.

  • Orders must be consistent with the Act's provisions.

  • Published officially for transparency.

  • Temporary or permanent measures can be introduced.

  • Supports smooth transition and enforcement.

Explanation of Companies Act Section 367

This section empowers the Central Government to intervene when difficulties arise in applying the Companies Act, 2013.

  • Applies to the Central Government as the authority.

  • Triggered by practical or legal difficulties in implementation.

  • Allows issuance of orders to remove such difficulties.

  • Orders must align with the Act’s provisions.

  • Does not override the Act but supplements it.

Purpose and Rationale of Companies Act Section 367

The section aims to ensure effective implementation of the Companies Act, 2013 by providing a mechanism to address unforeseen issues.

  • Strengthens corporate governance by removing procedural roadblocks.

  • Protects stakeholders from confusion or legal uncertainty.

  • Ensures transparency through official publication of orders.

  • Prevents misuse by restricting orders to be consistent with the Act.

When Companies Act Section 367 Applies

This section applies when difficulties arise in applying any provision of the Companies Act, 2013.

  • Triggered during implementation or transitional phases.

  • Applicable to all companies and stakeholders governed by the Act.

  • Used when existing provisions do not provide clear guidance.

  • Orders issued are time-bound or until difficulties are resolved.

  • Exceptions if provisions are explicitly excluded by the Act.

Legal Effect of Companies Act Section 367

This provision creates a legal mechanism for the Central Government to issue binding orders to remove difficulties in applying the Act. Such orders have the force of law but must not contradict the Act’s provisions. They impact corporate compliance by clarifying ambiguous areas or procedural gaps. Non-compliance with these orders can attract penalties under the Act. The section works alongside MCA rules and notifications to ensure cohesive governance.

  • Creates binding orders with legal effect.

  • Supports compliance and enforcement.

  • Non-compliance may lead to penalties.

Nature of Compliance or Obligation under Companies Act Section 367

Compliance with orders issued under this section is mandatory for companies and officers. The obligation is conditional, triggered only when the Central Government issues such orders. It is generally a one-time or temporary obligation until the difficulty is resolved. Directors and officers must ensure adherence to these orders as part of internal governance and regulatory compliance.

  • Mandatory compliance with issued orders.

  • Conditional and event-driven obligation.

  • Responsibility lies with company management and officers.

  • Supports internal governance and regulatory adherence.

Stage of Corporate Action Where Section Applies

This section is relevant primarily during the implementation and transitional stages of the Companies Act, 2013.

  • May apply at incorporation or operational stages if difficulties arise.

  • Relevant during board decisions impacted by unclear provisions.

  • Applicable when filing or disclosure requirements face ambiguities.

  • Supports ongoing compliance by resolving procedural issues.

Penalties and Consequences under Companies Act Section 367

While Section 367 itself does not prescribe penalties, failure to comply with orders issued under it can attract penalties under other relevant provisions of the Companies Act, 2013. The Central Government’s orders have legal force, and non-adherence may lead to monetary fines, prosecution, or disqualification of directors depending on the nature of the breach.

  • Non-compliance may attract penalties under related provisions.

  • Possible monetary fines or prosecution.

  • Director disqualification in severe cases.

Example of Companies Act Section 367 in Practical Use

Company X faced ambiguity regarding the applicability of a new compliance requirement under the Companies Act, 2013. The Central Government issued an order under Section 367 clarifying the timeline for compliance. Director X ensured the company followed the order, avoiding penalties and ensuring smooth governance.

  • Demonstrates government’s role in resolving legal ambiguities.

  • Highlights importance of compliance with government orders.

Historical Background of Companies Act Section 367

This section was introduced in the Companies Act, 2013 to replace similar provisions in the Companies Act, 1956. It reflects the need for a flexible mechanism to address implementation challenges in a modern corporate environment. Since 2013, it has been used to issue various clarifications and transitional provisions.

  • Replaces analogous provision in Companies Act, 1956.

  • Introduced to ensure smooth transition to the 2013 Act.

  • Supports ongoing amendments and clarifications.

Modern Relevance of Companies Act Section 367

In 2026, this section remains vital for addressing emerging challenges in corporate governance. With digital filings and evolving MCA portal requirements, the Central Government uses this power to clarify procedural issues. It supports compliance with ESG and CSR norms by resolving regulatory ambiguities promptly.

  • Facilitates digital compliance and e-governance.

  • Enables timely governance reforms.

  • Ensures practical importance in modern corporate law.

Related Sections

  • Companies Act Section 2 – Definitions relevant to corporate entities.

  • Companies Act Section 5 – Incorporation of company.

  • Companies Act Section 12 – Registered office of company.

  • Companies Act Section 403 – Power to make rules.

  • Companies Act Section 454 – Power to remove difficulties (repealed provisions).

  • SEBI Act Section 11 – Regulatory oversight for listed companies.

Case References under Companies Act Section 367

No landmark case directly interprets this section as of 2026.

Key Facts Summary for Companies Act Section 367

  • Section: 367

  • Title: Power to Remove Difficulties

  • Category: Governance, Compliance

  • Applies To: Central Government, Companies, Directors

  • Compliance Nature: Conditional, Mandatory upon order issuance

  • Penalties: Indirect, via non-compliance with orders

  • Related Filings: Official Gazette publication of orders

Conclusion on Companies Act Section 367

Companies Act Section 367 is a crucial provision empowering the Central Government to ensure the effective implementation of the Companies Act, 2013. By enabling the government to remove difficulties, it safeguards the law’s objectives and supports corporate governance.

This section provides flexibility to address unforeseen issues without undermining the Act’s integrity. Directors, companies, and professionals must stay aware of any orders issued under this section to maintain compliance and avoid penalties.

FAQs on Companies Act Section 367

What is the main purpose of Section 367?

Section 367 allows the Central Government to issue orders to remove difficulties in applying the Companies Act, 2013. It ensures smooth implementation and resolves ambiguities.

Who can issue orders under Section 367?

Only the Central Government has the authority to issue orders under this section to address difficulties in the Act’s implementation.

Are orders under Section 367 legally binding?

Yes, orders issued under Section 367 have the force of law and must be complied with by companies and officers.

Does Section 367 override the Companies Act provisions?

No, orders under Section 367 must be consistent with the Act and cannot override its provisions.

What happens if a company ignores an order under Section 367?

Ignoring such orders can lead to penalties, prosecution, or director disqualification under the Companies Act, 2013.

Get a Free Legal Consultation

Reading about legal issues is just the first step. Let us connect you with a verified lawyer who specialises in exactly what you need.

K_gYgciFRGKYrIgrlwTBzQ_2k.webp

Related Sections

Companies Act 2013 Section 433 governs the winding up of companies by the Tribunal, ensuring orderly liquidation and protection of stakeholders.

IPC Section 186 penalizes obstructing public servants from lawful duties, ensuring smooth administration and public order.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 70 details penalties for false or misleading advertisements to protect consumers from deceptive practices.

CPC Section 56 deals with the power of courts to reject a plaint for non-compliance with procedural requirements.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 76 defines the term 'holder' and explains who qualifies as a holder under the Act.

IPC Section 492 defines the offence of receiving stolen property, outlining its scope and punishment.

CPC Section 35A empowers courts to order discovery and inspection of documents in civil suits to ensure fair trial.

Advertising for votes in India is illegal under the Representation of the People Act and Election Commission rules.

Being homosexual in India is legal with protections under the law since 2018, but social challenges remain.

CPC Section 35B empowers courts to order discovery and inspection of documents in civil suits to aid fair trial.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 139 mandates filing of income tax returns by specified assessees within prescribed timelines.

IPC Section 308 punishes attempts to commit suicide, aiming to prevent self-harm and provide legal deterrence.

Snus is illegal in India; its sale, import, and use are prohibited under tobacco laws with strict enforcement.

Income Tax Act Section 115B specifies tax rates on income from units of UTI and mutual funds.

Companies Act 2013 Section 133 mandates the preparation and filing of financial statements by companies in India.

CrPC Section 476 deals with punishment for counterfeiting valuable security or documents, outlining penalties and legal procedures.

IPC Section 438 provides anticipatory bail to protect individuals from arrest in non-bailable offences.

Income Tax Act Section 80AA provides deductions for profits from certain newly established undertakings in specified areas.

IT Act Section 20 governs the recognition of electronic records and their legal validity in digital transactions.

In India, the legal age for most activities is 18; being 38 means you are fully an adult with all legal rights and responsibilities.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 12 outlines the establishment and powers of the Central Consumer Protection Authority (CCPA) for consumer rights enforcement.

IPC Section 344 defines punishment for wrongful confinement for three or more days, ensuring protection of personal liberty.

Understand the legality of CR 70 in India, including its definition, use, and legal status under Indian law.

Freelotto is not legally authorized in India due to strict gambling laws and lack of official licensing.

Section 195 of the Income Tax Act 1961 governs tax deduction at source on payments to non-residents in India.

IPC Section 390 defines robbery, detailing the use of force or intimidation to commit theft, highlighting its serious criminal nature.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 4 defines promissory notes and their essential features under Indian law.

bottom of page