top of page

Information Technology Act 2000 Section 55

IT Act Section 55 addresses the liability for damages caused by failure to protect computer source code.

Section 55 of the Information Technology Act, 2000, focuses on the protection of computer source code. It deals with liability arising from failure to safeguard source code, which is critical in software and digital products. This section is vital in preventing unauthorized access, copying, or misuse of source code, ensuring intellectual property rights are respected in the digital environment.

In today's digital world, source code forms the backbone of software applications. Protecting it is essential for businesses, developers, and users alike. Section 55 impacts software companies, service providers, and law enforcement by providing a legal framework to address violations involving source code security.

Information Technology Act Section 55 – Exact Provision

This section imposes liability on any person who has possession of computer source code and neglects to protect it adequately. If such negligence results in wrongful loss or damage, the liable person must compensate the affected party. The compensation amount can be up to one crore rupees, reflecting the high value of source code in the digital economy.

  • Applies to persons entrusted with source code possession.

  • Requires taking reasonable security measures.

  • Liability arises if negligence causes wrongful loss or damage.

  • Compensation can be up to one crore rupees.

  • Focuses on protecting intellectual property rights.

Explanation of Information Technology Act Section 55

Section 55 mandates protection of computer source code by those who possess it. Failure to do so can lead to legal liability.

  • States liability for failure to protect source code.

  • Applies to developers, companies, service providers, and custodians of source code.

  • Triggered when reasonable security measures are not implemented.

  • Legal criteria include possession, negligence, and resulting loss or damage.

  • Allows compensation claims for affected persons.

  • Prohibits negligence in safeguarding source code.

Purpose and Rationale of IT Act Section 55

The section aims to protect the valuable intellectual property embedded in source code. It encourages responsible handling and security practices to prevent unauthorized use or theft.

  • Protects users and businesses in the digital ecosystem.

  • Prevents cybercrimes related to source code theft.

  • Ensures secure handling of software assets.

  • Regulates custodianship and accountability for source code.

When IT Act Section 55 Applies

This section applies when a person entrusted with source code fails to secure it, causing loss or damage to another party.

  • When source code is in possession and security is inadequate.

  • When wrongful loss or damage results from negligence.

  • Claims can be invoked by affected persons or companies.

  • Requires evidence of possession, negligence, and damage.

  • Relevant to digital assets and software protection.

  • Exceptions may include unavoidable breaches or force majeure.

Legal Effect of IT Act Section 55

Section 55 creates a civil liability for damages caused by failure to protect source code. It restricts negligent handling and enforces compensation to victims. The section complements other IT Act provisions and intellectual property laws.

  • Creates right to claim damages for source code negligence.

  • Penalties include compensation up to one crore rupees.

  • Impacts software companies, developers, and custodians.

  • Supports enforcement of intellectual property rights.

  • Interacts with IPC provisions on cheating and fraud if applicable.

Nature of Offence or Liability under IT Act Section 55

Section 55 imposes civil liability rather than criminal liability. It focuses on compensatory damages for negligence in protecting source code.

  • Civil liability for damages.

  • Non-cognizable offence; no criminal prosecution under this section.

  • No arrest or criminal proceedings directly under Section 55.

  • Regulatory compliance for security measures is mandatory.

Stage of Proceedings Where IT Act Section 55 Applies

This section is relevant during civil claims for damages related to source code protection failures.

  • Investigation of negligence and security lapses.

  • Collection of evidence such as access logs, security protocols.

  • Filing of civil complaint for compensation.

  • Trial in civil courts or tribunals.

  • Appeal against compensation orders.

Penalties and Consequences under IT Act Section 55

Penalties under Section 55 are primarily monetary, focusing on compensation for losses caused by negligence.

  • Compensation up to one crore rupees.

  • Liability may extend to companies and individuals.

  • Intermediaries must ensure source code security.

  • No imprisonment or criminal fines under this section.

Example of IT Act Section 55 in Practical Use

Company X entrusted its software source code to a third-party developer. The developer failed to implement adequate security, leading to a leak of the source code. Competitors gained access, causing financial loss to Company X. Under Section 55, the developer was held liable and ordered to pay compensation for the damages caused by negligence.

  • Highlights importance of securing source code.

  • Demonstrates liability for negligent custodians.

Historical Background of IT Act Section 55

The IT Act was introduced to regulate electronic commerce, digital signatures, and cybercrime. Section 55 was included to protect software assets and source code. The 2008 Amendment strengthened provisions related to digital security and liability.

  • Introduced to safeguard digital intellectual property.

  • Amended in 2008 to enhance cybercrime laws.

  • Reflects evolving digital economy needs.

Modern Relevance of IT Act Section 55

In 2026, cybersecurity and data protection are critical. Source code protection remains vital for fintech, software development, and digital identity systems. Section 55 supports enforcement against negligence and theft in a complex digital landscape.

  • Supports digital evidence collection.

  • Enhances online safety and trust.

  • Addresses enforcement challenges in cybercrime.

Related Sections

  • IT Act Section 43 – Penalty for unauthorised access and data theft.

  • IT Act Section 66 – Computer-related offences.

  • IT Act Section 72 – Breach of confidentiality and privacy.

  • IPC Section 420 – Cheating, relevant for online fraud.

  • Evidence Act Section 65B – Admissibility of electronic evidence.

  • CrPC Section 91 – Summons for digital records or documents.

Case References under IT Act Section 55

No landmark case directly interprets this section as of 2026.

Key Facts Summary for IT Act Section 55

  • Section: 55

  • Title: Liability for failure to protect computer source code

  • Category: Cybersecurity, Intellectual Property, Liability

  • Applies To: Developers, companies, custodians of source code

  • Stage: Investigation, Civil trial, Appeal

  • Legal Effect: Civil liability for damages

  • Penalties: Compensation up to one crore rupees

Conclusion on IT Act Section 55

Section 55 of the IT Act, 2000, plays a crucial role in protecting computer source code, a valuable digital asset. By imposing liability for failure to secure source code, it encourages responsible handling and safeguards intellectual property rights in the digital ecosystem.

This provision benefits software developers, companies, and users by providing a legal remedy against negligence. As digital technologies evolve, Section 55 remains relevant to uphold trust and security in software and digital products.

FAQs on IT Act Section 55

Who is liable under Section 55 of the IT Act?

Any person entrusted with the possession of computer source code who fails to take reasonable security measures and causes wrongful loss or damage is liable under Section 55.

What kind of damages can be claimed under Section 55?

Compensation for wrongful loss or damage caused by failure to protect source code can be claimed, up to a maximum of one crore rupees.

Does Section 55 impose criminal penalties?

No, Section 55 primarily imposes civil liability for damages and does not provide for criminal penalties or imprisonment.

How does Section 55 protect intellectual property?

By requiring reasonable security measures for source code, Section 55 helps prevent unauthorized access, copying, or misuse, thereby protecting intellectual property rights.

Can companies be held liable under Section 55?

Yes, companies that possess or control source code and fail to protect it adequately can be held liable for damages under Section 55.

Related Sections

Companies Act 2013 Section 426 governs the power of the Central Government to give directions to companies for compliance.

CPC Section 21 empowers courts to issue commissions for examination of witnesses or documents in civil suits.

CrPC Section 458 details the procedure for search of a place entered by a person to avoid arrest, ensuring lawful search and seizure.

Sandalwood farming is legal in India with regulations; private cultivation requires licenses and adherence to state laws.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 99 defines the term 'holder' and explains who qualifies as a holder of a negotiable instrument.

Owning an air rifle in India is legal with conditions; licenses may be required depending on the rifle's power and local laws.

Section 144A of the Income Tax Act 1961 allows the Assessing Officer to make best judgment assessments in India under certain conditions.

Income Tax Act Section 125A deals with the recovery of tax in cases of failure to deduct or pay TDS by specified entities.

IPC Section 502 defines the offence of using a false document for the purpose of cheating or dishonesty.

CrPC Section 121 defines the offence of waging war against the Government of India and its legal consequences.

Companies Act 2013 Section 434 deals with the power of the Registrar to remove the name of a company from the register of companies.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 143 defines the liability of partners for negotiable instruments signed on behalf of the firm.

Companies Act 2013 Section 226 empowers the Central Government to appoint inspectors for company investigations.

IPC Section 251 penalizes the act of throwing or attempting to throw any acid on a person, aiming to cause harm or injury.

Companies Act 2013 Section 459 governs the power of the Tribunal to grant relief in cases of oppression and mismanagement.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 75A defines the duties and liabilities of partners in firms regarding negotiable instruments.

Understand the legality of using Adfly in India, including regulations, enforcement, and common misconceptions about link shorteners.

Wagering is generally illegal in India except for certain regulated activities like horse racing and lotteries under specific laws.

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 15 covering value of taxable supply under GST.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 71 outlines penalties for false or misleading advertisements, protecting consumers from deceptive marketing.

CrPC Section 342 explains the procedure for examining an accused in custody before trial to ensure fair justice.

Betting sites are mostly illegal in India, with a few exceptions under state laws and licenses.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 20 defines 'previous year' for income tax computation and assessment purposes.

IPC Section 48 defines the territorial jurisdiction of Indian courts over offences committed outside India by Indian citizens or persons on ships or aircraft registered in India.

Practicing allopathy medicine in India is legal only if you have a recognized medical degree and registration with the Medical Council of India or State Medical Council.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 23 defines when oral evidence is relevant to facts in issue or relevant facts in a trial.

Companies Act 2013 Section 11 governs the alteration of a company's memorandum of association.

bottom of page