top of page

Information Technology Act 2000 Section 55

IT Act Section 55 addresses the liability for damages caused by failure to protect computer source code.

Section 55 of the Information Technology Act, 2000, focuses on the protection of computer source code. It deals with liability arising from failure to safeguard source code, which is critical in software and digital products. This section is vital in preventing unauthorized access, copying, or misuse of source code, ensuring intellectual property rights are respected in the digital environment.

In today's digital world, source code forms the backbone of software applications. Protecting it is essential for businesses, developers, and users alike. Section 55 impacts software companies, service providers, and law enforcement by providing a legal framework to address violations involving source code security.

Information Technology Act Section 55 – Exact Provision

This section imposes liability on any person who has possession of computer source code and neglects to protect it adequately. If such negligence results in wrongful loss or damage, the liable person must compensate the affected party. The compensation amount can be up to one crore rupees, reflecting the high value of source code in the digital economy.

  • Applies to persons entrusted with source code possession.

  • Requires taking reasonable security measures.

  • Liability arises if negligence causes wrongful loss or damage.

  • Compensation can be up to one crore rupees.

  • Focuses on protecting intellectual property rights.

Explanation of Information Technology Act Section 55

Section 55 mandates protection of computer source code by those who possess it. Failure to do so can lead to legal liability.

  • States liability for failure to protect source code.

  • Applies to developers, companies, service providers, and custodians of source code.

  • Triggered when reasonable security measures are not implemented.

  • Legal criteria include possession, negligence, and resulting loss or damage.

  • Allows compensation claims for affected persons.

  • Prohibits negligence in safeguarding source code.

Purpose and Rationale of IT Act Section 55

The section aims to protect the valuable intellectual property embedded in source code. It encourages responsible handling and security practices to prevent unauthorized use or theft.

  • Protects users and businesses in the digital ecosystem.

  • Prevents cybercrimes related to source code theft.

  • Ensures secure handling of software assets.

  • Regulates custodianship and accountability for source code.

When IT Act Section 55 Applies

This section applies when a person entrusted with source code fails to secure it, causing loss or damage to another party.

  • When source code is in possession and security is inadequate.

  • When wrongful loss or damage results from negligence.

  • Claims can be invoked by affected persons or companies.

  • Requires evidence of possession, negligence, and damage.

  • Relevant to digital assets and software protection.

  • Exceptions may include unavoidable breaches or force majeure.

Legal Effect of IT Act Section 55

Section 55 creates a civil liability for damages caused by failure to protect source code. It restricts negligent handling and enforces compensation to victims. The section complements other IT Act provisions and intellectual property laws.

  • Creates right to claim damages for source code negligence.

  • Penalties include compensation up to one crore rupees.

  • Impacts software companies, developers, and custodians.

  • Supports enforcement of intellectual property rights.

  • Interacts with IPC provisions on cheating and fraud if applicable.

Nature of Offence or Liability under IT Act Section 55

Section 55 imposes civil liability rather than criminal liability. It focuses on compensatory damages for negligence in protecting source code.

  • Civil liability for damages.

  • Non-cognizable offence; no criminal prosecution under this section.

  • No arrest or criminal proceedings directly under Section 55.

  • Regulatory compliance for security measures is mandatory.

Stage of Proceedings Where IT Act Section 55 Applies

This section is relevant during civil claims for damages related to source code protection failures.

  • Investigation of negligence and security lapses.

  • Collection of evidence such as access logs, security protocols.

  • Filing of civil complaint for compensation.

  • Trial in civil courts or tribunals.

  • Appeal against compensation orders.

Penalties and Consequences under IT Act Section 55

Penalties under Section 55 are primarily monetary, focusing on compensation for losses caused by negligence.

  • Compensation up to one crore rupees.

  • Liability may extend to companies and individuals.

  • Intermediaries must ensure source code security.

  • No imprisonment or criminal fines under this section.

Example of IT Act Section 55 in Practical Use

Company X entrusted its software source code to a third-party developer. The developer failed to implement adequate security, leading to a leak of the source code. Competitors gained access, causing financial loss to Company X. Under Section 55, the developer was held liable and ordered to pay compensation for the damages caused by negligence.

  • Highlights importance of securing source code.

  • Demonstrates liability for negligent custodians.

Historical Background of IT Act Section 55

The IT Act was introduced to regulate electronic commerce, digital signatures, and cybercrime. Section 55 was included to protect software assets and source code. The 2008 Amendment strengthened provisions related to digital security and liability.

  • Introduced to safeguard digital intellectual property.

  • Amended in 2008 to enhance cybercrime laws.

  • Reflects evolving digital economy needs.

Modern Relevance of IT Act Section 55

In 2026, cybersecurity and data protection are critical. Source code protection remains vital for fintech, software development, and digital identity systems. Section 55 supports enforcement against negligence and theft in a complex digital landscape.

  • Supports digital evidence collection.

  • Enhances online safety and trust.

  • Addresses enforcement challenges in cybercrime.

Related Sections

  • IT Act Section 43 – Penalty for unauthorised access and data theft.

  • IT Act Section 66 – Computer-related offences.

  • IT Act Section 72 – Breach of confidentiality and privacy.

  • IPC Section 420 – Cheating, relevant for online fraud.

  • Evidence Act Section 65B – Admissibility of electronic evidence.

  • CrPC Section 91 – Summons for digital records or documents.

Case References under IT Act Section 55

No landmark case directly interprets this section as of 2026.

Key Facts Summary for IT Act Section 55

  • Section: 55

  • Title: Liability for failure to protect computer source code

  • Category: Cybersecurity, Intellectual Property, Liability

  • Applies To: Developers, companies, custodians of source code

  • Stage: Investigation, Civil trial, Appeal

  • Legal Effect: Civil liability for damages

  • Penalties: Compensation up to one crore rupees

Conclusion on IT Act Section 55

Section 55 of the IT Act, 2000, plays a crucial role in protecting computer source code, a valuable digital asset. By imposing liability for failure to secure source code, it encourages responsible handling and safeguards intellectual property rights in the digital ecosystem.

This provision benefits software developers, companies, and users by providing a legal remedy against negligence. As digital technologies evolve, Section 55 remains relevant to uphold trust and security in software and digital products.

FAQs on IT Act Section 55

Who is liable under Section 55 of the IT Act?

Any person entrusted with the possession of computer source code who fails to take reasonable security measures and causes wrongful loss or damage is liable under Section 55.

What kind of damages can be claimed under Section 55?

Compensation for wrongful loss or damage caused by failure to protect source code can be claimed, up to a maximum of one crore rupees.

Does Section 55 impose criminal penalties?

No, Section 55 primarily imposes civil liability for damages and does not provide for criminal penalties or imprisonment.

How does Section 55 protect intellectual property?

By requiring reasonable security measures for source code, Section 55 helps prevent unauthorized access, copying, or misuse, thereby protecting intellectual property rights.

Can companies be held liable under Section 55?

Yes, companies that possess or control source code and fail to protect it adequately can be held liable for damages under Section 55.

Related Sections

CrPC Section 460 details the procedure for compounding offences and the court's power to accept compromise between parties.

Income Tax Act Section 80AC defines the scope and applicability of deductions under Chapter VI-A, ensuring clarity on eligible taxpayers and conditions.

Companies Act 2013 Section 33 governs the alteration of a company's memorandum of association.

Companies Act 2013 Section 141 governs the appointment, qualifications, and duties of auditors in Indian companies.

IPC Section 301 addresses punishment for public servant disobeying law with intent to cause injury.

IT Act Section 66C addresses identity theft and fraudulent use of electronic identity information.

Comprehensive guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 174 covering offences and penalties under CGST Act.

Cigarettes are legal in India but regulated with strict laws on sale, advertising, and public smoking to protect health.

ATVs are not generally street legal in India unless specially permitted by local transport authorities.

CrPC Section 397 outlines the procedure for revision against orders passed by criminal courts, ensuring judicial oversight.

IPC Section 312 defines causing miscarriage without consent, penalizing unlawful abortion acts endangering life or health.

OTC trading in India is legal with regulations; learn the rules, risks, and enforcement around over-the-counter trading in India.

Income Tax Act Section 80HHB offers tax deductions for profits from specified industrial undertakings in backward areas.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 65B governs the admissibility of electronic records as evidence in Indian courts.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 3 outlines the rights of consumers to be protected against unfair trade practices and defective goods or services.

Section 217 of the Income Tax Act 1961 mandates the appointment of an auditor for companies to ensure proper financial auditing.

CrPC Section 394 defines the offence of dacoity and its punishment under Indian law.

Companies Act 2013 Section 455 governs the power of the Tribunal to grant relief in cases of oppression and mismanagement.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 13 defines the relevancy of facts which are the occasion, cause, or effect of facts in issue, crucial for linking evidence in trials.

Section 153B of the Income Tax Act 1961 allows reassessment when multiple assessments are pending for the same person.

CrPC Section 96 details the procedure for appeal against an order of acquittal or conviction in criminal cases.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 95 empowers the Central Government to make rules for effective consumer protection enforcement.

Income Tax Act Section 269C restricts cash transactions exceeding Rs. 20,000 to curb tax evasion and promote digital payments.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 64 details the power of the Central Government to make rules for effective implementation of the Act.

Insider trading is illegal in India under SEBI regulations and the Companies Act, with strict penalties for violations.

Male prostitution in India is illegal under laws prohibiting sex work and related activities, with strict enforcement and no legal exceptions.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 140 defines the liability of partners for offences under the Act committed by the firm or other partners.

bottom of page