top of page

Contract Act 1872 Section 19

Contract Act 1872 Section 19 defines when a contract becomes void due to unlawful consideration or object.

Contract Act Section 19 deals with contracts that have unlawful consideration or objects. It declares such contracts void, meaning they have no legal effect. This section is crucial to prevent illegal or immoral agreements from being enforced.

Understanding Section 19 helps businesses avoid entering into contracts that could be invalidated due to unlawful purposes. It safeguards commercial transactions by ensuring only lawful agreements are binding.

Contract Act Section 19 – Exact Provision

This section states that if the consideration or object of a contract is unlawful, the contract is void. It protects parties and society by invalidating agreements that involve illegal acts, fraud, or immoral purposes.

  • Defines lawful and unlawful consideration or object.

  • Invalidates contracts with illegal or fraudulent purposes.

  • Protects public policy and morality.

  • Ensures contracts comply with existing laws.

Explanation of Contract Act Section 19

Section 19 clarifies when a contract’s consideration or object is unlawful, making the contract void.

  • States that consideration or object must not be forbidden by law.

  • Affects all parties involved in the contract.

  • Requires that the contract’s purpose is legal and not fraudulent.

  • Triggers voidability if the object or consideration is illegal or immoral.

  • Valid contracts must have lawful consideration and object.

Purpose and Rationale of Contract Act Section 19

This section aims to uphold legal and ethical standards in contracts by preventing enforcement of agreements with unlawful purposes.

  • Protects contractual fairness by disallowing illegal objectives.

  • Ensures free consent is not given for unlawful acts.

  • Prevents fraud and injury through contracts.

  • Maintains certainty and legality in agreements.

When Contract Act Section 19 Applies

Section 19 applies whenever a contract’s consideration or object is unlawful, affecting its validity.

  • Applies when contract involves illegal, immoral, or fraudulent purposes.

  • Can be invoked by any party or affected third party.

  • Affects all types of contracts with unlawful elements.

  • Scope excludes contracts with lawful objects and consideration.

  • Exceptions include contracts authorized by law despite appearing unlawful.

Legal Effect of Contract Act Section 19

This section renders contracts with unlawful consideration or objects void and unenforceable. It interacts with Sections 10–30 by reinforcing the requirement of lawful consideration and object for contract validity.

  • Invalidates contracts with illegal purposes.

  • Prevents enforcement of void contracts.

  • Supports Sections 10 and 23 on lawful consideration and object.

Nature of Rights and Obligations under Contract Act Section 19

Section 19 creates no enforceable rights or obligations for contracts with unlawful consideration or object. Duties are mandatory to ensure legality, and non-performance is not actionable.

  • No legal rights arise from void contracts.

  • Obligations based on unlawful objects are void.

  • Duties to avoid illegal contracts are mandatory.

  • Non-performance has no legal consequences.

Stage of Transaction Where Contract Act Section 19 Applies

This section applies primarily at the contract formation stage to assess legality of consideration and object, but also affects enforcement and remedies.

  • Pre-contract stage: legality check.

  • Contract formation: validation of object and consideration.

  • Performance stage: unenforceability of illegal contracts.

  • Breach and remedies: no relief for void contracts.

Remedies and Legal Consequences under Contract Act Section 19

Contracts void under Section 19 cannot be enforced. Parties cannot sue for performance or damages. Courts may refuse specific performance or injunctions for unlawful contracts.

  • No right to sue for breach.

  • No damages or compensation.

  • No specific performance or injunctions.

  • Contract treated as null from inception.

Example of Contract Act Section 19 in Practical Use

Person X agrees to sell illegal fireworks to Person Y. Since the object (sale of illegal goods) is unlawful, the contract is void under Section 19. Neither party can enforce the agreement or claim damages.

  • Contracts with illegal objects are void.

  • Parties cannot seek legal remedies for such contracts.

Historical Background of Contract Act Section 19

Section 19 was introduced to prevent courts from enforcing illegal or immoral contracts. Historically, courts refused to enforce contracts against public policy. The section has evolved to clarify unlawful consideration and object.

  • Originated to uphold public policy and morality.

  • Courts historically voided illegal contracts.

  • Amended to define unlawful consideration and object clearly.

Modern Relevance of Contract Act Section 19

In 2026, Section 19 remains vital for digital and e-commerce contracts, ensuring agreements do not involve illegal activities. It protects businesses and consumers in online transactions.

  • Applies to digital contracts and e-signatures.

  • Prevents enforcement of illegal online agreements.

  • Ensures compliance with laws in e-commerce.

Related Sections

  • Contract Act Section 2 – Definitions of contract terms.

  • Contract Act Section 10 – Requirements of a valid contract.

  • Contract Act Section 13 – Meaning of consent.

  • Contract Act Section 23 – Lawful consideration and object.

  • IPC Section 420 – Cheating, relevant to fraudulent contracts.

  • Evidence Act Section 101 – Burden of proving contract terms.

Case References under Contract Act Section 19

  1. Gherulal Parakh v. Mahadeodas Maiya (1959, AIR 1959 SC 781)

    – Contracts with unlawful objects are void and unenforceable under Section 19.

  2. R.M.D. Chamarbaugwala v. Union of India (1957, AIR 1957 SC 628)

    – Contracts involving gambling or wagering are void due to unlawful object.

  3. Fertilizer Corporation Kamgar Union v. Union of India (1968, AIR 1968 SC 1160)

    – Public policy considerations affect contract validity under Section 19.

Key Facts Summary for Contract Act Section 19

  • Section:

    19

  • Title:

    Void Contracts Due to Unlawful Object or Consideration

  • Category:

    Validity, Voidability

  • Applies To:

    All contracting parties

  • Transaction Stage:

    Contract formation and enforcement

  • Legal Effect:

    Contracts with unlawful object/consideration are void

  • Related Remedies:

    No enforcement, no damages, no specific performance

Conclusion on Contract Act Section 19

Contract Act Section 19 plays a critical role in maintaining the legality and morality of contracts. It ensures that agreements with unlawful consideration or objects are declared void and unenforceable. This protects parties and society from illegal or unethical dealings.

By invalidating contracts that violate laws or public policy, Section 19 promotes fairness and trust in commercial transactions. Understanding this provision helps businesses and individuals avoid legal pitfalls and ensures that only lawful contracts are enforced.

FAQs on Contract Act Section 19

What makes a contract void under Section 19?

A contract is void if its consideration or object is unlawful, such as being illegal, fraudulent, immoral, or against public policy.

Can parties enforce a contract with an unlawful object?

No, contracts with unlawful objects are void and cannot be enforced by either party under Section 19.

Does Section 19 apply to digital contracts?

Yes, Section 19 applies to all contracts, including digital and e-commerce agreements, ensuring legality of consideration and object.

What remedies are available for breach of a contract void under Section 19?

No remedies like damages or specific performance are available because the contract is void and unenforceable.

How does Section 19 protect public policy?

It prevents enforcement of contracts that are illegal, fraudulent, or immoral, thereby upholding public policy and societal interests.

Related Sections

CrPC Section 204 details the magistrate's duty to take cognizance of offences upon receiving a complaint or police report.

Companies Act 2013 Section 129 mandates preparation and presentation of financial statements by companies in India.

CrPC Section 385 defines the offence of extortion, detailing its elements and legal consequences under Indian law.

IPC Section 314 punishes causing death by an act done with the intention of causing miscarriage without consent.

CrPC Section 395 defines the offence of dacoity and its legal consequences under Indian law.

CrPC Section 406 details the punishment for criminal breach of trust, outlining legal consequences for misappropriation of property.

CrPC Section 255 details the procedure for framing charges by a Magistrate after considering the evidence presented.

IPC Section 153 addresses provocation with intent to cause riot, focusing on preventing public disorder and maintaining peace.

CrPC Section 105I details the procedure for police to record statements of victims or witnesses in certain cases.

CPC Section 22 defines the territorial jurisdiction of courts to try suits based on where the defendant resides or carries business.

IPC Section 271 penalizes disobedience to quarantine rules to prevent disease spread, ensuring public health safety.

Companies Act 2013 Section 55 governs the issue and regulation of preference shares in Indian companies.

IPC Section 128 punishes the act of escaping from lawful custody, ensuring enforcement of judicial authority.

Companies Act 2013 Section 26 governs alteration of memorandum of association by companies in India.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 25 bars oral evidence to contradict or vary a written contract's terms.

CrPC Section 195 outlines the procedure for taking cognizance of offences requiring prior complaint before a Magistrate.

Companies Act 2013 Section 42 governs private placement of securities and related compliance requirements.

Contract Act 1872 Section 61 explains how contracts can be assigned or transferred to others under Indian law.

IT Act Section 70A mandates the appointment of a grievance officer by intermediaries to address user complaints effectively.

CrPC Section 42 details police powers to arrest without warrant when a person commits a non-bailable offence in presence of an officer.

CPC Section 116 details the procedure for examination of witnesses in civil trials, ensuring fair evidence recording.

CrPC Section 261 details the procedure for the transfer of cases from one court to another to ensure fair trial and jurisdictional correctness.

IPC Section 432 defines punishment for committing mischief by fire or explosive substance with intent to cause damage to property.

CrPC Section 99 details the procedure for issuing summons to witnesses to ensure their attendance in court.

CrPC Section 301 details the procedure for conducting an inquiry or trial when a Magistrate receives information about a cognizable offence.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 101 defines the burden of proof, specifying who must prove a fact in civil and criminal cases.

IPC Section 48 defines the territorial jurisdiction of Indian courts over offences committed outside India by Indian citizens or persons on ships or aircraft registered in India.

bottom of page