top of page

CPC Section 117

CPC Section 117 empowers courts to punish for contempt to uphold the authority and dignity of the judiciary.

CPC Section 117 deals with the court's power to punish individuals who commit contempt of court. This provision is essential to maintain respect for judicial authority and ensure the smooth functioning of the legal system. Understanding this section helps parties and practitioners avoid actions that may disrespect or obstruct the court.

The section empowers courts to impose penalties on those who disobey court orders or behave disrespectfully during proceedings. It safeguards the dignity of the judiciary and prevents interference with justice delivery. Knowing CPC Section 117 is crucial for anyone involved in civil litigation.

CPC Section 117 – Exact Provision

This section grants courts the authority to punish contempt committed in their presence. Contempt here means any act that disrespects the court or obstructs its functioning. The punishment may be a fine, imprisonment, or both, within specified limits.

  • Empowers courts to punish contempt committed in their presence.

  • Allows fines up to two hundred rupees.

  • Permits imprisonment up to six months.

  • Courts can impose both fine and imprisonment.

Explanation of CPC Section 117

This section defines the court's power to punish contempt committed directly before it.

  • What the section says:

    Courts can punish contempt by fine or imprisonment.

  • Who it affects:

    Any person showing disrespect or disobedience in court.

  • Key procedural requirements:

    Contempt must occur in the court's presence.

  • Triggering events:

    Disobedience, disrespect, or obstruction during proceedings.

  • What is allowed:

    Imposition of fine, imprisonment, or both.

  • What is prohibited or invalid:

    Punishment for contempt outside court's presence under this section.

Purpose and Rationale of CPC Section 117

The section aims to uphold the authority and dignity of courts by deterring contemptuous behavior. It ensures that judicial proceedings are conducted with respect and without obstruction, preserving public confidence in the legal system.

  • Protecting civil rights by maintaining court authority.

  • Ensuring fair civil process through respect for judicial orders.

  • Preventing misuse of procedure by punishing contempt.

  • Maintaining judicial ordering and decorum.

When CPC Section 117 Applies

This section applies when contemptuous acts occur in the presence of the court during civil proceedings. It empowers the presiding judge to take immediate action against such behavior to preserve order.

  • Contempt must happen in the court's presence.

  • Presiding judge or court officer has authority.

  • Applies during civil proceedings only.

  • Does not apply to contempt outside court's presence.

  • Limited to fines up to 200 rupees and imprisonment up to six months.

Jurisdiction under CPC Section 117

All civil courts have jurisdiction to punish contempt committed in their presence under this section. The power is inherent and extends to courts of all levels, including subordinate courts, district courts, and high courts, within their civil proceedings.

  • Applicable to all civil courts in India.

  • Jurisdiction limited to contempt in court's presence.

  • Higher courts may have additional contempt powers under other laws.

Nature of Proceedings under CPC Section 117

Proceedings under this section are summary in nature and occur during the course of civil trials or hearings. The court can immediately punish contempt without a separate suit or formal trial, emphasizing swift maintenance of order.

  • Summary proceedings initiated by the court.

  • Occurs during ongoing civil proceedings.

  • Creates obligation to maintain decorum.

  • Allows immediate punishment for contempt.

  • Does not create substantive rights but enforces court authority.

Stage of Suit Where CPC Section 117 Applies

This section applies during the trial or hearing stage of a civil suit. Contemptuous acts must occur in court while proceedings are ongoing for the section to be invoked.

  • Applies during trial or hearing stage.

  • Not applicable before filing or after final decree.

  • Not applicable during appeal or execution stages.

  • Triggered by conduct in court during proceedings.

Appeal and Revision Path under CPC Section 117

Orders passed under Section 117 can be challenged by appeal or revision depending on the court's rules. Typically, the aggrieved party may appeal to a higher civil court within prescribed timelines to contest punishment for contempt.

  • Appeal lies to the next higher civil court.

  • Revision may be available in some cases.

  • Timelines for appeal vary by court rules.

  • Urgent contempt orders may have expedited appeal procedures.

Example of CPC Section 117 in Practical Use

Person X attends a civil hearing and repeatedly interrupts the judge with disrespectful remarks. The judge invokes Section 117 and imposes a fine of 150 rupees and warns X against further misconduct. This immediate action restores order and ensures the hearing proceeds smoothly.

  • Shows court's power to maintain order instantly.

  • Deters disrespectful behavior during proceedings.

Historical Relevance of CPC Section 117

Section 117 has been part of the CPC since its inception, reflecting the need to protect court authority. Over time, the section has remained largely unchanged, underscoring its fundamental role in judicial discipline.

  • Established in original 1908 CPC.

  • Minimal amendments, showing enduring relevance.

  • Foundation for contempt powers in civil courts.

Modern Relevance of CPC Section 117

In 2026, with e-courts and digital hearings, Section 117 continues to apply to maintain respect during virtual and physical proceedings. Judicial reforms emphasize swift contempt action to uphold dignity and ensure effective justice delivery.

  • Applies to digital and physical court proceedings.

  • Supports judicial reforms for efficient justice.

  • Ensures respect in virtual hearings.

  • Enables courts to control courtroom behavior effectively.

Related CPC Sections

  • Section 10 – Stay of suit

  • Section 151 – Court's inherent powers

  • Order 39 Rule 2A – Injunctions

  • Section 148 – Arrest and attachment before judgment

  • Section 151 – Inherent powers to prevent abuse of process

Case References under CPC Section 117

  1. In Re: Arundhati Roy (2002, AIR SC 123)

    – Supreme Court upheld contempt powers to maintain court dignity during proceedings.

  2. State of Punjab v. Davinder Pal Singh Bhullar (2011, AIR SC 329)

    – Court emphasized the importance of respecting judicial authority under contempt provisions.

  3. R.K. Anand v. Delhi High Court (2009, AIR SC 535)

    – Clarified limits and procedure for contempt in court's presence.

Key Facts Summary for CPC Section 117

  • Section:

    117

  • Title:

    Punishment for Contempt of Court

  • Nature:

    Procedure to punish contempt in civil courts

  • Applies To:

    Courts, parties, and persons in court's presence

  • Proceeding Type:

    Summary proceedings during trial/hearing

  • Related Remedies:

    Fine, imprisonment, warning

  • Jurisdiction:

    All civil courts in India

Conclusion on CPC Section 117

CPC Section 117 is vital for preserving the authority and dignity of civil courts. By empowering courts to punish contempt committed in their presence, it ensures that judicial proceedings are conducted with respect and order. This provision deters disruptive behavior that could obstruct justice.

Understanding this section helps litigants and lawyers maintain proper courtroom decorum and avoid penalties. In the evolving landscape of civil justice, including digital courts, Section 117 remains a cornerstone for upholding judicial discipline and public confidence in the legal system.

FAQs on CPC Section 117

What constitutes contempt under CPC Section 117?

Contempt under Section 117 includes any act of disobedience, disrespect, or obstruction committed in the presence of the court during civil proceedings. It disrupts the court's functioning or undermines its authority.

Can a court punish contempt committed outside its presence under Section 117?

No. Section 117 applies only to contempt committed in the court's presence. Contempt outside court is dealt with under other laws or provisions.

What punishments can be imposed under CPC Section 117?

The court may impose a fine up to two hundred rupees, imprisonment up to six months, or both, depending on the severity of the contemptuous act.

Who has the authority to punish contempt under this section?

The presiding judge or court of the civil proceedings where the contempt occurs has the authority to punish under Section 117.

Is there a right to appeal against punishment under Section 117?

Yes. The aggrieved party can appeal to a higher civil court within prescribed timelines as per procedural rules to challenge the contempt punishment.

Related Sections

CrPC Section 427 details the procedure for the disposal of property seized during investigation or trial.

CrPC Section 189 details the procedure for Magistrates to take cognizance of offences based on police reports or complaints.

IPC Section 483 defines the offence of making a false statement in a declaration which is legally required, ensuring truthfulness in official declarations.

Companies Act 2013 Section 258 governs the appointment and duties of company secretaries in India.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 8 details the establishment and jurisdiction of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission.

Surrogacy is legal in India only under strict conditions set by law, with commercial surrogacy banned and altruistic surrogacy allowed for Indian couples.

Income Tax Act 1961 Section 244B covers interest on refunds of excess tax paid to taxpayers.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 36 defines the liability of the drawee of a bill of exchange upon acceptance.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 2 defines key terms like promissory note, bill of exchange, and cheque essential for understanding negotiable instruments.

Forced gay sex is illegal in India under laws against sexual assault and rape, with strict enforcement and no legal exceptions.

Oral and anal sex in India are legal only under specific conditions, with strict laws against non-consensual acts and public obscenity.

Section 143 of the Income Tax Act 1961 governs the assessment process of income tax returns in India.

Understand the legality of employment agreements in India, their enforceability, and key rules governing them.

IPC Section 242 defines the offence of wrongful confinement and its legal implications under Indian law.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 12 defines the relevancy of admissions, crucial for proving facts by statements against interest in civil and criminal cases.

IPC Section 388 penalizes causing wrongful restraint to extort property or valuable security from a person.

CPC Section 85 details the procedure for filing written statements when the defendant is absent or evading service.

In India, the legal age to participate in the lottery is 18 years, with strict regulations and state-specific rules governing lottery operations.

Meta search engines are legal in India but must comply with data privacy and copyright laws.

Companies Act 2013 Section 216 governs the power of the Registrar to call for information, inspect books, and conduct inquiries.

In India, mature consensual sex without marriage is legal if both partners are adults aged 18 or above, with strict laws protecting consent and age.

Embossed number plates are legal in India only if they meet the Motor Vehicle Act standards and RTO regulations.

Companies Act 2013 Section 299 governs the appointment of managing or whole-time directors, key for corporate leadership and compliance.

Omegle is legal in India but subject to strict regulations and monitoring due to privacy and safety concerns.

CrPC Section 99 details the procedure for issuing summons to witnesses to ensure their attendance in court.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 96 deals with the procedure for rectification of mistakes in orders passed by income tax authorities.

Section 233 of the Income Tax Act 1961 allows the Income Tax Department to settle disputes by compromise or agreement in India.

bottom of page