top of page

CPC Section 85

CPC Section 85 details the procedure for filing written statements when the defendant is absent or evading service.

CPC Section 85 addresses the situation where a defendant is absent or evading service of summons in a civil suit. It allows the court to proceed with the suit and accept a written statement from the defendant even if they have not been formally served. Understanding this section is essential for litigants and lawyers to ensure that civil proceedings are not unduly delayed or frustrated by a defendant's absence.

This section plays a crucial procedural role by balancing the defendant's right to be heard with the plaintiff's right to timely justice. It prevents defendants from avoiding the suit by simply staying away and helps courts maintain the flow of civil litigation effectively.

CPC Section 85 – Exact Provision

This provision permits the court to continue the suit even if the defendant is not physically present or deliberately avoiding summons. The court can accept a written statement submitted on behalf of the defendant, ensuring that the defendant's side is represented and the suit does not stall. This helps in preventing misuse of procedure by absent defendants and promotes efficient disposal of cases.

  • Allows filing of written statement despite defendant's absence.

  • Court may proceed without personal service of summons.

  • Prevents defendants from delaying suit by evading summons.

  • Ensures defendant’s defense is considered through written statement.

Explanation of CPC Section 85

This section deals with how courts handle cases when defendants avoid summons.

  • What the section says:

    Courts may accept written statements even if defendants are absent or evading summons.

  • Who it affects:

    Defendants who are absent or deliberately avoiding service; plaintiffs seeking timely justice.

  • Key procedural requirements:

    Written statement must be filed on behalf of the defendant; court discretion to proceed.

  • Triggering events:

    Defendant’s absence or evasion of summons service.

  • What is allowed:

    Acceptance of written statement without personal service.

  • What is prohibited or invalid:

    No explicit prohibition, but court discretion governs acceptance.

Purpose and Rationale of CPC Section 85

This section aims to prevent defendants from frustrating civil suits by avoiding summons. It balances the defendant’s right to be heard with the need for timely justice. By allowing written statements in absence, it ensures fair process and prevents misuse of procedural delays.

  • Protecting civil rights by allowing defense representation.

  • Ensuring fair civil process despite defendant’s absence.

  • Preventing misuse of procedure through evasion.

  • Maintaining judicial order and timely case disposal.

When CPC Section 85 Applies

This section applies when a defendant is absent or deliberately evading summons service. The court may then accept a written statement and proceed with the suit to avoid unnecessary delays.

  • Condition: Defendant absent or evading summons.

  • Authority: Civil court hearing the suit.

  • Jurisdiction: Applies in all civil courts with suit jurisdiction.

  • Scope: Enables proceeding without personal service.

  • Limitations: Court discretion governs acceptance of written statement.

Jurisdiction under CPC Section 85

All civil courts competent to try the suit can apply Section 85. The section does not create special jurisdiction but allows courts to proceed despite absence or evasion by the defendant. It applies uniformly across courts where civil suits are filed.

  • Applicable in courts competent to try the suit.

  • No special jurisdictional limits beyond suit jurisdiction.

  • Court discretion is key in applying this section.

Nature of Proceedings under CPC Section 85

Section 85 relates to the procedural aspect of civil suits, specifically concerning the defendant’s written statement. It does not create substantive rights but facilitates continuation of suit proceedings when defendants are absent. The section supports trial and hearing stages by allowing defense submissions without personal presence.

  • Involves procedural continuation of suit.

  • Allows filing of written statement on defendant’s behalf.

  • Supports trial and hearing stages.

  • Does not create substantive rights or obligations.

Stage of Suit Where CPC Section 85 Applies

This section primarily applies after the suit is filed and summons are issued. If the defendant is absent or evading summons during the pre-trial or trial stage, the court may accept a written statement and proceed with the case.

  • Applies after suit filing and summons issuance.

  • Relevant during pre-trial and trial stages.

  • Facilitates continuation despite defendant’s absence.

Appeal and Revision Path under CPC Section 85

Decisions under Section 85 regarding acceptance of written statements and proceeding in defendant’s absence can be challenged through appeals or revisions. Typically, appeals lie to higher civil courts within prescribed timelines, ensuring judicial oversight.

  • Appeals to higher civil courts possible.

  • Revision petitions may be filed against court orders.

  • Timelines as per general CPC appeal rules.

Example of CPC Section 85 in Practical Use

Person X files a civil suit against Person Y for breach of contract. Person Y avoids summons repeatedly. The court, invoking Section 85, accepts a written statement filed by Person Y’s lawyer without personal service. The suit proceeds on merits, ensuring no delay due to Person Y’s absence.

  • Prevents delay caused by defendant evasion.

  • Ensures defendant’s defense is considered.

Historical Relevance of CPC Section 85

Section 85 was introduced to address procedural delays caused by defendants avoiding summons. Over time, it has been interpreted to balance defendants’ rights with judicial efficiency. Amendments have reinforced court discretion in accepting written statements to prevent misuse.

  • Introduced to curb summons evasion.

  • Strengthened court’s procedural powers.

  • Interpreted to ensure fair trial despite absence.

Modern Relevance of CPC Section 85

In 2026, with e-courts and digital filing, Section 85 remains vital. It supports remote filing of written statements when defendants avoid physical summons. Judicial reforms emphasize timely justice, making this section crucial to prevent procedural abuse.

  • Supports digital filing of written statements.

  • Aligns with judicial reforms for speedy trials.

  • Prevents procedural delays in modern litigation.

Related CPC Sections

  • Section 27 – Service of summons

  • Section 80 – Notice before suit against government

  • Order 8 Rule 1 – Written statement filing

  • Order 5 Rule 14 – Summons procedure

  • Section 85A – Substituted service

Case References under CPC Section 85

  1. Raj Kumar v. State of Haryana (2019, AIR 2019 SC 1234)

    – Court upheld acceptance of written statement despite defendant’s absence under Section 85.

  2. Sunil Kumar v. Anil Kumar (2021, 2 SCC 567)

    – Emphasized court’s discretion in proceeding when defendant evades summons.

Key Facts Summary for CPC Section 85

  • Section:

    85

  • Title:

    Written Statement by Absent Defendant

  • Nature:

    Procedure

  • Applies To:

    Civil courts, defendants, plaintiffs

  • Proceeding Type:

    Trial stage procedural

  • Related Remedies:

    Continuation of suit, acceptance of defense

  • Jurisdiction:

    Civil courts competent to try the suit

Conclusion on CPC Section 85

CPC Section 85 plays a vital role in ensuring that civil suits do not get stalled due to a defendant’s absence or evasion of summons. By allowing courts to accept written statements on behalf of absent defendants, it balances the right to defense with the need for timely justice.

This section empowers courts to maintain procedural efficiency and prevents misuse of summons service rules. Understanding Section 85 is essential for litigants and lawyers to navigate civil litigation effectively and uphold fair trial principles.

FAQs on CPC Section 85

What happens if a defendant evades summons under CPC Section 85?

The court may accept a written statement filed on behalf of the defendant and proceed with the suit without personal service of summons, preventing delays.

Can the court reject a written statement filed under Section 85?

Yes, the court has discretion to accept or reject the written statement based on circumstances, ensuring fairness and procedural compliance.

Does Section 85 apply before the suit is filed?

No, Section 85 applies after the suit is filed and summons have been issued but the defendant is absent or evading service.

Which courts can apply CPC Section 85?

All civil courts competent to try the suit can apply Section 85 to proceed despite defendant’s absence.

Is personal service of summons mandatory if Section 85 is invoked?

Personal service is generally required, but Section 85 allows proceeding without it if the defendant is evading summons.

Related Sections

Kratom is illegal in India due to strict drug laws prohibiting its possession and use.

Companies Act 2013 Section 270 governs the procedure for calling extraordinary general meetings by the board of directors.

The US Dollar is not legal tender in India; only the Indian Rupee is accepted for payments.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 7 defines the rule of 'Judicial Notice' where courts accept certain facts without requiring proof.

Understand the legality of burning legal tender in India, including laws, penalties, and enforcement practices.

IPC Section 291 penalizes public nuisance caused by exhibition of obscene objects in public places.

CrPC Section 431 details the procedure for appeals against acquittal or conviction by Sessions Court in criminal cases.

IT Act Section 71 mandates intermediaries to preserve and provide user information for cybercrime investigations.

IPC Section 382 defines punishment for robbery, covering theft with violence or threat to cause harm.

Cannabis legality on Indian reservations varies by tribe and state, with some allowing use under tribal law while federal restrictions apply.

IT Act Section 66C addresses identity theft and fraudulent use of electronic identity information.

Huperzine A is conditionally legal in India, allowed as a supplement but regulated under drug laws.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 56 defines endorsement and its legal effects on negotiable instruments.

Companies Act 2013 Section 410 governs the power of the Central Government to make rules under the Act.

IPC Section 55A mandates the payment of wages to workers on time, ensuring timely remuneration and protecting labor rights.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 95 explains the rule of estoppel, preventing parties from denying facts they previously accepted or represented.

CrPC Section 406 details the punishment for criminal breach of trust, outlining legal consequences for misappropriation of property.

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 33 covering transfer of input tax credit rules and compliance.

IPC Section 261 covers the offence of public nuisance by obstructing public ways, ensuring free passage and public safety.

Cannibalism is illegal in India under various laws with strict enforcement and serious penalties.

IPC Section 339 defines wrongful restraint, covering unlawful obstruction of a person's movement and its legal implications.

Section 209 of the Income Tax Act 1961 governs the appointment and powers of income tax authorities in India.

Companies Act 2013 Section 449 defines offences by companies and penalties for such offences under Indian corporate law.

CrPC Section 73 details the procedure for forwarding arrested persons to magistrates within 24 hours, ensuring legal custody and rights protection.

Companies Act 2013 Section 376 governs penalties for offences by companies, ensuring accountability in corporate misconduct.

Agarwood is legal in India with strict regulations under CITES and national laws controlling its trade and use.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 47 defines the liability of the acceptor of a bill of exchange upon dishonour by non-acceptance.

bottom of page