top of page

CPC Section 154

CPC Section 154 details the procedure for filing a police report (FIR) upon receiving information about a cognizable offence.

CPC Section 154 outlines the procedure for the police to record information about a cognizable offence. This section ensures that when the police receive information about such an offence, they must register it promptly and begin an investigation. Understanding this section is crucial for anyone involved in criminal proceedings, as it marks the initiation of the police's official role in a case.

Knowing the procedural requirements under Section 154 helps protect citizens’ rights and ensures proper legal action is taken. It also clarifies the responsibilities of the police and the legal remedies available if the police fail to act on such information.

CPC Section 154 – Exact Provision

This section mandates that any information about a cognizable offence given to the police must be recorded in writing. The police officer must read it back to the informant and get it signed. This procedure ensures transparency and accountability in initiating police investigations.

  • Requires police to record information about cognizable offences.

  • Information can be oral or written but must be documented.

  • Informant must sign the recorded information.

  • Substance of information entered in a prescribed police register.

  • Triggers official police investigation.

Explanation of CPC Section 154

Section 154 explains how police must handle information about cognizable offences.

  • What the section says:

    Police must record and sign information about cognizable offences.

  • Who it affects:

    Police officers, informants, and complainants.

  • Key procedural requirements:

    Writing, reading back, signing, and registering the information.

  • Triggering events:

    Receipt of information about a cognizable offence.

  • What is allowed:

    Police can start investigation based on recorded information.

  • What is prohibited or invalid:

    Ignoring or refusing to record such information is unlawful.

Purpose and Rationale of CPC Section 154

This section protects citizens by ensuring police cannot ignore information about serious offences. It guarantees that all cognizable offences are officially recorded, promoting prompt investigation and justice. It also prevents misuse by requiring transparency and accountability in police action.

  • Protecting civil rights by ensuring police accountability.

  • Ensuring fair and prompt initiation of investigations.

  • Preventing misuse or neglect of police duties.

  • Maintaining order and trust in the judicial process.

When CPC Section 154 Applies

Section 154 applies whenever information about a cognizable offence is received by a police officer. It is the first step in criminal procedure and must be followed strictly to initiate lawful investigation.

  • Condition: Information relates to a cognizable offence.

  • Authority: Officer in charge of police station.

  • Jurisdiction: Police station where offence is reported.

  • Scope: Recording and registering the information.

  • Exceptions: Non-cognizable offences are excluded.

Jurisdiction under CPC Section 154

The section applies to the police station with territorial jurisdiction over the area where the offence occurred. The officer in charge of that police station must record the information and initiate investigation. Higher courts do not have jurisdiction to record such information; it is a police function.

  • Police station with territorial jurisdiction applies.

  • Officer in charge must record information.

  • Courts do not record FIRs but supervise police action.

Nature of Proceedings under CPC Section 154

Section 154 initiates the police investigation process. It is not a trial or appeal stage but a procedural step to record information and start inquiry. It creates an obligation on police to act and does not create rights for the accused at this stage.

  • Involves recording information and starting investigation.

  • Creates procedural obligation on police.

  • Does not involve trial or judgment.

  • Leads to further criminal proceedings.

Stage of Suit Where CPC Section 154 Applies

This section applies before any formal charge or trial begins. It is the initial stage after information is received but before investigation or charge-sheet filing.

  • Before filing of charge-sheet.

  • After receiving information about offence.

  • During preliminary police inquiry.

  • Not applicable during trial or appeal.

Appeal and Revision Path under CPC Section 154

There is no direct appeal against the recording of information under Section 154. However, if police refuse to register the information, the informant can approach higher authorities or courts through writ petitions or complaints. Courts can order police to register FIR and investigate.

  • No direct appeal against FIR recording.

  • Informant can seek judicial intervention if police refuse.

  • Higher courts supervise police compliance.

Example of CPC Section 154 in Practical Use

Person X witnesses a theft in their neighborhood and informs the local police officer. The officer records the information in writing, reads it back to X, and obtains their signature. This initiates the police investigation into the theft. Without Section 154, X’s complaint might be ignored, delaying justice.

  • Ensures police record and act on complaints.

  • Protects complainant’s right to legal remedy.

Historical Relevance of CPC Section 154

Section 154 has been a fundamental part of Indian criminal procedure since the 19th century. It has undergone minor amendments to improve police accountability and adapt to changing legal standards. Its core purpose remains to ensure prompt recording of cognizable offences.

  • Established in original Criminal Procedure Code.

  • Amended to enhance police transparency.

  • Continues to be a cornerstone of criminal justice.

Modern Relevance of CPC Section 154

In 2026, Section 154 remains vital with digital filing of FIRs and e-courts. It supports judicial reforms aimed at faster justice and better police accountability. The section’s procedural clarity helps integrate technology while protecting citizens’ rights.

  • Supports digital FIR filing systems.

  • Enhances police accountability through technology.

  • Integral to judicial reforms and e-justice initiatives.

Related CPC Sections

  • Section 156 – Police power to investigate cognizable cases

  • Section 157 – Procedure for investigation

  • Section 190 – Cognizance of offences by magistrates

  • Section 200 – Examination of complainant

  • Section 202 – Postponement of issue of process

Case References under CPC Section 154

  1. State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal (1992, AIR 604)

    – Police must record FIR if information relates to cognizable offence; refusal can be challenged in court.

  2. Lalita Kumari v. Govt. of UP (2014, 2 SCC 1)

    – Mandatory registration of FIR on receiving information about cognizable offence.

  3. Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar (2014, 8 SCC 273)

    – Police must follow procedure strictly before arresting under cognizable offence.

Key Facts Summary for CPC Section 154

  • Section:

    154

  • Title:

    Information in Cognizable Offence

  • Nature:

    Procedure for recording information and initiating investigation

  • Applies To:

    Police officers, informants, complainants

  • Proceeding Type:

    Preliminary police inquiry

  • Related Remedies:

    FIR registration, police investigation

  • Jurisdiction:

    Police station with territorial jurisdiction

Conclusion on CPC Section 154

CPC Section 154 is a critical provision ensuring that police record information about cognizable offences promptly and accurately. It safeguards citizens’ rights by mandating transparency and accountability in the initial stages of criminal proceedings. Without this section, the police could arbitrarily refuse to act on complaints, undermining justice.

Understanding Section 154 helps individuals know their rights and the police’s duties when reporting serious offences. It forms the foundation of the criminal justice process, enabling timely investigation and fair trial. Its continued relevance in the digital age highlights its importance in maintaining public trust in law enforcement.

FAQs on CPC Section 154

What is the main purpose of Section 154?

Section 154 requires police to record information about cognizable offences and start investigation. It ensures complaints are officially documented and acted upon.

Can police refuse to register an FIR under Section 154?

No, police must register FIR if information relates to a cognizable offence. Refusal can be challenged in court.

Does Section 154 apply to non-cognizable offences?

No, Section 154 specifically deals with cognizable offences where police have authority to investigate without magistrate’s order.

Who can give information under Section 154?

Any person who has knowledge of a cognizable offence can inform the police, either orally or in writing.

Is the informant’s signature necessary on the recorded information?

Yes, the police must read the information back to the informant and obtain their signature to ensure accuracy and accountability.

Related Sections

CrPC Section 453 details the procedure for search of places suspected to conceal stolen property or things unlawfully obtained.

CrPC Section 400 details the procedure for issuing a search warrant to find stolen property or evidence.

CrPC Section 265C defines the procedure for recording confessions and statements before a Magistrate, ensuring legal validity and protection of rights.

IPC Section 127 empowers officers to seize property to prevent obstruction of justice or escape of offenders.

IT Act Section 12 defines the legal recognition of electronic records, enabling digital documents to hold evidentiary value.

IPC Section 296 addresses the offence of voluntarily causing disturbance to a religious assembly or procession.

IPC Section 182 penalizes giving false information to public servants, hindering official duties.

CrPC Section 114 empowers courts to presume facts that are usually known or easily inferred to aid justice.

Companies Act 2013 Section 22 governs the use of the word 'Limited' or 'Private Limited' in company names in India.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 110 presumes the legitimacy of a child born during marriage, crucial for establishing parentage in civil and criminal cases.

IPC Section 225 defines the offence of concealing a person to prevent their appearance in court or custody.

Contract Act 1872 Section 35 covers contracts contingent on uncertain events and their enforceability.

IPC Section 267 defines punishment for maliciously or unlawfully destroying or damaging property.

IPC Section 235 covers the procedure for framing charges in criminal trials, ensuring fair trial commencement.

IPC Section 427 covers the offence of mischief causing damage to property valued over fifty rupees, outlining punishment and legal scope.

CrPC Section 121 defines the offence of waging war against the Government of India and its legal consequences.

CrPC Section 483 outlines the procedure for issuing summons to accused persons in criminal cases.

Companies Act 2013 Section 328 governs the appointment and qualifications of the company secretary in Indian companies.

IT Act Section 40 defines the term 'intermediary' and outlines its scope under the Information Technology Act, 2000.

Companies Act 2013 Section 434 deals with the power of the Registrar to remove the name of a company from the register of companies.

Companies Act 2013 Section 197 governs the overall limits on managerial remuneration in Indian companies.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 145 deals with the admissibility of confessions made by accused persons and safeguards against coerced statements.

Companies Act 2013 Section 92 mandates annual return filing requirements for companies in India.

IPC Section 504 addresses intentional insult with intent to provoke breach of peace, penalizing acts that disrupt public harmony.

Companies Act 2013 Section 333 deals with the power of the Central Government to exempt companies from certain provisions.

Contract Act 1872 Section 57 explains obligations when a party refuses to perform a contract without lawful excuse.

Income Tax Act Section 43 defines 'actual cost' for asset valuation, crucial for depreciation and capital gains calculations.

bottom of page