top of page

CrPC Section 335

CrPC Section 335 outlines the procedure when an offence is compoundable, allowing parties to settle and avoid prosecution.

CrPC Section 335 deals with the procedure to be followed when an offence is compoundable. It allows the parties involved to settle the matter amicably, preventing the need for prolonged litigation. Understanding this section helps citizens and legal practitioners know when and how offences can be legally compounded.

This section plays a vital role in reducing the burden on courts by encouraging dispute resolution outside formal trials. It ensures that compoundable offences are handled properly, respecting both the complainant's and accused's rights.

CrPC Section 335 – Exact Provision

This section mandates that if the parties involved in a compoundable offence reach a compromise, the Magistrate must record this settlement and dispose of the case accordingly. It formalizes the process of compounding offences to ensure legal clarity and finality.

  • Applies only to compoundable offences.

  • Requires parties to enter into a compromise.

  • Magistrate must record the compromise.

  • Enables disposal of the case based on the compromise.

  • Prevents further prosecution after compounding.

Explanation of CrPC Section 335

Section 335 allows parties in a compoundable offence to settle their dispute, and the Magistrate then records this settlement to close the case. It simplifies legal proceedings by avoiding trial when both sides agree.

  • The section states that if parties compromise, the Magistrate records it.

  • Affects the accused and the complainant in compoundable offences.

  • Triggered when both parties agree to settle the offence.

  • Allows the Magistrate to dispose of the case based on the compromise.

  • Prohibits further prosecution once the offence is compounded.

Purpose and Rationale of CrPC Section 335

This section exists to promote amicable settlements in minor offences, reducing court workload and encouraging reconciliation. It protects parties’ rights by ensuring compromises are formally recorded and legally binding, balancing justice with efficiency.

  • Protects the rights of both complainant and accused.

  • Ensures proper legal procedure for compounding offences.

  • Balances police and judicial powers with citizen rights.

  • Aims to avoid misuse of the criminal justice process.

When CrPC Section 335 Applies

Section 335 applies only when an offence is compoundable under law and both parties agree to settle. The Magistrate has authority to record the compromise and dispose of the case accordingly.

  • Offence must be compoundable as per the law.

  • Both parties must consent to the compromise.

  • Magistrate has jurisdiction over the case.

  • No specific time limit, but compromise should be before final judgment.

  • Does not apply to non-compoundable offences.

Cognizance under CrPC Section 335

Cognizance of a compoundable offence is taken by the Magistrate upon receiving a complaint. If the parties agree to a compromise, the Magistrate records it and disposes of the case without proceeding to trial.

  • Magistrate takes cognizance upon complaint or police report.

  • Compromise must be entered before trial or final judgment.

  • Magistrate records the compromise and passes disposal orders.

Bailability under CrPC Section 335

Bailability depends on the nature of the compoundable offence. Many compoundable offences are bailable, but this section itself does not specify bail conditions. Bail is granted as per the offence’s classification.

  • Bail depends on the offence involved.

  • Compounding does not affect bail rights.

  • Practical consideration: Compounding may lead to quicker release.

Triable By (Court Jurisdiction for CrPC Section 335)

Cases under Section 335 are triable by the Magistrate competent to try the offence. The Magistrate records the compromise and disposes of the case without trial if settlement occurs.

  • Trial court is the Magistrate’s court.

  • Trial is avoided if compromise is recorded.

  • Sessions Court not involved unless appeal or revision.

Appeal and Revision Path under CrPC Section 335

Appeals against orders disposing of cases under Section 335 lie with the Sessions Court. Revision petitions can be filed with the High Court if there is an error in the Magistrate’s order.

  • Appeal to Sessions Court against Magistrate’s order.

  • Revision to High Court in case of jurisdictional errors.

  • Typical appeal timelines as per CrPC rules.

Example of CrPC Section 335 in Practical Use

Person X is accused of causing hurt under a compoundable offence. Both X and the complainant agree to settle the matter amicably. They approach the Magistrate, who records their compromise and disposes of the case, preventing further prosecution.

  • The section enabled amicable dispute resolution.

  • Key takeaway: Compoundable offences can be settled to save time and cost.

Historical Relevance of CrPC Section 335

Section 335 has evolved to formalize the compounding process, ensuring legal recognition of settlements. Amendments have clarified which offences are compoundable and the Magistrate’s role in recording compromises.

  • Originally part of efforts to reduce court backlog.

  • Amendments expanded list of compoundable offences.

  • Improved procedural clarity for Magistrates.

Modern Relevance of CrPC Section 335

In 2026, Section 335 remains crucial for speedy justice and reducing litigation. It supports alternative dispute resolution within criminal law, aligning with modern judicial efficiency and citizen-friendly processes.

  • Encourages out-of-court settlements.

  • Reduces burden on courts and police.

  • Protects rights while promoting reconciliation.

Related Sections to CrPC Section 335

  • Section 320 – Offences which may be compounded

  • Section 320A – Compounding of certain offences by Magistrate

  • Section 482 – Power of High Court to quash proceedings

  • Section 41 – Arrest without warrant

  • Section 154 – Information in cognizable cases

Case References under CrPC Section 335

  1. State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal (1992, AIR 604)

    – Established guidelines for quashing proceedings in compoundable offences.

  2. Ramesh Kumar v. State of Chhattisgarh (2001, AIR 2591)

    – Held that compromise in compoundable offences bars further prosecution.

  3. Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia v. State of Punjab (1980, AIR 150)

    – Affirmed the importance of compromise in criminal cases under CrPC.

Key Facts Summary for CrPC Section 335

  • Section:

    335

  • Title:

    Procedure for Compoundable Offences

  • Nature:

    Procedural

  • Applies To:

    Magistrate, accused, complainant

  • Cognizance:

    Magistrate records compromise upon parties’ agreement

  • Bailability:

    Depends on offence

  • Triable By:

    Magistrate

Conclusion on CrPC Section 335

CrPC Section 335 plays a significant role in the Indian criminal justice system by facilitating the compounding of offences. It empowers parties to settle disputes amicably, reducing unnecessary trials and easing the burden on courts. This procedural provision ensures that compromises are legally recorded, providing finality and preventing further prosecution.

Understanding this section is essential for citizens and legal professionals alike, as it promotes efficient justice and respects the rights of both complainants and accused. By encouraging reconciliation, Section 335 contributes to a more balanced and accessible criminal justice process in India.

FAQs on CrPC Section 335

What types of offences can be compounded under Section 335?

Only compoundable offences, as listed under Section 320 of the CrPC, can be compounded under Section 335. These are generally less serious offences where the law allows parties to settle the matter amicably.

Who can initiate the compounding of an offence?

Both the complainant and the accused must mutually agree to compound the offence. The Magistrate then records this compromise and disposes of the case accordingly.

Does compounding an offence mean the accused is acquitted?

Compounding results in the case being disposed of without trial, but it is not an acquittal. It legally ends the prosecution based on the parties’ settlement.

Can the Magistrate refuse to record a compromise under Section 335?

The Magistrate generally records the compromise if the offence is compoundable and parties agree. However, if the compromise is not genuine or against public interest, the Magistrate may refuse.

Is there a time limit to compound an offence under Section 335?

There is no strict time limit, but compounding usually occurs before the final judgment or conclusion of the trial to avoid further proceedings.

Related Sections

Section 178 of the Income Tax Act 1961 deals with penalties for failure to furnish information or documents to income tax authorities in India.

Income Tax Act Section 132A empowers authorities to seize undisclosed assets during search and seizure operations.

Codeine is legal in India with restrictions; it requires prescription and is controlled under drug laws.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 70 details penalties for false or misleading advertisements to protect consumers from deceptive practices.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 70 deals with set-off of losses from one head of income against income from another head.

IPC Section 392 defines robbery, detailing its scope, punishment, and legal implications under Indian law.

CrPC Section 333 details punishment for public servants who intentionally cause injury to deter duty performance.

TV receivers for phones are legal in India with proper licenses and compliance with broadcasting laws.

Understand the legality of benchmarking against competitors in India and its limits under competition law.

Income Tax Act Section 32AC provides deduction for investment in new plant and machinery to promote business growth.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 269I restricts cash transactions exceeding specified limits to curb tax evasion.

Companies Act 2013 Section 164 details disqualifications for directors to ensure proper corporate governance and compliance.

Discover the legal status of Jeetwin in India, including regulations, enforcement, and common misconceptions about online gaming platforms.

Companies Act 2013 Section 170 mandates disclosure of interest by directors to ensure transparency and prevent conflicts in corporate governance.

CrPC Section 177 mandates police officers to report cognizable offences to magistrates, ensuring proper legal action begins promptly.

Payment in India using USD is not legal tender; only Indian Rupees are accepted for transactions within India.

CrPC Section 8 defines the territorial jurisdiction of criminal courts in India, specifying where offences can be tried.

In India, attempting suicide is illegal but treated with care under mental health laws and may lead to medical help instead of punishment.

IPC Section 480 defines the offence of counterfeiting property marks, addressing fraudulent imitation to protect property rights.

Escort agencies operate in a legal gray area in India, with strict laws against prostitution but no direct ban on agencies themselves.

Discover the legal status of Quotex trading platform in India and understand its regulations and restrictions.

Smoking marijuana is illegal in India except for limited medical or scientific use under strict laws.

Income Tax Act 1961 Section 245BA deals with the procedure for settlement of tax arrears between the taxpayer and the Income Tax Department.

Rave parties in India face strict legal restrictions and are often considered illegal due to drug and noise laws.

In India, roof racks are legal with certain safety and size rules to ensure safe transport of goods on vehicles.

CrPC Section 103 empowers police to seize property connected to offences, ensuring evidence preservation and lawful investigation.

Understand the legality of monthly maintenance charges by banks in India and how they are regulated.

bottom of page