top of page

CrPC Section 335

CrPC Section 335 outlines the procedure when an offence is compoundable, allowing parties to settle and avoid prosecution.

CrPC Section 335 deals with the procedure to be followed when an offence is compoundable. It allows the parties involved to settle the matter amicably, preventing the need for prolonged litigation. Understanding this section helps citizens and legal practitioners know when and how offences can be legally compounded.

This section plays a vital role in reducing the burden on courts by encouraging dispute resolution outside formal trials. It ensures that compoundable offences are handled properly, respecting both the complainant's and accused's rights.

CrPC Section 335 – Exact Provision

This section mandates that if the parties involved in a compoundable offence reach a compromise, the Magistrate must record this settlement and dispose of the case accordingly. It formalizes the process of compounding offences to ensure legal clarity and finality.

  • Applies only to compoundable offences.

  • Requires parties to enter into a compromise.

  • Magistrate must record the compromise.

  • Enables disposal of the case based on the compromise.

  • Prevents further prosecution after compounding.

Explanation of CrPC Section 335

Section 335 allows parties in a compoundable offence to settle their dispute, and the Magistrate then records this settlement to close the case. It simplifies legal proceedings by avoiding trial when both sides agree.

  • The section states that if parties compromise, the Magistrate records it.

  • Affects the accused and the complainant in compoundable offences.

  • Triggered when both parties agree to settle the offence.

  • Allows the Magistrate to dispose of the case based on the compromise.

  • Prohibits further prosecution once the offence is compounded.

Purpose and Rationale of CrPC Section 335

This section exists to promote amicable settlements in minor offences, reducing court workload and encouraging reconciliation. It protects parties’ rights by ensuring compromises are formally recorded and legally binding, balancing justice with efficiency.

  • Protects the rights of both complainant and accused.

  • Ensures proper legal procedure for compounding offences.

  • Balances police and judicial powers with citizen rights.

  • Aims to avoid misuse of the criminal justice process.

When CrPC Section 335 Applies

Section 335 applies only when an offence is compoundable under law and both parties agree to settle. The Magistrate has authority to record the compromise and dispose of the case accordingly.

  • Offence must be compoundable as per the law.

  • Both parties must consent to the compromise.

  • Magistrate has jurisdiction over the case.

  • No specific time limit, but compromise should be before final judgment.

  • Does not apply to non-compoundable offences.

Cognizance under CrPC Section 335

Cognizance of a compoundable offence is taken by the Magistrate upon receiving a complaint. If the parties agree to a compromise, the Magistrate records it and disposes of the case without proceeding to trial.

  • Magistrate takes cognizance upon complaint or police report.

  • Compromise must be entered before trial or final judgment.

  • Magistrate records the compromise and passes disposal orders.

Bailability under CrPC Section 335

Bailability depends on the nature of the compoundable offence. Many compoundable offences are bailable, but this section itself does not specify bail conditions. Bail is granted as per the offence’s classification.

  • Bail depends on the offence involved.

  • Compounding does not affect bail rights.

  • Practical consideration: Compounding may lead to quicker release.

Triable By (Court Jurisdiction for CrPC Section 335)

Cases under Section 335 are triable by the Magistrate competent to try the offence. The Magistrate records the compromise and disposes of the case without trial if settlement occurs.

  • Trial court is the Magistrate’s court.

  • Trial is avoided if compromise is recorded.

  • Sessions Court not involved unless appeal or revision.

Appeal and Revision Path under CrPC Section 335

Appeals against orders disposing of cases under Section 335 lie with the Sessions Court. Revision petitions can be filed with the High Court if there is an error in the Magistrate’s order.

  • Appeal to Sessions Court against Magistrate’s order.

  • Revision to High Court in case of jurisdictional errors.

  • Typical appeal timelines as per CrPC rules.

Example of CrPC Section 335 in Practical Use

Person X is accused of causing hurt under a compoundable offence. Both X and the complainant agree to settle the matter amicably. They approach the Magistrate, who records their compromise and disposes of the case, preventing further prosecution.

  • The section enabled amicable dispute resolution.

  • Key takeaway: Compoundable offences can be settled to save time and cost.

Historical Relevance of CrPC Section 335

Section 335 has evolved to formalize the compounding process, ensuring legal recognition of settlements. Amendments have clarified which offences are compoundable and the Magistrate’s role in recording compromises.

  • Originally part of efforts to reduce court backlog.

  • Amendments expanded list of compoundable offences.

  • Improved procedural clarity for Magistrates.

Modern Relevance of CrPC Section 335

In 2026, Section 335 remains crucial for speedy justice and reducing litigation. It supports alternative dispute resolution within criminal law, aligning with modern judicial efficiency and citizen-friendly processes.

  • Encourages out-of-court settlements.

  • Reduces burden on courts and police.

  • Protects rights while promoting reconciliation.

Related Sections to CrPC Section 335

  • Section 320 – Offences which may be compounded

  • Section 320A – Compounding of certain offences by Magistrate

  • Section 482 – Power of High Court to quash proceedings

  • Section 41 – Arrest without warrant

  • Section 154 – Information in cognizable cases

Case References under CrPC Section 335

  1. State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal (1992, AIR 604)

    – Established guidelines for quashing proceedings in compoundable offences.

  2. Ramesh Kumar v. State of Chhattisgarh (2001, AIR 2591)

    – Held that compromise in compoundable offences bars further prosecution.

  3. Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia v. State of Punjab (1980, AIR 150)

    – Affirmed the importance of compromise in criminal cases under CrPC.

Key Facts Summary for CrPC Section 335

  • Section:

    335

  • Title:

    Procedure for Compoundable Offences

  • Nature:

    Procedural

  • Applies To:

    Magistrate, accused, complainant

  • Cognizance:

    Magistrate records compromise upon parties’ agreement

  • Bailability:

    Depends on offence

  • Triable By:

    Magistrate

Conclusion on CrPC Section 335

CrPC Section 335 plays a significant role in the Indian criminal justice system by facilitating the compounding of offences. It empowers parties to settle disputes amicably, reducing unnecessary trials and easing the burden on courts. This procedural provision ensures that compromises are legally recorded, providing finality and preventing further prosecution.

Understanding this section is essential for citizens and legal professionals alike, as it promotes efficient justice and respects the rights of both complainants and accused. By encouraging reconciliation, Section 335 contributes to a more balanced and accessible criminal justice process in India.

FAQs on CrPC Section 335

What types of offences can be compounded under Section 335?

Only compoundable offences, as listed under Section 320 of the CrPC, can be compounded under Section 335. These are generally less serious offences where the law allows parties to settle the matter amicably.

Who can initiate the compounding of an offence?

Both the complainant and the accused must mutually agree to compound the offence. The Magistrate then records this compromise and disposes of the case accordingly.

Does compounding an offence mean the accused is acquitted?

Compounding results in the case being disposed of without trial, but it is not an acquittal. It legally ends the prosecution based on the parties’ settlement.

Can the Magistrate refuse to record a compromise under Section 335?

The Magistrate generally records the compromise if the offence is compoundable and parties agree. However, if the compromise is not genuine or against public interest, the Magistrate may refuse.

Is there a time limit to compound an offence under Section 335?

There is no strict time limit, but compounding usually occurs before the final judgment or conclusion of the trial to avoid further proceedings.

Get a Free Legal Consultation

Reading about legal issues is just the first step. Let us connect you with a verified lawyer who specialises in exactly what you need.

K_gYgciFRGKYrIgrlwTBzQ_2k.webp

Related Sections

CrPC Section 277 details the procedure for the disposal of property seized during investigation or trial.

Weed business is illegal in India except for licensed medical and industrial hemp use under strict laws.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 92 governs transfer pricing rules for transactions between associated enterprises.

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 69 covering inspection, search, and seizure provisions under GST law.

Companies Act 2013 Section 168 governs the resignation process of directors in Indian companies.

Understand the legality of mobile tracking in India, including laws, exceptions, and enforcement practices.

CrPC Section 428 details the procedure for the disposal of property when no person claims it during investigation.

IPC Section 403 defines dishonest misappropriation of property entrusted to a person, outlining its scope and punishment.

Cannibalism is illegal in India under various laws with strict enforcement and serious penalties.

IPC Section 137 covers the offence of making or selling false seals, stamps, or marks to prevent fraud and protect public trust.

Understand the legality of using Kali Linux in India, including its permitted uses and common misconceptions.

Discover the legality of Lotto247 in India, including laws, restrictions, and how online lottery sites operate under Indian law.

IPC Section 120A defines criminal conspiracy, outlining when an agreement to commit an illegal act becomes punishable under law.

Income Tax Act Section 276BB prescribes prosecution for failure to pay tax deducted at source within specified time.

IPC Section 366 defines kidnapping, abducting, or inducing a woman to compel marriage or illicit intercourse.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 17 defines the holder in due course and their rights under negotiable instruments law.

CrPC Section 144 empowers magistrates to issue orders to prevent unlawful assembly and maintain public peace.

Income Tax Act Section 49 defines cost of acquisition for capital gains computation under the Income-tax Act, 1961.

Legal cultivation of ganja in India is highly restricted and allowed only under strict government licenses.

Companies Act 2013 Section 368 defines the term 'Company' and its legal meaning under the Act.

Companies Act 2013 Section 270 governs the procedure for calling extraordinary general meetings by the board of directors.

Income Tax Act Section 280B outlines penalties for failure to deduct or pay tax at source under TDS provisions.

Birth control pills are legal in India and widely available with regulations on prescription and sale.

Understand the legality of cross voting under the Indian Constitution and its implications in elections.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 25 defines the acceptance of bills of exchange and its legal implications.

Understand the legal validity of NWAC marksheets in India and how they are recognized for academic and official purposes.

CrPC Section 312 details the procedure for the discharge of an accused before trial, ensuring fair judicial process.

bottom of page