top of page

CrPC Section 335

CrPC Section 335 outlines the procedure when an offence is compoundable, allowing parties to settle and avoid prosecution.

CrPC Section 335 deals with the procedure to be followed when an offence is compoundable. It allows the parties involved to settle the matter amicably, preventing the need for prolonged litigation. Understanding this section helps citizens and legal practitioners know when and how offences can be legally compounded.

This section plays a vital role in reducing the burden on courts by encouraging dispute resolution outside formal trials. It ensures that compoundable offences are handled properly, respecting both the complainant's and accused's rights.

CrPC Section 335 – Exact Provision

This section mandates that if the parties involved in a compoundable offence reach a compromise, the Magistrate must record this settlement and dispose of the case accordingly. It formalizes the process of compounding offences to ensure legal clarity and finality.

  • Applies only to compoundable offences.

  • Requires parties to enter into a compromise.

  • Magistrate must record the compromise.

  • Enables disposal of the case based on the compromise.

  • Prevents further prosecution after compounding.

Explanation of CrPC Section 335

Section 335 allows parties in a compoundable offence to settle their dispute, and the Magistrate then records this settlement to close the case. It simplifies legal proceedings by avoiding trial when both sides agree.

  • The section states that if parties compromise, the Magistrate records it.

  • Affects the accused and the complainant in compoundable offences.

  • Triggered when both parties agree to settle the offence.

  • Allows the Magistrate to dispose of the case based on the compromise.

  • Prohibits further prosecution once the offence is compounded.

Purpose and Rationale of CrPC Section 335

This section exists to promote amicable settlements in minor offences, reducing court workload and encouraging reconciliation. It protects parties’ rights by ensuring compromises are formally recorded and legally binding, balancing justice with efficiency.

  • Protects the rights of both complainant and accused.

  • Ensures proper legal procedure for compounding offences.

  • Balances police and judicial powers with citizen rights.

  • Aims to avoid misuse of the criminal justice process.

When CrPC Section 335 Applies

Section 335 applies only when an offence is compoundable under law and both parties agree to settle. The Magistrate has authority to record the compromise and dispose of the case accordingly.

  • Offence must be compoundable as per the law.

  • Both parties must consent to the compromise.

  • Magistrate has jurisdiction over the case.

  • No specific time limit, but compromise should be before final judgment.

  • Does not apply to non-compoundable offences.

Cognizance under CrPC Section 335

Cognizance of a compoundable offence is taken by the Magistrate upon receiving a complaint. If the parties agree to a compromise, the Magistrate records it and disposes of the case without proceeding to trial.

  • Magistrate takes cognizance upon complaint or police report.

  • Compromise must be entered before trial or final judgment.

  • Magistrate records the compromise and passes disposal orders.

Bailability under CrPC Section 335

Bailability depends on the nature of the compoundable offence. Many compoundable offences are bailable, but this section itself does not specify bail conditions. Bail is granted as per the offence’s classification.

  • Bail depends on the offence involved.

  • Compounding does not affect bail rights.

  • Practical consideration: Compounding may lead to quicker release.

Triable By (Court Jurisdiction for CrPC Section 335)

Cases under Section 335 are triable by the Magistrate competent to try the offence. The Magistrate records the compromise and disposes of the case without trial if settlement occurs.

  • Trial court is the Magistrate’s court.

  • Trial is avoided if compromise is recorded.

  • Sessions Court not involved unless appeal or revision.

Appeal and Revision Path under CrPC Section 335

Appeals against orders disposing of cases under Section 335 lie with the Sessions Court. Revision petitions can be filed with the High Court if there is an error in the Magistrate’s order.

  • Appeal to Sessions Court against Magistrate’s order.

  • Revision to High Court in case of jurisdictional errors.

  • Typical appeal timelines as per CrPC rules.

Example of CrPC Section 335 in Practical Use

Person X is accused of causing hurt under a compoundable offence. Both X and the complainant agree to settle the matter amicably. They approach the Magistrate, who records their compromise and disposes of the case, preventing further prosecution.

  • The section enabled amicable dispute resolution.

  • Key takeaway: Compoundable offences can be settled to save time and cost.

Historical Relevance of CrPC Section 335

Section 335 has evolved to formalize the compounding process, ensuring legal recognition of settlements. Amendments have clarified which offences are compoundable and the Magistrate’s role in recording compromises.

  • Originally part of efforts to reduce court backlog.

  • Amendments expanded list of compoundable offences.

  • Improved procedural clarity for Magistrates.

Modern Relevance of CrPC Section 335

In 2026, Section 335 remains crucial for speedy justice and reducing litigation. It supports alternative dispute resolution within criminal law, aligning with modern judicial efficiency and citizen-friendly processes.

  • Encourages out-of-court settlements.

  • Reduces burden on courts and police.

  • Protects rights while promoting reconciliation.

Related Sections to CrPC Section 335

  • Section 320 – Offences which may be compounded

  • Section 320A – Compounding of certain offences by Magistrate

  • Section 482 – Power of High Court to quash proceedings

  • Section 41 – Arrest without warrant

  • Section 154 – Information in cognizable cases

Case References under CrPC Section 335

  1. State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal (1992, AIR 604)

    – Established guidelines for quashing proceedings in compoundable offences.

  2. Ramesh Kumar v. State of Chhattisgarh (2001, AIR 2591)

    – Held that compromise in compoundable offences bars further prosecution.

  3. Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia v. State of Punjab (1980, AIR 150)

    – Affirmed the importance of compromise in criminal cases under CrPC.

Key Facts Summary for CrPC Section 335

  • Section:

    335

  • Title:

    Procedure for Compoundable Offences

  • Nature:

    Procedural

  • Applies To:

    Magistrate, accused, complainant

  • Cognizance:

    Magistrate records compromise upon parties’ agreement

  • Bailability:

    Depends on offence

  • Triable By:

    Magistrate

Conclusion on CrPC Section 335

CrPC Section 335 plays a significant role in the Indian criminal justice system by facilitating the compounding of offences. It empowers parties to settle disputes amicably, reducing unnecessary trials and easing the burden on courts. This procedural provision ensures that compromises are legally recorded, providing finality and preventing further prosecution.

Understanding this section is essential for citizens and legal professionals alike, as it promotes efficient justice and respects the rights of both complainants and accused. By encouraging reconciliation, Section 335 contributes to a more balanced and accessible criminal justice process in India.

FAQs on CrPC Section 335

What types of offences can be compounded under Section 335?

Only compoundable offences, as listed under Section 320 of the CrPC, can be compounded under Section 335. These are generally less serious offences where the law allows parties to settle the matter amicably.

Who can initiate the compounding of an offence?

Both the complainant and the accused must mutually agree to compound the offence. The Magistrate then records this compromise and disposes of the case accordingly.

Does compounding an offence mean the accused is acquitted?

Compounding results in the case being disposed of without trial, but it is not an acquittal. It legally ends the prosecution based on the parties’ settlement.

Can the Magistrate refuse to record a compromise under Section 335?

The Magistrate generally records the compromise if the offence is compoundable and parties agree. However, if the compromise is not genuine or against public interest, the Magistrate may refuse.

Is there a time limit to compound an offence under Section 335?

There is no strict time limit, but compounding usually occurs before the final judgment or conclusion of the trial to avoid further proceedings.

Get a Free Legal Consultation

Reading about legal issues is just the first step. Let us connect you with a verified lawyer who specialises in exactly what you need.

K_gYgciFRGKYrIgrlwTBzQ_2k.webp

Related Sections

Companies Act 2013 Section 201 governs the filing of resolutions and agreements with the Registrar of Companies.

IPC Section 198 outlines the procedure for complaint in cases of offences against public servants, ensuring proper legal process.

CrPC Section 436 details the conditions and procedures for granting bail to accused persons in bailable offences.

IPC Section 13 defines criminal conspiracy, outlining its scope and legal implications in Indian law.

Income Tax Act Section 80EE offers deduction on home loan interest for first-time homebuyers under specified conditions.

Income Tax Act Section 245A details the procedure for adjustment of refund against outstanding tax demands.

Filming police in India is generally legal but subject to restrictions and conditions under law and public order.

Using clone mobile phones is illegal in India due to laws against device cloning and telecom fraud.

Indiacsonline.com is legal in India but must comply with IT laws and content regulations to operate lawfully.

Khatna (female circumcision) is illegal in India, with strict laws protecting women's rights and bodily integrity.

Indian BHMS degree is conditionally recognized in Poland but not fully legal for medical practice without additional certification.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 102 defines the term 'holder' and explains who qualifies as a holder of a negotiable instrument.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 125 defines the term 'holder in due course' and its significance under the Act.

Understand the legality of mobile tracking in India, including laws, exceptions, and enforcement practices.

Trusts are not separate legal entities in India; trustees hold property on behalf of beneficiaries under Indian law.

Job consultancy services are legal in India but must comply with specific regulations and licensing requirements.

Understand the legality of employment agreements in India, their enforceability, and key rules governing them.

Understand the legal status of Openload in India and its implications for users and content sharing.

Bonded labor is illegal in India under strict laws banning forced labor and exploitation.

Companies Act 2013 Section 422 governs the power of the Central Government to remove names of companies from the register.

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 158 covering appeals to Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling.

Melamine in milk is illegal in India due to strict food safety laws protecting consumers from harmful adulterants.

CrPC Section 82 details the procedure for issuing summons to a person accused of a non-bailable offence.

Companies Act 2013 Section 213 governs the power of the Tribunal to grant relief in cases of oppression or mismanagement.

Companies Act 2013 Section 216 governs the power of the Registrar to call for information, inspect books, and conduct inquiries.

Creative Commons licenses are legal in India and can be used to share and protect creative works under clear terms.

Ola and Uber are legal in India with specific regulations governing ride-hailing services and driver requirements.

bottom of page