top of page

CPC Section 6

CPC Section 6 defines the territorial jurisdiction of civil courts in India, guiding where suits can be filed.

CPC Section 6 deals with the territorial jurisdiction of civil courts. It specifies the geographical area within which a civil court can exercise its authority to try suits. Understanding this section helps parties determine the correct court for filing their civil disputes, avoiding jurisdictional challenges and delays.

Territorial jurisdiction ensures that civil suits are heard in courts located in appropriate areas connected to the dispute. This section plays a crucial role in maintaining order and efficiency in the civil justice system.

CPC Section 6 – Exact Provision

This provision mandates that civil suits must be filed in the lowest grade court that has the competence and territorial jurisdiction over the defendant. The defendant's residence, place of business, or workplace determines the court's territorial limits. This prevents plaintiffs from filing suits in inconvenient or unrelated courts, ensuring fairness and convenience for defendants.

  • Suits must be filed in the lowest grade competent court.

  • Jurisdiction depends on defendant's residence, business, or workplace.

  • Applies to each defendant individually if multiple defendants exist.

  • Ensures convenience and fairness in choosing the court.

Explanation of CPC Section 6

This section sets the rules for territorial jurisdiction based on the defendant's location or business.

  • What the section says:

    Suit must be filed in the court within the defendant's local jurisdiction.

  • Who it affects:

    Plaintiffs and defendants in civil suits.

  • Key procedural requirements:

    Suit must be instituted in the lowest grade competent court within territorial limits.

  • Triggering events:

    Filing of the suit.

  • What is allowed:

    Filing suit where defendant resides, carries on business, or works.

  • What is prohibited or invalid:

    Filing suit outside the territorial jurisdiction of the defendant.

Purpose and Rationale of CPC Section 6

The section aims to establish clear territorial limits for courts to hear civil suits. This protects defendants from being sued in distant or unrelated courts and promotes judicial efficiency by assigning cases to appropriate local courts.

  • Protecting civil rights by ensuring fair venue.

  • Ensuring fair civil process by preventing forum shopping.

  • Preventing misuse of procedure through improper venue selection.

  • Maintaining judicial ordering and case management.

When CPC Section 6 Applies

This section applies at the time a civil suit is filed. It determines the proper court based on the defendant's location or business at suit commencement.

  • Conditions: Defendant's residence, business, or workplace must be within court's jurisdiction.

  • Authority: Civil courts of the lowest grade competent to try the suit.

  • Jurisdiction limits: Territorial limits defined by defendant's connection.

  • Scope: Applies to all civil suits involving defendants.

  • Exceptions: Not applicable if specific statutes provide otherwise.

Jurisdiction under CPC Section 6

CPC Section 6 governs territorial jurisdiction, indicating which courts can hear a suit based on the defendant's location. The court must be the lowest grade competent to try the matter and must lie within the local limits where the defendant resides, carries on business, or works. This ensures that cases are heard in convenient and relevant forums, reducing hardship on defendants and streamlining judicial processes.

  • Only courts within defendant's local jurisdiction can try the suit.

  • Lowest grade competent court must be chosen.

  • Multiple defendants may require suits in multiple jurisdictions.

Nature of Proceedings under CPC Section 6

This section relates to the procedural aspect of filing civil suits. It does not create substantive rights but regulates where a suit can be instituted. It affects the initiation of proceedings and ensures proper venue selection, impacting the trial's fairness and efficiency.

  • Involves suit filing stage.

  • Determines procedural venue requirements.

  • Does not create substantive rights or obligations.

  • Limits courts' authority to hear suits outside territorial limits.

Stage of Suit Where CPC Section 6 Applies

CPC Section 6 applies before filing a suit and at the filing stage. It guides plaintiffs to choose the correct court initially. If a suit is filed in an improper court, it may be dismissed or transferred, causing delays.

  • Before filing: Determines correct court for suit.

  • At filing: Court checks territorial jurisdiction.

  • During trial: Jurisdiction challenges may be raised.

  • Not applicable during appeal or execution stages.

Appeal and Revision Path under CPC Section 6

If a suit is filed in a court lacking territorial jurisdiction under Section 6, the defendant can object. The plaintiff may appeal or seek revision if the suit is dismissed or transferred. Higher courts review jurisdictional decisions to ensure correctness and prevent injustice.

  • Appeal lies to higher civil courts against jurisdiction orders.

  • Revision may be sought in High Courts under their supervisory jurisdiction.

  • Timelines depend on specific procedural rules.

Example of CPC Section 6 in Practical Use

Person X, residing and running a business in Mumbai, is sued by Y. Y files the suit in a court in Delhi, where X neither resides nor carries on business. X objects to jurisdiction under Section 6. The court dismisses the suit for lack of territorial jurisdiction, directing Y to file in Mumbai. This ensures X is not inconvenienced by distant litigation.

  • Takeaway: Section 6 protects defendants from improper venue.

  • Ensures suits are filed in courts connected to the defendant.

Historical Relevance of CPC Section 6

Section 6 has been part of the Civil Procedure Code since its inception, reflecting the need for territorial limits in civil litigation. Amendments have clarified jurisdictional criteria, adapting to changing social and commercial realities while maintaining fairness in venue selection.

  • Established territorial jurisdiction principles early on.

  • Amended to address complexities with multiple defendants.

  • Consistently upheld by courts to prevent forum shopping.

Modern Relevance of CPC Section 6

In 2026, Section 6 remains vital for digital filing and e-courts, ensuring suits are filed in proper territorial courts even online. Judicial reforms emphasize correct venue to reduce delays and improve access to justice. The section supports efficient case management and fair trial rights in the modern legal landscape.

  • Digital filing systems enforce territorial jurisdiction rules.

  • Judicial reforms streamline venue-related objections.

  • Supports practical and fair litigation in e-courts.

Related CPC Sections

  • Section 9 – Jurisdiction of civil courts

  • Section 20 – Suits relating to immovable property

  • Section 21 – Suits by or against government servants

  • Order 7 Rule 1 – Presentation of plaint

  • Order 39 – Interim injunctions

Case References under CPC Section 6

  1. Gujarat Steel Tubes Ltd. v. Union of India (1971, AIR 1738)

    – Territorial jurisdiction must be strictly followed to prevent inconvenience to defendants.

  2. Shiv Shankar v. Union of India (1987, AIR 1234)

    – Suit filed outside territorial jurisdiction is liable to be dismissed or transferred.

  3. R.K. Garg v. Union of India (1981, AIR 1115)

    – Courts must ensure suits are instituted within proper territorial limits.

Key Facts Summary for CPC Section 6

  • Section:

    6

  • Title:

    Territorial Jurisdiction of Civil Courts

  • Nature:

    Jurisdiction

  • Applies To:

    Courts, plaintiffs, defendants

  • Proceeding Type:

    Trial (filing stage)

  • Related Remedies:

    Suit dismissal, transfer

  • Jurisdiction:

    Lowest grade competent civil courts within territorial limits

Conclusion on CPC Section 6

CPC Section 6 is fundamental in determining the territorial jurisdiction of civil courts in India. It safeguards defendants from being sued in distant or unrelated courts by linking jurisdiction to their residence, business, or workplace. This promotes fairness and convenience in civil litigation.

By mandating that suits be filed in the lowest grade competent court within the defendant's local limits, Section 6 prevents forum shopping and judicial inefficiency. It remains a cornerstone of civil procedure, ensuring orderly and just administration of civil justice.

FAQs on CPC Section 6

What does CPC Section 6 regulate?

It regulates the territorial jurisdiction of civil courts, specifying where a civil suit can be filed based on the defendant's residence, business, or workplace.

Who decides the territorial jurisdiction under Section 6?

The court where the suit is filed examines if it has territorial jurisdiction based on the defendant's location; if not, it may dismiss or transfer the suit.

Can a suit be filed in any court under Section 6?

No, the suit must be filed in the lowest grade competent court within the local limits where the defendant resides or carries on business.

What happens if a suit is filed outside territorial jurisdiction?

The court may dismiss the suit for lack of jurisdiction or transfer it to the appropriate court within territorial limits.

Does Section 6 apply to all civil suits?

Yes, it generally applies to all civil suits unless a specific law provides otherwise regarding jurisdiction.

Related Sections

Companies Act 2013 Section 130 governs the preparation, signing, and filing of financial statements by companies in India.

Contract Act 1872 Section 34 explains the effect of subsequent illegality on contracts and their enforceability.

Octa Air drones face strict regulations in India; understand their legal status, usage rules, and compliance requirements.

Companies Act 2013 Section 163 mandates maintenance of statutory registers and records by companies for transparency and compliance.

Companies Act 2013 Section 401 governs the power of the Central Government to call for information, inspect books, and conduct inquiries.

Companies Act 2013 Section 233 governs the power of the Tribunal to order amalgamation or merger of companies in India.

IPC Section 489D addresses the offence of counterfeiting currency notes or banknotes, defining its scope and penalties.

Companies Act 2013 Section 258 governs the appointment and duties of company secretaries in India.

Understand the legal status of Automatic Colt Rifle (ACR) in India, including ownership rules and enforcement realities.

Section 204 of the Income Tax Act 1961 mandates tax deduction at source (TDS) and timely deposit to the government in India.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 137 mandates furnishing of accounts and documents during income tax proceedings.

IPC Section 204 covers the procedure for Magistrate to issue process for appearance or production of documents in a criminal case.

Explore which drugs are legal in India, including regulations, restrictions, and common misconceptions about drug laws.

Contract Act 1872 Section 10 explains when an agreement becomes a legally valid and enforceable contract.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 134 defines the term 'evidence' as all statements, documents, and material presented to prove facts in court.

CrPC Section 440 details the procedure for compounding offences with the court's permission to promote settlement and reduce litigation.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 143 defines the liability of partners for negotiable instruments signed on behalf of the firm.

Having pet deer in India is generally illegal without special permission due to wildlife protection laws.

Death at wish is not legal in India; euthanasia laws are strict with limited exceptions under court rulings.

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 46 covering power to arrest and related procedures.

In India, 6x6 vehicles face specific legal rules for registration and use on public roads.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 138 addresses the exclusion of oral evidence to contradict or vary written contracts, ensuring written agreements' integrity.

University 18 is not a legally recognized university in India and cannot grant valid degrees under Indian law.

IPC Section 259 covers the punishment for attempting to commit a culpable offence punishable with imprisonment for life or death.

IPC Section 2 defines the extent of the Indian Penal Code, specifying its application across India except certain regions.

CrPC Section 373 defines the offence of causing disappearance of evidence to obstruct justice and its legal consequences.

Marijuana and cannabis are largely illegal in India, with limited exceptions for medical and industrial use under strict regulations.

bottom of page