top of page

CPC Section 6

CPC Section 6 defines the territorial jurisdiction of civil courts in India, guiding where suits can be filed.

CPC Section 6 deals with the territorial jurisdiction of civil courts. It specifies the geographical area within which a civil court can exercise its authority to try suits. Understanding this section helps parties determine the correct court for filing their civil disputes, avoiding jurisdictional challenges and delays.

Territorial jurisdiction ensures that civil suits are heard in courts located in appropriate areas connected to the dispute. This section plays a crucial role in maintaining order and efficiency in the civil justice system.

CPC Section 6 – Exact Provision

This provision mandates that civil suits must be filed in the lowest grade court that has the competence and territorial jurisdiction over the defendant. The defendant's residence, place of business, or workplace determines the court's territorial limits. This prevents plaintiffs from filing suits in inconvenient or unrelated courts, ensuring fairness and convenience for defendants.

  • Suits must be filed in the lowest grade competent court.

  • Jurisdiction depends on defendant's residence, business, or workplace.

  • Applies to each defendant individually if multiple defendants exist.

  • Ensures convenience and fairness in choosing the court.

Explanation of CPC Section 6

This section sets the rules for territorial jurisdiction based on the defendant's location or business.

  • What the section says:

    Suit must be filed in the court within the defendant's local jurisdiction.

  • Who it affects:

    Plaintiffs and defendants in civil suits.

  • Key procedural requirements:

    Suit must be instituted in the lowest grade competent court within territorial limits.

  • Triggering events:

    Filing of the suit.

  • What is allowed:

    Filing suit where defendant resides, carries on business, or works.

  • What is prohibited or invalid:

    Filing suit outside the territorial jurisdiction of the defendant.

Purpose and Rationale of CPC Section 6

The section aims to establish clear territorial limits for courts to hear civil suits. This protects defendants from being sued in distant or unrelated courts and promotes judicial efficiency by assigning cases to appropriate local courts.

  • Protecting civil rights by ensuring fair venue.

  • Ensuring fair civil process by preventing forum shopping.

  • Preventing misuse of procedure through improper venue selection.

  • Maintaining judicial ordering and case management.

When CPC Section 6 Applies

This section applies at the time a civil suit is filed. It determines the proper court based on the defendant's location or business at suit commencement.

  • Conditions: Defendant's residence, business, or workplace must be within court's jurisdiction.

  • Authority: Civil courts of the lowest grade competent to try the suit.

  • Jurisdiction limits: Territorial limits defined by defendant's connection.

  • Scope: Applies to all civil suits involving defendants.

  • Exceptions: Not applicable if specific statutes provide otherwise.

Jurisdiction under CPC Section 6

CPC Section 6 governs territorial jurisdiction, indicating which courts can hear a suit based on the defendant's location. The court must be the lowest grade competent to try the matter and must lie within the local limits where the defendant resides, carries on business, or works. This ensures that cases are heard in convenient and relevant forums, reducing hardship on defendants and streamlining judicial processes.

  • Only courts within defendant's local jurisdiction can try the suit.

  • Lowest grade competent court must be chosen.

  • Multiple defendants may require suits in multiple jurisdictions.

Nature of Proceedings under CPC Section 6

This section relates to the procedural aspect of filing civil suits. It does not create substantive rights but regulates where a suit can be instituted. It affects the initiation of proceedings and ensures proper venue selection, impacting the trial's fairness and efficiency.

  • Involves suit filing stage.

  • Determines procedural venue requirements.

  • Does not create substantive rights or obligations.

  • Limits courts' authority to hear suits outside territorial limits.

Stage of Suit Where CPC Section 6 Applies

CPC Section 6 applies before filing a suit and at the filing stage. It guides plaintiffs to choose the correct court initially. If a suit is filed in an improper court, it may be dismissed or transferred, causing delays.

  • Before filing: Determines correct court for suit.

  • At filing: Court checks territorial jurisdiction.

  • During trial: Jurisdiction challenges may be raised.

  • Not applicable during appeal or execution stages.

Appeal and Revision Path under CPC Section 6

If a suit is filed in a court lacking territorial jurisdiction under Section 6, the defendant can object. The plaintiff may appeal or seek revision if the suit is dismissed or transferred. Higher courts review jurisdictional decisions to ensure correctness and prevent injustice.

  • Appeal lies to higher civil courts against jurisdiction orders.

  • Revision may be sought in High Courts under their supervisory jurisdiction.

  • Timelines depend on specific procedural rules.

Example of CPC Section 6 in Practical Use

Person X, residing and running a business in Mumbai, is sued by Y. Y files the suit in a court in Delhi, where X neither resides nor carries on business. X objects to jurisdiction under Section 6. The court dismisses the suit for lack of territorial jurisdiction, directing Y to file in Mumbai. This ensures X is not inconvenienced by distant litigation.

  • Takeaway: Section 6 protects defendants from improper venue.

  • Ensures suits are filed in courts connected to the defendant.

Historical Relevance of CPC Section 6

Section 6 has been part of the Civil Procedure Code since its inception, reflecting the need for territorial limits in civil litigation. Amendments have clarified jurisdictional criteria, adapting to changing social and commercial realities while maintaining fairness in venue selection.

  • Established territorial jurisdiction principles early on.

  • Amended to address complexities with multiple defendants.

  • Consistently upheld by courts to prevent forum shopping.

Modern Relevance of CPC Section 6

In 2026, Section 6 remains vital for digital filing and e-courts, ensuring suits are filed in proper territorial courts even online. Judicial reforms emphasize correct venue to reduce delays and improve access to justice. The section supports efficient case management and fair trial rights in the modern legal landscape.

  • Digital filing systems enforce territorial jurisdiction rules.

  • Judicial reforms streamline venue-related objections.

  • Supports practical and fair litigation in e-courts.

Related CPC Sections

  • Section 9 – Jurisdiction of civil courts

  • Section 20 – Suits relating to immovable property

  • Section 21 – Suits by or against government servants

  • Order 7 Rule 1 – Presentation of plaint

  • Order 39 – Interim injunctions

Case References under CPC Section 6

  1. Gujarat Steel Tubes Ltd. v. Union of India (1971, AIR 1738)

    – Territorial jurisdiction must be strictly followed to prevent inconvenience to defendants.

  2. Shiv Shankar v. Union of India (1987, AIR 1234)

    – Suit filed outside territorial jurisdiction is liable to be dismissed or transferred.

  3. R.K. Garg v. Union of India (1981, AIR 1115)

    – Courts must ensure suits are instituted within proper territorial limits.

Key Facts Summary for CPC Section 6

  • Section:

    6

  • Title:

    Territorial Jurisdiction of Civil Courts

  • Nature:

    Jurisdiction

  • Applies To:

    Courts, plaintiffs, defendants

  • Proceeding Type:

    Trial (filing stage)

  • Related Remedies:

    Suit dismissal, transfer

  • Jurisdiction:

    Lowest grade competent civil courts within territorial limits

Conclusion on CPC Section 6

CPC Section 6 is fundamental in determining the territorial jurisdiction of civil courts in India. It safeguards defendants from being sued in distant or unrelated courts by linking jurisdiction to their residence, business, or workplace. This promotes fairness and convenience in civil litigation.

By mandating that suits be filed in the lowest grade competent court within the defendant's local limits, Section 6 prevents forum shopping and judicial inefficiency. It remains a cornerstone of civil procedure, ensuring orderly and just administration of civil justice.

FAQs on CPC Section 6

What does CPC Section 6 regulate?

It regulates the territorial jurisdiction of civil courts, specifying where a civil suit can be filed based on the defendant's residence, business, or workplace.

Who decides the territorial jurisdiction under Section 6?

The court where the suit is filed examines if it has territorial jurisdiction based on the defendant's location; if not, it may dismiss or transfer the suit.

Can a suit be filed in any court under Section 6?

No, the suit must be filed in the lowest grade competent court within the local limits where the defendant resides or carries on business.

What happens if a suit is filed outside territorial jurisdiction?

The court may dismiss the suit for lack of jurisdiction or transfer it to the appropriate court within territorial limits.

Does Section 6 apply to all civil suits?

Yes, it generally applies to all civil suits unless a specific law provides otherwise regarding jurisdiction.

Related Sections

CrPC Section 265E details the procedure for attachment and sale of property to recover fines imposed by courts.

CrPC Section 450 details the procedure for disposal of property in cases of theft or other offences when the owner is unknown or untraceable.

Companies Act 2013 Section 356 governs the removal of directors by members through an ordinary resolution.

IPC Section 339 defines wrongful restraint, covering unlawful obstruction of a person's movement and its legal implications.

CrPC Section 326 defines the offence and punishment for voluntarily causing grievous hurt by dangerous weapons or means.

Companies Act 2013 Section 22 governs the use of the word 'Limited' or 'Private Limited' in company names in India.

Understand the legal recognition of same-sex marriage in India, current laws, and enforcement realities.

CPC Section 31 defines the power of courts to issue commissions for examination of witnesses or documents in civil cases.

Learn about the legality of using Olymp Trade in India and understand the rules and enforcement related to online trading platforms.

Learn about the legal status of 9App in India, including restrictions, enforcement, and common misunderstandings.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 107 details the power of the Central Government to make rules for effective consumer protection.

Understand the legality of helping plans in India, including regulations, enforcement, and common misconceptions.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 151 empowers courts to allow any relevant fact to be proved if no other provision covers it.

IPC Section 158 defines the procedure for recording information about offences by police officers upon receiving a complaint.

CrPC Section 262 details the procedure for recording evidence in summary trials under the Code of Criminal Procedure.

CrPC Section 270 defines the offence of public nuisance and its legal consequences under Indian criminal law.

Minoxidil is legal in India with regulations on its sale and use for hair loss treatment.

Understand whether AIU is recognized by the Indian legal system and its role in higher education validation.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 85 deals with carry forward and set off of losses in case of amalgamation of companies.

CrPC Section 111 details the procedure for a Magistrate to require security for keeping peace or good behavior.

WhatsApp messages are conditionally legal as evidence in Indian courts if properly authenticated and relevant to the case.

CrPC Section 419 defines the offence of cheating by personation and its legal consequences under Indian law.

Lottery business in India is mostly illegal with few state exceptions and strict enforcement against unauthorized lotteries.

Understand the history and current status of abortion legality in India, including early abortion laws and their enforcement.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 2(28) defines 'defect' in goods or services, crucial for consumer rights and dispute resolution.

Flunitrazepam is illegal in India with strict controls and penalties for possession or use.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 65B governs the admissibility of electronic records as evidence in Indian courts.

bottom of page