top of page

CPC Section 6

CPC Section 6 defines the territorial jurisdiction of civil courts in India, guiding where suits can be filed.

CPC Section 6 – Territorial Jurisdiction of Civil Courts

CPC Section 6 deals with the territorial jurisdiction of civil courts. It specifies the geographical area within which a civil court can exercise its authority to try suits. Understanding this section helps parties determine the correct court for filing their civil disputes, avoiding jurisdictional challenges and delays.

Territorial jurisdiction ensures that civil suits are heard in courts located in appropriate areas connected to the dispute. This section plays a crucial role in maintaining order and efficiency in the civil justice system.

CPC Section 6 – Exact Provision

This provision mandates that civil suits must be filed in the lowest grade court that has the competence and territorial jurisdiction over the defendant. The defendant's residence, place of business, or workplace determines the court's territorial limits. This prevents plaintiffs from filing suits in inconvenient or unrelated courts, ensuring fairness and convenience for defendants.

  • Suits must be filed in the lowest grade competent court.

  • Jurisdiction depends on defendant's residence, business, or workplace.

  • Applies to each defendant individually if multiple defendants exist.

  • Ensures convenience and fairness in choosing the court.

Explanation of CPC Section 6

This section sets the rules for territorial jurisdiction based on the defendant's location or business.

  • What the section says:

    Suit must be filed in the court within the defendant's local jurisdiction.

  • Who it affects:

    Plaintiffs and defendants in civil suits.

  • Key procedural requirements:

    Suit must be instituted in the lowest grade competent court within territorial limits.

  • Triggering events:

    Filing of the suit.

  • What is allowed:

    Filing suit where defendant resides, carries on business, or works.

  • What is prohibited or invalid:

    Filing suit outside the territorial jurisdiction of the defendant.

Purpose and Rationale of CPC Section 6

The section aims to establish clear territorial limits for courts to hear civil suits. This protects defendants from being sued in distant or unrelated courts and promotes judicial efficiency by assigning cases to appropriate local courts.

  • Protecting civil rights by ensuring fair venue.

  • Ensuring fair civil process by preventing forum shopping.

  • Preventing misuse of procedure through improper venue selection.

  • Maintaining judicial ordering and case management.

When CPC Section 6 Applies

This section applies at the time a civil suit is filed. It determines the proper court based on the defendant's location or business at suit commencement.

  • Conditions: Defendant's residence, business, or workplace must be within court's jurisdiction.

  • Authority: Civil courts of the lowest grade competent to try the suit.

  • Jurisdiction limits: Territorial limits defined by defendant's connection.

  • Scope: Applies to all civil suits involving defendants.

  • Exceptions: Not applicable if specific statutes provide otherwise.

Jurisdiction under CPC Section 6

CPC Section 6 governs territorial jurisdiction, indicating which courts can hear a suit based on the defendant's location. The court must be the lowest grade competent to try the matter and must lie within the local limits where the defendant resides, carries on business, or works. This ensures that cases are heard in convenient and relevant forums, reducing hardship on defendants and streamlining judicial processes.

  • Only courts within defendant's local jurisdiction can try the suit.

  • Lowest grade competent court must be chosen.

  • Multiple defendants may require suits in multiple jurisdictions.

Nature of Proceedings under CPC Section 6

This section relates to the procedural aspect of filing civil suits. It does not create substantive rights but regulates where a suit can be instituted. It affects the initiation of proceedings and ensures proper venue selection, impacting the trial's fairness and efficiency.

  • Involves suit filing stage.

  • Determines procedural venue requirements.

  • Does not create substantive rights or obligations.

  • Limits courts' authority to hear suits outside territorial limits.

Stage of Suit Where CPC Section 6 Applies

CPC Section 6 applies before filing a suit and at the filing stage. It guides plaintiffs to choose the correct court initially. If a suit is filed in an improper court, it may be dismissed or transferred, causing delays.

  • Before filing: Determines correct court for suit.

  • At filing: Court checks territorial jurisdiction.

  • During trial: Jurisdiction challenges may be raised.

  • Not applicable during appeal or execution stages.

Appeal and Revision Path under CPC Section 6

If a suit is filed in a court lacking territorial jurisdiction under Section 6, the defendant can object. The plaintiff may appeal or seek revision if the suit is dismissed or transferred. Higher courts review jurisdictional decisions to ensure correctness and prevent injustice.

  • Appeal lies to higher civil courts against jurisdiction orders.

  • Revision may be sought in High Courts under their supervisory jurisdiction.

  • Timelines depend on specific procedural rules.

Example of CPC Section 6 in Practical Use

Person X, residing and running a business in Mumbai, is sued by Y. Y files the suit in a court in Delhi, where X neither resides nor carries on business. X objects to jurisdiction under Section 6. The court dismisses the suit for lack of territorial jurisdiction, directing Y to file in Mumbai. This ensures X is not inconvenienced by distant litigation.

  • Takeaway: Section 6 protects defendants from improper venue.

  • Ensures suits are filed in courts connected to the defendant.

Historical Relevance of CPC Section 6

Section 6 has been part of the Civil Procedure Code since its inception, reflecting the need for territorial limits in civil litigation. Amendments have clarified jurisdictional criteria, adapting to changing social and commercial realities while maintaining fairness in venue selection.

  • Established territorial jurisdiction principles early on.

  • Amended to address complexities with multiple defendants.

  • Consistently upheld by courts to prevent forum shopping.

Modern Relevance of CPC Section 6

In 2026, Section 6 remains vital for digital filing and e-courts, ensuring suits are filed in proper territorial courts even online. Judicial reforms emphasize correct venue to reduce delays and improve access to justice. The section supports efficient case management and fair trial rights in the modern legal landscape.

  • Digital filing systems enforce territorial jurisdiction rules.

  • Judicial reforms streamline venue-related objections.

  • Supports practical and fair litigation in e-courts.

Related CPC Sections

  • Section 9 – Jurisdiction of civil courts

  • Section 20 – Suits relating to immovable property

  • Section 21 – Suits by or against government servants

  • Order 7 Rule 1 – Presentation of plaint

  • Order 39 – Interim injunctions

Case References under CPC Section 6

  1. Gujarat Steel Tubes Ltd. v. Union of India (1971, AIR 1738)

    – Territorial jurisdiction must be strictly followed to prevent inconvenience to defendants.

  2. Shiv Shankar v. Union of India (1987, AIR 1234)

    – Suit filed outside territorial jurisdiction is liable to be dismissed or transferred.

  3. R.K. Garg v. Union of India (1981, AIR 1115)

    – Courts must ensure suits are instituted within proper territorial limits.

Key Facts Summary for CPC Section 6

  • Section:

    6

  • Title:

    Territorial Jurisdiction of Civil Courts

  • Nature:

    Jurisdiction

  • Applies To:

    Courts, plaintiffs, defendants

  • Proceeding Type:

    Trial (filing stage)

  • Related Remedies:

    Suit dismissal, transfer

  • Jurisdiction:

    Lowest grade competent civil courts within territorial limits

Conclusion on CPC Section 6

CPC Section 6 is fundamental in determining the territorial jurisdiction of civil courts in India. It safeguards defendants from being sued in distant or unrelated courts by linking jurisdiction to their residence, business, or workplace. This promotes fairness and convenience in civil litigation.

By mandating that suits be filed in the lowest grade competent court within the defendant's local limits, Section 6 prevents forum shopping and judicial inefficiency. It remains a cornerstone of civil procedure, ensuring orderly and just administration of civil justice.

FAQs on CPC Section 6

What does CPC Section 6 regulate?

It regulates the territorial jurisdiction of civil courts, specifying where a civil suit can be filed based on the defendant's residence, business, or workplace.

Who decides the territorial jurisdiction under Section 6?

The court where the suit is filed examines if it has territorial jurisdiction based on the defendant's location; if not, it may dismiss or transfer the suit.

Can a suit be filed in any court under Section 6?

No, the suit must be filed in the lowest grade competent court within the local limits where the defendant resides or carries on business.

What happens if a suit is filed outside territorial jurisdiction?

The court may dismiss the suit for lack of jurisdiction or transfer it to the appropriate court within territorial limits.

Does Section 6 apply to all civil suits?

Yes, it generally applies to all civil suits unless a specific law provides otherwise regarding jurisdiction.

Related Sections

CrPC Section 193 deals with punishment for giving false evidence or fabricating false documents in judicial proceedings.

IPC Section 443 defines criminal trespass, covering unlawful entry into property with intent to commit an offence or intimidate.

IPC Section 97 defines the right of private defense of the body and property under specific conditions.

IPC Section 232 covers the procedure for sentencing when a person is convicted of an offence, detailing how courts pronounce and record sentences.

IPC Section 270 addresses the offence of malignant act likely to spread infection of disease dangerous to life.

IPC Section 394 defines robbery with hurt, covering theft combined with causing bodily harm to the victim.

CrPC Section 391 details the procedure for taking cognizance of offences by a Magistrate upon police report or complaint.

IPC Section 471 addresses punishment for using a forged document as genuine to deceive others.

CrPC Section 321 empowers a public prosecutor to withdraw from a case with court approval, ensuring efficient justice delivery.

CrPC Section 445 details the procedure for attachment and sale of movable property when a person fails to pay fine imposed by a court.

CrPC Section 138 details the procedure for issuing summons to accused persons in criminal cases to ensure their presence in court.

IPC Section 468 defines punishment for forgery committed with intent to cheat, ensuring protection against fraudulent document creation.

bottom of page