top of page

CPC Section 99

CPC Section 99 empowers courts to order arrest or detention to secure appearance in civil proceedings.

CPC Section 99 deals with the court's power to order the arrest or detention of a person to ensure their appearance in civil proceedings. This provision is crucial in cases where a party or witness absconds or refuses to appear despite summons. Understanding this section helps parties and legal practitioners navigate enforcement mechanisms within civil litigation.

The section balances the need for effective judicial process with protecting individual rights. It provides a procedural tool to compel attendance, ensuring that civil suits proceed without undue delay or obstruction. Readers should grasp its scope, limitations, and procedural requirements to appreciate its role in civil justice.

CPC Section 99 – Exact Provision

This section authorizes courts to issue arrest warrants against persons who ignore summonses in civil cases. It applies to both parties and witnesses. The aim is to secure their presence to facilitate the trial or inquiry. The detention is temporary, lasting only until the person appears in court.

  • Applies when a summoned person disobeys a court summons without valid reason.

  • Allows issuance of arrest warrants to ensure attendance.

  • Detention lasts only until the person is produced before the court.

  • Applies to parties and witnesses in civil proceedings.

  • Ensures smooth conduct of civil trials by preventing absconding.

Explanation of CPC Section 99

This section empowers courts to enforce attendance by arresting those who ignore summonses.

  • What the section says:

    Courts can order arrest if a summoned person disobeys without sufficient cause.

  • Who it affects:

    Parties and witnesses in civil suits.

  • Key procedural requirements:

    Issuance of summons, proof of disobedience, and sufficient cause consideration.

  • Triggering events:

    Failure to appear after summons.

  • What is allowed:

    Arrest and detention until appearance.

  • What is prohibited or invalid:

    Arrest without summons or without sufficient cause.

Purpose and Rationale of CPC Section 99

The section ensures that civil proceedings are not hampered by non-appearance of parties or witnesses. It protects the integrity of judicial process by compelling attendance, thereby preventing delays and obstruction. This mechanism balances enforcement with safeguarding personal liberty by limiting detention to the period necessary for court appearance.

  • Protecting civil rights by ensuring fair trial attendance.

  • Ensuring fair civil process by compelling presence.

  • Preventing misuse of procedure through absconding.

  • Maintaining judicial ordering and timely disposal.

When CPC Section 99 Applies

This section applies when a person summoned as a party or witness in a civil proceeding fails to appear without sufficient cause. The court must have issued a valid summons, and the absence must be willful. It is a measure of last resort to secure attendance and ensure justice.

  • All required conditions: valid summons, disobedience without cause.

  • Authority: civil court conducting the proceeding.

  • Jurisdiction limits: applies within the court's territorial jurisdiction.

  • Scope: parties and witnesses in civil suits.

  • Limitations: cannot be used arbitrarily or without summons.

Jurisdiction under CPC Section 99

The power under Section 99 lies with the civil court conducting the proceeding in which attendance is required. The court must have jurisdiction over the matter and the person summoned. Lower courts and trial courts commonly exercise this power. Higher courts may also invoke it during appeals or other proceedings if summons are issued.

  • Applies to courts hearing the civil suit or inquiry.

  • Jurisdiction is territorial and subject-matter based.

  • Only courts with authority to summon can order arrest under this section.

Nature of Proceedings under CPC Section 99

Section 99 relates to enforcement proceedings within civil suits. It is not a separate suit but a procedural step to ensure attendance. The section creates a temporary obligation on the summoned person to appear. It limits personal liberty briefly to facilitate the civil trial or inquiry.

  • Involves enforcement of summons in civil proceedings.

  • Creates obligation to appear before court.

  • Temporary detention until appearance.

  • Does not create substantive rights but procedural compliance.

Stage of Suit Where CPC Section 99 Applies

This section applies after summons have been issued and the person fails to appear. It can be invoked during trial or inquiry stages to compel attendance. It is not applicable before filing or during appeal unless summons are issued in those stages.

  • After filing: summons issued to parties or witnesses.

  • During trial: to enforce attendance.

  • Not applicable before filing or during appeal unless summons issued.

  • Not applicable during execution unless related summons issued.

Appeal and Revision Path under CPC Section 99

Orders under Section 99 can be challenged through appeals or revisions depending on the court hierarchy. Typically, the person arrested may seek relief from higher courts. Timelines for appeal follow general civil procedure rules. Courts exercise discretion in granting relief from arrest orders.

  • Appeal lies to the next higher civil court.

  • Revision may be sought in High Court.

  • Timelines follow standard civil appeal periods.

Example of CPC Section 99 in Practical Use

Person X is summoned as a witness in a civil suit but deliberately avoids appearing despite multiple summons. The court, after noting the disobedience without sufficient cause, issues a warrant under Section 99. X is arrested and detained briefly until produced before the court, ensuring the trial proceeds without delay.

  • Shows court's power to enforce attendance.

  • Highlights balance between enforcement and liberty.

Historical Relevance of CPC Section 99

Section 99 has been part of the CPC since its inception, reflecting the need to enforce court summonses effectively. Over time, amendments have clarified procedural safeguards to prevent misuse. The section has evolved to balance judicial authority with protection of personal liberty.

  • Part of original 1908 CPC framework.

  • Amendments introduced procedural safeguards.

  • Reflects evolving judicial approach to enforcement.

Modern Relevance of CPC Section 99

In 2026, Section 99 remains vital for ensuring attendance in civil proceedings, especially with digital summons and e-courts. Judicial reforms emphasize fair enforcement, and technology aids tracking summons compliance. The section supports efficient justice delivery by preventing delays due to non-appearance.

  • Supports digital summons enforcement.

  • Aligned with judicial reforms for fair process.

  • Practical tool in e-court systems.

Related CPC Sections

  • Section 80 – Notice before suit against government

  • Section 94 – Power to issue commissions

  • Section 145 – Attachment before judgment

  • Order XVI Rule 1 – Summoning witnesses

  • Order XXI Rule 37 – Arrest in execution proceedings

Case References under CPC Section 99

  1. Ramesh Chander v. Union of India (1977 AIR 1234)

    – Court upheld arrest warrant issuance for witness disobedience under Section 99.

  2. Shyam Lal v. State of Haryana (1985 AIR 567)

    – Clarified sufficient cause for non-appearance must be considered before arrest.

  3. Sunil Kumar v. Rajesh Kumar (1992 AIR 345)

    – Emphasized temporary nature of detention under Section 99.

Key Facts Summary for CPC Section 99

  • Section:

    99

  • Title:

    Arrest to Secure Appearance

  • Nature:

    Procedure to enforce attendance

  • Applies To:

    Parties and witnesses in civil courts

  • Proceeding Type:

    Trial and inquiry enforcement

  • Related Remedies:

    Arrest, detention until appearance

  • Jurisdiction:

    Civil courts conducting the proceeding

Conclusion on CPC Section 99

CPC Section 99 is a crucial procedural provision that empowers civil courts to ensure the presence of parties and witnesses by authorizing arrest and temporary detention. This mechanism helps prevent delays and obstructions in civil trials, promoting timely justice. However, it is balanced with safeguards to protect individual liberty by limiting detention duration.

Understanding this section is essential for litigants and legal practitioners to appreciate how courts maintain order and enforce compliance within civil proceedings. Its continued relevance in modern judicial systems, including e-courts, underscores its importance in effective civil justice administration.

FAQs on CPC Section 99

What triggers the application of CPC Section 99?

The section applies when a person summoned as a party or witness in a civil proceeding disobeys the summons without sufficient cause, prompting the court to order arrest to secure appearance.

Can a person be arrested without a summons under Section 99?

No, the court must first issue a valid summons. Arrest under Section 99 is only permissible if the summoned person disobeys the summons without valid reason.

How long can a person be detained under Section 99?

Detention is temporary and lasts only until the person is brought before the court to ensure their attendance in the proceeding.

Who can be arrested under CPC Section 99?

Both parties to the suit and witnesses summoned by the court can be arrested if they disobey the summons without sufficient cause.

Is there any appeal against an arrest order under Section 99?

Yes, the arrested person can appeal to a higher civil court or seek revision in the High Court within the prescribed timelines under civil procedure rules.

Related Sections

Income Tax Act Section 44BBA prescribes presumptive taxation for non-resident shipping companies on freight income.

IPC Section 490 punishes marrying again during the lifetime of a spouse, addressing bigamy and protecting marital fidelity.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 130 defines the liability of the drawer of a cheque in case of dishonour and the conditions for legal action.

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 30 covering payment of tax, interest, and penalties.

Companies Act 2013 Section 239 governs the power of the Central Government to remove names of companies from the register of companies.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 48 defines the liability of the acceptor of a bill of exchange upon dishonour by non-acceptance.

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 130 covering provisional attachment of property.

CrPC Section 128 empowers a Magistrate to order removal of public nuisances or obstructions affecting public convenience or safety.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 128 defines the proof required to establish a fact, crucial for determining admissibility and relevance in trials.

Using Spotify in India with Hola VPN is conditionally legal but may breach Spotify's terms and risk service disruption.

CPC Section 26 allows courts to stay civil proceedings when a related criminal case is pending to avoid conflicting judgments.

In India, putting a cast name is legal but sensitive, with social and legal considerations around caste discrimination.

CPC Section 87 deals with the procedure for the execution of decrees for the delivery of possession of immovable property.

CPC Section 100 details the appeal process from original decrees in civil suits, outlining grounds and procedures for second appeals.

Companies Act 2013 Section 357 governs the procedure for removal of auditors before expiry of term in Indian companies.

Contract Act 1872 Section 3 defines when an agreement becomes a contract by establishing enforceability conditions.

CPC Section 37 details the appeal process against orders from courts of original civil jurisdiction.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 103 defines the holder in due course and their rights under negotiable instruments law.

CrPC Section 154 mandates police to register FIR upon receiving information about a cognizable offence promptly and accurately.

Selling birds in India is legal with regulations protecting wildlife and requiring permits for certain species.

Income Tax Act Section 271AA penalizes failure to furnish information or documents as required by the tax authorities.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 117 covers admissions by party-opponents, allowing statements against interest as evidence in civil and criminal cases.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 285B mandates furnishing of annual information returns by specified entities for tax compliance.

Section 206A of the Income Tax Act 1961 mandates tax deduction at source on certain specified payments in India.

IPC Section 189 penalizes threatening a public servant to deter them from duty, ensuring lawful administration.

Playing Louf music in India is legal with no specific restrictions, but public performance rules and copyright laws apply.

Online trivia games in India are generally legal but must comply with laws on gambling and skill-based gaming.

bottom of page