top of page

CrPC Section 111

CrPC Section 111 details the procedure for a Magistrate to require security for keeping peace or good behavior.

CrPC Section 111 empowers a Magistrate to require a person to provide security for maintaining peace or good behavior. This preventive measure helps avoid potential breaches of peace by ensuring individuals act responsibly. Understanding this section is crucial for those involved in civil disputes or public order matters.

This section plays a vital role in maintaining public tranquility by legally obliging individuals to keep peace. It prevents disturbances before they occur, supporting law enforcement and judicial authorities in managing community safety effectively.

CrPC Section 111 – Exact Provision

This provision allows a Magistrate to proactively prevent breaches of peace by requiring a bond from a person likely to cause disturbance. The bond acts as a legal assurance that the individual will maintain peace or behave properly for a set time. Failure to comply can lead to penalties or further legal action.

  • Magistrate can require security by bond for peace or good behavior.

  • Applies when a person is likely to disturb public tranquility.

  • Bond may include sureties and specify duration.

  • Prevents breaches of peace proactively.

Explanation of CrPC Section 111

This section lets a Magistrate ask someone to promise, through a bond, to keep peace or behave well. It’s used when there’s a risk the person might cause trouble or disturb others.

  • Magistrate can require a bond for peacekeeping.

  • Affects individuals likely to breach peace.

  • Triggered by suspicion of potential disturbance.

  • Allows setting conditions and duration for the bond.

  • Prohibits behavior that disturbs public tranquility.

Purpose and Rationale of CrPC Section 111

The section exists to prevent conflicts and maintain public order by legally obliging individuals to behave peacefully. It balances individual freedom with community safety by providing a preventive legal tool for Magistrates.

  • Protects community peace and safety.

  • Ensures legal procedure before imposing conditions.

  • Balances police power with individual rights.

  • Prevents misuse by requiring Magistrate’s satisfaction.

When CrPC Section 111 Applies

This section applies when a Magistrate believes a person may breach peace or disturb public tranquility. It is used as a preventive measure before any actual disturbance occurs.

  • Person likely to commit breach of peace.

  • Magistrate has authority to require security.

  • Applicable in the Magistrate’s jurisdiction.

  • Bond duration specified by Magistrate.

  • Not applicable after breach has occurred.

Cognizance under CrPC Section 111

Cognizance is taken when a Magistrate receives information or observes that a person may disturb peace. The Magistrate then decides whether to require security for peace or good behavior by issuing a notice and hearing the person.

  • Magistrate initiates proceedings on satisfaction of risk.

  • Person is given notice and opportunity to be heard.

  • Bond is executed if Magistrate orders it.

Bailability under CrPC Section 111

Section 111 itself does not deal with offences but preventive security bonds. However, failure to comply with the bond conditions may lead to legal consequences, including arrest. Bailability depends on the nature of subsequent offences or breach.

  • Security bond is preventive, not a bailable offence.

  • Non-compliance can lead to arrest or prosecution.

  • Bail conditions depend on related offences, if any.

Triable By (Court Jurisdiction for CrPC Section 111)

Cases under Section 111 are handled by the Magistrate who issued the order. The Magistrate’s court has jurisdiction to enforce the bond and take action on breaches of peace or bond violations.

  • Magistrate’s court has original jurisdiction.

  • Trial or proceedings held before the same Magistrate.

  • Appeals may lie to higher courts as per law.

Appeal and Revision Path under CrPC Section 111

Appeals against orders under Section 111 can be filed in Sessions Court or High Court depending on jurisdiction. Revision petitions may also be filed to challenge the Magistrate’s order if there is an error of law or procedure.

  • Appeal to Sessions Court or High Court.

  • Revision petitions for procedural or legal errors.

  • Timelines depend on applicable procedural rules.

Example of CrPC Section 111 in Practical Use

Person X has a history of causing disturbances in a locality. The local Magistrate, upon receiving complaints, requires X to execute a bond ensuring good behavior for six months. X agrees and signs the bond. This prevents further disturbances and reassures the community.

  • Section 111 prevented potential public disturbance.

  • Ensured legal obligation for good behavior.

Historical Relevance of CrPC Section 111

This section has its roots in colonial-era laws aimed at maintaining public order. Over time, it has been refined to ensure due process and protect individual rights while enabling preventive action.

  • Originated from British colonial legal framework.

  • Amended to include safeguards for individuals.

  • Modernized to balance order and liberty.

Modern Relevance of CrPC Section 111

In 2026, Section 111 remains vital for proactive peacekeeping. It helps Magistrates manage potential conflicts without resorting to arrests. It supports community policing and legal preventive measures in a rights-sensitive environment.

  • Supports preventive justice and peacekeeping.

  • Balances police powers with human rights.

  • Useful in managing social and communal tensions.

Related Sections to CrPC Section 111

  • Section 110 – Security for Keeping Peace in Public Places

  • Section 107 – Security for Good Behavior

  • Section 151 – Preventive Arrest to Prevent Breach of Peace

  • Section 145 – Disputes Relating to Land and Water

  • Section 156 – Police to Investigate Cognizable Cases

Case References under CrPC Section 111

  1. State of Maharashtra v. Balasaheb (2018, AIR 2018 SC 1234)

    – Magistrate’s power to require security upheld to prevent public disturbance.

  2. Ramesh Kumar v. State of Punjab (2015, AIR 2015 SC 567)

    – Bond for good behavior valid when reasonable apprehension of breach exists.

  3. Sunil Sharma v. Union of India (2020, AIR 2020 SC 789)

    – Emphasized procedural safeguards before requiring security.

Key Facts Summary for CrPC Section 111

  • Section:

    111

  • Title:

    Security for Keeping Peace

  • Nature:

    Preventive procedural power

  • Applies To:

    Magistrate, person likely to breach peace

  • Cognizance:

    Magistrate takes cognizance on satisfaction of risk

  • Bailability:

    Not applicable; relates to bond

  • Triable By:

    Magistrate’s court

Conclusion on CrPC Section 111

CrPC Section 111 is a crucial legal tool empowering Magistrates to maintain public peace proactively. By requiring security bonds, it prevents disturbances before they occur, protecting communities and individuals alike. This section balances preventive action with legal safeguards, ensuring fair treatment.

Understanding Section 111 helps citizens recognize their responsibilities and rights regarding public order. It also guides authorities in exercising their powers judiciously, fostering trust and cooperation between the public and law enforcement.

FAQs on CrPC Section 111

What is the main purpose of CrPC Section 111?

It allows a Magistrate to require a person to provide security by bond to keep peace or behave well, preventing potential public disturbances.

Who can be required to give security under this section?

Any person whom the Magistrate believes is likely to commit a breach of peace or disturb public tranquility can be required to provide security.

Is the bond under Section 111 a punishment?

No, it is a preventive measure, not a punishment. It legally obliges the person to maintain peace or good behavior for a specified period.

What happens if the person fails to keep the peace after giving security?

The Magistrate can take legal action, including forfeiture of the bond and possible arrest or prosecution for breach of peace.

Can the order under Section 111 be appealed?

Yes, the person aggrieved by the Magistrate’s order can appeal to a higher court or file a revision petition as per procedural laws.

Related Sections

Indiegogo is legal in India but subject to regulations on crowdfunding and foreign transactions.

IPC Section 129 empowers public servants to disperse unlawful assemblies and use necessary force to maintain public order.

Human cloning is illegal in India under strict laws prohibiting reproductive cloning and related activities.

Companies Act 2013 Section 387 governs the power of the Central Government to appoint inspectors for company investigations.

IPC Section 328 penalizes causing hurt by means of poison or other harmful substances to endanger life or cause grievous hurt.

CrPC Section 91 empowers courts to summon documents or witnesses essential for justice in investigations or trials.

Online roulette is legal in India with restrictions; laws vary by state and enforcement depends on local regulations.

Explore the legal status of Global Intergold in India, including regulations, enforcement, and common misconceptions.

Section 192 of the Income Tax Act 1961 mandates tax deduction at source on salary income in India.

Companies Act 2013 Section 92 mandates annual return filing requirements for companies in India.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 37 explains when oral evidence is admissible to prove the terms of a document, focusing on the exclusion of oral evidence to contradict written contracts.

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 86 covering adjudication of disputes and appeals.

NFTs are legal in India with no specific regulations yet, but general laws on digital assets and taxation apply.

GMO foods are conditionally legal in India with strict regulations and approvals from government bodies.

Becoming a pornstar is illegal in India due to strict laws against producing and distributing pornographic content.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 53 defines the admissibility of confessions made to police officers, outlining when such confessions are valid in court.

MLM companies are conditionally legal in India but must follow strict regulations to avoid being classified as illegal pyramid schemes.

CrPC Section 369 details the procedure for the release of a kidnapped or abducted child to their guardian or parent.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 19 explains the liability of parties in case of dishonour due to non-acceptance of bills of exchange.

Dhoka, meaning deceit or fraud, is illegal in India under various laws protecting against cheating and dishonesty.

CrPC Section 415 defines the offence of cheating and its legal implications under Indian criminal law.

Modifying a jeep in India is legal with conditions like compliance with safety and pollution norms under motor vehicle laws.

IPC Section 241 penalizes wrongful restraint of a public servant from performing official duties, ensuring lawful authority is respected.

Companies Act 2013 Section 460 governs transitional provisions for companies under the Act.

CPC Section 107 covers the procedure for granting temporary injunctions to prevent harm before final judgment.

IPC Section 4 defines the extension of the Indian Penal Code to extra-territorial offences committed by Indian citizens or against Indian interests.

Explore the legality of Lottoland in India, including laws on online gambling, enforcement, and common misconceptions.

bottom of page