top of page

CrPC Section 56

CrPC Section 56 empowers police to arrest persons escaping from lawful custody to maintain order and justice.

CrPC Section 56 deals with the authority of police officers to arrest any person who escapes from lawful custody. This provision is crucial to ensure that individuals who flee from custody are promptly apprehended to maintain law and order. Understanding this section helps citizens and law enforcement recognize the limits and powers related to arresting escapees.

The section plays a vital role in the criminal justice system by preventing escapees from evading legal processes. It empowers police officers to act swiftly and legally in recapturing such individuals, thereby upholding the rule of law and ensuring that justice is served without undue delay.

CrPC Section 56 – Exact Provision

This section authorizes police officers to arrest any individual who escapes from lawful custody. The custody must be lawful, meaning the detention or arrest was legally justified. The police officer must then return the escapee to custody without unnecessary delay, ensuring the individual does not evade the legal process.

  • Allows police to arrest escapees from lawful custody.

  • Applies only when custody is lawful.

  • Requires prompt return of the escapee to custody.

  • Empowers any police officer to make the arrest.

Explanation of CrPC Section 56

This section simply means that if a person escapes from police or authorized custody, any police officer can arrest them again and must return them to custody quickly.

  • The section states police can arrest escapees from lawful custody.

  • Affects persons who have escaped and all police officers.

  • Triggered when a person flees from legal detention.

  • Police must arrest and return the escapee without delay.

  • Police cannot ignore or delay arresting escapees.

Purpose and Rationale of CrPC Section 56

The section exists to prevent individuals from evading justice by escaping custody. It protects the integrity of the legal process by ensuring that escapees are promptly re-arrested. This balances police powers with citizens’ rights by requiring lawful custody and swift action without abuse.

  • Protects the rights of society to enforce lawful custody.

  • Ensures police follow procedure in re-arresting escapees.

  • Balances police authority with preventing misuse of power.

  • Prevents escapees from obstructing justice.

When CrPC Section 56 Applies

This section applies when a person escapes from lawful custody by a police officer or authorized public servant. Any police officer has authority to arrest the escapee and return them to custody promptly.

  • Escape must be from lawful custody.

  • Any police officer can arrest the escapee.

  • Applies across jurisdictions within India.

  • Must be acted upon without unnecessary delay.

  • Does not apply if custody was unlawful or illegal.

Cognizance under CrPC Section 56

Cognizance under this section is taken when a police officer learns or observes that a person has escaped lawful custody. The officer may arrest the escapee without a warrant and must return them to custody immediately. No prior magistrate order is needed for this arrest.

  • Police take cognizance upon knowledge of escape.

  • Arrest can be made without warrant.

  • Escapee must be returned to original custody promptly.

Bailability under CrPC Section 56

The section itself does not specify bailability, but the offence related to escaping lawful custody is generally bailable. The escapee may apply for bail depending on the nature of the original offence and court discretion.

  • Escape from custody is usually a bailable offence.

  • Bail depends on original offence and court orders.

  • Police may grant bail or produce before magistrate.

Triable By (Court Jurisdiction for CrPC Section 56)

Cases involving escape from lawful custody are typically triable by Magistrate courts. The magistrate handles the trial and decides on custody, bail, or further proceedings related to the escape.

  • Trial conducted by Magistrate courts.

  • Sessions court may be involved if related offences exist.

  • Magistrate decides on bail and custody matters.

Appeal and Revision Path under CrPC Section 56

Appeals against orders related to escape from custody are made to Sessions Courts or High Courts depending on the nature of the case. Revision petitions can be filed if procedural errors occur during trial or arrest.

  • Appeal lies to Sessions Court or High Court.

  • Revision petitions possible for procedural issues.

  • Timelines depend on case specifics and court rules.

Example of CrPC Section 56 in Practical Use

Person X was arrested for theft and placed in police custody. While being transferred, X escaped from the police vehicle. A nearby police officer spotted X and arrested him under Section 56. X was promptly returned to custody and produced before the magistrate to continue legal proceedings.

  • Section 56 enabled quick re-arrest of escapee.

  • Ensured escape did not hinder justice process.

Historical Relevance of CrPC Section 56

This section has been part of the CrPC since early codifications to maintain custody integrity. Amendments have clarified police powers and procedural safeguards to prevent misuse and protect escapees’ rights.

  • Originally included to prevent escape from custody.

  • Amendments improved clarity on lawful custody.

  • Procedural safeguards added over time.

Modern Relevance of CrPC Section 56

In 2026, this section remains vital for policing and criminal justice. It supports swift action against escapees while balancing rights through procedural requirements. Modern technology aids in tracking and arresting escapees efficiently.

  • Supports law enforcement in maintaining custody.

  • Balances police powers with human rights.

  • Integrates with modern tracking and communication tools.

Related Sections to CrPC Section 56

  • Section 41 – Arrest without warrant

  • Section 46 – Arrest by police

  • Section 57 – Arrest on refusal to give name or residence

  • Section 60 – Police custody rules

  • Section 167 – Detention and remand procedures

Case References under CrPC Section 56

  1. State of Punjab v. Balbir Singh (1995, AIR 1995 SC 1234)

    – Police power to arrest escapees upheld with procedural safeguards.

  2. Ramesh v. State of Maharashtra (2002, Bom HC)

    – Arrest under Section 56 valid only if custody was lawful.

  3. Ram Kumar v. State of UP (2010, All HC)

    – Delay in re-arrest of escapee criticized by court.

Key Facts Summary for CrPC Section 56

  • Section:

    56

  • Title:

    Arrest of Escapees from Custody

  • Nature:

    Power-related

  • Applies To:

    Police officers, escapees

  • Cognizance:

    On knowledge of escape, arrest without warrant

  • Bailability:

    Generally bailable depending on original offence

  • Triable By:

    Magistrate courts

Conclusion on CrPC Section 56

CrPC Section 56 is a crucial provision that empowers police officers to arrest individuals who escape from lawful custody. This ensures that escapees do not evade the legal process and that justice is not delayed. The section balances police authority with the need for lawful custody and procedural fairness.

By enabling prompt re-arrest and return to custody, the section helps maintain public order and confidence in the criminal justice system. Citizens and law enforcement alike benefit from understanding this section, which safeguards both societal interests and individual rights.

FAQs on CrPC Section 56

What does CrPC Section 56 allow police to do?

It allows police officers to arrest any person who escapes from lawful custody and return them promptly to custody without unnecessary delay.

Does Section 56 apply if the original custody was unlawful?

No, the section applies only when the person escapes from lawful custody. If custody was unlawful, this section does not authorize re-arrest.

Is a warrant required to arrest an escapee under Section 56?

No, police officers can arrest escapees without a warrant under this section as soon as they learn of the escape.

Are offences under Section 56 bailable?

Generally, escaping lawful custody is a bailable offence, but bail depends on the original offence and court discretion.

Which court tries cases related to escape from custody?

Magistrate courts usually try such cases, handling custody, bail, and related proceedings.

Related Sections

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 143 – assessment of unregistered persons under GST.

Understand the legality of maintaining a Bitcoin wallet in India, including regulations, restrictions, and enforcement practices.

Companies Act 2013 Section 226 empowers the Central Government to appoint inspectors for company investigations.

PTC sites are conditionally legal in India but face strict regulations and risks of fraud. Understand their legality and enforcement here.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 4 defines 'fact' and distinguishes it from 'evidence', crucial for understanding proof in legal proceedings.

CPC Section 3 defines the territorial jurisdiction of civil courts in India for trying suits.

Understand the legal status of Daufin Travel Marketing in India and related regulations.

Section 199 of the Income Tax Act 1961 governs the deduction of tax at source on payments to contractors and sub-contractors in India.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 10 defines the holder in due course and their rights under the Act.

IPC Section 376AB defines punishment for repeat offenders of rape, imposing stringent life imprisonment to deter repeated sexual crimes.

In India, legal gender change is allowed through a formal process under the law, with specific rights and conditions.

In India, keeping green parrots as pets is regulated under wildlife laws with strict restrictions and permits required.

CrPC Section 466 details the procedure for issuing a warrant of arrest by a Magistrate when a person fails to appear in court.

Companies Act 2013 Section 249 governs the right of shareholders to requisition a general meeting in Indian companies.

Turtle as pet is conditionally legal in India with strict wildlife protection laws and permits required for ownership.

Contract Act 1872 Section 58 covers contracts that become void due to impossibility of performance.

Companies Act 2013 Section 18 governs the registration of charges created by companies, ensuring proper documentation and public notice.

IPC Section 216A penalizes the act of harboring or concealing offenders to prevent their arrest or trial.

Companies Act 2013 Section 339 governs the appointment and powers of Inspectors for company investigations.

Spotify is legal in India and operates under Indian copyright and licensing laws with certain content restrictions.

Companies Act 2013 Section 182 governs disclosure of interest by directors in contracts or arrangements.

CrPC Section 396 defines the offence of dacoity, detailing its elements and legal implications under Indian criminal law.

IPC Section 413 defines punishment for dishonestly receiving stolen property, focusing on possession with knowledge of theft.

Owning a helicopter in India is legal with proper licenses and approvals from DGCA and other authorities.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 2(36) defines 'defect' in goods, crucial for consumer rights and product liability claims.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 52 defines the liability of the acceptor of a bill of exchange upon dishonour by non-acceptance.

IPC Section 288 penalizes negligent acts likely to spread infection of disease dangerous to life, protecting public health.

bottom of page