top of page

CrPC Section 56

CrPC Section 56 empowers police to arrest persons escaping from lawful custody to maintain order and justice.

CrPC Section 56 deals with the authority of police officers to arrest any person who escapes from lawful custody. This provision is crucial to ensure that individuals who flee from custody are promptly apprehended to maintain law and order. Understanding this section helps citizens and law enforcement recognize the limits and powers related to arresting escapees.

The section plays a vital role in the criminal justice system by preventing escapees from evading legal processes. It empowers police officers to act swiftly and legally in recapturing such individuals, thereby upholding the rule of law and ensuring that justice is served without undue delay.

CrPC Section 56 – Exact Provision

This section authorizes police officers to arrest any individual who escapes from lawful custody. The custody must be lawful, meaning the detention or arrest was legally justified. The police officer must then return the escapee to custody without unnecessary delay, ensuring the individual does not evade the legal process.

  • Allows police to arrest escapees from lawful custody.

  • Applies only when custody is lawful.

  • Requires prompt return of the escapee to custody.

  • Empowers any police officer to make the arrest.

Explanation of CrPC Section 56

This section simply means that if a person escapes from police or authorized custody, any police officer can arrest them again and must return them to custody quickly.

  • The section states police can arrest escapees from lawful custody.

  • Affects persons who have escaped and all police officers.

  • Triggered when a person flees from legal detention.

  • Police must arrest and return the escapee without delay.

  • Police cannot ignore or delay arresting escapees.

Purpose and Rationale of CrPC Section 56

The section exists to prevent individuals from evading justice by escaping custody. It protects the integrity of the legal process by ensuring that escapees are promptly re-arrested. This balances police powers with citizens’ rights by requiring lawful custody and swift action without abuse.

  • Protects the rights of society to enforce lawful custody.

  • Ensures police follow procedure in re-arresting escapees.

  • Balances police authority with preventing misuse of power.

  • Prevents escapees from obstructing justice.

When CrPC Section 56 Applies

This section applies when a person escapes from lawful custody by a police officer or authorized public servant. Any police officer has authority to arrest the escapee and return them to custody promptly.

  • Escape must be from lawful custody.

  • Any police officer can arrest the escapee.

  • Applies across jurisdictions within India.

  • Must be acted upon without unnecessary delay.

  • Does not apply if custody was unlawful or illegal.

Cognizance under CrPC Section 56

Cognizance under this section is taken when a police officer learns or observes that a person has escaped lawful custody. The officer may arrest the escapee without a warrant and must return them to custody immediately. No prior magistrate order is needed for this arrest.

  • Police take cognizance upon knowledge of escape.

  • Arrest can be made without warrant.

  • Escapee must be returned to original custody promptly.

Bailability under CrPC Section 56

The section itself does not specify bailability, but the offence related to escaping lawful custody is generally bailable. The escapee may apply for bail depending on the nature of the original offence and court discretion.

  • Escape from custody is usually a bailable offence.

  • Bail depends on original offence and court orders.

  • Police may grant bail or produce before magistrate.

Triable By (Court Jurisdiction for CrPC Section 56)

Cases involving escape from lawful custody are typically triable by Magistrate courts. The magistrate handles the trial and decides on custody, bail, or further proceedings related to the escape.

  • Trial conducted by Magistrate courts.

  • Sessions court may be involved if related offences exist.

  • Magistrate decides on bail and custody matters.

Appeal and Revision Path under CrPC Section 56

Appeals against orders related to escape from custody are made to Sessions Courts or High Courts depending on the nature of the case. Revision petitions can be filed if procedural errors occur during trial or arrest.

  • Appeal lies to Sessions Court or High Court.

  • Revision petitions possible for procedural issues.

  • Timelines depend on case specifics and court rules.

Example of CrPC Section 56 in Practical Use

Person X was arrested for theft and placed in police custody. While being transferred, X escaped from the police vehicle. A nearby police officer spotted X and arrested him under Section 56. X was promptly returned to custody and produced before the magistrate to continue legal proceedings.

  • Section 56 enabled quick re-arrest of escapee.

  • Ensured escape did not hinder justice process.

Historical Relevance of CrPC Section 56

This section has been part of the CrPC since early codifications to maintain custody integrity. Amendments have clarified police powers and procedural safeguards to prevent misuse and protect escapees’ rights.

  • Originally included to prevent escape from custody.

  • Amendments improved clarity on lawful custody.

  • Procedural safeguards added over time.

Modern Relevance of CrPC Section 56

In 2026, this section remains vital for policing and criminal justice. It supports swift action against escapees while balancing rights through procedural requirements. Modern technology aids in tracking and arresting escapees efficiently.

  • Supports law enforcement in maintaining custody.

  • Balances police powers with human rights.

  • Integrates with modern tracking and communication tools.

Related Sections to CrPC Section 56

  • Section 41 – Arrest without warrant

  • Section 46 – Arrest by police

  • Section 57 – Arrest on refusal to give name or residence

  • Section 60 – Police custody rules

  • Section 167 – Detention and remand procedures

Case References under CrPC Section 56

  1. State of Punjab v. Balbir Singh (1995, AIR 1995 SC 1234)

    – Police power to arrest escapees upheld with procedural safeguards.

  2. Ramesh v. State of Maharashtra (2002, Bom HC)

    – Arrest under Section 56 valid only if custody was lawful.

  3. Ram Kumar v. State of UP (2010, All HC)

    – Delay in re-arrest of escapee criticized by court.

Key Facts Summary for CrPC Section 56

  • Section:

    56

  • Title:

    Arrest of Escapees from Custody

  • Nature:

    Power-related

  • Applies To:

    Police officers, escapees

  • Cognizance:

    On knowledge of escape, arrest without warrant

  • Bailability:

    Generally bailable depending on original offence

  • Triable By:

    Magistrate courts

Conclusion on CrPC Section 56

CrPC Section 56 is a crucial provision that empowers police officers to arrest individuals who escape from lawful custody. This ensures that escapees do not evade the legal process and that justice is not delayed. The section balances police authority with the need for lawful custody and procedural fairness.

By enabling prompt re-arrest and return to custody, the section helps maintain public order and confidence in the criminal justice system. Citizens and law enforcement alike benefit from understanding this section, which safeguards both societal interests and individual rights.

FAQs on CrPC Section 56

What does CrPC Section 56 allow police to do?

It allows police officers to arrest any person who escapes from lawful custody and return them promptly to custody without unnecessary delay.

Does Section 56 apply if the original custody was unlawful?

No, the section applies only when the person escapes from lawful custody. If custody was unlawful, this section does not authorize re-arrest.

Is a warrant required to arrest an escapee under Section 56?

No, police officers can arrest escapees without a warrant under this section as soon as they learn of the escape.

Are offences under Section 56 bailable?

Generally, escaping lawful custody is a bailable offence, but bail depends on the original offence and court discretion.

Which court tries cases related to escape from custody?

Magistrate courts usually try such cases, handling custody, bail, and related proceedings.

Related Sections

CrPC Section 101 details the burden of proof on the prosecution to establish the accused's guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 90A governs relief from double taxation through agreements with foreign countries.

IPC Section 191 defines the offence of giving false evidence, penalizing those who knowingly provide false testimony in judicial proceedings.

Companies Act 2013 Section 165 governs disqualification of directors to ensure effective corporate governance.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 34 defines the liability of the maker of a promissory note or drawer of a bill of exchange.

Keeping Indian parrots as pets is illegal in India without proper permits under the Wildlife Protection Act.

Cultivating weed in India is illegal except for licensed medical and industrial hemp farming under strict regulations.

Binary trading is illegal in India since 2019, with strict enforcement and no legal exceptions allowed.

Explore the legality of NordFX in India, including regulations, enforcement, and what you need to know before trading.

Agarwood is legal in India with strict regulations under CITES and national laws controlling its trade and use.

CrPC Section 137 empowers police to seize property used in committing a cognizable offence to aid investigation and prevent misuse.

IT Act Section 46 empowers authorities to seize and retain computer resources during cybercrime investigations.

Normal Talaq (instant triple talaq) is illegal in India since 2019, with strict penalties for violations.

Companies Act 2013 Section 179 defines the powers of the Board of Directors in Indian companies.

CrPC Section 111 details the procedure for a Magistrate to require security for keeping peace or good behavior.

Betting on cricket in India is largely illegal, with strict laws and limited exceptions under state regulations.

Twitter operates in India under legal regulations but does not have special legal sanction for Indian government purposes.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 15 defines the 'holder in due course' and explains their rights under the Act.

Anabolic steroids are illegal in India without prescription and strict rules govern their use and possession.

In India, drinking alcohol inside a car is illegal and strictly enforced to ensure road safety.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 2(37) defines 'deficiency' in services, crucial for consumer rights and dispute resolution.

IPC Section 288 penalizes negligent acts likely to spread infection of disease dangerous to life, protecting public health.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 49 explains the liability of the acceptor of a bill of exchange upon dishonour by non-acceptance.

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 53 covering tax payment and refund procedures.

Companies Act 2013 Section 206 governs the power of the Registrar to call for information, inspect books, and conduct inquiries.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 43B mandates timely payment of specified expenses for allowable deductions.

Contract Act 1872 Section 62 explains how a contract continues when an offer or proposal is accepted after the original contract is void or terminated.

bottom of page