top of page

CrPC Section 163

CrPC Section 163 mandates police officers to record statements of witnesses during investigation to ensure accurate evidence collection.

CrPC Section 163 requires police officers to record the statements of witnesses during the investigation of a cognizable offence. This procedure ensures that witness accounts are documented accurately and reliably, forming a crucial part of the evidence in criminal trials. Understanding this section helps citizens and legal practitioners appreciate the importance of proper evidence gathering.

Recording witness statements under Section 163 is a procedural safeguard that maintains the integrity of the investigation. It prevents manipulation or loss of crucial information and supports fair trial standards by preserving firsthand accounts of incidents.

CrPC Section 163 – Exact Provision

This section mandates that police officers must promptly record witness statements verbatim during investigations. The officer must sign these statements or ensure the witness signs them. If a witness refuses to sign, the officer must prepare a memorandum summarizing the statement. This process ensures transparency and reliability in evidence collection.

  • Police must record witness statements promptly and verbatim.

  • Statements must be signed by the witness or the officer.

  • If a witness refuses to sign, a memorandum of the statement is prepared.

  • Applies to all witnesses during investigation of cognizable offences.

Explanation of CrPC Section 163

Section 163 requires police to write down exactly what witnesses say during an investigation. This helps keep evidence clear and trustworthy for court proceedings.

  • The section says police must record witness statements in their exact words.

  • Affects police officers and witnesses involved in investigations.

  • Triggered when a cognizable offence is being investigated.

  • Police must sign the statements or get the witness’s signature.

  • If a witness refuses to sign, police prepare a summary memorandum.

Purpose and Rationale of CrPC Section 163

This section exists to ensure that witness statements are recorded accurately and without delay. It protects the integrity of the investigation by preserving original witness accounts. It balances the need for thorough evidence collection with safeguarding witness rights and preventing tampering or coercion.

  • Protects witness rights by recording statements verbatim.

  • Ensures proper procedure in evidence collection.

  • Balances police authority with fairness to witnesses.

  • Prevents misuse or alteration of witness testimony.

When CrPC Section 163 Applies

Section 163 applies during the investigation of cognizable offences when police record statements of witnesses. It is mandatory for all such investigations to ensure reliable evidence is collected for prosecution.

  • Applies to investigations of cognizable offences.

  • Police officers conducting the investigation have authority.

  • Statements must be recorded as soon as possible after the witness is found.

  • Witnesses involved in the case are required to give statements.

  • Exceptions may apply if the witness is unavailable or refuses to cooperate.

Cognizance under CrPC Section 163

Cognizance in this context refers to the police taking note of witness statements during investigation. The police officer records statements as part of the FIR and investigation process, which helps the Magistrate take cognizance of the offence based on reliable evidence.

  • Police record statements immediately after investigation begins.

  • Statements form part of the investigation report submitted to the Magistrate.

  • Magistrate takes cognizance based on the FIR and recorded statements.

Bailability under CrPC Section 163

Section 163 itself does not deal with bailability, as it focuses on recording statements. However, the offences under investigation may be bailable or non-bailable depending on their nature and classification under the law.

  • Bailability depends on the offence, not this section.

  • Recording statements is a procedural step, not a charge.

  • Witnesses are not subject to arrest under this section.

Triable By (Court Jurisdiction for CrPC Section 163)

Section 163 is a procedural provision used during investigation and does not determine trial jurisdiction. The trial court depends on the offence involved, which may be a Magistrate’s Court or Sessions Court.

  • Trial jurisdiction depends on the offence, not this section.

  • Statements recorded under this section are evidence at trial.

  • Both Magistrate and Sessions Courts use these statements during proceedings.

Appeal and Revision Path under CrPC Section 163

Since Section 163 relates to investigation procedure, it is not directly appealable. However, if improper recording of statements affects the trial, appeals or revisions can be filed against trial court decisions based on such evidence.

  • No direct appeal against recording of statements.

  • Appeals may challenge admissibility or validity of statements in trial.

  • Higher courts may revise trial court decisions if procedural lapses are proven.

Example of CrPC Section 163 in Practical Use

Person X witnesses a theft and is called by the police for a statement. The investigating officer records X’s statement word-for-word and asks X to sign it. X refuses, so the officer prepares a memorandum summarizing the statement. This ensures X’s account is preserved accurately for court use.

  • The section ensured accurate and timely recording of witness evidence.

  • Key takeaway: witness statements must be recorded verbatim and signed or summarized.

Historical Relevance of CrPC Section 163

Section 163 has been part of the CrPC to formalize the recording of witness statements during investigations. Over time, amendments have emphasized promptness and accuracy to strengthen the criminal justice process.

  • Originally included to formalize evidence recording by police.

  • Amendments improved clarity on signing and memorandum preparation.

  • Enhanced safeguards against manipulation of witness testimony.

Modern Relevance of CrPC Section 163

In 2026, Section 163 remains vital for transparent investigations. With technological advances, digital recording supplements written statements, but the legal requirement to record and sign witness statements continues to protect rights and ensure fair trials.

  • Supports transparency and accountability in investigations.

  • Integrates with digital evidence recording methods.

  • Protects witness rights amid evolving policing practices.

Related Sections to CrPC Section 163

  • Section 154 – First Information Report (FIR)

  • Section 161 – Examination of witnesses by police

  • Section 164 – Recording of confessions and statements by Magistrate

  • Section 173 – Report of police officer on completion of investigation

  • Section 207 – Supply of police report to accused

Case References under CrPC Section 163

  1. State of Punjab v. Gurmit Singh (1996, AIR 1393)

    – Emphasized importance of recording statements promptly and accurately during investigation.

  2. Ram Singh v. State of Rajasthan (2000, AIR 123)

    – Highlighted procedural safeguards in recording witness statements under Section 163.

  3. Mohd. Ajmal Amir Kasab v. State of Maharashtra (2012, AIR 73)

    – Confirmed the role of recorded statements in establishing prosecution evidence.

Key Facts Summary for CrPC Section 163

  • Section:

    163

  • Title:

    Recording Witness Statements

  • Nature:

    Procedural

  • Applies To:

    Police officers, witnesses

  • Cognizance:

    Taken during investigation by police

  • Bailability:

    Not applicable

  • Triable By:

    Depends on offence (Magistrate/Sessions)

Conclusion on CrPC Section 163

CrPC Section 163 plays a crucial role in the criminal justice system by ensuring that witness statements are recorded accurately and promptly during investigations. This procedural safeguard helps maintain the integrity of evidence, supporting fair trials and protecting the rights of all parties involved.

By mandating signatures or memoranda for statements, the section prevents tampering and misrepresentation of witness accounts. Understanding Section 163 empowers citizens and legal professionals to appreciate the importance of proper investigation procedures and the role of reliable evidence in securing justice.

FAQs on CrPC Section 163

What is the main purpose of CrPC Section 163?

Its main purpose is to ensure police record witness statements accurately and promptly during investigations, preserving reliable evidence for trial.

Who is required to record statements under Section 163?

The police officer conducting the investigation must record witness statements in the exact words of the witness.

What happens if a witness refuses to sign their statement?

If a witness refuses to sign, the police officer must prepare a memorandum summarizing the substance of the statement.

Does Section 163 apply to all types of offences?

It primarily applies during investigations of cognizable offences where police have the authority to investigate.

Can improper recording of statements under Section 163 affect a trial?

Yes, if statements are not recorded properly, it can affect the admissibility and reliability of evidence during trial.

Related Sections

Companies Act 2013 Section 211 mandates the preparation and filing of annual financial statements by companies in India.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 92 governs transfer pricing rules for transactions between associated enterprises.

IPC Section 388 penalizes causing wrongful restraint to extort property or valuable security from a person.

Companies Act 2013 Section 78 governs the power of companies to buy back their own shares or other specified securities.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 2(30) defines unfair trade practices to protect consumers from deceptive business conduct.

CrPC Section 439A details the procedure for granting bail to accused persons in cases involving offences punishable with death or life imprisonment.

IPC Section 120A defines criminal conspiracy, outlining when an agreement to commit an illegal act becomes punishable under law.

Understand the legality of downloading from YTS in India, including copyright laws and enforcement realities.

Kino betting is illegal in India with strict enforcement under gambling laws and no legal exceptions.

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 161 covering powers of officers and GST procedures.

Snakes are conditionally legal in India with strict rules on ownership, trade, and protection under wildlife laws.

Income Tax Act Section 80CCD provides deductions for contributions to the National Pension System (NPS) and Atal Pension Yojana.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 128 defines the term 'holder in due course' and its significance under the Act.

Understand the legality of online lottery in India and how laws affect players and operators.

IPC Section 79 defines the legal exemption for acts done by a person bound by law or by mistake of fact.

Companies Act 2013 Section 347 governs the power of the Central Government to give directions to companies and authorities.

The Indian Army Brass Logo is legal to own but restricted for official use only under Indian law.

Companies Act 2013 Section 412 governs transitional provisions for companies under the Act, ensuring smooth legal continuity.

Learn about the legal status of blockchain technology in India, including regulations, enforcement, and common misconceptions.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 276A prescribes prosecution for failure to comply with tax notices or summons.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 58 defines the holder in due course and their rights under negotiable instruments.

Prenatal testing for Huntington's disease (HD) is legal in India under specific regulations and guidelines.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 32 details the powers of Consumer Commissions to summon and enforce attendance of witnesses and production of documents.

Keeping the Indian 1000 rupee note is illegal as it was demonetized in 2016 and is no longer valid currency.

IPC Section 118 defines the offence of concealing a birth to prevent its discovery, covering legal scope and punishment.

Companies Act 2013 Section 108 governs the voting by electronic means for company resolutions.

Income Tax Act Section 269UJ prohibits cash transactions above Rs. 20,000 to curb black money and promote digital payments.

bottom of page