top of page

CrPC Section 214

CrPC Section 214 mandates the police to produce the accused before a Magistrate promptly after arrest, ensuring legal custody and judicial oversight.

CrPC Section 214 requires that when a person is arrested by the police, they must be produced before a Magistrate without unnecessary delay. This provision ensures judicial supervision over the detention of the accused, preventing unlawful or prolonged custody. Understanding this section is crucial for protecting individual liberty and upholding the rule of law in criminal procedures.

This section plays a vital role in the criminal justice system by mandating timely presentation of the accused, thereby safeguarding against illegal detention and misuse of police powers. It also facilitates early judicial intervention, which is essential for fair trial rights.

CrPC Section 214 – Exact Provision

This section clearly states the duty of the arresting officer to bring the arrested individual before the appropriate Magistrate promptly. The phrase "without unnecessary delay" emphasizes that the police cannot hold the accused arbitrarily or for extended periods without judicial oversight. This ensures that the accused's rights are protected and that the Magistrate can decide on further custody or bail.

  • Mandates prompt production of arrested persons before Magistrate.

  • Prevents unlawful or prolonged police custody.

  • Ensures judicial supervision of detention.

  • Applies to all arrests made by police or other authorized persons.

  • Supports protection of individual liberty and fair trial rights.

Explanation of CrPC Section 214

Simply put, this section means that once someone is arrested, the police must take them to a Magistrate quickly. It stops the police from keeping a person locked up without permission from the court.

  • The section says arrested persons must be produced before a Magistrate without delay.

  • It affects the arrested individual and the arresting officer.

  • The trigger is the act of arrest by police or authorized persons.

  • The police must bring the accused to the Magistrate promptly.

  • Holding the accused beyond reasonable time without Magistrate’s order is prohibited.

Purpose and Rationale of CrPC Section 214

This section exists to protect the fundamental rights of arrested persons by ensuring they are not detained unlawfully. It balances police powers with judicial oversight, preventing misuse of authority and arbitrary detention. Early Magistrate intervention helps uphold the rule of law and fair treatment in criminal justice.

  • Protects arrested persons’ rights against illegal detention.

  • Ensures proper legal procedure is followed after arrest.

  • Balances police authority with judicial supervision.

  • Prevents abuse or misuse of police custody.

When CrPC Section 214 Applies

This section applies immediately after any lawful arrest by police or authorized persons. It requires the arrested person to be produced before the Magistrate having jurisdiction over the case without unnecessary delay.

  • Applies upon arrest of any person by police or authorized individuals.

  • Arresting officer has authority to produce accused before Magistrate.

  • Magistrate must have jurisdiction over the offence/location.

  • Time limit: without unnecessary delay, typically within 24 hours.

  • Exceptions only in extraordinary circumstances with valid reasons.

Cognizance under CrPC Section 214

Cognizance is taken by the Magistrate when the arrested person is produced before them. The Magistrate reviews the legality of the arrest and detention, and decides whether to remand the accused to police custody, judicial custody, or grant bail. This step is crucial for judicial control over the detention process.

  • Police produce arrested person before Magistrate promptly.

  • Magistrate examines the grounds of arrest and detention.

  • Magistrate orders remand, bail, or release as per law.

Bailability under CrPC Section 214

Section 214 itself does not specify bailability but facilitates judicial determination of bail. Once produced, the Magistrate decides if the offence is bailable or non-bailable and grants bail accordingly. This ensures the accused’s right to bail is considered early in the process.

  • Bail decision is made by Magistrate upon production of accused.

  • Bail conditions depend on nature of offence and circumstances.

  • Accused can apply for bail immediately after arrest.

Triable By (Court Jurisdiction for CrPC Section 214)

The Magistrate before whom the accused is produced under Section 214 is typically the one with jurisdiction over the area where the offence occurred. This Magistrate handles initial custody decisions and may conduct trial if empowered, or commit the case to a higher court if necessary.

  • Initial production before Magistrate with territorial jurisdiction.

  • Magistrate conducts custody and bail hearings.

  • Trial may be conducted by Magistrate or Sessions Court depending on offence.

Appeal and Revision Path under CrPC Section 214

Decisions made by the Magistrate regarding custody or bail under Section 214 can be appealed or revised. The accused or prosecution may approach higher courts such as Sessions Court or High Court for revision or appeal against Magistrate’s orders within prescribed timelines.

  • Appeal lies to Sessions Court or High Court depending on order.

  • Revision petitions can be filed against Magistrate’s decisions.

  • Timelines for appeal or revision are governed by CrPC and court rules.

Example of CrPC Section 214 in Practical Use

Person X is arrested by police on suspicion of theft. Under Section 214, the police must take X to the Magistrate without delay. The Magistrate examines the arrest’s legality and decides whether X should be kept in custody or released on bail. This process ensures X’s rights are protected from unlawful detention.

  • Section 214 ensured prompt judicial oversight of X’s arrest.

  • Key takeaway: prevents police from holding X indefinitely without court approval.

Historical Relevance of CrPC Section 214

Section 214 has roots in colonial-era laws designed to prevent arbitrary detention by authorities. Over time, it has been refined to strengthen judicial control over arrests and custody. Amendments have emphasized timely production and protection of personal liberty.

  • Originated to curb unlawful detention during British rule.

  • Amendments have clarified "without unnecessary delay" standards.

  • Reinforced judicial oversight in criminal procedure reforms.

Modern Relevance of CrPC Section 214

In 2026, Section 214 remains vital for protecting human rights amid evolving policing practices. It ensures that technological advances or procedural changes do not erode the fundamental right to prompt judicial review after arrest. Courts continue to uphold this provision strictly to prevent custodial abuses.

  • Supports rights-based policing and accountability.

  • Ensures compliance with constitutional protections.

  • Adapts to modern challenges in criminal justice administration.

Related Sections to CrPC Section 214

  • Section 41 – Arrest without warrant conditions

  • Section 167 – Procedure when investigation cannot be completed in 24 hours

  • Section 437 – Bail of accused in bailable and non-bailable offences

  • Section 438 – Anticipatory bail

  • Section 209 – Commitment of case to Sessions Court

Case References under CrPC Section 214

  1. Hussainara Khatoon v. State of Bihar (1979 AIR 1369)

    – Emphasized the right to be produced before Magistrate promptly to prevent unlawful detention.

  2. Joginder Kumar v. State of UP (1994 AIR 1349)

    – Laid down guidelines for arrest and production before Magistrate under Section 214.

  3. DK Basu v. State of West Bengal (1997 AIR 610)

    – Highlighted safeguards against custodial torture, including prompt production under Section 214.

Key Facts Summary for CrPC Section 214

  • Section:

    214

  • Title:

    Production of Accused Before Magistrate

  • Nature:

    Procedural

  • Applies To:

    Police, Magistrate, Accused

  • Cognizance:

    Taken when accused is produced before Magistrate

  • Bailability:

    Determined by Magistrate upon production

  • Triable By:

    Magistrate with jurisdiction

Conclusion on CrPC Section 214

CrPC Section 214 is a cornerstone of criminal procedure that safeguards individual liberty by ensuring that no person arrested is kept in custody without prompt judicial oversight. It compels the police to produce the accused before a Magistrate quickly, preventing unlawful or prolonged detention.

This section upholds the balance between effective law enforcement and protection of citizens’ rights. Its strict enforcement is essential for maintaining public confidence in the justice system and preventing custodial abuses in India’s criminal justice process.

FAQs on CrPC Section 214

What does CrPC Section 214 require from the police after arrest?

It requires the police to produce the arrested person before a Magistrate without unnecessary delay, ensuring judicial supervision over detention.

Who is responsible for producing the accused before the Magistrate?

The officer or person who makes the arrest must take or send the arrested individual to the Magistrate having jurisdiction.

What is the typical time limit to produce the accused under Section 214?

The accused should be produced before the Magistrate within 24 hours of arrest, excluding travel time, to avoid illegal detention.

Does Section 214 decide if the accused gets bail?

No, Section 214 mandates production before the Magistrate, who then decides on bail based on the offence and circumstances.

What happens if the police fail to produce the accused promptly?

Failure to produce the accused promptly can lead to violation of fundamental rights and may result in legal consequences for unlawful detention.

Related Sections

Companies Act 2013 Section 398 deals with the procedure for investigation into company affairs by the Registrar or other authorities.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 95 defines 'business connection' for non-resident taxation purposes.

Section 194L of the Income Tax Act 1961 mandates tax deduction at source on income from units of specified mutual funds in India.

Blockchain-based smart contracts are conditionally legal in India with evolving regulations and certain legal challenges.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 245BB details the procedure for recovery of tax deducted at source (TDS) from deductors.

Learn if charity trusts in India can legally handle legal cases and understand their role and limitations in legal matters.

CrPC Section 146 details the procedure for handling unlawful assembly and dispersal by magistrates.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 2(25) defines 'defect' in goods, crucial for consumer rights and product liability claims.

CrPC Section 407 details the procedure for transferring a case from one criminal court to another for trial or disposal.

IPC Section 434 defines the offence of mischief by fire or explosive substance with intent to cause damage to property.

Cross currency trading in India is legal with RBI approval, regulated under FEMA, and subject to strict compliance and restrictions.

Income Tax Act Section 271AAB imposes penalty for concealment of income during search and seizure operations.

Companies Act 2013 Section 139 governs the appointment of auditors and their tenure in Indian companies.

Yukon Gold Casino is not legally accessible in India; online gambling laws restrict such foreign platforms.

Teleconsultation is legal in India with guidelines under the Telemedicine Practice and IT Acts, allowing remote medical advice with certain conditions.

Sandalwood farming is legal in India with regulations; private cultivation requires licenses and adherence to state laws.

Section 196A of the Income Tax Act 1961 governs TDS on payments to non-resident sportsmen and sports associations in India.

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 114 covering powers of inspection, search, and seizure.

Companies Act 2013 Section 133 mandates the preparation and filing of financial statements by companies in India.

Understand the current legal status of cow slaughter in India, including laws, exceptions, and enforcement realities.

Brass knuckles are illegal in India under arms laws and can lead to serious penalties if possessed or used.

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 104 covering appeals to the Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling.

Understand the legal status of Otakustream in India and its implications for users accessing anime content online.

Playing bingo is legal in India with specific state regulations and licensing requirements.

In India, using slang is legal with no restrictions, but context and intent matter for any legal issues.

IPC Section 390 defines robbery, detailing the use of force or intimidation to commit theft, highlighting its serious criminal nature.

CrPC Section 390 details the procedure for appeals from convictions by Magistrates to Sessions Courts.

bottom of page