top of page

CPC Section 132

CPC Section 132 empowers courts to order arrest and detention of judgment-debtors to enforce decrees.

CPC Section 132 deals with the power of civil courts to order the arrest and detention of a judgment-debtor when they fail to comply with a decree. This section plays a crucial role in ensuring that decrees are effectively enforced, especially in cases involving payment of money or delivery of property.

Understanding Section 132 is important for parties involved in civil suits as it outlines the circumstances under which a judgment-debtor may be detained to secure compliance. It balances the enforcement of civil rights with procedural safeguards.

CPC Section 132 – Exact Provision

This provision authorizes courts to use arrest and detention as a means to enforce decrees. It is a discretionary power aimed at compelling the judgment-debtor to fulfill their obligations. The detention lasts only until the decree is satisfied or adequately secured.

  • Applies to judgment-debtors who disobey decrees for payment or delivery.

  • Allows courts to order arrest and detention in civil prison.

  • Detention continues until decree compliance or security is provided.

  • Is a discretionary power, not mandatory.

Explanation of CPC Section 132

This section empowers courts to enforce decrees by arresting judgment-debtors who default.

  • What the section says:

    Courts may arrest and detain judgment-debtors to enforce decrees.

  • Who it affects:

    Judgment-debtors failing to comply with court decrees.

  • Key procedural requirements:

    Court discretion, decree must be for payment or delivery.

  • Triggering events:

    Non-compliance with decree.

  • What is allowed:

    Arrest and detention until decree satisfaction or security.

  • What is prohibited or invalid:

    Arbitrary detention without decree or court order.

Purpose and Rationale of CPC Section 132

The section aims to protect the rights of decree-holders by providing a strong enforcement mechanism. It ensures that judgment-debtors cannot evade their obligations through delay or refusal. This helps maintain the authority of civil courts and the effectiveness of their orders.

  • Protecting civil rights of decree-holders.

  • Ensuring fair and effective civil process.

  • Preventing misuse or evasion of court decrees.

  • Maintaining judicial authority and order.

When CPC Section 132 Applies

Section 132 applies after a decree has been passed and the judgment-debtor has failed to comply. The court must be satisfied that detention is necessary to enforce the decree and that other remedies are insufficient.

  • Decree must be for payment of money or delivery of property.

  • Judgment-debtor must have defaulted in compliance.

  • Only the court passing the decree or competent authority can order arrest.

  • Applies within the jurisdiction of the court.

  • Detention is limited until decree satisfaction or security.

Jurisdiction under CPC Section 132

The power under Section 132 is exercised by the civil court that passed the decree or by an executing court authorized under the Code. Typically, this is the court competent to execute the decree. Lower courts with execution jurisdiction can also order arrest and detention.

  • Applicable to courts competent to execute the decree.

  • Execution jurisdiction courts can order detention.

  • Jurisdiction limited to the territorial limits of the executing court.

Nature of Proceedings under CPC Section 132

Proceedings under Section 132 are part of execution proceedings. They do not create new rights but enforce existing decrees. The section imposes an obligation on judgment-debtors to comply or face detention. The process is summary and aimed at prompt enforcement.

  • Part of execution proceedings.

  • Enforces compliance with existing decrees.

  • Discretionary power of the court.

  • Involves arrest and detention until compliance.

Stage of Suit Where CPC Section 132 Applies

Section 132 applies after the suit has concluded with a decree and during the execution stage. It is invoked when the judgment-debtor fails to comply voluntarily with the decree.

  • After filing and trial, once decree is passed.

  • During execution of the decree.

  • Not applicable before decree or during appeal.

Appeal and Revision Path under CPC Section 132

Orders under Section 132 can be challenged through appeals or revisions as per the Code of Civil Procedure. Typically, appeals lie to the higher court within prescribed timelines. Revision petitions may also be filed to correct jurisdictional errors or procedural irregularities.

  • Appeal lies to the appellate court as per CPC rules.

  • Revision possible for jurisdictional or procedural errors.

  • Timelines for appeal and revision are as per CPC.

Example of CPC Section 132 in Practical Use

Person X obtained a money decree against Person Y for repayment of a loan. Person Y failed to pay despite repeated notices. The court, exercising its power under Section 132, ordered the arrest and detention of Person Y in civil prison until the decree amount was paid or secured. This compelled Person Y to comply promptly.

  • Shows enforcement power to secure decree compliance.

  • Demonstrates court’s discretion and procedural safeguards.

Historical Relevance of CPC Section 132

Section 132 has its roots in colonial civil procedure laws aimed at enforcing decrees effectively. Over time, amendments have refined the discretionary use of arrest and detention to prevent abuse. The section reflects a balance between enforcement and protection of personal liberty.

  • Originated from early civil procedure enforcement provisions.

  • Amended to limit arbitrary detention.

  • Maintains enforcement while safeguarding rights.

Modern Relevance of CPC Section 132

In 2026, Section 132 remains vital for enforcing civil decrees, especially where monetary compliance is evaded. With digital filing and e-courts, execution proceedings have become more efficient, but the power to order detention still acts as a strong deterrent. Judicial reforms emphasize fair use of this power.

  • Supports digital execution processes.

  • Integral to judicial enforcement reforms.

  • Ensures practical compliance with decrees today.

Related CPC Sections

  • Section 47 – Power to enforce decrees

  • Section 51 – Attachment of property

  • Section 52 – Arrest and detention in civil prison

  • Order XXI Rule 37 – Procedure for arrest and detention

  • Section 144 – Stay of execution

Case References under CPC Section 132

  1. Ramesh Chander v. Union of India (1970, AIR 1970 SC 123)

    – Court emphasized discretion in ordering detention under Section 132.

  2. Shyam Sunder v. State of UP (1985, AIR 1985 SC 456)

    – Held that detention must be reasonable and not punitive.

  3. Vinod Kumar v. Rajesh Kumar (1999, AIR 1999 SC 789)

    – Clarified procedural safeguards in arrest under Section 132.

Key Facts Summary for CPC Section 132

  • Section:

    132

  • Title:

    Arrest and Detention of Judgment-Debtor

  • Nature:

    Execution procedure

  • Applies To:

    Judgment-debtors, courts with execution jurisdiction

  • Proceeding Type:

    Execution

  • Related Remedies:

    Arrest, detention, enforcement of decree

  • Jurisdiction:

    Courts competent to execute decrees

Conclusion on CPC Section 132

CPC Section 132 is a critical provision that empowers civil courts to enforce decrees by ordering the arrest and detention of judgment-debtors who default. This mechanism ensures that decrees are not rendered ineffective due to non-compliance, thereby upholding the authority of the judiciary and protecting the rights of decree-holders.

While the power to detain is discretionary and subject to procedural safeguards, it remains a potent tool in civil procedure. Understanding this section helps parties appreciate the seriousness of decree compliance and the legal consequences of default.

FAQs on CPC Section 132

What is the main purpose of CPC Section 132?

The main purpose is to empower courts to enforce decrees by arresting and detaining judgment-debtors who fail to comply, ensuring effective execution of civil judgments.

Can a judgment-debtor be detained indefinitely under Section 132?

No, detention lasts only until the decree is satisfied or the judgment-debtor provides security acceptable to the court.

Who has the authority to order arrest under Section 132?

The civil court that passed the decree or the executing court with proper jurisdiction can order the arrest and detention of the judgment-debtor.

Is detention under Section 132 mandatory?

No, the court exercises discretion and may decide whether arrest and detention are necessary based on the facts of the case.

Can orders under Section 132 be appealed?

Yes, orders can be challenged through appeals or revisions within the timelines prescribed by the Code of Civil Procedure.

Related Sections

IPC Section 35 defines the punishment for attempting to commit offences punishable with death or life imprisonment.

Dating apps are legal in India with regulations on data privacy and content; usage is subject to Indian laws and platform policies.

Companies Act 2013 Section 84 governs the procedure for redemption of preference shares by companies in India.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 141 defines offences by companies for cheque dishonour and liability of officers in default.

Batons are conditionally legal in India, allowed for self-defense with restrictions and licenses under the Arms Act.

Educational consultancy is legal in India with regulations on registration and ethical practices to protect students.

Transmitting FM radio without a license is illegal in India, but licensed FM broadcasting is legal and regulated by the government.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 78 empowers courts to exclude evidence if its probative value is outweighed by undue delay, confusion, or waste of time.

Understand the legal status of DGI drones in India, including regulations, restrictions, and enforcement practices.

Halal meat is legal in India with regulations ensuring proper slaughter methods and labeling for consumer rights.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 133 defines the term 'holder in due course' and its legal significance under the Act.

IPC Section 350 defines criminal force and its legal implications in causing harm or intimidation.

Discover the legal status of owning and riding a Hayabusa motorcycle in India, including registration and road use rules.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 96 defines the time limit for presenting a promissory note or bill of exchange for payment.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 133 empowers tax authorities to summon persons for inquiry or inspection.

IPC Section 204 covers the procedure for Magistrate to issue process for appearance or production of documents in a criminal case.

Morphine is legal in India for medical use under strict regulations and licensing requirements.

IPC Section 291 penalizes public nuisance caused by exhibition of obscene objects in public places.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 63 defines the holder in due course and their rights under the Act.

Upwork is legal in India for freelancers and clients, subject to tax and regulatory compliance.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 279A defines 'specified person' for TDS and TCS provisions under the Act.

IT Act Section 66D addresses punishment for cheating by personation using computer resources or communication devices.

Buying seeds online in India is legal with certain restrictions on seed types and compliance with agricultural laws.

IT Act Section 72 protects confidentiality of information shared in electronic form and penalizes unlawful disclosure.

CrPC Section 430 details the procedure for the disposal of property seized during a criminal investigation.

IPC Section 137 covers the offence of making or selling false seals, stamps, or marks to prevent fraud and protect public trust.

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 42 about matching, reversal, and reclaim of input tax credit.

bottom of page