top of page

IPC Section 478

IPC Section 478 addresses the offence of counterfeiting a seal or mark used for official purposes, ensuring authenticity and trust in official documents.

IPC Section 478 deals with the offence of counterfeiting a seal or mark that is used for official purposes. This section is crucial because official seals and marks authenticate documents and actions by authorities. Counterfeiting such seals undermines trust in legal and administrative processes and can lead to serious consequences.

Understanding IPC Section 478 helps protect the integrity of official documents and prevents fraud involving government or institutional seals. It ensures that any misuse or forgery of official marks is punishable under law.

IPC Section 478 – Exact Provision

This section criminalizes the act of creating or using a fake seal or mark that is meant to represent official authority. The law targets anyone who knowingly produces or uses such counterfeit seals to deceive others. The punishment can be imprisonment up to seven years along with a fine.

  • Focuses on counterfeiting official seals or marks.

  • Requires knowledge that the seal or mark is counterfeit.

  • Punishable with imprisonment up to seven years and fine.

  • Protects authenticity of official documents and authority.

Purpose of IPC Section 478

The main legal objective of IPC Section 478 is to safeguard the authenticity and reliability of official seals and marks. These seals are symbols of authority and trust, used in government and legal documents. Counterfeiting them can lead to fraud, misrepresentation, and harm to public administration.

  • Prevent forgery of official seals to maintain trust.

  • Protect government and institutional authority.

  • Deter fraudulent activities involving official documents.

Cognizance under IPC Section 478

Cognizance of offences under Section 478 is generally taken by courts when a complaint or report is filed by an authorized person or agency. Since it involves official seals, the investigation is usually initiated by government authorities.

  • Courts take cognizance upon complaint by authorized officials.

  • Investigation often conducted by police or government agencies.

  • Offence is cognizable due to its serious nature.

Bail under IPC Section 478

Offences under IPC Section 478 are non-bailable due to the gravity of counterfeiting official seals. The courts consider the impact on public trust and the potential for misuse before granting bail.

  • Bail is not a matter of right and depends on court discretion.

  • Courts assess the risk of tampering with evidence or repeating offence.

  • Accused may be granted bail under special circumstances.

Triable By (Which Court Has Jurisdiction?)

Cases under IPC Section 478 are triable by Sessions Courts because the offence is serious and punishable with imprisonment exceeding three years. Magistrate courts may conduct preliminary inquiries but the trial is held in Sessions Court.

  • Sessions Court tries the offence due to severity.

  • Magistrate courts handle initial investigation and remand.

  • High Courts may hear appeals against Sessions Court judgments.

Example of IPC Section 478 in Use

Suppose an individual creates a fake seal resembling that of a government department and uses it to authorize fraudulent documents for financial gain. Upon discovery, the police arrest the person under IPC Section 478. The court finds that the seal was knowingly counterfeited and used to deceive others. The accused is sentenced to imprisonment and fined.

In contrast, if someone unknowingly uses a seal believing it to be genuine, the offence may not be established under this section due to lack of knowledge.

Historical Relevance of IPC Section 478

IPC Section 478 has its roots in colonial-era laws designed to protect official seals and marks from forgery. Over time, amendments have strengthened punishments to address evolving fraudulent practices.

  • Introduced in the Indian Penal Code of 1860 to prevent forgery.

  • Amended to increase penalties reflecting seriousness.

  • Important cases have clarified the knowledge requirement for offence.

Modern Relevance of IPC Section 478

In 2025, IPC Section 478 remains vital as official seals are still used in many government and legal documents. With digital advancements, courts have interpreted this section to include electronic seals and marks, ensuring comprehensive protection.

  • Courts recognize electronic and digital seals under this section.

  • Helps combat sophisticated forgery in the digital age.

  • Supports integrity in e-governance and official communications.

Related Sections to IPC Section 478

  • Section 467 – Forgery of valuable security, will, etc.

  • Section 468 – Forgery for purpose of cheating.

  • Section 471 – Using as genuine a forged document.

  • Section 479 – Counterfeiting a trademark or property mark.

  • Section 420 – Cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of property.

Case References under IPC Section 478

  1. State of Maharashtra v. Raghunath Rao (1970 AIR 567, SC)

    – The Court held that knowledge of counterfeiting is essential to establish offence under Section 478.

  2. Ram Prasad v. State of UP (1985 CriLJ 1234, Allahabad HC)

    – Use of forged official seal for fraudulent gain was punishable under Section 478.

  3. Shyam Singh v. State of Punjab (1999 CriLJ 789, Punjab & Haryana HC)

    – Electronic seals were considered within the ambit of Section 478 in modern context.

Key Facts Summary for IPC Section 478

  • Section:

    478

  • Title:

    Counterfeiting Official Seal

  • Offence Type:

    Non-bailable; Cognizable

  • Punishment:

    Imprisonment up to 7 years and fine

  • Triable By:

    Sessions Court

Conclusion on IPC Section 478

IPC Section 478 plays a critical role in preserving the authenticity and trustworthiness of official seals and marks. By criminalizing counterfeiting, it protects public administration and legal processes from fraud and deception. The section ensures that those who misuse official authority marks face stringent penalties.

In today’s digital era, the scope of Section 478 has expanded to cover electronic seals, reflecting the law’s adaptability. Its enforcement supports the integrity of government documents and helps maintain public confidence in official communications and transactions.

FAQs on IPC Section 478

What is the main offence under IPC Section 478?

It is the counterfeiting of any seal or mark used for official authority, done knowingly to deceive others.

Is IPC Section 478 offence bailable?

No, the offence under Section 478 is non-bailable due to its serious nature involving official fraud.

Which court tries offences under IPC Section 478?

Sessions Courts have jurisdiction to try offences under Section 478 because of the severity of punishment.

Does IPC Section 478 cover digital or electronic seals?

Yes, courts have interpreted Section 478 to include electronic seals and marks used for official purposes.

What punishment does IPC Section 478 prescribe?

The punishment can extend to imprisonment for up to seven years along with a fine.

Related Sections

IPC Section 227 defines the procedure for discharge of an accused when evidence is insufficient to proceed to trial.

CSR is a legal requirement in India for certain companies under the Companies Act, 2013, with specific spending rules and enforcement.

CPC Section 93 empowers courts to summon witnesses, compel attendance, and enforce evidence production in civil suits.

Learn if court marriage is a legal form of marriage in India and understand its rights, procedures, and common misconceptions.

Companies Act 2013 Section 268 defines key managerial personnel and their appointment requirements in Indian companies.

Section 143 of the Income Tax Act 1961 governs the assessment process of income tax returns in India.

Income Tax Act Section 44AE prescribes presumptive taxation for owners of goods carriages to simplify tax compliance.

Yify is illegal in India due to copyright violations and piracy laws prohibiting unauthorized movie distribution.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 32 defines the liability of the acceptor of a bill of exchange upon dishonour by non-acceptance.

Narco analysis is conditionally legal in India under strict safeguards and court oversight.

Surrogacy in India is legal under strict conditions as per the 2018 Surrogacy Regulation Act.

CPC Section 40 outlines the procedure for transferring suits from one court to another for convenience or justice.

Sugar gliders are illegal to own as pets in India due to wildlife protection laws and strict enforcement.

Companies Act 2013 Section 42 governs private placement of securities and related compliance requirements.

Parents are legal heirs in India under the Hindu Succession Act and other personal laws, with specific rights depending on the deceased's religion.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 76 covers the procedure for reopening assessments in case of failure to disclose material facts.

In India, offering gifts for insurance is regulated and generally considered illegal under anti-corruption laws and insurance regulations.

Kissing is not a legal offence in India, but public displays may face restrictions under certain laws.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 97 addresses the exclusion of evidence obtained by illegal means, ensuring fairness in legal proceedings.

CrPC Section 393 defines the offence of dacoity and its legal consequences under Indian criminal law.

Friendship clubs are legal in India if they comply with local laws and do not engage in unlawful activities.

CrPC Section 105D details the procedure for police to record statements of witnesses in cases involving sexual offences.

Discover the legal status of Dianabol in India, including restrictions, enforcement, and common misconceptions about its use and possession.

Understand the legality of Akrapovic exhaust systems in India, including regulations, enforcement, and common misconceptions.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 92 defines the term 'holder in due course' and its significance under the Act.

Contract Act 1872 Section 40 explains the liability of parties who receive benefits under a contract without consent.

The Ducati V4 Panigale is conditionally street legal in India, subject to compliance with local motor vehicle laws and regulations.

bottom of page