top of page

CrPC Section 406

CrPC Section 406 details the punishment for criminal breach of trust, outlining legal consequences for misappropriation of property.

CrPC Section 406 addresses the punishment for criminal breach of trust, a serious offence involving the dishonest misappropriation or conversion of property entrusted to a person. Understanding this section is crucial for anyone involved in property disputes or accused of breach of trust, as it defines the legal consequences and safeguards property rights.

This section plays a vital role in criminal law by deterring misuse of entrusted property and ensuring justice for victims. It outlines the penalties applicable, helping courts impose appropriate sentences and maintain public trust in legal processes.

CrPC Section 406 – Exact Provision

This provision specifies the punishment for anyone found guilty of criminal breach of trust. It empowers the court to impose imprisonment, fine, or both, depending on the severity of the offence. The section ensures that those who dishonestly misappropriate property face legal consequences, protecting the rights of the property owner.

  • Defines punishment for criminal breach of trust.

  • Allows imprisonment up to three years.

  • Permits imposition of fine or both fine and imprisonment.

  • Applies to persons entrusted with property.

  • Supports enforcement of property rights.

Explanation of CrPC Section 406

Section 406 explains the punishment for criminal breach of trust in simple terms. It states that anyone who dishonestly misuses property entrusted to them can be punished with jail time, fine, or both.

  • The section prescribes penalties for breach of trust offences.

  • Affects individuals entrusted with property or responsibility.

  • Triggered when property is dishonestly misappropriated.

  • Allows courts to impose imprisonment or fine.

  • Prohibits misuse or conversion of entrusted property.

Purpose and Rationale of CrPC Section 406

This section exists to deter dishonest conduct involving entrusted property. It protects individuals and entities by ensuring that those who violate trust face legal consequences. The provision balances the need for justice with fair punishment, preventing misuse of power and maintaining confidence in property transactions.

  • Protects property owners’ rights.

  • Ensures legal procedure for breach of trust cases.

  • Balances police and judicial powers with citizen rights.

  • Prevents abuse by imposing clear penalties.

When CrPC Section 406 Applies

Section 406 applies when a person entrusted with property dishonestly misappropriates or converts it for their own use. It is relevant in cases involving breach of trust, whether in business, employment, or personal relationships.

  • Property must be entrusted to the accused.

  • Dishonest misappropriation or conversion must occur.

  • Police or magistrate can initiate proceedings.

  • Applicable in criminal courts with jurisdiction over the offence.

  • No specific time limit beyond general criminal limitation rules.

Cognizance under CrPC Section 406

Cognizance of an offence under Section 406 is taken by a Magistrate upon receiving a complaint or police report alleging criminal breach of trust. The Magistrate examines the case to determine if there is sufficient ground to proceed with trial.

  • Magistrate takes cognizance on complaint or police report.

  • Preliminary inquiry may be conducted.

  • Case registered and trial initiated if grounds exist.

Bailability under CrPC Section 406

The offence under Section 406 is generally bailable, allowing the accused to obtain bail as a right. However, bail conditions depend on the case facts and judicial discretion, especially if the accused is a flight risk or may tamper with evidence.

  • Offence is bailable under usual circumstances.

  • Bail granted as a right by police or court.

  • Conditions may be imposed to ensure attendance.

Triable By (Court Jurisdiction for CrPC Section 406)

Cases under Section 406 are triable by Magistrate courts, as it is a criminal offence punishable with imprisonment up to three years. Sessions courts may hear appeals or cases combined with more serious offences.

  • Trial initiated in Magistrate courts.

  • Sessions court handles appeals or serious related offences.

  • Summary or regular trial depending on case complexity.

Appeal and Revision Path under CrPC Section 406

Appeals against convictions or sentences under Section 406 lie to the Sessions Court. Further appeals can be made to High Courts and Supreme Court. Revision petitions may be filed to challenge procedural errors or jurisdictional issues.

  • First appeal to Sessions Court.

  • Further appeal to High Court and Supreme Court.

  • Revision petitions for procedural review.

  • Typical appeal timelines apply as per CrPC.

Example of CrPC Section 406 in Practical Use

Person X was entrusted with managing funds for a company. Instead of using the money for business purposes, X diverted it for personal use. The company filed a complaint under Section 406. The court found X guilty of criminal breach of trust and sentenced him to imprisonment and fine, ensuring justice and protecting company assets.

  • Section 406 enabled punishment for dishonest conduct.

  • Key takeaway: Entrusted property misuse is punishable.

Historical Relevance of CrPC Section 406

This section has evolved to address growing concerns over trust violations in commercial and personal contexts. Amendments have clarified punishments and procedural aspects to strengthen enforcement against breach of trust.

  • Originally part of Indian Penal Code provisions.

  • Amended to specify punishments clearly.

  • Procedural clarifications added over time.

Modern Relevance of CrPC Section 406

In 2026, Section 406 remains vital for protecting property rights amid complex financial transactions. It supports digital and traditional trust relationships, ensuring accountability and deterring fraud in modern policing and judicial processes.

  • Applies to digital and physical property breaches.

  • Supports anti-corruption and fraud prevention efforts.

  • Ensures fair trial and protection of citizen rights.

Related Sections to CrPC Section 406

  • Section 405 – Definition of Criminal Breach of Trust

  • Section 409 – Criminal Breach of Trust by Public Servant

  • Section 420 – Cheating and Dishonest Inducement

  • Section 34 – Acts Done by Several Persons in Furtherance of Common Intention

  • Section 120B – Criminal Conspiracy

Case References under CrPC Section 406

  1. State of Maharashtra v. Vasudeo Ramchandra (1965, AIR 1965 SC 722)

    – Established the requirement of dishonest intention for criminal breach of trust.

  2. R. K. Garg v. Union of India (1981, AIR 1981 SC 1118)

    – Clarified the scope of entrustment and misappropriation under Section 406.

  3. Union of India v. V. Krishnan (1990, AIR 1990 SC 139)

    – Held public servants to a higher standard under related breach of trust provisions.

Key Facts Summary for CrPC Section 406

  • Section:

    406

  • Title:

    Punishment for Criminal Breach of Trust

  • Nature:

    Procedural and Punitive

  • Applies To:

    Persons entrusted with property

  • Cognizance:

    Taken by Magistrate on complaint or police report

  • Bailability:

    Generally bailable offence

  • Triable By:

    Magistrate Court

Conclusion on CrPC Section 406

CrPC Section 406 plays a crucial role in upholding trust in property dealings by penalizing dishonest misappropriation. It ensures that individuals who violate entrusted responsibilities face legal consequences, thereby protecting property owners and maintaining social order.

Understanding this section helps citizens recognize their rights and the legal remedies available if trust is breached. It also guides law enforcement and judiciary in handling such offences fairly and effectively, balancing punishment with justice.

FAQs on CrPC Section 406

What is criminal breach of trust under Section 406?

It is the dishonest misappropriation or conversion of property entrusted to a person. Section 406 prescribes punishment for such offences to protect property rights.

Who can be punished under Section 406?

Any person entrusted with property or dominion over it who dishonestly misappropriates or converts it can be punished under this section.

Is the offence under Section 406 bailable?

Yes, the offence is generally bailable, allowing the accused to obtain bail as a right, subject to judicial discretion based on case facts.

Which court tries offences under Section 406?

Magistrate courts have jurisdiction to try offences under Section 406. Appeals can be made to Sessions Courts and higher courts.

What punishment does Section 406 prescribe?

The section allows imprisonment up to three years, or fine, or both, depending on the severity and circumstances of the offence.

Related Sections

CrPC Section 20 defines the territorial jurisdiction of criminal courts in India based on where offences occur.

Companies Act 2013 Section 153 governs the appointment of company secretaries and their roles in corporate compliance.

Companies Act 2013 Section 222 governs the power of the Registrar to call for information and inspect books of a company.

Companies Act 2013 Section 367 governs the power of the Central Government to remove difficulties in implementing the Act.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 73 deals with the admissibility of evidence of character to prove conduct in civil or criminal cases.

IPC Section 482 empowers High Courts to quash criminal proceedings to prevent abuse of process or injustice.

Contract Act 1872 Section 57 explains obligations when a party refuses to perform a contract without lawful excuse.

Companies Act 2013 Section 79 governs the appointment and powers of the Company Secretary in Indian companies.

Companies Act 2013 Section 48 governs the issue and transfer of shares and securities in India.

IPC Section 326B addresses the offence of voluntarily causing grievous hurt by dangerous weapons or means, ensuring protection against serious bodily harm.

IPC Section 408 defines criminal breach of trust by a clerk or servant, covering misuse of entrusted property.

IPC Section 63 defines the offence of abetment of suicide, outlining liability for encouraging or aiding suicide.

IPC Section 130 defines the offence of resisting lawful arrest or detention, ensuring public order and authority of law enforcement.

Companies Act 2013 Section 326 governs the punishment for false statements in declarations and affidavits by company officers.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 85 deals with carry forward and set off of losses in case of amalgamation of companies.

Camera drones are conditionally legal in India with strict regulations under DGCA and IT laws.

CrPC Section 105H details the procedure for trial of offences committed by public servants under the Prevention of Corruption Act.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 8 details the establishment and jurisdiction of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission.

Companies Act 2013 Section 382 governs the filing of documents with the Registrar of Companies, ensuring compliance and transparency.

IPC Section 405 defines criminal breach of trust, covering dishonest misappropriation of property entrusted to a person.

IT Act Section 2 defines key terms used throughout the Information Technology Act, 2000 for clarity and legal interpretation.

Companies Act 2013 Section 73 regulates acceptance of deposits by companies, ensuring compliance and protecting stakeholders.

CrPC Section 42 details police powers to arrest without warrant when a person commits a non-bailable offence in presence of an officer.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 20 defines the competency of witnesses, specifying who is qualified to testify in court.

Companies Act 2013 Section 41 governs the issue of shares by companies, detailing allotment and transfer procedures.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 60 defines oral evidence as statements made by witnesses verbally, crucial for proving facts in court.

IPC Section 125 mandates maintenance of wives, children, and parents to prevent destitution and neglect.

bottom of page