top of page

CrPC Section 406

CrPC Section 406 details the punishment for criminal breach of trust, outlining legal consequences for misappropriation of property.

CrPC Section 406 – Punishment for Criminal Breach of Trust

CrPC Section 406 addresses the punishment for criminal breach of trust, a serious offence involving the dishonest misappropriation or conversion of property entrusted to a person. Understanding this section is crucial for anyone involved in property disputes or accused of breach of trust, as it defines the legal consequences and safeguards property rights.

This section plays a vital role in criminal law by deterring misuse of entrusted property and ensuring justice for victims. It outlines the penalties applicable, helping courts impose appropriate sentences and maintain public trust in legal processes.

CrPC Section 406 – Exact Provision

This provision specifies the punishment for anyone found guilty of criminal breach of trust. It empowers the court to impose imprisonment, fine, or both, depending on the severity of the offence. The section ensures that those who dishonestly misappropriate property face legal consequences, protecting the rights of the property owner.

  • Defines punishment for criminal breach of trust.

  • Allows imprisonment up to three years.

  • Permits imposition of fine or both fine and imprisonment.

  • Applies to persons entrusted with property.

  • Supports enforcement of property rights.

Explanation of CrPC Section 406

Section 406 explains the punishment for criminal breach of trust in simple terms. It states that anyone who dishonestly misuses property entrusted to them can be punished with jail time, fine, or both.

  • The section prescribes penalties for breach of trust offences.

  • Affects individuals entrusted with property or responsibility.

  • Triggered when property is dishonestly misappropriated.

  • Allows courts to impose imprisonment or fine.

  • Prohibits misuse or conversion of entrusted property.

Purpose and Rationale of CrPC Section 406

This section exists to deter dishonest conduct involving entrusted property. It protects individuals and entities by ensuring that those who violate trust face legal consequences. The provision balances the need for justice with fair punishment, preventing misuse of power and maintaining confidence in property transactions.

  • Protects property owners’ rights.

  • Ensures legal procedure for breach of trust cases.

  • Balances police and judicial powers with citizen rights.

  • Prevents abuse by imposing clear penalties.

When CrPC Section 406 Applies

Section 406 applies when a person entrusted with property dishonestly misappropriates or converts it for their own use. It is relevant in cases involving breach of trust, whether in business, employment, or personal relationships.

  • Property must be entrusted to the accused.

  • Dishonest misappropriation or conversion must occur.

  • Police or magistrate can initiate proceedings.

  • Applicable in criminal courts with jurisdiction over the offence.

  • No specific time limit beyond general criminal limitation rules.

Cognizance under CrPC Section 406

Cognizance of an offence under Section 406 is taken by a Magistrate upon receiving a complaint or police report alleging criminal breach of trust. The Magistrate examines the case to determine if there is sufficient ground to proceed with trial.

  • Magistrate takes cognizance on complaint or police report.

  • Preliminary inquiry may be conducted.

  • Case registered and trial initiated if grounds exist.

Bailability under CrPC Section 406

The offence under Section 406 is generally bailable, allowing the accused to obtain bail as a right. However, bail conditions depend on the case facts and judicial discretion, especially if the accused is a flight risk or may tamper with evidence.

  • Offence is bailable under usual circumstances.

  • Bail granted as a right by police or court.

  • Conditions may be imposed to ensure attendance.

Triable By (Court Jurisdiction for CrPC Section 406)

Cases under Section 406 are triable by Magistrate courts, as it is a criminal offence punishable with imprisonment up to three years. Sessions courts may hear appeals or cases combined with more serious offences.

  • Trial initiated in Magistrate courts.

  • Sessions court handles appeals or serious related offences.

  • Summary or regular trial depending on case complexity.

Appeal and Revision Path under CrPC Section 406

Appeals against convictions or sentences under Section 406 lie to the Sessions Court. Further appeals can be made to High Courts and Supreme Court. Revision petitions may be filed to challenge procedural errors or jurisdictional issues.

  • First appeal to Sessions Court.

  • Further appeal to High Court and Supreme Court.

  • Revision petitions for procedural review.

  • Typical appeal timelines apply as per CrPC.

Example of CrPC Section 406 in Practical Use

Person X was entrusted with managing funds for a company. Instead of using the money for business purposes, X diverted it for personal use. The company filed a complaint under Section 406. The court found X guilty of criminal breach of trust and sentenced him to imprisonment and fine, ensuring justice and protecting company assets.

  • Section 406 enabled punishment for dishonest conduct.

  • Key takeaway: Entrusted property misuse is punishable.

Historical Relevance of CrPC Section 406

This section has evolved to address growing concerns over trust violations in commercial and personal contexts. Amendments have clarified punishments and procedural aspects to strengthen enforcement against breach of trust.

  • Originally part of Indian Penal Code provisions.

  • Amended to specify punishments clearly.

  • Procedural clarifications added over time.

Modern Relevance of CrPC Section 406

In 2026, Section 406 remains vital for protecting property rights amid complex financial transactions. It supports digital and traditional trust relationships, ensuring accountability and deterring fraud in modern policing and judicial processes.

  • Applies to digital and physical property breaches.

  • Supports anti-corruption and fraud prevention efforts.

  • Ensures fair trial and protection of citizen rights.

Related Sections to CrPC Section 406

  • Section 405 – Definition of Criminal Breach of Trust

  • Section 409 – Criminal Breach of Trust by Public Servant

  • Section 420 – Cheating and Dishonest Inducement

  • Section 34 – Acts Done by Several Persons in Furtherance of Common Intention

  • Section 120B – Criminal Conspiracy

Case References under CrPC Section 406

  1. State of Maharashtra v. Vasudeo Ramchandra (1965, AIR 1965 SC 722)

    – Established the requirement of dishonest intention for criminal breach of trust.

  2. R. K. Garg v. Union of India (1981, AIR 1981 SC 1118)

    – Clarified the scope of entrustment and misappropriation under Section 406.

  3. Union of India v. V. Krishnan (1990, AIR 1990 SC 139)

    – Held public servants to a higher standard under related breach of trust provisions.

Key Facts Summary for CrPC Section 406

  • Section:

    406

  • Title:

    Punishment for Criminal Breach of Trust

  • Nature:

    Procedural and Punitive

  • Applies To:

    Persons entrusted with property

  • Cognizance:

    Taken by Magistrate on complaint or police report

  • Bailability:

    Generally bailable offence

  • Triable By:

    Magistrate Court

Conclusion on CrPC Section 406

CrPC Section 406 plays a crucial role in upholding trust in property dealings by penalizing dishonest misappropriation. It ensures that individuals who violate entrusted responsibilities face legal consequences, thereby protecting property owners and maintaining social order.

Understanding this section helps citizens recognize their rights and the legal remedies available if trust is breached. It also guides law enforcement and judiciary in handling such offences fairly and effectively, balancing punishment with justice.

FAQs on CrPC Section 406

What is criminal breach of trust under Section 406?

It is the dishonest misappropriation or conversion of property entrusted to a person. Section 406 prescribes punishment for such offences to protect property rights.

Who can be punished under Section 406?

Any person entrusted with property or dominion over it who dishonestly misappropriates or converts it can be punished under this section.

Is the offence under Section 406 bailable?

Yes, the offence is generally bailable, allowing the accused to obtain bail as a right, subject to judicial discretion based on case facts.

Which court tries offences under Section 406?

Magistrate courts have jurisdiction to try offences under Section 406. Appeals can be made to Sessions Courts and higher courts.

What punishment does Section 406 prescribe?

The section allows imprisonment up to three years, or fine, or both, depending on the severity and circumstances of the offence.

Related Sections

IPC Section 281 penalizes causing hurt by rash or negligent driving or riding of vehicles, ensuring road safety and accountability.

IPC Section 148 addresses rioting armed with a deadly weapon, defining the offence and its legal consequences.

CrPC Section 446 details the procedure for the disposal of property forfeited to the government after conviction.

CrPC Section 74 details the procedure for issuing summons to accused persons in criminal cases.

IPC Section 240 defines the offence of wrongful assembly and its legal implications under Indian Penal Code.

CrPC Section 156 empowers police to investigate cognizable offences upon receiving information or magistrate's order.

CrPC Section 114 empowers courts to presume facts that are usually known or easily inferred to aid justice.

CPC Section 131 empowers courts to summon witnesses and compel their attendance in civil proceedings.

IPC Section 200 covers the examination of the accused by a magistrate upon receiving a complaint, ensuring proper inquiry before proceeding.

CrPC Section 175 mandates the attendance of witnesses and the penalties for non-compliance during criminal proceedings.

CPC Section 11 explains the doctrine of res judicata, preventing repeated litigation of the same matter.

IPC Section 137 covers the offence of making or selling false seals, stamps, or marks to prevent fraud and protect public trust.

bottom of page