top of page

CrPC Section 406

CrPC Section 406 details the punishment for criminal breach of trust, outlining legal consequences for misappropriation of property.

CrPC Section 406 addresses the punishment for criminal breach of trust, a serious offence involving the dishonest misappropriation or conversion of property entrusted to a person. Understanding this section is crucial for anyone involved in property disputes or accused of breach of trust, as it defines the legal consequences and safeguards property rights.

This section plays a vital role in criminal law by deterring misuse of entrusted property and ensuring justice for victims. It outlines the penalties applicable, helping courts impose appropriate sentences and maintain public trust in legal processes.

CrPC Section 406 – Exact Provision

This provision specifies the punishment for anyone found guilty of criminal breach of trust. It empowers the court to impose imprisonment, fine, or both, depending on the severity of the offence. The section ensures that those who dishonestly misappropriate property face legal consequences, protecting the rights of the property owner.

  • Defines punishment for criminal breach of trust.

  • Allows imprisonment up to three years.

  • Permits imposition of fine or both fine and imprisonment.

  • Applies to persons entrusted with property.

  • Supports enforcement of property rights.

Explanation of CrPC Section 406

Section 406 explains the punishment for criminal breach of trust in simple terms. It states that anyone who dishonestly misuses property entrusted to them can be punished with jail time, fine, or both.

  • The section prescribes penalties for breach of trust offences.

  • Affects individuals entrusted with property or responsibility.

  • Triggered when property is dishonestly misappropriated.

  • Allows courts to impose imprisonment or fine.

  • Prohibits misuse or conversion of entrusted property.

Purpose and Rationale of CrPC Section 406

This section exists to deter dishonest conduct involving entrusted property. It protects individuals and entities by ensuring that those who violate trust face legal consequences. The provision balances the need for justice with fair punishment, preventing misuse of power and maintaining confidence in property transactions.

  • Protects property owners’ rights.

  • Ensures legal procedure for breach of trust cases.

  • Balances police and judicial powers with citizen rights.

  • Prevents abuse by imposing clear penalties.

When CrPC Section 406 Applies

Section 406 applies when a person entrusted with property dishonestly misappropriates or converts it for their own use. It is relevant in cases involving breach of trust, whether in business, employment, or personal relationships.

  • Property must be entrusted to the accused.

  • Dishonest misappropriation or conversion must occur.

  • Police or magistrate can initiate proceedings.

  • Applicable in criminal courts with jurisdiction over the offence.

  • No specific time limit beyond general criminal limitation rules.

Cognizance under CrPC Section 406

Cognizance of an offence under Section 406 is taken by a Magistrate upon receiving a complaint or police report alleging criminal breach of trust. The Magistrate examines the case to determine if there is sufficient ground to proceed with trial.

  • Magistrate takes cognizance on complaint or police report.

  • Preliminary inquiry may be conducted.

  • Case registered and trial initiated if grounds exist.

Bailability under CrPC Section 406

The offence under Section 406 is generally bailable, allowing the accused to obtain bail as a right. However, bail conditions depend on the case facts and judicial discretion, especially if the accused is a flight risk or may tamper with evidence.

  • Offence is bailable under usual circumstances.

  • Bail granted as a right by police or court.

  • Conditions may be imposed to ensure attendance.

Triable By (Court Jurisdiction for CrPC Section 406)

Cases under Section 406 are triable by Magistrate courts, as it is a criminal offence punishable with imprisonment up to three years. Sessions courts may hear appeals or cases combined with more serious offences.

  • Trial initiated in Magistrate courts.

  • Sessions court handles appeals or serious related offences.

  • Summary or regular trial depending on case complexity.

Appeal and Revision Path under CrPC Section 406

Appeals against convictions or sentences under Section 406 lie to the Sessions Court. Further appeals can be made to High Courts and Supreme Court. Revision petitions may be filed to challenge procedural errors or jurisdictional issues.

  • First appeal to Sessions Court.

  • Further appeal to High Court and Supreme Court.

  • Revision petitions for procedural review.

  • Typical appeal timelines apply as per CrPC.

Example of CrPC Section 406 in Practical Use

Person X was entrusted with managing funds for a company. Instead of using the money for business purposes, X diverted it for personal use. The company filed a complaint under Section 406. The court found X guilty of criminal breach of trust and sentenced him to imprisonment and fine, ensuring justice and protecting company assets.

  • Section 406 enabled punishment for dishonest conduct.

  • Key takeaway: Entrusted property misuse is punishable.

Historical Relevance of CrPC Section 406

This section has evolved to address growing concerns over trust violations in commercial and personal contexts. Amendments have clarified punishments and procedural aspects to strengthen enforcement against breach of trust.

  • Originally part of Indian Penal Code provisions.

  • Amended to specify punishments clearly.

  • Procedural clarifications added over time.

Modern Relevance of CrPC Section 406

In 2026, Section 406 remains vital for protecting property rights amid complex financial transactions. It supports digital and traditional trust relationships, ensuring accountability and deterring fraud in modern policing and judicial processes.

  • Applies to digital and physical property breaches.

  • Supports anti-corruption and fraud prevention efforts.

  • Ensures fair trial and protection of citizen rights.

Related Sections to CrPC Section 406

  • Section 405 – Definition of Criminal Breach of Trust

  • Section 409 – Criminal Breach of Trust by Public Servant

  • Section 420 – Cheating and Dishonest Inducement

  • Section 34 – Acts Done by Several Persons in Furtherance of Common Intention

  • Section 120B – Criminal Conspiracy

Case References under CrPC Section 406

  1. State of Maharashtra v. Vasudeo Ramchandra (1965, AIR 1965 SC 722)

    – Established the requirement of dishonest intention for criminal breach of trust.

  2. R. K. Garg v. Union of India (1981, AIR 1981 SC 1118)

    – Clarified the scope of entrustment and misappropriation under Section 406.

  3. Union of India v. V. Krishnan (1990, AIR 1990 SC 139)

    – Held public servants to a higher standard under related breach of trust provisions.

Key Facts Summary for CrPC Section 406

  • Section:

    406

  • Title:

    Punishment for Criminal Breach of Trust

  • Nature:

    Procedural and Punitive

  • Applies To:

    Persons entrusted with property

  • Cognizance:

    Taken by Magistrate on complaint or police report

  • Bailability:

    Generally bailable offence

  • Triable By:

    Magistrate Court

Conclusion on CrPC Section 406

CrPC Section 406 plays a crucial role in upholding trust in property dealings by penalizing dishonest misappropriation. It ensures that individuals who violate entrusted responsibilities face legal consequences, thereby protecting property owners and maintaining social order.

Understanding this section helps citizens recognize their rights and the legal remedies available if trust is breached. It also guides law enforcement and judiciary in handling such offences fairly and effectively, balancing punishment with justice.

FAQs on CrPC Section 406

What is criminal breach of trust under Section 406?

It is the dishonest misappropriation or conversion of property entrusted to a person. Section 406 prescribes punishment for such offences to protect property rights.

Who can be punished under Section 406?

Any person entrusted with property or dominion over it who dishonestly misappropriates or converts it can be punished under this section.

Is the offence under Section 406 bailable?

Yes, the offence is generally bailable, allowing the accused to obtain bail as a right, subject to judicial discretion based on case facts.

Which court tries offences under Section 406?

Magistrate courts have jurisdiction to try offences under Section 406. Appeals can be made to Sessions Courts and higher courts.

What punishment does Section 406 prescribe?

The section allows imprisonment up to three years, or fine, or both, depending on the severity and circumstances of the offence.

Related Sections

Using Popcorn Time in India is illegal due to copyright laws and strict enforcement against piracy.

IPC Section 124 defines sedition, penalizing acts that incite hatred or contempt against the government.

Companies Act 2013 Section 391 governs compromise, arrangement, and reconstruction procedures for companies in India.

Currency exchange is legal in India under strict regulations by the RBI and FEMA rules.

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 87 covering appeals to Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling.

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 68 covering assessment of unregistered persons under GST.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 130 defines the liability of the drawer of a cheque in case of dishonour and the conditions for legal action.

Income Tax Act Section 44BB prescribes presumptive income for non-resident contractors and professionals in India.

In India, the legal age for most activities is 18; being 38 means you are fully an adult with all legal rights and responsibilities.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 269J prohibits cash payments exceeding Rs. 20,000 for certain transactions to curb tax evasion.

Section 161 of the Income Tax Act 1961 allows the income tax officer to recover tax from any person responsible for paying it but who fails to do so.

Explore the legal status of gambling in India, including where it is allowed and the rules that apply across states.

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 116 covering search, seizure, and related procedures under GST law.

Understand the legality of jailbreaking devices in India, including laws, restrictions, and enforcement practices.

Understand the legality of accessing and using the dark web in India, including laws, restrictions, and enforcement practices.

IPC Section 295A punishes deliberate and malicious acts intended to outrage religious feelings.

Understand the legal status of Showlion in India, including regulations, restrictions, and enforcement practices.

Alternative medicine is legal in India with regulated practice and government recognition under AYUSH.

IPC Section 171F penalizes bribery by public servants to influence their official duties, ensuring integrity in public administration.

Companies Act 2013 Section 374 governs the power of the Central Government to make rules for the Act's effective implementation.

IPC Section 5 defines the territorial scope of the Indian Penal Code, specifying where its provisions apply within and beyond India.

Companies Act 2013 Section 340 governs the power of the Central Government to appoint inspectors for company investigations.

CrPC Section 185 defines the offence and penalties for disobedience to summons issued by a criminal court.

Amazon parrots are illegal to own in India due to wildlife protection laws and strict enforcement.

Companies Act 2013 Section 146 governs the rectification of the register of members and related records.

In India, cow meat is largely illegal due to state laws protecting cows, with strict enforcement and limited exceptions.

Companies Act 2013 Section 209 mandates preparation and presentation of profit and loss accounts and balance sheets by companies.

bottom of page